First-principles study of Si and Mg segregation in grain boundaries in Al and Cu: application of local-energy decomposition
Source abstract
Abstract
Segregation of Si and Mg at grain boundaries (GBs) in Al and Cu has been investigated using density-functional theory calculations combined with recently developed local-energy and local-stress schemes. The physics behind the impurity-segregation energy is effectively analyzed by the local-energy decomposition. For the $$\Sigma $$ 9 tilt and $$\Sigma $$ 5 twist GBs in Al and Cu, Si shows large segregation-energy gains only at tighter sites, where local configuration of remarkably short Si–Al or Si–Cu bonds with high charge densities of covalent-bonding features are formed, leading to the local-energy stabilization as the final-state effects. On the other hand, Mg shows large gains only at looser sites. For Mg in the Cu GBs, the formation of stable Mg–Cu bonds or Mg states at looser sites is the origin of the preferential segregation as the final-state effects. For Mg in the Al GBs, however, the local energies of Mg–Al bonds are not so stable at looser sites, while the instability of Al atoms at looser sites in pure GBs before substitution is the origin of the preferential segregation as the initial-state effects. The behaviors of Si and Mg in Al GBs are dominated by the difference in local sp bonding nature among Mg, Al and Si, while Si–Cu and Mg–Cu $$sp-d$$ hybridization interactions dominate the behaviors of Si and Mg in Cu GBs.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Microstructure and mechanical properties · Semiconductor materials and interfaces · Aluminum Alloy Microstructure Properties
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (57)
Show source-provided references
1. Herbig M, Raabe D, Li YJ, Choi P, Zaefferer S, Goto S (2014) Atomic-scale quantification of grain boundary segregation in nanocrystalline material. Phys Rev Lett 112:126103-1–126103-510.1103/PhysRevLett.112.126103 ↗
2. Lejček P (2010) Grain boundary segregation in metals. Springer, Berlin10.1007/978-3-642-12505-8 ↗
3. Edalati K, Fujioka T, Horita Z (2008) Microstructure and mechanical properties of pure Cu processed by high-pressure torsion. Mater Sci Eng A 497:168–17310.1016/j.msea.2008.06.039 ↗
4. Ito Y, Horita Z (2009) Microstructural evolution in pure aluminum processed by high-pressure torsion. Mater Sci Eng A 503:32–3610.1016/j.msea.2008.03.055 ↗
5. Ogata S, Li J, Yip S (2002) Ideal pure shear strength of aluminum and copper. Science 298:807–81110.1126/science.1076652 ↗
6. Carling K, Wahnström G, Mattsson TR, Mattsson AE, Sandberg N, Grimvall G (2000) Vacancies in metals: from first-principles calculations to experimental data. Phys Rev Lett 85:3862–386510.1103/PhysRevLett.85.3862 ↗
7. Uesugi T, Kohyama M, Higashi K (2003) Ab initio study on divacancy binding energies in aluminum and magnesium. Phys Rev B 68:184103-1–184103-510.1103/PhysRevB.68.184103 ↗
8. Wang RZ, Kohyama M, Tanaka S, Tamura T, Ishibashi S (2009) First-principles study of the stability and interfacial bonding of tilt and twist grain boundaries in Al and Cu. Mater Trans 50:11–1810.2320/matertrans.MD200820 ↗
9. Wang RZ, Tanaka S, Kohyama M (2012) First-principles tensile tests of tilt and twist grain boundaries in Al. Mater Trans 53:140–14610.2320/matertrans.MD201130 ↗
10. Shiihara Y, Kohyama M, Ishibashi S (2010) Ab initio local stress and its application to Al (111) surfaces. Phys Rev B 81:075441-1–075441-110.1103/PhysRevB.81.075441 ↗
11. Muller DA, Mills MJ (1999) Electron microscopy: probing the atomic structure and chemistry of grain boundaries, interfaces and defects. Mater Sci Eng A 260:12–2810.1016/S0921-5093(98)00979-4 ↗
12. Hu JR, Chang SC, Chen FR, Kai JJ (2002) HRTEM investigation of the multiplicity of $$\Sigma $$ Σ =9[ $$0\overline{1}1$$ 0 1 ¯ 1 ]/(122) symmetric tilt grain boundary in Cu. Mater Chem Phys 74:313–31910.1016/S0254-0584(01)00484-9 ↗
13. Wang H, Kohyama M, Tanaka S, Shiihara Y (2013) Ab initio local energy and local stress: application to tilt and twist grain boundaries in Cu and Al. J Phys Condens Matter 25:305006-1–305006-13
14. Na SH, Yang MS, Nam SW (1995) Effects of stress amplitude and internal stress on the grain boundary deformation behavior under high temperature creep in an Al-2.9%Mg alloy. Scr Metall 32:627–63210.1016/0956-716X(95)90849-F ↗
15. Song RG, Tseng MK, Zhang BJ, Liu J, Jin ZH, Shin KS (1996) Grain boundary segregation and hydrogen-induced fracture in 7050 aluminum alloy. Acta Mater 44:3241–324810.1016/1359-6454(95)00406-8 ↗
16. Horikawa K, Kuramoto S, Kanno M (2001) Intergranular fracture caused by trace impurities in an Al-5.5 mol% Mg alloy. Acta Mater 49:3981–398910.1016/S1359-6454(01)00291-9 ↗
17. Terada D, Masui T, Kamikawa N, Tsuji N (2008) Microstructure and mechanical properties of Al-0.5 at.% X (=Si, Ag, Mg) alloys highly deformed by ARB process. Mater Sci Forum 584–586:547–55210.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.584-586.547 ↗
18. Liu XY, Adams JB (1998) Grain-boundary segregation in Al-10%Mg alloys at hot working temperature. Acta Mater 46:3467–347610.1016/S1359-6454(98)00038-X ↗
19. Namilae S, Chandra N, Nieh TG (2002) Atomistic simulation of grain boundary sliding in pure and magnesium doped aluminum bicrystals. Scr Mater 46:49–5410.1016/S1359-6462(01)01195-2 ↗
20. Liu X, Wang X, Wang J, Zhang H (2005) First-principles investigation of Mg segregation at $$\Sigma $$ Σ = 11(113) grain boundaries in Al. J Phys Condens Matter 17:4301–430810.1088/0953-8984/17/27/006 ↗
21. Uesugi T, Higashi K Private communication
22. Razumovskiy VI, Ruban AV, Razumovskii IM, Lozovoi AY, Butrim VN, Vekilov YuKh (2011) The effect of alloying elements on grain boundary and bulk cohesion in aluminum alloys: an ab initio study. Scr Mater 65:926–92910.1016/j.scriptamat.2011.08.014 ↗
23. Thomson DI, Heine V, Payne MC, Marzari N, Finnis MW (2000) Insight into gallium behavior in aluminum grain boundaries from calculation on $$\Sigma $$ Σ = 11(113) boundary. Acta Mater 48:3623–363210.1016/S1359-6454(00)00175-0 ↗
24. Zhang Y, Lu GH, Hu X, Wang T, Kohyama M, Yamamoto R (2007) First-principles computational tensile test on a Na-segregated Al grain boundary with an Si additive and an intergranular embrittlement suppression mechanism. J Phys Condens Matter 19:456225-1–456225-8
25. Lu GH, Suzuki A, Ito A, Kohyama M, Yamamoto R (2000) Comparison of effects of sodium and silicon impurities on aluminium grain boundaries by first-principles calculation, Modell Simul Mater Sci Eng 8:727–736; (2003) Effects of Impurities on an Al Grain Boundary. Mater Trans 44:337–343
26. Kunimine T, Fujii T, Onaka S, Tsuji N, Kato M (2011) Effects of Si addition on mechanical properties of copper severely deformed by accumulative roll-bonding. J Mater Sci 46:4290–4295. doi: 10.1007/s10853-010-5235-410.1007/s10853-010-5235-4 ↗
27. Nishikawa K, Semboshi S, Konno TJ (2007) Transmission electron microscopy observations on Cu-Mg alloy systems. Solid State Phenom 127:103–10810.4028/www.scientific.net/SSP.127.103 ↗
28. Lozovoi AY, Paxton AT, Finnis MW (2006) Structural and chemical embrittlement of grain boundaries by impurities: a general theory and first-principles calculations for copper. Phys Rev B 74:155416-1–155416-1310.1103/PhysRevB.74.155416 ↗
29. Blöchl PE (1994) Projector augmented-wave method. Phys Rev B 50:17953–1797910.1103/PhysRevB.50.17953 ↗
30. Kresse G, Joubert D (1999) From ultrasoft pseudopotentials to the projector augmented-wave method. Phys Rev B 59:1758–177510.1103/PhysRevB.59.1758 ↗
31. Perdew JP, Burke K, Ernzerhof M (1996) Generalized gradient approximation made simple. Phys Rev Lett 77:3865–386810.1103/PhysRevLett.77.3865 ↗
32. Kr Bhattacharya S, Tanaka S, Shiihara Y, Kohyama M (2013) Ab initio study of symmetrical tilt grain boundaries in bcc Fe: structural units, magnetic moments, interfacial bonding, local energy and local stress. J Phys Condens Matter 25:135004-1–135004-14
33. Bhattacharya SKR, Tanaka S, Shiihara Y, Kohyama M (2014) Ab initio perspective of the $$\langle 110\rangle $$ ⟨ 110 ⟩ symmetrical tilt grain boundaries in bcc Fe: application of local energy and local stress. J Mater Sci 49:3980–3995. doi: 10.1007/s10853-014-8038-110.1007/s10853-014-8038-1 ↗
34. Kr Bhattacharya S, Kohyama M, Tanaka S, Shiihara Y (2014) Si segregation at Fe grain boundaries analyzed by ab initio local energy and local stress. J Phys Condens Matter 26:355005-1–355005-18
35. Chetty N, Martin RM (1992) First-principles energy density and its applications to selected polar surfaces. Phys Rev B 45:6074–608810.1103/PhysRevB.45.6074 ↗
36. Chetty N, Martin RM (1992) GaAs (111) and ( $$\overline{1}\overline{1}\overline{1}$$ 1 ¯ 1 ¯ 1 ¯ ) surfaces and the GaAs/AlAs (111) heterojunction studied using a local energy density. Phys Rev B 45:608910.1103/PhysRevB.45.6089 ↗
37. Filippetti A, Fiorentini V (2000) Theory and applications of the stress density. Phys Rev B 61:8433–844210.1103/PhysRevB.61.8433 ↗
38. Nielsen OH, Martin RM (1985) Quantum-mechanical theory of stress and force. Phys Rev B 32:3780–379110.1103/PhysRevB.32.3780 ↗
39. Bader RF (1990) Atoms in molecules: a quantum theory. Oxford University Press, Oxford10.1093/oso/9780198551683.001.0001 ↗
40. Yu M, Trinkle DR (2011) Accurate and efficient algorithm for Bader charge integration. J Chem Phys 134:064111-1–064111-8
41. Yu M, Trinkle DR, Martin RM (2011) Energy density in density functional theory: application to crystalline defects and surfaces. Phys Rev B 83:115113-1–115113-10
42. Ishibashi S, Tamura T, Tanaka S, Kohyama M, Terakura K. http://qmas.jp . Accessed 17 Nov 2013
43. Ishibashi S, Tamura T, Tanaka S, Kohyama M, Terakura K (2007) Ab initio calculations of electric-field-induced stress profiles for diamond/c-BN (110) superlattices. Phys Rev B 76:153310-1–153310-410.1103/PhysRevB.76.153310 ↗
44. Kittel C (2005) Introduction to solid state physics, 8th edn. Wiley, New York
45. Becke AD (1988) A multicenter numerical Integration scheme for polyatomic molecules. J Comput Phys 88:2547–2553
46. Turner DE, Zhu ZZ, Chan CT, Ho KM (1997) Energetics of vacancy and substitutional impurities in aluminum bulk and clusters. Phys Rev B 55:13842–1385210.1103/PhysRevB.55.13842 ↗
47. Chetty N, Weinert M, Rahman TS, Davenport JW (1995) Vacancies and impurities in aluminum and magnesium. Phys Rev B 52:6313–632610.1103/PhysRevB.52.6313 ↗
48. Ullmaier H (ed) (1991) Atomic defects in metals. Springer, Berlin
49. Cruz CA, Chantrenne P, Veiga RGA, Perez M, Kleber X (2013) Modified embedded-atom method interatomic potential and interfacial thermal conductance of Si-Cu systems: A molecular dynamics study. J Appl Phys 113:023710-1–023710-9
50. Chen W, Sun J (2006) The electronic structure and mechanical properties of MgCu $$_2$$ 2 Laves phase compound. Physica B 382:279–28410.1016/j.physb.2006.02.031 ↗
51. Ganeshan S, Shang SL, Zhang H, Wang Y, Mantina M, Liu ZK (2009) Elastic constants of binary Mg compounds from first-principles calculations. Intermetallics 17:313–31810.1016/j.intermet.2008.11.005 ↗
52. Mao P, Yu B, Liu Z, Wang F, Ju Y (2013) First-principles calculations of structural, elastic and electronic properties of AB $$_2$$ 2 type intermetallics in Mg-Zn-Ca-Cu alloy. J Mag Alloys 1:256–26210.1016/j.jma.2013.10.001 ↗
53. Lejček P, Šob M, Paidar V, Vitek V (2013) Why calculated energies of grain boundary segregation are unreliable when segregant solubility is low. Scr Mater 68:547–55010.1016/j.scriptamat.2012.11.019 ↗
54. Seah MP, Hondros ED (1973) Grain boundary segregation. Proc R Soc Lond A 335:191–21210.1098/rspa.1973.0121 ↗
55. McLean D (1957) Grain boundaries in metals. Oxford University Press, London
56. Rice JR, Wang JS (1989) Embrittlement of interfaces by solute segregation. Mater Sci Eng A 107:23–4010.1016/0921-5093(89)90372-9 ↗
57. Sato Y, Roh J-Y, Ikuhara Y (2013) Grain-boundary structural transformation induced by geometry and chemistry. Phys Rev B 87:140101-1–140101-4