journal article·2019-11

Characterization of morphological and rheological properties of rigid magnetorheological foams via in situ fabrication method

Noor Sahirah Muhazeli, Nur Azmah Nordin, Saiful Amri Mazlan, Norhaniza Rizuan, Siti Aishah Abdul Aziz, Abdul Yasser Abd Fatah, Zawawi Ibrahim, U. Ubaidillah, Seung-Bok Choi

Journal of Materials Science· Volume 54· Issue 21
Publisher page

Abstract

This paper presents material characteristics of a rigid magnetorheological (MR) foam that comprises polyurethane foam matrix and carbonyl iron particles (CIPs). Three different samples of MR foams are prepared by changing the concentration of CIPs (0, 35, and 70 g) in isotropic condition. In-depth characterization on the morphological properties, the field-dependent rheological behavior in terms of linear viscoelastic region and storage modulus, and the off-state sound absorption properties are then experimentally investigated. In the morphological observation, it is seen from the fluorescence micrographs that MR foam consists of open pore structure and the average size of the pores is decreased with the increment in CIPs content. In the rheological test of MR foam, it is identified that MR foam with the addition of 70 g of CIPs to the total of polyol and isocyanates (100 g) can enhance the storage modulus up to 112% compared with MR foam without CIPs. In the meantime, from the acoustic absorption test, it is shown that the maximum peaks of sound absorption coefficient (SAC) are shifted to the low frequency and the SAC is increased up to 229% due to the decrement in the pores size and increment in the storage modulus. The results achieved from this material characterization of MR foam provide useful guidelines for the development of new type smart materials associated with MR fluids and for the findings of appropriate applications which require controllability of both the stiffness and acoustic properties.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Vibration Control and Rheological Fluids · Structural Engineering and Vibration Analysis · Seismic Performance and Analysis

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (38)

Show source-provided references
1. Gong Q, Wu J, Gong X, Fan Y, Xia H (2013) Smart polyurethane foam with magnetic field controlled modulus and anisotropic compression property. RSC Adv 3:3241–324810.1039/c2ra22824f ↗
2. Carlson JD, Jolly MR (2000) MR fuid, foam and elastomer devices. Mechatronics 10:555–56910.1016/S0957-4158(99)00064-1 ↗
3. Wereley NM, Perez C, Choi YT (2018) Strain-dependent dynamic compressive properties of magnetorheological elastomeric foams. AIP Adv 8:056721–05672610.1063/1.5007266 ↗
4. Aziz SAA, Ubaidillah, Mazlan SA, Ismail NIN, Choi SB (2018) Implementation of functionalized multiwall carbon nanotubes on magnetorheological elastomer. J Mater Sci 53:10122–1013410.1007/s10853-018-2315-3 ↗
5. Ahamed R, Choi S, Ferdaus MM (2018) A state of art on magneto-rheological materials and their potential applications. J Intell Mate Syst Struct 29:2051–209510.1177/1045389X18754350 ↗
6. Blanco E, Lam S, Smoukov SK, Velikov KP, Khan SA, Velev OD (2013) Stability and viscoelasticity of magneto-pickering foams. Langmuir 29:10019–1002710.1021/la4014224 ↗
7. Lam S, Blanco E, Smoukov SK, Velikov KP, Velev OD (2011) Magnetically responsive pickering foams. J Am Chem Soc 133:13856–1385910.1021/ja205065w ↗
8. Scarpa F, Smith FC (2004) Passive and MR fluid-coated auxetic PU foam—Mechanical, acoustic, and electromagnetic properties. J Intell Mater Syst Struct 15:973–97910.1177/1045389X04046610 ↗
9. White SW, Kim SK, Bajaj AK, Davies P, Showers DK, Liedtke PE (2000) Experimental techniques and identification of nonlinear and viscoelastic properties of flexible polyurethane foam. Nonlinear Dyn 22:281–31310.1023/A:1008302208269 ↗
10. Scarpa F, Pastorino P, Garelli A, Patsias S, Ruzzene M (2005) Auxetic compliant flexible PU foams: static and dynamic properties. Physica Status Solidi 694:681–69410.1002/pssb.200460386 ↗
11. Carlson JD (2000) Low cost MR fluid sponge devices. J Intell Mater Syst Struct 10:589–59510.1106/CG4J-V704-9LPH-GEC0 ↗
12. Co Ting Keh LO-S, Zang J, Zhao X (2013) Magneto-rheological foams capable of tunable energy absorption. Proc IEEE 4:1–3
13. Ge L, Xuan S, Liao G, Yin T, Gong X (2015) Stretchable polyurethane sponge reinforced magnetorheological material with enhanced mechanical properties. Smart Mater Struct 24:037001–03700910.1088/0964-1726/24/3/037001 ↗
14. Xu Y, Gong X, Xuan S (2013) Soft magnetorheological polymer gels with controllable rheological properties. Smart Mater Struct 22:075029–07503910.1088/0964-1726/22/7/075029 ↗
15. D’Auria M, Davino D, Pantani R, Sorrentino L (2016) Polymeric foam-ferromagnet composites as smart lightweight materials. Smart Mater Struct 25:055014–05502710.1088/0964-1726/25/5/055014 ↗
16. Davino D, Mei P, Sorrentino L, Visone C (2012) Polymeric composite foams with properties controlled by the magnetic field. IEEE Trans Magn 48:3043–304610.1109/TMAG.2012.2198634 ↗
17. Sorrentino L, Aurilia M, Forte G, Iannace S (2011) Anisotropic mechanical behavior of magnetically oriented iron particle reinforced foams. J Appl Polym Sci 119:1239–124710.1002/app.32603 ↗
18. Sorrentino L, D’Auria M, Davino D, Visone C, Iannace S (2014) SmartFoams with magneto-sensitive elastic behavior. Times Polym (TOP) Compos 1599:238–241
19. Schümann M, Seelig N, Odenbach S (2015) The effect of external magnetic fields on the pore structure of polyurethane foams loaded with magnetic microparticles. Smart Mater Struct 24:105028–10503410.1088/0964-1726/24/10/105028 ↗
20. Zhang S, Rodrigue D, Riedl B (2005) Preparation and morphology of polypropylene/wood flour composite foams via extrusion. Polym Compos 26:731–73810.1002/pc.20143 ↗
21. Gong X, Xu Y, Xuan S, Guo C, Zong L (2012) The investigation on the nonlinearity of plasticine-like magnetorheological material under oscillatory shear rheometry. J Rheol 56:1375–139110.1122/1.3687300 ↗
22. Gao D, Wang J, Wang Y (2016) Effect of melt viscosity on the cell morphology and properties of poly (lactic acid) foams. J Cell Plast 52(2):175–18710.1177/0021955X14566210 ↗
23. Yang J, Huang L, Zhang Y, Chen F, Fan P, Zhong M, Yeh S (2013) A new promising nucleating agent for polymer foaming: applications of ordered mesoporous silica particles in polymethyl methacrylate supercritical carbon dioxide microcellular foaming. IECR 52:14169–14178
24. Filipcsei G, Csetneki I, Szilágyi A, Zrínyi M (2007) Magnetic field-responsive smart polymer composites. Adv Polym Sci 206:137–18910.1007/12_2006_104 ↗
25. Agirre-Olabide I, Berasategui J, Elejabarrieta MJ, Bou-Ali MM (2014) Characterization of the linear viscoelastic region of magnetorheological elastomers. J Intell Mater Syst Struct 25:2074–208110.1177/1045389X13517310 ↗
26. Agirre-olabide I, Berasategui J, Elejabarrieta MJ (2014) Characterization of the linear viscoelastic region of magnetorheological elastomers 25:2074–2081
27. Ubaidillah, Imaduddin F, Li Y, Mazlan SA, Sutrisno J, Koga T, Yahya I, Choi SB (2016) A new class of magnetorheological elastomers based on waste tire rubber and the characterization of their properties. Smart Mater Struct 25:1–15
28. Ubaidillah, Sutrisno J, Purwanto A, Mazlan SA (2014) Recent progress on magnetorheological solids: materials, fabrication, testing and applications. Adv Eng Mater 17:563–59710.1002/adem.201400258 ↗
29. Agirre-Olabide I, Elejabarrieta MJ, Bou-Ali MM (2015) Matrix dependence of the linear viscoelastic region in magnetorheological elastomers. J Intell Mater Syst Struct 26:1880–188610.1177/1045389X15580658 ↗
30. Niedermeier W, Luginsland H, Fro J (2005) The effect of filler—filler and filler—elastomer interaction on rubber reinforcement. Compos A Appl Sci Manuf 36:449–46010.1016/j.compositesa.2004.10.004 ↗
31. Sorrentino L, Aurilia M, Forte G, Iannace S (2008) Composite polymeric foams produced by using magnetic field. Adv Sci Technol 54:123–12610.4028/www.scientific.net/AST.54.123 ↗
32. Journal I, Engineering M, Doi P (2014) Acoustic performance of green polymer foam from renewable resources after UV exposure. Int J Autom Mech Eng 9:1639–164810.15282/ijame.9.2013.14.0136 ↗
33. Jorge P, Malcolm A, Croker J (2007) Recent trends in porous sound absorbing materials. J Comput Phys 226:1845–185810.1016/j.jcp.2007.06.013 ↗
34. Navacerrada MA, Fernández P, Díaz C, Pedrero A (2013) Thermal and acoustic properties of aluminium foams manufactured by the infiltration process. Appl Acoust 74:496–50110.1016/j.apacoust.2012.10.006 ↗
35. Liu Z, Zhan J, Fard M, Davy JL (2016) Acoustic properties of a porous polycarbonate material produced by additive manufacturing. Mater Lett 181:296–29910.1016/j.matlet.2016.06.045 ↗
36. Bahrambeygi H, Sabetzadeh N, Rabbi A, Nasouri K, Shoushtari AM, Babaei MR (2013) Nanofibers (PU and PAN) and nanoparticles (nanoclay and MWNTs) simultaneous effects on polyurethane foam sound absorption. J Polym Res 20:72–8210.1007/s10965-012-0072-6 ↗
37. Oliviero M, Verdolotti L, Stanzione M, Lavotgna M (2017) Bio-based flexible polyurethane foams derived from succinic polyol: mechanical and acoustic performance. J Appl Polym Sci 134:45113–4512510.1002/app.45113 ↗
38. Knight RD, Jones B, Field S (2007) College physics: a strategic approach. Pearson/Addison Wesley, San Francisco