Field emission properties of one-dimensional single CuO nanoneedle by in situ microscopy
Source abstract
Abstract
In this article, the field-emission property of individual CuO nanoneedle was investigated to explore its tip image and real work function using in situ transmission electron microscopy. The maximum emission current of nanoneedle used in this study was 1.08 μA, and two different slopes in the corresponding F–N graph existed with work functions of the CuO nanoneedle being 1.12 and 0.58 eV. In comparison with the single CuO nanoneedle, the field enhancement β and parameter s of the CuO nanoneedle’s film arrays were also studied, which showed that the screening effect played a key role in the field-emission process.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: ZnO doping and properties · Nanowire Synthesis and Applications · Copper-based nanomaterials and applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (22)
Show source-provided references
1. Hsieha C-T, Chen J-M, Lin H-H, Shih H-C (2003) App Phys Lett 83(16):338310.1063/1.1619229 ↗
2. Chen J, Deng SZ, She JC, Xu NS, Zhang WX, Wen XG, Yang SH (2003) J Appl Phys 93(3):177410.1063/1.1536739 ↗
3. Chen US, Chueh YL, Lai SH, Chou LJ, Shih HC (2006) J Vac Sci Technol B 24(10):13910.1116/1.2151215 ↗
4. Gandhi S, Subramani RHH, Ramakrishnan T, Sivabalan A, Dhanalakshmi V, Nair MRG, Anbarasan R (2010) J Mater Sci 45(6):1688. doi: 10.1007/s10853-009-4158-410.1007/s10853-009-4158-4 ↗
5. Zhu YW, Yu T, Cheong FC, Xu XJ, Lim CT, Tan VBC, Thong JTL, Sow CH (2005) Nanotechnology 16:8810.1088/0957-4484/16/1/018 ↗
6. Filip V, Nicolaescu D, Tanemura M, Okuyama F (2001) Ultramicroscopy 89:3910.1016/S0304-3991(01)00107-3 ↗
7. Bonard J-M, Weiss N, Kind H, Stőckli T, Forró L, Kern K, Châtelain A (2001) Adv Mater 13(3):18410.1002/1521-4095(200102)13:3<184::AID-ADMA184>3.0.CO;2-I ↗
8. Cheng G, Wang SJ, Cheng K, Jiang XH, Wang LX, Li LS, Du ZL, Zou GT (2008) Appl Phys Lett 92:22311610.1063/1.2938694 ↗
9. She JC, An S, Deng SZ, Chen J, Xiao ZM, Zhou J, Xu NS (2007) Appl Phys Lett 90:073130
10. Xu Z, Bai XD, Wang EG, Wang ZL (2005) Appl Phys Lett 87:16310610.1063/1.2103420 ↗
11. Wang ZL, Gao RP, de Heer WA, Poncharal P (2002) Appl Phys Lett 80:85610.1063/1.1446994 ↗
12. Wang ZL, Poncharal P, de Heer WA (2000) Microsc Microanal 6:22410.1017/S1431927600000374 ↗
13. Liu YL, Liao L, Li JC, Pan CX (2007) J Phys Chem C 111:505010.1021/jp069043d ↗
14. Nicolaescu D, Filip V, Wilshaw PR (1996) Appl Surf Sci 94–95:7910.1016/0169-4332(95)00354-1 ↗
15. Nilsson L, Groening O, Emmenegger C, Kuettel O, Schaller E, Schlapbach L, Kind H, Bonard J-M, Kern K (2000) Appl Phys Lett 76:207110.1063/1.126258 ↗
16. Groning O, Kuttel OM, Emmenegger C, Groning P, Schlapbach L (2000) J Vac Sci Technol B 18:66510.1116/1.591258 ↗
17. Chueh YL, Lai MW, Liang JQ, Chou LJ, Wang ZL (2006) Adv Funct Mater 16(17):224310.1002/adfm.200600499 ↗
18. Peng XL (2000) Thin Solid Films 372:29210.1016/S0040-6090(00)01076-2 ↗
19. Boratd JM, Dean KA, Coll BF, Klinke C (2002) Phys Rev Lett 89:19760210.1103/PhysRevLett.89.197602 ↗
20. Kim CD, Jang HS, Lee SY, Lee HR, Roh YS, Rhee IS, Lee EW, Yang HS, Kim DH (2006) Nanotechnology 17(20):518010.1088/0957-4484/17/20/023 ↗
21. Seelaboyina R, Huang J, Park J, Kang DH, Choi WB (2006) Nanotechnology 17:484010.1088/0957-4484/17/19/010 ↗
22. Zhao Q, Xu J, Xu XY, Wang Z, Yu DP (2004) Appl Phys Lett 85(22):533110.1063/1.1825620 ↗