journal article·2019-10

Efficient silicon solar cells applying cuprous sulfide as hole-selective contact

Lei Jin, Lun Cai, Danmin Chen, Wenxian Wang, Hui Shen, Fuqin Zhang

Journal of Materials Science· Volume 54· Issue 19
Publisher page

Abstract

The introduction of dopant-free materials used for carrier-selective contact effectively overcomes the issue of high surface recombination velocity at aluminum back surface field. Additionally, dopant-free materials have the advantages of low fabrication temperature, simple process and considerably high efficiency. In this contribution, cuprous sulfide (Cu2S), fabricated by thermal evaporation, is applied as hole-selective contact material at rear-surface region of crystalline silicon (c-Si) solar cells for the first time. The band alignment of Cu2S/p-Si exhibits only a small valence band offset and huge conduction band offset being excellent hole-selective and electron blocking properties. By inserting Cu2S layer between p-Si and Ag, a lower contact resistivity of 27.2 mΩ cm2 is achieved. As a result, the introduction with 4-nm Cu2S interlayer significantly improves device efficiency to over 21%, affording a 1.2% absolute increase from the control cell. Metal sulfides introduced herein exhibit remarkable properties for carrier-selective contacts, compared to conventional metal nitrides and oxides.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Silicon and Solar Cell Technologies · Semiconductor materials and interfaces · Nanowire Synthesis and Applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (57)

Show source-provided references
1. Green MA (2009) The path to 25% silicon solar cell efficiency: history of silicon cell evolution. Prog Photovolt Res Appl 17:183–18910.1002/pip.892 ↗
2. Battaglia C, Cuevas A, De Wolf S (2016) High-efficiency crystalline silicon solar cells: status and perspectives. Energy Environ Sci 9:1552–157610.1039/C5EE03380B ↗
3. Yoshikawa K, Kawasaki H, Yoshida W et al (2017) Silicon heterojunction solar cell with interdigitated back contacts for a photoconversion efficiency over 26%. Nat Energy 2:1703210.1038/nenergy.2017.32 ↗
4. Bullock J, Hettick M, Geissbühler J et al (2016) Efficient silicon solar cells with dopant-free asymmetric heterocontacts. Nat Energy 1:1503110.1038/nenergy.2015.31 ↗
5. Battaglia C, Yin X, Zheng M et al (2014) Hole selective MoOx contact for silicon solar cells. Nano Lett 14:967–97110.1021/nl404389u ↗
6. Bullock J, Cuevas A, Allen T, Battaglia C (2014) Molybdenum oxide MoOx: a versatile hole contact for silicon solar cells. Appl Phys Lett 105:23210910.1063/1.4903467 ↗
7. Bullock J, Zheng P, Jeangros Q et al (2016) Lithium fluoride based electron contacts for high efficiency n-type crystalline silicon solar cells. Adv Energy Mater 6:160024110.1002/aenm.201600241 ↗
8. Yang X, Aydin E, Xu H et al (2018) Tantalum nitride electron-selective contact for crystalline silicon solar cells. Adv Energy Mater 8:180060810.1002/aenm.201800608 ↗
9. Geissbühler J, Werner J, Martin de Nicolas S et al (2015) 22.5% efficient silicon heterojunction solar cell with molybdenum oxide hole collector. Appl Phys Lett 107:08160110.1063/1.4928747 ↗
10. Glunz SW, Feldmann F (2018) SiO2 surface passivation layers—a key technology for silicon solar cells. Sol Energy Mater Sol Cells 185:260–26910.1016/j.solmat.2018.04.029 ↗
11. Quan C, Tong H, Yang Z et al (2018) Electron-selective scandium-tunnel oxide passivated contact for n-type silicon solar cells. Solar RRL 2:180007110.1002/solr.201800071 ↗
12. Wan Y, Karuturi SK, Samundsett C et al (2017) Tantalum oxide electron-selective heterocontacts for silicon photovoltaics and photoelectrochemical water reduction. ACS Energy Lett 3:125–13110.1021/acsenergylett.7b01153 ↗
13. Melskens J, van de Loo BWH, Macco B, Black LE, Smit S, Kessels WMM (2018) Passivating contacts for crystalline silicon solar cells: from concepts and materials to prospects. IEEE J Photovolt 8:373–38810.1109/JPHOTOV.2018.2797106 ↗
14. Feldmann F, Simon M, Bivour M, Reichel C, Hermle M, Glunz SW (2014) Efficient carrier-selective p- and n-contacts for Si solar cells. Sol Energy Mater Sol Cells 131:100–10410.1016/j.solmat.2014.05.039 ↗
15. Yang X, Zheng P, Bi Q, Weber K (2016) Silicon heterojunction solar cells with electron selective TiOx contact. Sol Energy Mater Sol Cells 150:32–3810.1016/j.solmat.2016.01.020 ↗
16. Lin L, Gu C, Zhu J et al (2019) Engineering of hole-selective contact for high-performance perovskite solar cell featuring silver back-electrode. J Mater Sci 54:7789–7797. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-018-03258-x10.1007/s10853-018-03258-x ↗
17. Wan Y, Samundsett C, Bullock J et al (2016) Magnesium fluoride electron-selective contacts for crystalline silicon solar cells. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 8:14671–1467710.1021/acsami.6b03599 ↗
18. Allen TG, Bullock J, Zheng P et al (2017) Calcium contacts to n-type crystalline silicon solar cells. Prog Photovolt Res Appl 25:636–64410.1002/pip.2838 ↗
19. Allen TG, Bullock J, Jeangros Q et al (2017) A low resistance calcium/reduced titania passivated contact for high efficiency crystalline silicon solar cells. Adv Energy Mater 7:160260610.1002/aenm.201602606 ↗
20. Feldmann F, Ritzau K-U, Bivour M et al (2015) High and low work function materials for passivated contacts. Energy Proc 77:263–27010.1016/j.egypro.2015.07.037 ↗
21. Lin W, Wu W, Liu Z et al (2018) Chromium trioxide hole-selective heterocontacts for silicon solar cells. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 10:13645–1365110.1021/acsami.8b02878 ↗
22. Bivour M, Temmler J, Steinkemper H, Hermle M (2015) Molybdenum and tungsten oxide: high work function wide band gap contact materials for hole selective contacts of silicon solar cells. Sol Energy Mater Sol Cells 142:34–4110.1016/j.solmat.2015.05.031 ↗
23. Tong J, Wan Y, Cui J, Lim S, Song N, Lennon A (2017) Solution-processed molybdenum oxide for hole-selective contacts on crystalline silicon solar cells. Appl Surf Sci 423:139–14610.1016/j.apsusc.2017.06.011 ↗
24. Zhang X, Wan Y, Bullock J, Allen T, Cuevas A (2016) Low resistance Ohmic contact to p-type crystalline silicon via nitrogen-doped copper oxide films. Appl Phys Lett 109:05210210.1063/1.4960529 ↗
25. Gao P, Yang Z, He J et al (2018) Dopant-free and carrier-selective heterocontacts for silicon solar cells: recent advances and perspectives. Adv Sci 5:170054710.1002/advs.201700547 ↗
26. Lin W, Wu W, Xie Q et al (2018) Conductive cuprous iodide hole-selective contacts with thermal and ambient stability for silicon solar cells. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 10:43699–4370610.1021/acsami.8b16883 ↗
27. Cai L, Wang W, Jin L et al (2019) 12.29% Low temperature-processed dopant-free CdS/p-Si heterojunction solar cells. Adv Mater Interfaces. https://doi.org/10.1002/admi.20190036710.1002/admi.201900367 ↗
28. Parreira P, Lavareda G, Amaral A et al (2011) Transparent p-type CuxS thin films. J Alloys Compd 509:5099–510410.1016/j.jallcom.2011.01.174 ↗
29. Huang A, He Y, Zhou Y et al (2018) A review of recent applications of porous metals and metal oxide in energy storage, sensing and catalysis. J Mater Sci 54:949–973. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-018-2961-510.1007/s10853-018-2961-5 ↗
30. Martinson ABF, Riha SC, Thimsen E, Elam JW, Pellin MJ (2013) Structural, optical, and electronic stability of copper sulfide thin films grown by atomic layer deposition. Energy Environ Sci 6:186810.1039/c3ee40371h ↗
31. Zhang Y, Wang Y, Xi L et al (2014) Electronic structure of antifluorite Cu2x (X = S, Se, Te) within the modified Becke–Johnson potential plus an on-site Coulomb U. J Chem Phys 140:07470210.1063/1.4865257 ↗
32. Riha SC, Jin S, Baryshev SV, Thimsen E, Wiederrecht GP, Martinson AB (2013) Stabilizing Cu2S for photovoltaics one atomic layer at a time. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 5:10302–1030910.1021/am403225e ↗
33. Jiang Y, Zhang X, Ge QQ et al (2014) Engineering the interfaces of ITO@Cu2S nanowire arrays toward efficient and stable counter electrodes for quantum-dot-sensitized solar cells. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 6:15448–1545510.1021/am504057y ↗
34. Fu H (2018) Environmentally friendly and earth-abundant colloidal chalcogenide nanocrystals for photovoltaic applications. J Mater Chem C 6:414–44510.1039/C7TC04952H ↗
35. Sharma R, Cai G, Shinde DV et al (2014) Polyelectrolyte multilayer-assisted fabrication of p-Cu2S/n-CdS heterostructured thin-film phototransistors. J Mater Chem C 2:8012–801710.1039/C4TC01428F ↗
36. Zhang C, Tao J, Chu J (2018) An 8.7% efficiency co-electrodeposited Cu2ZnSnS4 photovoltaic device fabricated via a pressurized post-sulfurization process. J Mater Chem C 6:13275–1328210.1039/C8TC05058A ↗
37. Tang A, Teng F, Wang Y et al (2008) Investigation on photovoltaic performance based on matchstick-like Cu(2)S–In(2)S(3) heterostructure nanocrystals and polymer. Nanoscale Res Lett 3:502–50710.1007/s11671-008-9187-4 ↗
38. Türck J, Siol S, Mayer T, Klein A, Jaegermann W (2015) Cu2S as ohmic back contact for CdTe solar cells. Thin Solid Films 582:336–33910.1016/j.tsf.2014.11.017 ↗
39. Hall R, Birkmire R, Phillips J, Meakin J (1981) Thin-film polycrystalline Cu2S/Cd1−x ZnxS solar cells of 10% efficiency. Appl Phys Lett 38:925–92610.1063/1.92184 ↗
40. Sam M, Bayati MR, Mojtahedi M, Janghorban K (2010) Growth of Cu2S/CdS nano-layered photovoltaic junctions for solar cell applications. Appl Surf Sci 257:1449–145310.1016/j.apsusc.2010.08.066 ↗
41. Norian KH, Hall RB (1982) Fabrication and characterization of stable high efficiency (Cd, Zn)S/Cu2S solar cells. Thin Solid Films 88:55–6610.1016/0040-6090(82)90350-9 ↗
42. Bryant FJ, Hariri AK, Scott CG (1983) Surface and interface processes influencing the stability of Cu2S–CdS thin film solar cells. J Phys D Appl Phys 16:2341–234810.1088/0022-3727/16/12/012 ↗
43. Agbenyeke RE, Park BK, Chung T-M, Kim CG, Han JH (2018) Growth of Cu2S thin films by atomic layer deposition using Cu(dmamb)2 and H2S. Appl Surf Sci 456:501–50610.1016/j.apsusc.2018.05.017 ↗
44. Chen SG, Huang YF, Liu YQ, Xia Q, Liao HW, Long CG (2008) Synthesis and characterization of cuprous sulfide crystals with novel morphology. Mater Lett 62:2503–250610.1016/j.matlet.2007.12.032 ↗
45. Pi P, Hou K, Zhou C et al (2017) Superhydrophobic Cu2S@Cu2O film on copper surface fabricated by a facile chemical bath deposition method and its application in oil–water separation. Appl Surf Sci 396:566–57310.1016/j.apsusc.2016.10.198 ↗
46. Liu D, Liu J, Liu J et al (2018) The effect of CuS counter electrodes for the CdS/CdSe quantum dot co-sensitized solar cells based on zinc titanium mixed metal oxides. J Mater Sci 54:4884–4892. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-018-03203-y10.1007/s10853-018-03203-y ↗
47. More P, Dhanayat S, Gattu K, Mahajan S, Upadhye D, Sharma R (2016) Annealing effect on Cu2S thin films prepared by chemical bath deposition. AIP Conf Proc 1728:02048910.1063/1.4946540 ↗
48. Isac L, Duta A, Kriza A, Manolache S, Nanu M (2007) Copper sulfides obtained by spray pyrolysis-possible absorbers in solid-state solar cells. Thin Solid Films 515:5755–575810.1016/j.tsf.2006.12.073 ↗
49. Zhuge F, Li X, Gao X, Gan X, Zhou F (2009) Synthesis of stable amorphous Cu2S thin film by successive ion layer adsorption and reaction method. Mater Lett 63:652–65410.1016/j.matlet.2008.12.010 ↗
50. Siol S, Sträter H, Brüggemann R et al (2013) PVD of copper sulfide (Cu2S) for PIN-structured solar cells. J Phys D Appl Phys 46:49511210.1088/0022-3727/46/49/495112 ↗
51. Zhao Y, Chen K, Zhong Q, Yang S, Liu Y (2017) Single sub-microwire solar cells based on the CdS–Cu2S and CdS–ZnS core–shell heterostructures. Prog Nat Sci Mater Int 27:182–18510.1016/j.pnsc.2017.03.009 ↗
52. Cox R, Strack H (1967) Ohmic contacts for GaAs devices. Solid State Electron 10:1213–121810.1016/0038-1101(67)90063-9 ↗
53. Krylova V, Andrulevičius M (2009) Optical, XPS and XRD studies of semiconducting copper sulfide layers on a polyamide film. Int J Photoenergy 2009:1–810.1155/2009/304308 ↗
54. Aria AI, Kidambi PR, Weatherup RS, Xiao L, Williams JA, Hofmann S (2016) Time evolution of the wettability of supported graphene under ambient air exposure. J Phys Chem C 120:2215–222410.1021/acs.jpcc.5b10492 ↗
55. Ma J, Du Q, Ge H, Zhang Q (2018) Fabrication of core–shell TiO2@CuS nanocomposite via a bifunctional linker-assisted synthesis and its photocatalytic performance. J Mater Sci 54:2928–2939. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-018-3054-110.1007/s10853-018-3054-1 ↗
56. Ghazzal MN, Wojcieszak R, Raj G, Gaigneaux EM (2014) Study of mesoporous CdS-quantum-dot-sensitized TiO2 films by using X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy and AFM. Beil J Nanotechnol 5:6810.3762/bjnano.5.6 ↗
57. Gupta S, Batra Y, Mehta BR, Satsangi VR (2013) Study of charge separation and interface formation in a single nanorod CdS–Cu(x)S heterojunction solar cell using Kelvin probe force microscopy. Nanotechnology 24:25570310.1088/0957-4484/24/25/255703 ↗