journal article·2016-04

Carbon nanotube-stabilized three-phase-foams

Christina Krämer, Torsten L. Kowald, Volker Butters, Reinhard H. F. Trettin

Journal of Materials Science· Volume 51· Issue 8
Publisher page

Abstract

Lightweight constructions have in many ways advantages through efficient use of materials. By biomimetic approaches, new possibilities are offered in materials science. In a new approach, three-phase-foams, which contain chemically reactive nanomaterials, were combined with carbon nanotubes to further improve foam stability and microstructure. The foam was designed in such a way that an application in inorganic binders as well as a separate material after a chemical treatment is possible. This approach enables a high stability of the particle-stabilized inorganic foams without drain within 60 min and low densities up to 90 kg/m3. Additionally, due to a pozzolanic hardening, reaction products were built, which result in further stabilization of the pore structure. Implementation of carbon nanotubes causes not only smaller pore sizes but also smaller border or lamellae widths. Furthermore, they act as seeds for the formation of calcium–silicate–hydrates (C–S–H) phases or other strengthening reaction products. Investigations of the phase development and microstructure of the achieved carbon nanotube-stabilized foams will be shown and explained. Additionally, a first hypothesis about the interaction mechanism between the used nanoparticles, carbon nanotubes, and surfactant is described.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Pickering emulsions and particle stabilization · Mesoporous Materials and Catalysis · Bone Tissue Engineering Materials

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (25)

Show source-provided references
1. Wilson AJ (ed) (1989) Foams: physics, chemistry and structure. Springer Series in Applied Biology, London
2. Lakes R (1993) Materials with structural hierarchy. Nature 361(6412):511–51510.1038/361511a0 ↗
3. Wilde PJ (2000) Interfaces: their role in foam and emulsion behaviour. Curr Opin Colloid Interface Sci 5(3–4):176–18110.1016/S1359-0294(00)00056-X ↗
4. Dickinson E (1999) Adsorbed protein layers at fluid interfaces: interactions, structure and surface rheology. Colloids Surf B 15(2):161–17610.1016/S0927-7765(99)00042-9 ↗
5. Murray BS, Ettelaie R (2004) Foam stability: proteins and nanoparticles. Curr Opin Colloid Interface Sci 9(5):314–32010.1016/j.cocis.2004.09.004 ↗
6. Binks BP (2002) Particles as surfactants-similarities and differences. Curr Opin Colloid Interface Sci 7(1–2):21–4110.1016/S1359-0294(02)00008-0 ↗
7. Binks BP, Horozov TS (2005) Aqueous foams stabilized solely by silica nanoparticles. Angew Chem Int Ed 44(24):3722–372510.1002/anie.200462470 ↗
8. Sun YQ, Gao T (2002) The optimum wetting angle for the stabilization of liquid-metal foams by ceramic particles: experimental simulations. Metall Mater Trans A 33(10):3285–329210.1007/s11661-002-0315-y ↗
9. Du Z, Bilbao-Montoya MP, Binks BP, Dickinson E, Ettelaie R, Murray BS (2003) Outstanding stability of particle-stabilized bubbles. Langmuir 19(8):3106–310810.1021/la034042n ↗
10. Dickinson E, Ettelaie R, Kostakis T, Murray BS (2004) Factors controlling the formation and stability of air bubbles stabilized by partially hydrophobic silica nanoparticles. Langmuir 20(20):8517–852510.1021/la048913k ↗
11. Alargova RG, Warhadpande DS, Paunov VN, Velev OD (2004) Foam superstabilization by polymer microrods. Langmuir 20(24):10371–1037410.1021/la048647a ↗
12. Gonzenbach UT, Studart AR, Tervoort E, Gauckler LJ (2006) Ultrastable particle-stabilized foams. Angew Chem Int Ed 45(21):3526–353010.1002/anie.200503676 ↗
13. Studart AR, Gonzenbach UT, Tervoort E, Gauckler LJ (2006) Processing routes to macroporous ceramics: a review. J Am Ceram Soc 89(6):1771–178910.1111/j.1551-2916.2006.01044.x ↗
14. Gonzenbach UT, Studart AR, Tervoort E, Gauckler LJ (2006) Stabilization of foams with inorganic colloidal particles. Langmuir 22(26):10983–1098810.1021/la061825a ↗
15. Gonzenbach UT, Studart AR, Tervoort E, Gauckler LJ (2006) Tailoring the microstructure of particle-stabilized wet foams. Langmuir 23(3):1025–103210.1021/la0624844 ↗
16. Stevenson P (2012) Foam engineering: fundamentals and applications, 2nd edn. Wiley, Hoboken10.1002/9781119954620 ↗
17. Weaire DL, Hutzler S (1999) The physics of foams. Clarendon Press, Oxford
18. Pott J (2006) Entwicklungsstrategien für zementgebundene Schäume. PhD Dissertation, University of Hannover
19. Krämer C, Schauerte M, Kowald TL, Trettin RHF (2015) Three-phase-foams for foam concrete application. Mater Charact 102:173–17910.1016/j.matchar.2015.03.004 ↗
20. Scheffler M, Colombo P (2005) Chapter 2.6 carbon foams, cellular ceramics. Structure, manufacturing, properties and applications, Wiley-VCH, Weinheim10.1002/3527606696 ↗
21. Hopper RW, Pekala RW (1989). US Patent 4, 806, 290
22. Böttger KG, Thieme J, Trettin R, Korpa A, Schmidt C (2008) Pozzolanic reactivity of nanoscale pyrogene oxides and their strength contribution in cement-based systems. Adv Cement Res 20(1):35–4610.1680/adcr.2008.20.1.35 ↗
23. Krämer C, Kowald TL, Trettin RHF (2015) Pozzolanic hardened three-phase-foams. Cement Concr Compos 62:44–5110.1016/j.cemconcomp.2015.06.002 ↗
24. Li GY, Wang PM, Zhao X (2005) Mechanical behavior and microstructure of cement composites incorporating surface-treated multi-walled carbon nanotubes. Carbon 43:1239–124510.1016/j.carbon.2004.12.017 ↗
25. Makar JM, Chan GW (2009) Growth of cement hydration products on single-walled carbon nanotubes. J Am Ceram Soc 92(6):1303–131010.1111/j.1551-2916.2009.03055.x ↗