Preparation of antimicrobial wound dressings via thiol–ene photopolymerization reaction
Source abstract
Abstract
Preparation of poly (urethane-acrylate) based wound dressings with the ability to boost self-healing of skin tissue through physical protection and maintaining hygiene and moist environment over wounded area is described in the present work. The dressings were prepared via a visible-light induced thiol–ene photopolymerization reaction of a mixture consisting methacrylate urethane prepolymers with hydrophilic and hydrophobic backbones, a quaternary ammonium salt containing methacrylate monomer as an antimicrobial agent, hydroxyethyl methacrylate as reactive diluent and a tetra-functional thiol molecule as a transfer agent. The prepared dressings were characterized and their performance as wound dressings were evaluated through measuring their equilibrium water absorption (EWA), water vapor transmission rate (WVTR), mechanical, and biological properties. Based on recorded data, the optimized dressing formulation had suitable tensile strength even at fully hydrated state and it could preserve the appropriate moist environment by balanced EWA and WVTR ratio. MTT assay confirmed proper cytocompatibility of those dressings containing optimized concentration of quaternary ammonium salt containing monomer (20 wt% or less). Examination of antibacterial activity against different Gram positive, Gram negative bacteria and a fungal strain revealed a complete killing ability for those dressings containing at least 20 wt% of quaternary ammonium salt containing monomer.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Antimicrobial agents and applications · Wound Healing and Treatments · Photopolymerization techniques and applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (34)
Show source-provided references
1. Boateng JS, Matthews KH, Stevens HNE, Eccleston GM (2008) Wound healing dressings and drug delivery systems: a review. J Pharm Sci 97:2892–2923. doi: 10.1002/jps.2121010.1002/jps.21210 ↗
2. Stashak TS, Farstvedt E, Othic A (2004) Update on wound dressings: indications and best use. Clin Tech Equine Pract 3:148–163. doi: 10.1053/j.ctep.2004.08.00610.1053/j.ctep.2004.08.006 ↗
3. Hanna JR, Giacopelli JA (1997) A review of wound healing and wound dressing products. J Foot Ankle Surg 36:2–14. doi: 10.1016/S1067-2516(97)80003-810.1016/S1067-2516(97)80003-8 ↗
4. Sweeney IR, Miraftab M, Collyer G (2012) A critical review of modern and emerging absorbent dressings used to treat exuding wounds. Int Wound J 9:601–612. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-481X.2011.00923.x10.1111/j.1742-481X.2011.00923.x ↗
5. Yari A, Yeganeh H, Bakhshi H (2012) Synthesis and evaluation of novel absorptive and antibacterial polyurethane membranes as wound dressing. J Mater Sci Mater Med 23:2187–2202. doi: 10.1007/s10856-012-4683-610.1007/s10856-012-4683-6 ↗
6. Golas PL, Matyjaszewski K, Stenzel MH et al (2010) Marrying click chemistry with polymerization: expanding the scope of polymeric materials. Chem Soc Rev 39:1338–1354. doi: 10.1039/B901978M10.1039/B901978M ↗
7. Binder WH, Sachsenhofer R (2008) “Click” chemistry in polymer and material science: an update. Macromol Rapid Commun 29:952–981. doi: 10.1002/marc.20080008910.1002/marc.200800089 ↗
8. Lowe AB, Lin CC, Scott TF et al (2014) Thiol–ene “click” reactions and recent applications in polymer and materials synthesis: a first update. Polym Chem 5:4820–4870. doi: 10.1039/C4PY00339J10.1039/C4PY00339J ↗
9. Hvilsted S (2012) Facile design of biomaterials by “click” chemistry. Polym Int 61:485–494. doi: 10.1002/pi.413510.1002/pi.4135 ↗
10. Hoyle CE, Bowman CN (2010) Thiol–ene click chemistry. Angew Chem Int Ed 49:1540–1573. doi: 10.1002/anie.20090392410.1002/anie.200903924 ↗
11. Hoyle CE, Lowe AB, Bowman CN et al (2010) Thiol-click chemistry: a multifaceted toolbox for small molecule and polymer synthesis. Chem Soc Rev 39:1355–1387. doi: 10.1039/b901979k10.1039/b901979k ↗
12. Aimetti AA, Machen AJ, Anseth KS (2009) Poly(ethylene glycol) hydrogels formed by thiol–ene photopolymerization for enzyme-responsive protein delivery. Biomaterials 30:6048–6054. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.07.04310.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.07.043 ↗
13. Cleophas RTC, Riool M, Quarles Van Ufford HC et al (2014) Convenient preparation of bactericidal hydrogels by covalent attachment of stabilized antimicrobial peptides using thiol–ene click chemistry. ACS Macro Lett 3:477–480. doi: 10.1021/mz500146510.1021/mz5001465 ↗
14. Kim M, Song C, Han DK et al (2015) Allylimidazolium salt based antibacterial polymer coatings produced by thiol–ene photocuring. React Funct Polym 87:53–60. doi: 10.1016/j.reactfunctpolym.2015.01.00110.1016/j.reactfunctpolym.2015.01.001 ↗
15. Beigi Burujeny S, Atai M, Yeganeh H (2015) Assessments of antibacterial and physico-mechanical properties for dental materials with chemically anchored quaternary ammonium moieties: thiol–ene–methacrylate vs. conventional methacrylate system. Dent Mater 31:244–261. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2014.12.01410.1016/j.dental.2014.12.014 ↗
16. Lu G, Wu D, Fu R (2007) Studies on the synthesis and antibacterial activities of polymeric quaternary ammonium salts from dimethylaminoethyl methacrylate. React Funct Polym 67:355–366. doi: 10.1016/j.reactfunctpolym.2007.01.00810.1016/j.reactfunctpolym.2007.01.008 ↗
17. Yari A, Yeganeh H, Bakhshi H, Gharibi R (2014) Preparation and characterization of novel antibacterial castor oil-based polyurethane membranes for wound dressing application. J Biomed Mater Res Part A 102:84–96. doi: 10.1002/jbm.a.3467210.1002/jbm.a.34672 ↗
18. Gharibi R, Yeganeh H, Gholami H, Hassan ZM (2014) Aniline tetramer embedded polyurethane/siloxane membranes and their corresponding nanosilver composites as intelligent wound dressing materials. RSC Adv 4:62046–62060. doi: 10.1039/C4RA11454J10.1039/C4RA11454J ↗
19. Rezapour-Lactoee A, Yeganeh H, Ostad SN et al (2016) Thermoresponsive polyurethane/siloxane membrane for wound dressing and cell sheet transplantation: in-vitro and in-vivo studies. Mater Sci Eng C 69:804–814. doi: 10.1016/j.msec.2016.07.06710.1016/j.msec.2016.07.067 ↗
20. Gharibi R, Yeganeh H, Rezapour-Lactoee A, Hassan ZM (2015) Stimulation of wound healing by electroactive, antibacterial, and antioxidant polyurethane/siloxane dressing membranes. In vitro and in vivo evaluations. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 7:24296–24311. doi: 10.1021/acsami.5b0837610.1021/acsami.5b08376 ↗
21. Fouassier JP, Allonas X, Burget D (2003) Photopolymerization reactions under visible lights: principle, mechanisms and examples of applications. Prog Org Coat 47:16–36. doi: 10.1016/S0300-9440(03)00011-010.1016/S0300-9440(03)00011-0 ↗
22. Shao J, Huang Y, Fan QB (2014) Visible light initiating systems for photopolymerization: status, development and challenges. Polym Chem 5:4195–4210. doi: 10.1039/c4py00072b10.1039/c4py00072b ↗
23. Xu H, Chang J, Chen Y et al (2013) Asymmetric polyurethane membrane with inflammation-responsive antibacterial activity for potential wound dressing application. J Mater Sci 48:6625–6639. doi: 10.1007/s10853-013-7461-z10.1007/s10853-013-7461-z ↗
24. Liu L, Hu D, Xu G et al (2013) Fabrication and evaluation of polyurethane-based asymmetric membranes. J Mater Sci 48:1902–1910. doi: 10.1007/s10853-012-6954-510.1007/s10853-012-6954-5 ↗
25. Abdali Z, Yeganeh H, Solouk A et al (2015) Thermoresponsive antimicrobial wound dressings via simultaneous thiol–ene polymerization and in situ generation of silver nanoparticles. RSC Adv 5:66024–66036. doi: 10.1039/C5RA11618J10.1039/C5RA11618J ↗
26. Cutting KF (2003) Wound exudate: composition and functions. Br J Community Nurs 8:S4–S9. doi: 10.12968/bjcn.2003.8.Sup3.1157710.12968/bjcn.2003.8.Sup3.11577 ↗
27. Field FK, Kerstein MD (1994) Overview of wound healing in a moist environment. Am J Surg 167:2S–6S10.1016/0002-9610(94)90002-7 ↗
28. Cutting KF (2009) Managing wound exudate using a super-absorbent polymer dressing: a 53-patient clinical evaluation. J Wound Care 18:200–205. doi: 10.12968/jowc.2009.18.5.4217410.12968/jowc.2009.18.5.42174 ↗
29. Yoo H-J, Kim H-D (2008) Characteristics of waterborne polyurethane/poly(N-vinylpyrrolidone) composite films for wound-healing dressings. J Appl Polym Sci 107:331–338. doi: 10.1002/app.2697010.1002/app.26970 ↗
30. Jin Ho Lee JH, Hai Bang Lee HB (1993) A wettability gradient as a tool to study protein adsorption and cell adhesion on polymer surfaces. J Biomater Sci Polym Ed 4:467–481. doi: 10.1163/156856293X0013110.1163/156856293X00131 ↗
31. Díez-Pascual AM, Díez-Vicente AL (2015) Wound healing bionanocomposites based on castor oil polymeric films reinforced with Chitosan-modified ZnO nanoparticles. Biomacromolecules 16:2631–2644. doi: 10.1021/acs.biomac.5b0044710.1021/acs.biomac.5b00447 ↗
32. Sudheesh Kumar PT, Lakshmanan VK, Anilkumar TV et al (2012) Flexible and microporous chitosan hydrogel/nano ZnO composite bandages for wound dressing: in vitro and in vivo evaluation. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 4:2618–2629. doi: 10.1021/am300292v10.1021/am300292v ↗
33. Bertal K, Shepherd J, Douglas CWI et al (2009) Antimicrobial activity of novel biocompatible wound dressings based on triblock copolymer hydrogels. J Mater Sci 44:6233–6246. doi: 10.1007/s10853-009-3843-710.1007/s10853-009-3843-7 ↗
34. Jiao Y, Niu L, Ma S et al (2017) Quaternary ammonium-based biomedical materials: state-of-the-art, toxicological aspects and antimicrobial resistance. Prog Polym Sci 71:53–90. doi: 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2017.03.00110.1016/j.progpolymsci.2017.03.001 ↗