Bend formability and strength of Cu–Be–Co alloys
Source abstract
Abstract
The effects of addition of 0.01 and 0.03 wt% Mg on the bend formability and strength of a Cu-1.8 wt% Be-0.21 wt% Co alloy aged at 320 °C for 30 min have been investigated metallographically. The addition of Mg to the Cu-Be-Co alloy enhances the bend formability and strength of the alloy. The enhancement of strength is caused by the increase in volume fraction of γ I′ precipitates in the Cu matrix. In bending of the alloys with and without 0.01 and 0.03 wt% Mg, a number of micro necks first arise along grain boundaries, and part of them grows, resulting in surface wrinkles, which finally lead to surface cracking. The cracking is initiated from voids formed by destruction of bar-like γ precipitates in discontinuous precipitation (DP) cells and propagates along grain boundaries. The addition of Mg decreases the width of DP cells, resulting in better bend formability. This arises because smaller stress concentration due to less inhomogeneous deformation develops in cells and, as a result, destruction of the γ precipitates in cells occurs less easily as the cell width decreases. © 2011 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC. 金沢大学理工研究域機械工学系
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Microstructure and mechanical properties · Aluminum Alloys Composites Properties · Metal Forming Simulation Techniques
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (14)
Show source-provided references
1. Williams DB, Butler EP (1981) Int Met Rev 26:15310.1179/imr.1981.26.1.153 ↗
2. Chiba H, Muramatsu N, Takeda M (2006) J Jpn Res Inst Cu 45:76
3. Sugiyama M, Furukawa T (1964) J Jpn Inst Met 28:53010.2320/jinstmet1952.28.9_530 ↗
4. Murakami Y, Yoshida H, Kawashima T, Yamamoto S (1966) J Jpn Inst Met 30:50810.2320/jinstmet1952.30.5_508 ↗
5. Standard test method of bend formability for sheets and strips of copper and copper alloys in “JCBA (Japan Copper and Brass Association) technology standards” (JCBA, Tokyo, 2007)
6. Monzen R, Seo T, Sakai T, Watanabe C (2006) Mater Trans 47:292510.2320/matertrans.47.2925 ↗
7. Gerold V, Haberkorn H (1966) Phys Status Solidi 16:67510.1002/pssb.19660160234 ↗
8. Nagamura M, Ochiai S, Uehara T (1984) J Jpn Inst Light Met 34:51710.2464/jilm.34.517 ↗
9. Mori T, Osawa T (1979) Philos Mag 40:44510.1080/01418617908234851 ↗
10. Monzen R, Kawaguchi Y, Mori T (1982) Acta Metall 30:96510.1016/0001-6160(82)90204-8 ↗
11. Pawlek F, Reichel K (1956) Z Metallkde 47:347
12. Baumann SF, Michael J, Williams DB (1981) Acta Metall 29:134310.1016/0001-6160(81)90025-0 ↗
13. Monzen R, Watanabe C, Mino D, Saida S (2005) Acta Mater 53:125310.1016/j.actamat.2004.11.019 ↗
14. Nagayoshi H, Nishijima F, Watanabe C, Monzen R, Hara T (2006) J Jpn Inst Met 70:75010.2320/jinstmet.70.750 ↗