DFT study of Mg2TiO4 and Ni doped Mg1.5Ni0.5TiO4 as electrode material for Mg ion battery application
Source abstract
Abstract
Mg2TiO4 is a spinel material, however it is electrochemically inactive. We have simulated Ni doping in its tetrahedral network by partially replacing Mg+2 (0.5 Mg+2) ions with Ni+2 to form Mg1.5Ni0.5TiO4. Mg2TiO4, Mg1.5Ni0.5TiO4 and its de-intercalated end product MgNi0.5TiO4 are studied through analysis of structural parameters and density of states. All the three materials produce almost similar x-ray diffraction pattern ensuring structural stability during charge–discharge. After doping of Ni, Mg1.5Ni0.5TiO4 becomes electrochemically active, as, only Ni states are found to be contributing charges (electrons) to the conduction band of MgNi0.5TiO4 after de-intercalation. This redox activity is also supported from the magnetic moments of Ni indicating change in valance from +2 to +3 on de-intercalation. Calculation of de-intercalation voltage for de-intercalation of tetrahedral Mg from Mg1.5Ni0.5TiO4 indicates a value of 4.22 V. This high voltage with electrochemical capacity 151 mAh g−1 would generate energy density of 637.2 W–h kg−1. Simulation of formation energy (Ef) of Mg1.5Ni0.5TiO4 indicates that with rutile TiO2 the phase formation is probable with slightly negative value of formation energy, however, with anatase TiO2 the phase formation is highly probable with high negative value of formation energy (Ef).
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Microwave Dielectric Ceramics Synthesis · Nuclear materials and radiation effects · Ferroelectric and Piezoelectric Materials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (22)
Show source-provided references
1. Shukla AK, Prem Kumar T (2008) Materials for next-generation lithium batteries. Curr Sci 94:314–331
2. Ichitsubo T, Adachi T, Yagi S, Doi T (2011) Potential positive electrodes for high-voltage magnesium-ion batteries. J Mater Chem 21:11764–1177210.1039/c1jm11793a ↗
3. Saha P, Jampani PH, Datta MK, Beck F, Hong DH, Poston JA, Manivannan A (2015) Synthesis and electrochemical study of Mg1.5MnO3: a defect spinel cathode for secondary magnesium battery. Mater Sci Eng B 202:8–1410.1016/j.mseb.2015.08.008 ↗
4. Ling C, Banerjee D, Song W, Zhang M, Matsui M (2012) First-principles study of the magnesiation of olivines:redox reaction mechanism, electrochemical and thermodynamic properties. J Mater Chem 22:13517–1352310.1039/c2jm31122d ↗
5. Wechsler BA, Von Dreele RB (1989) Structure refinements of Mg2TiO4, MgTiO3 and MgTi2O5 by time-of-flight neutron powder diffraction. Acta Cryst B4:542–54910.1107/S010876818900786X ↗
6. Chen Y-B (2012) Dielectric properties and crystal structure of Mg2TiO4 ceramics substituting Mg2+ with Zn2+ and Co2+. J Alloy Compd 513:481–48610.1016/j.jallcom.2011.10.095 ↗
7. Filipovic S, Obradovic N, Krstic J, Šcepanovic M, Pavlovic V, Paunovic V, Ristic MM (2013) Structural characterization and electrical properties of sintered magnesium–titanate ceramics. J Alloy Compd 555:39–4410.1016/j.jallcom.2012.12.040 ↗
8. Gittins J, Fawcett JJ, Rucklidge JC, Brooks CK (1982) An occurrence of the spinel end-member Mg2TiO4 and related spinel solid solutions. Miner Mag 45:135–13710.1180/minmag.1982.045.337.15 ↗
9. Kumar S, Kumar R, Koo BH, Choi H, Kim DU, Lee CG (2009) Structural and electrical properties of Mg2TiO4. J Ceram Soc Jpn 117:689–69210.2109/jcersj2.117.689 ↗
10. Golubovic A, Radovic M (2011) The growth of Mg2TiO4 single crystals using a four mirror furnace. J Serb Chem Soc 76(11):1561–156610.2298/JSC100818134G ↗
11. Dharmaraj N, Park HC, Lee BM, Viswanathamurthi P, Kim HY, Lee DR (2004) Preparation and morphology of magnesium titanate nanofibres via electrospinning. Inorg Chem Commun 7:431–43310.1016/j.inoche.2003.12.033 ↗
12. Belous A, Ovchar O, Durylin D, Valant M, Krzmanc MM, Suvorov D (2007) Microwave composite dielectrics based on magnesium titanates. J Eur Ceram Soc 27:2963–296610.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2006.11.022 ↗
13. Seko A, Oba F, Tanaka I (2010) Classification of spinel structures based on first-principles cluster expansion analysis. Phys Rev B 81:054114-1–054114-710.1103/PhysRevB.81.054114 ↗
14. Palin EJ, walker AM, Harrison RJ (2008) A computational study of order-disorder phenomena in Mg2TiO4 spinel (qandilite). Am Miner 93:1363–137210.2138/am.2008.2896 ↗
15. Blaha P, Schwarz K, Madsen GKH, Kvasnicka D, Luitz J (2001) WIEN2k An augmented plane. wave + local orbitals programme for calculating crystal properties. Karlheinz Schwarz Techn Universitat Wien, Wien
16. S. Cottenier (2002) Density Functional Theory and the Family of (L)APW methods: a step–by–step introduction (Instituut voor Kern-en Stralingsfysica, K. U. Leuven, Belgium). http://www.wien2k.at/reg_user/textbooks
17. Anisimov VI, Zaanen J, Andersen OK (1991) Band theory and Mott insulators: hubbard U instead of Stoner I. Phys Rev B 44:943–95410.1103/PhysRevB.44.943 ↗
18. http://www.ccp14.ac.uk/
19. Chakrabarti S, Thakur AK, Biswas K (2016) Density Functional Theory study of LiFeTiO4. J Power Sources 313:81–9010.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.02.072 ↗
20. Aydinol MK, Kohan AF, Ceder G, Cho K, Joannopoulos J (1997) Ab initio study of lithium intercalation in metal oxides and metal dichalcogenides. PRB 56:1354–136510.1103/PhysRevB.56.1354 ↗
21. K. H. M. Georg, P. Nov´ak (2007) Calculating the effective U in APW methods. NiO. http://susi.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/reg_user/textbooks/Constraint_U.pdf
22. Diebold U (2003) The surface science of titanium di-oxide. Surf Sci Rep 48:53–22910.1016/S0167-5729(02)00100-0 ↗