Creating three-dimensional (3D) fiber networks with out-of-plane auxetic behavior over large deformations
Source abstract
Abstract
Fiber networks with out-of-plane auxetic behavior have been sporadically investigated. One of the major challenges is to design such materials with giant negative Poisson’s ratio over large deformations. Here in, we report a systematic investigation to create three-dimensional (3D) fiber networks in the form of needlepunched nonwoven materials with out-of-plane auxetic behavior over large deformations via theoretical modeling and extensive set of experiments. The experimental matrix has encapsulated the key parameters of the needlepunching nonwoven process. Under uniaxial tensile loading, the anisotropy coupled with local fiber densification in networks has yielded large negative Poisson’s ratio (up to −5.7) specifically in the preferential direction. The in-plane and out-of-plane Poisson’s ratios of fiber networks have been predicted and, subsequently, compared with the experimental results. Fiber orientation was found to be a core parameter that modulated the in-plane Poisson’s ratio of fiber networks. A parametric analysis has revealed the interplay between the anisotropy of the fiber network and the out-of-plane Poisson’s ratio based upon constant volume consideration.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Cellular and Composite Structures · Advanced Materials and Mechanics · Pickering emulsions and particle stabilization
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (36)
Show source-provided references
1. Evans KE, Nkansah MA, Hutchinson IJ, Rogers SC (1991) Molecular network design. Nature 353:124–12410.1038/353124a0 ↗
2. Lakes R (1987) Foam structures with a negative Poisson’s ratio. Science 235:1038–104010.1126/science.235.4792.1038 ↗
3. Alderson KL, Evans KE (1992) The fabrication of microporous polyethylene having a negative Poisson’s ratio. Polymer 33:4435–443810.1016/0032-3861(92)90294-7 ↗
4. Baughman RH, Shacklette JM, Zakhidov AA, Stafström S (1998) Negative Poisson’s ratios as a common feature of cubic metals. Nature 392:362–36510.1038/32842 ↗
5. Liu Y, Hu H, Jimmy KC, Liu S (2010) Negative Poisson’s ratio weft-knitted fabrics. Text Res J 80:856–86310.1177/0040517509349788 ↗
6. Wu H, Wei G (2004) Molecular design of new kinds of auxetic polymers and networks. Chin J Polym Sci 22:355–362
7. Huang C, Chen L (2016) Negative Poisson’s ratio in modern functional materials. Adv Mater 28:8079–8096.10.1002/adma.201601363 ↗
8. Evans KE, Alderson A (2000) Auxetic materials: functional materials and structures from lateral thinking. Adv Mater 12:617–62810.1002/(SICI)1521-4095(200005)12:9<617::AID-ADMA617>3.0.CO;2-3 ↗
9. Grima JN, Evans KE (2000) Auxetic behavior from rotating squares. J Mater Sci Lett 19:1563–156510.1023/A:1006781224002 ↗
10. Gibson LJ, Ashby MF, Schajer GS, Robertson CI (1982) The mechanics of two-dimensional cellular materials. Proc R Soc Lond A 382:25–4210.1098/rspa.1982.0087 ↗
11. Alderson KL, Alderson A, Evans KE (1997) The interpretation of the strain-dependent Poisson’s ratio in auxetic polyethylene. J Strain Anal Eng Des 32:201–21210.1243/0309324971513346 ↗
12. Clausen A, Wang F, Jensen JS et al (2015) Topology optimized architectures with programmable Poisson’s ratio over large deformations. Adv Mater 27:5523–552710.1002/adma.201502485 ↗
13. Jayanty S, Crowe J, Berhan L (2011) Auxetic fibre networks and their composites. Phys Stat Sol B 248:73–8110.1002/pssb.201083973 ↗
14. Delincé M, Delannay F (2004) Elastic anisotropy of a transversely isotropic random network of interconnected fibres: non-triangulated network model. Acta Mater 52:1013–102210.1016/j.actamat.2003.10.035 ↗
15. Neelakantan S, Bosbach W, Woodhouse J, Markaki AE (2014) Characterization and deformation response of orthotropic fibre networks with auxetic out-of-plane behaviour. Acta Mater 66:326–33910.1016/j.actamat.2013.11.020 ↗
16. Neelakantan S, Tan J-C, Markaki AE (2015) Out-of-plane auxeticity in sintered fibre network mats. Scr Mater 106:30–3310.1016/j.scriptamat.2015.04.028 ↗
17. Thirlwell BE, Treloar LRG (1965) Non-woven fabrics. Part VI: dimensional and mechanical anisotropy. Text Res J 35:827–83510.1177/004051756503500907 ↗
18. Hearle JWS, Purdy AT (1972) On the nature of deformation of needled fabrics. Fibre Sci Technol 5:113–12810.1016/0015-0568(72)90003-6 ↗
19. Verma P, Shofner ML, Griffin AC (2014) Deconstructing the auxetic behavior of paper. Phys Stat Sol B 251:289–29610.1002/pssb.201384243 ↗
20. Verma P, Shofner ML, Lin A et al (2015) Inducing out-of-plane auxetic behavior in needle-punched nonwovens. Phys Stat Sol B 252:1455–146410.1002/pssb.201552036 ↗
21. Verma P, Shofner ML, Lin A et al (2016) Induction of auxetic response in needle-punched nonwovens: effects of temperature, pressure, and time. Phys Stat Sol B 253:1270–127810.1002/pssb.201600072 ↗
22. Åström JA, Mäkinen JP, Hirvonen H, Timonen J (2000) Stiffness of compressed fiber mats. J Appl Phys 88:5056–506110.1063/1.1315622 ↗
23. Rawal A, Lomov S, Ngo T et al (2007) Mechanical behavior of thru-air bonded nonwoven structures. Text Res J 77:417–43110.1177/0040517507081313 ↗
24. Hearle JWS, Sultan MAI (1967) A study of needled fabrics. Part I: experimental methods and properties. J Text Inst 58:251–26510.1080/00405006708629869 ↗
25. Watanabe A, Miwa M, Yokoi T, Merati AA (2004) Predicting the penetrating force and number of fibers caught by a needle barb in needle punching. Text Res J 74:417–42510.1177/004051750407400508 ↗
26. Hearle JWS, Sultan MAI (1968) A study of needled fabrics Part IV: the effects of stretch, shrinkage and reinforcement. J Text Inst 59:161–18210.1080/00405006808659976 ↗
27. Hearle JWS, Sultan MAI (1968) A study of needled fabrics Part V: the approach to theoretical understanding. J Text Inst 59:183–20110.1080/00405006808659977 ↗
28. Hearle JWS, Stevenson PJ (1964) Studies in nonwoven fabrics. Part IV: prediction of tensile properties. Text Res J 34:181–19110.1177/004051756403400301 ↗
29. Komori T, Makishima K (1977) Numbers of fiber-to-fiber contacts in general fiber assemblies. Text Res J 47:13–1710.1177/004051757704700104 ↗
30. Pan N, Chen J, Seo M, Backer S (1997) Micromechanics of a planar hybrid fibrous network. Text Res J 67:907–92510.1177/004051759706701208 ↗
31. Kumar V, Rawal A (2014) A model for predicting uniaxial compression behavior of fused fibrous networks. Mech Mater 78:66–7310.1016/j.mechmat.2014.07.014 ↗
32. Lee DH, Lee JK (1985) Initial compressional behaviour of fibre assembly. Objective measurements: application to product design and process control. The Textile Machinery Society of Japan, Osaka, pp 613–622
33. Giroud JP (2004) Poisson’s ratio of unreinforced geomembranes and nonwoven geotextiles subjected to large strains. Geotext Geomembr 22:297–30510.1016/j.geotexmem.2004.02.001 ↗
34. Hearle JWS, Sultan MAI, Choudhari TN (1968) A study of needled fabrics. Part II: effects of the needling process. J Text Inst 59:103–11610.1080/00405006808659970 ↗
35. Goswami BC, Suryadevara J, Vigo TL (1984) Determination of Poisson’s ratio in thermally bonded nonwoven fabrics. Text Res J 54:391–39610.1177/004051758405400606 ↗
36. Rawal A, Priyadarshi A, Kumar N et al (2010) Tensile behaviour of nonwoven structures: comparison with experimental results. J Mater Sci 45:6643–665210.1007/s10853-010-4755-2 ↗