Anti-corrosion reinforcement of waterborne polyurethane coating with polymerized graphene oxide by the one-pot method
Source abstract
Abstract
The research and preparation of excellent anti-corrosion coatings is still a difficult task and critical to practical applications. In this paper, phosphoric acid, dodecylbenzenesulfonic acid (DBSA), and polyaniline (PANI) were polymerized in-situ onto graphene oxide (GO) by the one-pot method to prepare dodecylbenzenesulfonic acid-PANI/phosphorylated graphene oxide (DPPGO). The results of TEM, FTIR, Raman spectrum, XRD, TGA, and XPS analysis showed that the DPPGO was successfully prepared. The SEM observations showed that DPPGO has best dispersibility and compatibility than GO and PANI/phosphorylated graphene oxide (PPGO) in waterborne polyurethane (WPU) matrix. To achieve anti-corrosion performance, a new type of graphene-based polymer nanocomposites water-based coating was developed and tested by electrochemical measurements. Through a series of electrochemical tests, it is concluded that the anti-corrosion performance of a composite coating DPPGO is significantly improved. The excellent anti-corrosion properties are due to the perfect dispersion and good compatibility of DPPGO in WPU.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Conducting polymers and applications · Corrosion Behavior and Inhibition · Polymer composites and self-healing
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (44)
Show source-provided references
1. Ding Y, Zhong J, Xie P et al (2019) Polymers 11:13. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym1112199810.3390/polym11121998 ↗
2. Dutta D, Ganda ANF, Chih JK, Huang CC, Tseng CJ, Su CY (2018) Nanoscale 10:12612. https://doi.org/10.1039/c8nr03261k10.1039/c8nr03261k ↗
3. Gianni L, Gigante GE, Cavallini M, Adriaens A (2014) Materials 7:3353. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma705335310.3390/ma7053353 ↗
4. Singh BP, Jena BK, Bhattacharjee S, Besra L (2013) Surf Coat Technol 232:475. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surfcoat.2013.06.00410.1016/j.surfcoat.2013.06.004 ↗
5. Mondal T, Ashkar R, Butler P, Bhowmick AK, Krishnamoorti R (2016) ACS Macro Lett 5:278. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsmacrolett.5b0093010.1021/acsmacrolett.5b00930 ↗
6. Xiong LL, Liu JH, Yu M, Li SM (2019) Corros Sci 146:70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.corsci.2018.10.01610.1016/j.corsci.2018.10.016 ↗
7. Cui G, Bi ZX, Zhang RY, Liu JG, Yu X, Li ZL (2019) Chem Eng J 373:104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2019.05.03410.1016/j.cej.2019.05.034 ↗
8. Chen SS, Brown L, Levendorf M et al (2011) ACS Nano 5:1321. https://doi.org/10.1021/nn103028d10.1021/nn103028d ↗
9. Nikpour B, Ramezanzadeh B, Bahlakeh G, Mandavian M (2017) Corros Sci 127:240. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.corsci.2017.08.02910.1016/j.corsci.2017.08.029 ↗
10. Othman NH, Ismail MC, Mustapha M, Sallih N, Kee KE, Jaal RA (2019) Prog Org Coat 135:82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.porgcoat.2019.05.03010.1016/j.porgcoat.2019.05.030 ↗
11. Sung SJ, Park J, Cho YS, Gihm SH, Yang SJ, Park CR (2019) Carbon 150:275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2019.04.12010.1016/j.carbon.2019.04.120 ↗
12. Wang K, Li LW, Zhang TZ, Liu ZF (2014) Energy 70:612. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2014.04.03410.1016/j.energy.2014.04.034 ↗
13. Zheng ZX, Feng QL, Zhu MJ et al (2019) Anal Chim Acta 1072:46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aca.2019.04.04010.1016/j.aca.2019.04.040 ↗
14. Da SX, Wang J, Geng HZ et al (2017) Appl Surf Sci 392:1117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2016.09.14310.1016/j.apsusc.2016.09.143 ↗
15. Geng HZ, Kim KK, So KP, Lee YS, Chang Y, Lee YH (2007) J Am Chem Soc 129:7758. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja072222410.1021/ja0722224 ↗
16. Gu ZZ, Jia SL, Li GF, Li CQ, Wu YQ, Geng HZ (2019) RSC Adv 9:3162. https://doi.org/10.1039/c8ra09443h10.1039/c8ra09443h ↗
17. Wang T, Jing LC, Zhu QX et al (2020) Appl Surf Sci 500:10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2019.14399710.1016/j.apsusc.2019.143997 ↗
18. Wang J, Geng H-Z, Luo Z-J et al (2015) RSC Adv 5:105393. https://doi.org/10.1039/c5ra19166a10.1039/c5ra19166a ↗
19. Hsieh YP, Hofmann M, Chang KW et al (2014) ACS Nano 8:443. https://doi.org/10.1021/nn404756q10.1021/nn404756q ↗
20. Zhong F, He Y, Wang PQ et al (2019) Appl Surf Sci 488:801. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2019.05.32110.1016/j.apsusc.2019.05.321 ↗
21. Li JY, Li XR, Zhu K, Wang HH, Fei GQ (2018) Journal Of Macromolecular Science Part a-Pure And Applied. Chemistry 55:649. https://doi.org/10.1080/10601325.2018.150461110.1080/10601325.2018.1504611 ↗
22. Sankarasubramanian S, Singh N, Mizuno F, Prakash J (2016) J Power Sources 319:202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.04.05410.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.04.054 ↗
23. Zhang H, Tao Z, Tang Y, Yang M, Wang G (2016) New J Chem 40:8587. https://doi.org/10.1039/c6nj02408d10.1039/c6nj02408d ↗
24. Ramezanzadeh B, Haeri Z, Ramezanzadeh M (2016) Chem Eng J 303:511. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2016.06.02810.1016/j.cej.2016.06.028 ↗
25. Li YY, Xu YT, Wang SC, Wang HC, Li M, Dai LZ (2019) High Perform Polym 31:1226. https://doi.org/10.1177/095400831983944210.1177/0954008319839442 ↗
26. Ramezanzadeh B, Bahlakeh G, Ramezanzadeh M (2018) Corros Sci 137:111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.corsci.2018.03.03810.1016/j.corsci.2018.03.038 ↗
27. Chang CH, Huang TC, Peng CW et al (2012) Carbon 50:5044. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2012.06.04310.1016/j.carbon.2012.06.043 ↗
28. Hayatgheib Y, Ramezanzadeh B, Kardar P, Mandavian M (2018) Corros Sci 133:358. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.corsci.2018.01.04610.1016/j.corsci.2018.01.046 ↗
29. Kang JH, Kim T, Choi J et al (2016) Chem Mater 28:756. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemmater.5b0370010.1021/acs.chemmater.5b03700 ↗
30. Feng JY, Wang XC, Guo PY, Wang YJ, Luo XM (2018) Polymers 10:12. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym1001007510.3390/polym10010075 ↗
31. Nakagawa A, Tanaka M, Hanamura S, Takahashi D, Toshima K (2015) Angew Chem Int Ed 54:1093510.1002/anie.201504182 ↗
32. Pathak AK, Kumar V, Sharma S, Yokozeki T, Dhakate SR (2019) J Colloid Interface Sci 533:548. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2018.08.10510.1016/j.jcis.2018.08.105 ↗
33. Ciric-Marjanovic G (2013) Synth Met 177:1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.synthmet.2013.06.00410.1016/j.synthmet.2013.06.004 ↗
34. Dermani AK, Kowsari E, Ramezanzadeh B, Amini R (2018) Prog Org Coat 122:255. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.porgcoat.2018.06.00310.1016/j.porgcoat.2018.06.003 ↗
35. Wu H, Sun H, Hong W, et al (2017) Acs Appl Mater Interfaces. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.7b0968010.1021/acsami.7b09680 ↗
36. Tsai TH, Yeh PC, Chen SM, Ali MA, Al-Hemaid FMA (2014) Electroanalysis 26:97110.1002/elan.201300625 ↗
37. Song PG, Cao ZH, Cai YZ, Zhao LP, Fang ZP, Fu SY (2011) Polymer 52:4001. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymer.2011.06.04510.1016/j.polymer.2011.06.045 ↗
38. Ramezanzadeh B, Ghasemi E, Mahdavian M, Changizi E, Moghadam MHM (2015) Carbon 93:555. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2015.05.09410.1016/j.carbon.2015.05.094 ↗
39. Aneja KS, Bohm S, Khanna AS, Bohm HLM (2015) Nanoscale 7:17879. https://doi.org/10.1039/c5nr04702a10.1039/c5nr04702a ↗
40. Wessling B, Posdorfer J (1999) Electrochim Acta 44:2139. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0013-4686(98)00322-310.1016/s0013-4686(98)00322-3 ↗
41. Liu S, Gu L, Zhao HC, Chen JM, Yu HB (2016) J Mater Sci Technol 32:425. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmst.2015.12.01710.1016/j.jmst.2015.12.017 ↗
42. Wen JG, Geng WM, Geng HZ et al (2019) Acs Omega 4:20265. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.9b0268710.1021/acsomega.9b02687 ↗
43. Ejenstam L, Swerin A, Pan JS, Claesson PM (2015) Corros Sci 99:89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.corsci.2015.06.01810.1016/j.corsci.2015.06.018 ↗
44. Jing L-C, Wang T, Cao W-W et al (2020) Prog Org Coat. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.porgcoat.2020.10573410.1016/j.porgcoat.2020.105734 ↗