Modeling the damage evolution and recompression behavior during laser shock loading of aluminum microstructures at the mesoscales
Source abstract
Abstract
Damage evolution in metals during laser-shock loading (spallation) is a complex phenomenon accompanied by extremely high temperatures, pressures, and strain rates that affect the void nucleation/growth mechanisms. The current modeling efforts at the atomic scales to investigate the evolution of microstructure undergoing the spall failure at the atomic scales are limited to a hybrid atomistic–continuum method that combines the two-temperature model (TTM) with the molecular dynamics (MD) simulations. This manuscript demonstrates this capability by investigating the mechanisms of nucleation/evolution of voids for a nanocrystalline Al system experiencing an ultrafast laser pulse. This capability, however, is unable to model the laser shock response of experimental systems (with grain sizes greater than 100 nm and thicknesses in the microns) as well as the post-spall behavior (damage growth or recompression behavior). This work combines the TTM with the quasi-coarse-grained dynamics (QCGD) method to extend MD-TTM simulations to the mesoscales. The hybrid QCGD-TTM approach retains the laser energy absorption, heat generation/transfer, and microstructure evolution (melting, defects, and damage) behavior predicted by MD-TTM simulations. The QCGD-TTM simulations allow the investigation of the wave propagation behavior, the evolution of microstructure (defects and damage), temperature, and pressure at the time and length scales of laser-shock experiments. The QCGD-TTM simulations reported here investigate the nucleation and post-spall damage evolution behavior during spall failure of sc-Al and 0.5 µm grain-sized pc-Al films with a thickness of up to 2 µm. The QCGD-TTM-predicted damage evolution behavior captures the post-spall behavior observed experimentally and retains the atomistic characteristics of void nucleation and void collapse.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Surface Treatment and Residual Stress · High-Velocity Impact and Material Behavior · Ion-surface interactions and analysis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (65)
Show source-provided references
1. Meyers MA, Gregori F, Kad BK et al (2002) Laser-induced shock compression of monocrystalline copper: characterization and analysis. Acta Mater 51:1211–1228. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1359-6454(02)00420-210.1016/S1359-6454(02)00420-2 ↗
2. Eliezer S, Moshe E, Eliezer DAN (2002) Laser-induced tension to measure the ultimate strength of metals related to the equation of state. Laser Part Beams 20:87–92. https://doi.org/10.1017/S026303460220112310.1017/S0263034602201123 ↗
3. Remington TP, Hahn EN, Zhao S et al (2018) Spall strength dependence on grain size and strain rate in tantalum. Acta Mater 158:313. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2018.07.04810.1016/j.actamat.2018.07.048 ↗
4. Remington TP, Remington BA, Hahn EN, Meyers MA (2017) Deformation and failure in extreme regimes by high-energy pulsed lasers: a review. Mater Sci Eng, A 688:429. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2017.01.11410.1016/j.msea.2017.01.114 ↗
5. Ashitkov SI, Komapov PS, Agranat MB, Kanel GI, Fortov VE (2014) Measurements of strength of metals in a picosecond time range. J Phys Conf Ser 500:112006. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/500/11/11200610.1088/1742-6596/500/11/112006 ↗
6. Agranat MB, Ashitkov SI, Komarov PS (2014) Metal behavior near theoretical ultimate strength in experiments with femtosecond laser pulses. Mech Solids 49:643–648. https://doi.org/10.3103/S002565441406005310.3103/S0025654414060053 ↗
7. Cuq-Lelandais JP, Boustie M, Berthe L et al (2009) Spallation generated by femtosecond laser driven shocks in thin metallic targets. J Phys D Appl Phys 42:065402. https://doi.org/10.1088/0022-3727/42/6/06540210.1088/0022-3727/42/6/065402 ↗
8. Morard G, de Rességuier T, Vinci T et al (2010) High-power laser shock-induced dynamic fragmentation of iron foils. Phys Rev B 82:174102. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.82.17410210.1103/PhysRevB.82.174102 ↗
9. Tomko JA, Giri A, Donovan BF, Bubb DM, O’Malley SM, Hopkins PE (2017) Energy confinement and thermal boundary conductance effects on short-pulsed thermal ablation thresholds in thin films. Physi Rev B 96:014108. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.96.01410810.1103/PhysRevB.96.014108 ↗
10. Meyers MA, Taylor Aimone C (1983) Dynamic fracture (spalling) of metals. Prog Mater Sci 28:1–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/0079-6425(83)90003-810.1016/0079-6425(83)90003-8 ↗
11. Curran DR, Seaman L, Shockey DA (1987) Dynamic failure of solids. Phys Rep 147:253–388. https://doi.org/10.1016/0370-1573(87)90049-410.1016/0370-1573(87)90049-4 ↗
12. Crowhurst JC, Armstrong MR, Knight KB, Zaug JM, Behymer EM (2011) Invariance of the dissipative action at ultrahigh strain rates above the strong shock threshold. Phys Rev Lett 107:144302. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.107.14430210.1103/PhysRevLett.107.144302 ↗
13. Whitley VH, McGrane SD, Eakins DE, Bolme CA, Moore DS, Bingert JF (2011) The elastic-plastic response of aluminum films to ultrafast laser-generated shocks. J Appl Phys. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.350669610.1063/1.3506696 ↗
14. Kanel GI (2014) Unusual behaviour of usual materials in shock waves. J Phys Conf Ser 500:01200110.1088/1742-6596/500/1/012001 ↗
15. Zaretsky EB, Kanel GI (2012) Effect of temperature, strain, and strain rate on the flow stress of aluminum under shock-wave compression. J Appl Phys 112:073504. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.475579210.1063/1.4755792 ↗
16. Kanel GI, Razorenov SV, Baumung K, Singer J (2001) Dynamic yield and tensile strength of aluminum single crystals at temperatures up to the melting point. J Appl Phys 90:136–143. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.137447810.1063/1.1374478 ↗
17. Agranat MB, Ashitkov SI, Komarov PS (2015) Metal behavior near theoretical ultimate strength in experiments with femtosecond laser pulses. Mech Solids 49:643–648. https://doi.org/10.3103/s002565441406005310.3103/s0025654414060053 ↗
18. Kanel GI (2010) Spall fracture: methodological aspects, mechanisms and governing factors. Int J Fract 163:173–191. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10704-009-9438-010.1007/s10704-009-9438-0 ↗
19. Dalton DA, Brewer J, Bernstein AC et al (2008) Laser-induced spall of aluminum and aluminum alloys at high strain rates. AIP Conf Proc 501:501–504. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.283311910.1063/1.2833119 ↗
20. Moshe E, Eliezer S, Henis Z et al (2000) Experimental measurements of the strength of metals approaching the theoretical limit predicted by the equation of state. Appl Phys Lett 76:1555–1557. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.12609410.1063/1.126094 ↗
21. Moshe E, Eliezer S, Dekel E et al (1998) An increase of the spall strength in aluminum, copper, and metglas at strain rates larger than 107 s−1. J Appl Phys 83:4004–4011. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.36722210.1063/1.367222 ↗
22. Tamura H, Kohama T, Kondo K, Yoshida M (2001) Femtosecond-laser-induced spallation in aluminum. J Appl Phys 89:3520–3522. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.134699610.1063/1.1346996 ↗
23. Ashitkov SI, Agranat MB, Kanel’ GI, Komarov PS, Fortov VE (2010) Behavior of aluminum near an ultimate theoretical strength in experiments with femtosecond laser pulses. JETP Lett 92:516–520. https://doi.org/10.1134/s002136401020005110.1134/s0021364010200051 ↗
24. Sokolowski-Tinten K, Blome C, Blums J et al (2003) Femtosecond X-ray measurement of coherent lattice vibrations near the Lindemann stability limit. Nature 422:287–289. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature0149010.1038/nature01490 ↗
25. Williamson S, Mourou G, Li JCM (1984) Time-resolved laser-induced phase transformation in aluminum. Phys Rev Lett 52:2364–2367. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.52.236410.1103/PhysRevLett.52.2364 ↗
26. Zhu P, Chen J, Li R et al (2013) Laser-induced short-range disorder in aluminum revealed by ultrafast electron diffuse scattering. Appl Phys Lett 103:231914. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.484035510.1063/1.4840355 ↗
27. Martin AA, Calta NP, Hammons JA et al (2019) Ultrafast dynamics of laser-metal interactions in additive manufacturing alloys captured by in situ X-ray imaging. Mater Today Adv 1:100002. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtadv.2019.01.00110.1016/j.mtadv.2019.01.001 ↗
28. Lind J, Jensen BJ, Barham M, Kumar M (2018) In situ dynamic compression wave behavior in additively manufactured lattice materials. J Mater Res 34:2–19. https://doi.org/10.1557/jmr.2018.35110.1557/jmr.2018.351 ↗
29. Sliwa M, McGonegle D, Wehrenberg C et al (2018) Femtosecond X-ray diffraction studies of the reversal of the microstructural effects of plastic deformation during shock release of tantalum. Phys Rev Lett 120:265502. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.120.26550210.1103/PhysRevLett.120.265502 ↗
30. Milathianaki D, Boutet S, Williams GJ et al (2013) Femtosecond visualization of lattice dynamics in shock-compressed matter. Science 342:220–223. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.123956610.1126/science.1239566 ↗
31. Remington BA, Bazan G, Belak J et al (2004) Materials science under extreme conditions of pressure and strain rate. Metall Mater Transac A 35:2587–2607. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11661-004-0205-610.1007/s11661-004-0205-6 ↗
32. Turley WD, Stevens GD, Hixson RS et al (2016) Explosive-induced shock damage in copper and recompression of the damaged region. J Appl Phys 120:085904. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.496201310.1063/1.4962013 ↗
33. Becker R, LeBlanc MM, Cazamias JU (2007) Characterization of recompressed spall in copper gas gun targets. J Appl Phys 102:093512. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.280258910.1063/1.2802589 ↗
34. Zhigilei LV, Volkov AN, Dongare AM (2012) Computational Study of Nanomaterials: From Large-Scale Atomistic Simulations to Mesoscopic Modeling. In: Bhushan B. (eds) Encyclopedia of Nanotechnology. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-9751-4_40310.1007/978-90-481-9751-4_403 ↗
35. Clayton JD (2018) Mesoscale models of interface mechanics in crystalline solids: a review. J Mater Sci 53:5515–5545. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-017-1596-210.1007/s10853-017-1596-2 ↗
36. Dongare AM, LaMattina B, Rajendran AM (2011) Atomic scale studies of spall behavior in single crystal Cu. Proc Eng 10:3636–3641. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2011.04.59810.1016/j.proeng.2011.04.598 ↗
37. Mackenchery K, Valisetty RR, Namburu RR, Stukowski A, Rajendran AM, Dongare AM (2016) Dislocation evolution and peak spall strengths in single crystal and nanocrystalline Cu. J Appl Phys 119:044301. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.493986710.1063/1.4939867 ↗
38. Srinivasan SG, Baskes MI, Wagner GJ (2007) Atomistic simulations of shock induced microstructural evolution and spallation in single crystal nickel. J Appl Phys 101:043504. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.242308410.1063/1.2423084 ↗
39. Ravelo R, Germann TC, Guerrero O, An Q, Holian BL (2013) Shock-induced plasticity in tantalum single crystals: interatomic potentials and large-scale molecular-dynamics simulations. Phys Rev B 88:134101. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.88.13410110.1103/PhysRevB.88.134101 ↗
40. Agarwal G, Dongare AM (2016) Shock wave propagation and spall failure in single crystal Mg at atomic scales. J Appl Phys 119:145901. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.494494210.1063/1.4944942 ↗
41. Huang Y, Xiong Y, Li P et al (2019) Atomistic studies of shock-induced plasticity and phase transition in iron-based single crystal with edge dislocation. Int J Plast 114:215–226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijplas.2018.11.00410.1016/j.ijplas.2018.11.004 ↗
42. Dongare AM, Rajendran AM, LaMattina B, Zikry MA, Brenner DW (2010) Atomic scale studies of spall behavior in nanocrystalline Cu. J Appl Phys 108:113518. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.351782710.1063/1.3517827 ↗
43. Valisetty R, Dongare AM, Ianni J (2019) High performance computing simulations of spall phenomenon in a submicron thick nanocrystalline aluminum. Modell Simul Mater Sci Eng 27:065015. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-651x/ab279610.1088/1361-651x/ab2796 ↗
44. Chen J, Hahn EN, Dongare AM, Fensin SJ (2019) Understanding and predicting damage and failure at grain boundaries in BCC Ta. J Appl Phys 126:165902. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.511183710.1063/1.5111837 ↗
45. Anisimov SI, Kapeliovich BL, Perel'man TL (1974) Electron emission from metal surfaces exposed to ultrashort laser pulses. Sov Phys -JETP 39(2):375–377
46. Hakkinen H, Landman U (1993) Superheating, melting, and annealing of copper surfaces. Phys Rev Lett 71:1023–1026. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.71.102310.1103/PhysRevLett.71.1023 ↗
47. Schäfer C, Urbassek HM, Zhigilei LV (2002) Metal ablation by picosecond laser pulses: a hybrid simulation. Phys Rev B 66:115404. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.66.11540410.1103/PhysRevB.66.115404 ↗
48. Ivanov DS, Zhigilei LV (2003) Combined atomistic-continuum modeling of short-pulse laser melting and disintegration of metal films. Phys Rev B 68:064114. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.68.06411410.1103/PhysRevB.68.064114 ↗
49. Ivanov DS, Zhigilei LV (2007) Kinetic limit of heterogeneous melting in metals. Phys Rev Lett 98:195701. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.98.19570110.1103/PhysRevLett.98.195701 ↗
50. Lin Z, Zhigilei LV, Celli V (2008) Electron-phonon coupling and electron heat capacity of metals under conditions of strong electron-phonon nonequilibrium. Phys Rev B 77:075133. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.77.07513310.1103/PhysRevB.77.075133 ↗
51. Ivanov DS, Zhigilei LV (2004) Combined atomistic-continuum model for simulation of laser interaction with metals: application in the calculation of melting thresholds in Ni targets of varying thickness. Appl Phys A 79:977–981. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00339-004-2607-010.1007/s00339-004-2607-0 ↗
52. Galitskiy S, Ivanov DS, Dongare AM (2018) Dynamic evolution of microstructure during laser shock loading and spall failure of single crystal Al at the atomic scales. J Appl Phys 124:205901. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.505161810.1063/1.5051618 ↗
53. Dongare AM (2014) Quasi-coarse-grained dynamics: modelling of metallic materials at mesoscales. Phil Mag 94:3877–3897. https://doi.org/10.1080/14786435.2014.96199210.1080/14786435.2014.961992 ↗
54. Agarwal G, Dongare AM (2017) Modeling the thermodynamic behavior and shock response of Ti systems at the atomic scales and the mesoscales. J Mater Sci 52:10853–10870. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-017-1243-y10.1007/s10853-017-1243-y ↗
55. Agarwal G, Valisetty RR, Namburu RR, Rajendran AM, Dongare AM (2017) The quasi-coarse-grained dynamics method to unravel the mesoscale evolution of defects/damage during shock loading and spall failure of polycrystalline Al microstructures. Sci Rep 7:12376. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-12340-410.1038/s41598-017-12340-4 ↗
56. Agarwal G, Dongare AM (2018) Defect and damage evolution during spallation of single crystal Al: comparison between molecular dynamics and quasi-coarse-grained dynamics simulations. Comput Mater Sci 145:68–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.commatsci.2017.12.03210.1016/j.commatsci.2017.12.032 ↗
57. Suresh S, Lee S-W, Aindow M, Brody H, Champagne VR, Dongare AM (2020) Unraveling mesoscale evolution of pressure, temperature, and strains during cold spray single particle Impact. Acta Mater. 182:197. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-28437-310.1038/s41598-018-28437-3 ↗
58. Suresh S, Lee S-W, Aindow M, Brody HD, Champagne VK, Dongare AM (2020) Mesoscale modeling of jet initiation behavior and microstructural evolution during cold spray single particle impact. Acta Mater 182:197–206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2019.10.03910.1016/j.actamat.2019.10.039 ↗
59. Agarwal G, Valisetty RR, Dongare AMM (2020) Shock wave compression behavior and dislocation density evolution in Al microstructures at the atomic scales and the mesoscales. Int J Plast 128:102678. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijplas.2020.10267810.1016/j.ijplas.2020.102678 ↗
60. Derlet PM, Van Swygenhoven H (2003) Atomic positional disorder in fcc metal nanocrystalline grain boundaries. Phys Rev B. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.67.01420210.1103/PhysRevB.67.014202 ↗
61. Mishin Y, Farkas D, Mehl MJ, Papaconstantopoulos DA (1999) Interatomic potentials for monoatomic metals from experimental data and ab initio calculations. Phys Rev B 59:3393–3407. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.59.339310.1103/PhysRevB.59.3393 ↗
62. Kelchner CL, Plimpton SJ, Hamilton JC (1998) Dislocation nucleation and defect structure during surface indentation. Phys Rev B 58:11085–11088. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.58.1108510.1103/PhysRevB.58.11085 ↗
63. Honeycutt DJ, Anderse HC (1987) Molecular dynamics study of melting and frrezing of small Leonard-Jones clusters. J Phys Chem 91:4950–4963. https://doi.org/10.1021/j100303a01410.1021/j100303a014 ↗
64. Dongare AM (2020) Challenges to model the role of heterogeneities on the shock response and spall failure of metallic materials at the mesoscales. J Mater Sci 55:3157–3166. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-019-04260-710.1007/s10853-019-04260-7 ↗
65. Stukowski A, Bulatov VV, Arsenlis A (2012) Automated identification and indexing of dislocations in crystal interfaces. Modell Simul Mater Sci Eng. https://doi.org/10.1088/0965-0393/20/8/08500710.1088/0965-0393/20/8/085007 ↗