Effect of the carbon nanotube size dispersity on the electrical properties and pressure sensing of the polymer composites
Source abstract
Abstract
Two different-diameter carbon nanotubes (CNTs), i.e., CNT-1 (diameter = 10–30 nm, length = 5–15 μm) and CNT-2 (diameter = 20–40 nm, length = 5–15 μm), were mixed in various relative concentrations to obtain series of hybrids with wider diameter disparity, which were subsequently melt blended with a polypropylene-based thermoplastic elastomer to fabricate their respective polymer composites. By changing the relative concentrations of CNTs in a polydisperse mixture, we were able to tune the percolation characteristics and the pressure–resistance sensitivity of the polymer composites. Percolation threshold, percolation window, and the minimum achievable resistivity value of the composites were found to be the function of relative concentration of CNTs in the polydisperse system. An important finding of this study is that percolation characteristics of composites with polydisperse system of CNTs prepared by mixing of two different CNTs with different relative concentrations can be explained by model of hybrid fillers. These findings may open a new pathway to design the conductive polymer composites with controlled electrical and sensing properties for various applications.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials · Conducting polymers and applications · Carbon Nanotubes in Composites
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (28)
Show source-provided references
1. He L, Tjong SC (2015) Facile synthesis of silver-decorated reduced graphene oxide as a hybrid filler material for electrically conductive polymer composites. RSC Adv 5:1507010.1039/C5RA00257E ↗
2. Kaur G, Adhikari R, Cass P, Bown M, Gunatillake P (2015) Electrically conductive polymers and composites for biomedical applications. RSC Adv 5:3755310.1039/C5RA01851J ↗
3. Arjmand M, Chizari K, Krause B, Pötschke P, Sundararaj U (2016) Effect of synthesis catalyst on structure of nitrogen-doped carbon nanotubes and electrical conductivity and electromagnetic interference shielding of their polymeric nanocomposites. Carbon 98:35810.1016/j.carbon.2015.11.024 ↗
4. Narasimman R, Vijayan S, Prabhakaran K (2015) Graphene-reinforced carbon composite foams with improved strength and EMI shielding from sucrose and graphene oxide. J Mater Sci 50:801810.1007/s10853-015-9368-3 ↗
5. Saini P (2015) Intrinsically conducting polymer-based blends and composites for electromagnetic interference shielding: theoretical and experimental aspects fundamentals of conjugated polymer blends, copolymers and composites: synthesis, properties and applications. John Wiley & Sons Inc, Hoboken, p 449
6. Verma P, Saini P, Choudhary V (2015) Designing of carbon nanotube/polymer composites using melt recirculation approach: effect of aspect ratio on mechanical, electrical and EMI shielding response. Mater Des 88:26910.1016/j.matdes.2015.08.156 ↗
7. Verma P, Saini P, Malik RS, Choudhary V (2015) Excellent electromagnetic interference shielding and mechanical properties of high loading carbon-nanotubes/polymer composites designed using melt recirculation equipped twin-screw extruder. Carbon 89:30810.1016/j.carbon.2015.03.063 ↗
8. Amrin S, Deshpande V (2016) Electrical properties and conduction mechanism in carboxyl-functionalized multiwalled carbon nanotubes/poly (vinyl alcohol) composites. J Mater Sci 51:2453. doi: 10.1007/s10853-015-9558-z10.1007/s10853-015-9558-z ↗
9. Nam TH, Goto K, Yamaguchi Y et al (2016) Improving mechanical properties of high volume fraction aligned multi-walled carbon nanotube/epoxy composites by stretching and pressing. Compos B Eng 85:1510.1016/j.compositesb.2015.09.012 ↗
10. Jackson EM, Laibinis PE, Collins WE, Ueda A, Wingard CD, Penn B (2016) Development and thermal properties of carbon nanotube-polymer composites. Compos B Eng 89:362–37310.1016/j.compositesb.2015.12.018 ↗
11. Zha J-W, Shehzad K, Li W-K, Dang Z-M (2013) The effect of aspect ratio on the piezoresistive behavior of the multiwalled carbon nanotubes/thermoplastic elastomer nanocomposites. J Appl Phys 113:01410210.1063/1.4772747 ↗
12. Liu S, Tian M, Zhang L, Lu Y, Chan TW, Ning N (2016) Tailoring dielectric properties of polymer composites by controlling alignment of carbon nanotubes. J Mater Sci 51:2616. doi: 10.1007/s10853-015-9575-y10.1007/s10853-015-9575-y ↗
13. Saini P (2013) Electrical properties and electromagnetic interference shielding response of electrically conducting thermosetting nanocomposites, chapter 10. In: Mittal Vikas (ed) Thermoset Nanocomposites. Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co KGaA, Weinheim, pp 211–23710.1002/9783527659647.ch10 ↗
14. Saini P, Choudhary V (2013) Enhanced electromagnetic interference shielding effectiveness of polyaniline functionalized carbon nanotubes filled polystyrene composites. J Nanopart Res 15:110.1007/s11051-012-1415-2 ↗
15. Saini P, Choudhary V, Singh B, Mathur R, Dhawan S (2011) Enhanced microwave absorption behavior of polyaniline-CNT/polystyrene blend in 12.4–18.0 GHz range. Synth Met 161:152210.1016/j.synthmet.2011.04.033 ↗
16. Shehzad K, Hakro AA, Zeng Y et al (2015) Two percolation thresholds and remarkably high dielectric permittivity in pristine carbon nanotube/elastomer composites. Appl Nanosci 5:969. doi: 10.1007/s13204-015-0403-010.1007/s13204-015-0403-0 ↗
17. Shehzad K, Zha J-W, Zhang Z-F, Yuan J-K, Dang Z-M (2013) Piezoresistive behavior of electrically conductive carbon fillers/thermoplastic elastomer nanocomposites. J Adv Phys 2:7010.1166/jap.2013.1038 ↗
18. Sandler J, Kirk J, Kinloch I, Shaffer M, Windle A (2003) Ultra-low electrical percolation threshold in carbon-nanotube-epoxy composites. Polymer 44:589310.1016/S0032-3861(03)00539-1 ↗
19. Chatterjee AP (2008) Percolation thresholds for rod-like particles: polydispersity effects. J Phys 20:255250
20. Mutiso RM, Sherrott MC, Li J, Winey KI (2012) Simulations and generalized model of the effect of filler size dispersity on electrical percolation in rod networks. Phys Rev B 86:21430610.1103/PhysRevB.86.214306 ↗
21. Nigro B, Grimaldi C, Ryser P, Chatterjee AP, Van Der Schoot P (2013) Quasiuniversal connectedness percolation of polydisperse rod systems. Phys Rev Lett 110:01570110.1103/PhysRevLett.110.015701 ↗
22. White SI, Mutiso RM, Vora PM et al (2010) Electrical percolation behavior in silver nanowire-polystyrene composites: simulation and experiment. Adv Funct Mater 20:2709. doi: 10.1002/adfm.20100045110.1002/adfm.201000451 ↗
23. Dang Z-M, Shehzad K, Zha J-W et al (2011) Complementary percolation characteristics of carbon fillers based electrically percolative thermoplastic elastomer composites. Compos Sci Technol 72:2810.1016/j.compscitech.2011.08.020 ↗
24. Shehzad K, Dang Z-M, Ahmad MN et al (2013) Effects of carbon nanotubes aspect ratio on the qualitative and quantitative aspects of frequency response of electrical conductivity and dielectric permittivity in the carbon nanotube/polymer composites. Carbon 54:10510.1016/j.carbon.2012.10.068 ↗
25. Shehzad K, Ahmad MN, Hussain T et al (2014) Influence of carbon nanotube dimensions on the percolation characteristics of carbon nanotube/polymer composites. J Appl Phys 116:06490810.1063/1.4892156 ↗
26. Dang Z-M, Shehzad K, Zha J-W, Hussain T, Jun N, Bai J (2011) On refining the relationship between aspect ratio and percolation threshold of practical carbon nanotubes/polymer nanocomposites. Jpn J Appl Phys 50:08021410.7567/JJAP.50.080214 ↗
27. Hu N, Karube Y, Arai M et al (2010) Investigation on sensitivity of a polymer/carbon nanotube composite strain sensor. Carbon 48:68010.1016/j.carbon.2009.10.012 ↗
28. Simmons JG (1963) Electric tunnel effect between dissimilar electrodes separated by a thin insulating film. J Appl Phys 34:2581. doi: 10.1063/1.172977410.1063/1.1729774 ↗