Effects of oxygen pressure on the structure and photoluminescence of ZnO thin films
Source abstract
Abstract
A series of ZnO thin films were deposited on silicon (100) substrate at 473 K by using facing target RF magnetron sputtering system at different oxygen pressure in this paper. The structure, surface morphology and photoluminescence of the ZnO thin films were characterized by X-ray diffraction, atomic force microscopy (AFM), and photoluminescence spectra (PL), respectively. The results showed that only a (002) peak of hexagonal wurtzite appeared in all ZnO thin films, indicating that ZnO films exhibited strong texture. With increasing the oxygen pressure, the results indicated that the ZnO film deposited at 1.2 Pa Ar pressure and 0.6 Pa oxygen pressure had the best preferential C-axis orientation and the weakest compressive stress. Meanwhile, AFM observation showed that ZnO film deposited at pure Ar had the highest surface roughness. With the increment of oxygen pressure, the surface roughness decreased gradually. In addition, PL measurement showed that the ZnO film deposited at 1.2 Pa Ar pressure and 0.6 Pa oxygen pressure had the strongest ultraviolet emission and the weakest blue emission.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: ZnO doping and properties · Ga2O3 and related materials · Gas Sensing Nanomaterials and Sensors
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (18)
Show source-provided references
1. Özgür Ü, Alivov YI, Liu C, Teke A, Reshchikov MA, Dogan S, Avrutin V, Cho SJ, Morkoc H (2005) J Appl Phys 98:04130110.1063/1.1992666 ↗
2. Look DC (2001) Mater Sci Eng B 80:38310.1016/S0921-5107(00)00604-8 ↗
3. Muthukumar S, Gorla CR, Emanetoglu NW, Liang S, Lu Y (2001) J Cryst Growth 225:19710.1016/S0022-0248(01)00874-0 ↗
4. Makino T, Isoya G, Segawa Y, Chia CH, Yasuda T, Kawasaki M, Ohtomo A, Tamura K, Koinuma H (2000) J Cryst Growth 214/215:28910.1016/S0022-0248(00)00094-4 ↗
5. Liu M, Wei XQ, Zhang ZG, Sun G, Chen CS, Xue CS, Zhuang HZ, Man BY (2006) Appl Surf Sci 252:432110.1016/j.apsusc.2005.07.038 ↗
6. Znaidi L, Soler-Illia GJAA, Benyahia S, Sanchez C, Kanaev AV (2003) Thin Solid Films 428:25710.1016/S0040-6090(02)01219-1 ↗
7. Ondo-Ndong R, Ferblantier G, Kalfioui MA, Boyer A, Foucaran A (2003) J Cryst Growth 255:13010.1016/S0022-0248(03)01243-0 ↗
8. Ondo-Ndong R, Dellanoy FP, Boyer A, Giani A, Foucaran A (2003) Mater Sci Eng B 97:6810.1016/S0921-5107(02)00406-3 ↗
9. Wang QP, Zhang DH, Xue ZY, Zhang XJ (2004) Opt Mater 26:2310.1016/j.optmat.2003.12.005 ↗
10. Xue ZY, Zhang DH, Wang QP, Wang JH (2002) Appl Surf Sci 195:12610.1016/S0169-4332(02)00547-0 ↗
11. Hayashi Y, Kondo K, Murai K, Moriga T, Nakabayashi I, Fukumoto H, Tominaga K (2004) Vacuum 74:60710.1016/j.vacuum.2004.01.033 ↗
12. Chen JJ, Gao Y, Zeng F, Li DM, Pan F (2004) Appl Surf Sci 223:31810.1016/j.apsusc.2003.09.015 ↗
13. Hong RJ, Qi HJ, Huang JB, He HB, Fan ZX, Shao JD (2005) Thin Solid Films 473:5810.1016/j.tsf.2004.06.159 ↗
14. Cebulla R, Wendt R, Ellmer K (1998) J Appl Phys 83:108710.1063/1.366798 ↗
15. Fang ZB, Gong HX, Liu XQ, Xu DY, Huang CM, Wang YY (2003) Acta Phys Sin 52:174810.7498/aps.52.1748 ↗
16. Xu XL, Guo CX, Qi ZM, Liu HT, Xu J, Shi CS, Chong C, Huang WH, Zhou YJ, Xu CM (2002) Chem Phys Lett 364:5710.1016/S0009-2614(02)01281-2 ↗
17. Lin BX, Fu ZX, Jia YB, Liao GH (2001) Acta Phys Sin 50:220810.7498/aps.50.2208 ↗
18. Mahamuni S, Borgohain K, Bendre BS, Leppert VJ, Risbud SH (1999) Appl Phys Lett 85:2861