Mechanical properties of chitin polymorphs: A computational study
Source abstract
Abstract
Chitin-based bio-composites in nature such as the exoskeleton of crustaceans and squid pen usually exhibit hierarchical structures, where the chitin crystal is the most fundamental structural hierarchy as the load-bearing scaffold. Previous studies have unveiled the mechanical design of the structures at high hierarchies in these biomaterials, while the structure–property relationship remains unclear for the chitin crystal at the bottom hierarchy. In this paper, we investigate the mechanical properties of chitin crystals with $$\alpha$$ - and $$\beta$$ -polymorphic structures that mainly exist over the animal kingdom using the reactive force field molecular dynamics simulations. We first validate the force field parameters adopted from literature then study the mechanical behaviors of chitin polymorphs in response to the tensile and shear deformation. It is found that the mechanical performance of $$\alpha$$ -chitin crystal is comprehensively superior to that of $$\beta$$ -chitin crystal, such as the elastic modulus, work of fracture, shear modulus and strength. Different from the $$\beta$$ -chitin, yielding caused by the transformation of crystalline structure is observed in the $$\alpha$$ -chitin during uniaxial tension. Based on the mechanical properties obtained from simulations and theoretical analysis, we can deduce that the $$\alpha$$ -chitin shows higher wear resistance than the $$\beta$$ -chitin, implying better protection against the surface scratch that is one of the environmental threats to organisms. Our results shed light on the structure–property relationship of chitin crystals at the molecular level. The fundamental understanding of mechanical properties of chitin polymorphs is of great significance for the bottom-up modeling and design of chitin-based bio-composites.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Silk-based biomaterials and applications · Polymer Surface Interaction Studies · Calcium Carbonate Crystallization and Inhibition
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (33)
Show source-provided references
1. Tharanathan RN, Kittur FS (2003) Chitin — the undisputed biomolecule of great potential. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr 43:61–87. https://doi.org/10.1080/1040869039082645510.1080/10408690390826455 ↗
2. Ravi Kumar MNV (2000) A review of chitin and chitosan applications. React Funct Polym. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1381-5148(00)00038-910.1016/S1381-5148(00)00038-9 ↗
3. Vincent JFV, Wegst UGK (2004) Design and mechanical properties of insect cuticle. Arthropod Struct Dev 33:187–199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asd.2004.05.00610.1016/j.asd.2004.05.006 ↗
4. Miserez A, Li Y, Waite JH, Zok F (2007) Jumbo squid beaks: inspiration for design of robust organic composites. Acta Biomater 3:139–149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2006.09.00410.1016/j.actbio.2006.09.004 ↗
5. Politi Y, Priewasser M, Pippel E, Zaslansky P, Hartmann J, Siegel S, Li C, Barth FG, Fratzl P (2012) A spider’s fang: how to design an injection needle using chitin-based composite material. Adv Funct Mater 22:2519–2528. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.20120006310.1002/adfm.201200063 ↗
6. Guo Z, Sha W, Yao H (2019) Measuring thermal conductivity of ultra-small materials exampled by the reaction chambers of bombardier beetles. Int J Heat Mass Transf 134:1318–1322. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2019.02.05910.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2019.02.059 ↗
7. Raabe D, Romano P, Sachs C, Fabritius H, Al-Sawalmih A, Yi SB, Servos G, Hartwig HG (2006) Microstructure and crystallographic texture of the chitin–protein network in the biological composite material of the exoskeleton of the lobster Homarus americanus. Mater Sci Eng A 421:143–153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2005.09.11510.1016/j.msea.2005.09.115 ↗
8. Chen PY, Lin AYM, McKittrick J, Meyers MA (2008) Structure and mechanical properties of crab exoskeletons. Acta Biomater 4:587–596. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2007.12.01010.1016/j.actbio.2007.12.010 ↗
9. Giraud-Guille MM (1984) Fine structure of the chitin-protein system in the crab cuticle. Tissue Cell 16:75–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/0040-8166(84)90020-X10.1016/0040-8166(84)90020-X ↗
10. Raabe D, Sachs C, Romano P (2005) The crustacean exoskeleton as an example of a structurally and mechanically graded biological nanocomposite material. Acta Mater 53:4281–4292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2005.05.02710.1016/j.actamat.2005.05.027 ↗
11. Song Z, Ni Y, Cai S (2019) Fracture modes and hybrid toughening mechanisms in oscillated/twisted plywood structure. Acta Biomater 91:284–293. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2019.04.04710.1016/j.actbio.2019.04.047 ↗
12. Wu K, Song Z, Zhang S, Ni Y, Cai S, Gong X, He L, Yu S-H (2020) Discontinuous fibrous Bouligand architecture enabling formidable fracture resistance with crack orientation insensitivity. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 117:15465–15472. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.200063911710.1073/pnas.2000639117 ↗
13. Yu Z, Lau D (2015) Molecular dynamics study on stiffness and ductility in chitin–protein composite. J Mater Sci 50:7149–7157. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-015-9271-y10.1007/s10853-015-9271-y ↗
14. Minke R, Blackwell J (1978) The structure of α-chitin. J Mol Biol 120:167–181. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-2836(78)90063-310.1016/0022-2836(78)90063-3 ↗
15. Blackwell J (1969) Structure of β-chitin or parallel chain systems of poly-β-(1→4)-N-acetyl-D-glucosamine. Biopolymers 7:281–298. https://doi.org/10.1002/bip.1969.36007030210.1002/bip.1969.360070302 ↗
16. Jang M-K, Kong B-G, Jeong Y-I, Lee CH, Nah J-W (2004) Physicochemical characterization of α-chitin, β-chitin, and γ-chitin separated from natural resources. J Polym Sci Pol Chem 42:3423–3432. https://doi.org/10.1002/pola.2017610.1002/pola.20176 ↗
17. Atkins E (1985) Conformations in polysaccharides and complex carbohydrates. J Biosci 8:375–387. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF0270399010.1007/BF02703990 ↗
18. Ifuku S, Nogi M, Abe K, Yoshioka M, Morimoto M, Saimoto H, Yano H (2009) Preparation of chitin nanofibers with a uniform width as α-chitin from crab shells. Biomacromol 10:1584–1588. https://doi.org/10.1021/bm900163d10.1021/bm900163d ↗
19. Majtán J, Bíliková K, Markovič O, Gróf J, Kogan G, Šimúth J (2007) Isolation and characterization of chitin from bumblebee (Bombus terrestris). Int J Biol Macromol 40:237–241. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2006.07.01010.1016/j.ijbiomac.2006.07.010 ↗
20. Lavall RL, Assis OBG, Campana-Filho SP (2007) β-Chitin from the pens of Loligo sp.: extraction and characterization. Bioresour Technol 98:2465–2472. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2006.09.00210.1016/j.biortech.2006.09.002 ↗
21. Rudall KM, Kenchington W (1973) The chitin system. Biol Rev 48:597–633. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-185X.1973.tb01570.x10.1111/j.1469-185X.1973.tb01570.x ↗
22. Sikorski P, Hori R, Wada M (2009) Revisit of α-chitin crystal structure using high resolution X-ray diffraction data. Biomacromol 10:1100–1105. https://doi.org/10.1021/bm801251e10.1021/bm801251e ↗
23. Gardner KH, Blackwell J (1975) Refinement of the structure of β-chitin. Biopolymers 14:1581–1595. https://doi.org/10.1002/bip.1975.36014080410.1002/bip.1975.360140804 ↗
24. Plimpton S (1995) Fast parallel algorithms for short-range molecular dynamics. J Comput Phys 117:1–19. https://doi.org/10.1006/jcph.1995.103910.1006/jcph.1995.1039 ↗
25. Beckham GT, Crowley MF (2011) Examination of the α-chitin structure and decrystallization thermodynamics at the nanoscale. J Phys Chem B 115:4516–4522. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp200912q10.1021/jp200912q ↗
26. Guvench O, Mallajosyula SS, Raman EP, Hatcher E, Vanommeslaeghe K, Foster TJ, Jamison FW, MacKerell AD (2011) CHARMM additive all-atom force field for carbohydrate derivatives and its utility in polysaccharide and carbohydrate–protein modeling. J Chem Theory Comput 7:3162–3180. https://doi.org/10.1021/ct200328p10.1021/ct200328p ↗
27. Fantauzzi D, Mueller JE, Sabo L, van Duin ACT, Jacob T (2015) Surface Buckling and Subsurface Oxygen: Atomistic Insights into the Surface Oxidation of Pt(111). ChemPhysChem 16:2797–2802. https://doi.org/10.1002/cphc.20150052710.1002/cphc.201500527 ↗
28. Nishino T, Matsui R, Nakamae K (1999) Elastic modulus of the crystalline regions of chitin and chitosan. J Polym Sci Pt B-Polym Phys 37:1191–1196. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-0488(19990601)37:11%3c1191::AID-POLB13%3e3.0.CO;2-H10.1002/(SICI)1099-0488(19990601)37:11<1191::AID-POLB13>3.0.CO;2-H ↗
29. Chen MQ, Quek SS, Sha ZD, Chiu CH, Pei QX, Zhang YW (2015) Effects of grain size, temperature and strain rate on the mechanical properties of polycrystalline graphene – A molecular dynamics study. Carbon 85:135–146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2014.12.09210.1016/j.carbon.2014.12.092 ↗
30. Cheng Z, Zhou H, Lu Q, Gao H, Lu L (2018) Extra strengthening and work hardening in gradient nanotwinned metals. Science. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aau192510.1126/science.aau1925 ↗
31. Wei Y, Wu J, Yin H, Shi X, Yang R, Dresselhaus M (2012) The nature of strength enhancement and weakening by pentagon–heptagon defects in graphene. Nat Mater 11:759–763. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat337010.1038/nmat3370 ↗
32. Fu J, He C, Xia B, Li Y, Feng Q, Yin Q, Shi X, Feng X, Wang H, Yao H (2016) C-axis preferential orientation of hydroxyapatite accounts for the high wear resistance of the teeth of black carp (Mylopharyngodon piceus). Sci Rep 6:23509. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep2350910.1038/srep23509 ↗
33. Sedriks AJ, Mulhearn TO (1963) Mechanics of cutting and rubbing in simulated abrasive processes. Wear 6:457–466. https://doi.org/10.1016/0043-1648(63)90281-310.1016/0043-1648(63)90281-3 ↗