journal article·2017-09

Modeling the thermodynamic behavior and shock response of Ti systems at the atomic scales and the mesoscales

Garvit Agarwal, Avinash M. Dongare

Journal of Materials Science· Volume 52· Issue 18
Publisher page

Abstract

The ‘quasi-coarse-grained dynamics’ (QCGD) method is extended to model the thermodynamic behavior and the shock response of HCP Ti systems at the mesoscales by coarse-graining the atomistic microstructure using representative atoms (R-atoms) and scaled interatomic potentials. To demonstrate the capability of the QCGD method, the melting behavior of a single-crystal slab of HCP Ti and the dynamic failure (spallation) behavior of nanocrystalline systems under shock loading conditions are first investigated using molecular dynamics (MD) simulations using an embedded atom method interatomic potential for Ti. The melting simulation suggests an interplay between the nucleation and propagation of the surface-induced heterogeneous melting and the nucleation and propagation of bulk homogeneous melting of the system. In addition, the spall strengths calculated using MD at strain rates of 1010 s−1 allow the development of improved models for the strain rate dependence of the spall strength determined experimentally at 105 s−1. The QCGD method is observed to be capable of reproducing the MD-predicted kinetics of melting and the shock response and spall failure of nanocrystalline Ti systems using a coarse-grained microstructure comprising of representative atoms (R-atoms). The QCGD simulations demonstrate the ability to model the mesoscale behavior of Ti systems by modeling the shock deformation and failure due to spallation of a 1 µm × 1 µm × 2 µm sized system at strain rates of 108 s−1 to bridge the gap between MD simulations and experiments.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Energetic Materials and Combustion · High-pressure geophysics and materials · High-Velocity Impact and Material Behavior

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (41)

Show source-provided references
1. Cain V, Thijs L, Van Humbeeck J, Van Hooreweder B, Knutsen R (2015) Crack propagation and fracture toughness of Ti-6Al-4V alloy produced by selective laser melting. Addit Manuf 5:68–7610.1016/j.addma.2014.12.006 ↗
2. Gong H, Rafi K, Gu H, Starr T, Stucker B (2014) Analysis of defect generation in Ti-6Al-4V parts made using powder bed fusion additive manufacturing processes. Addit Manuf 1–4:87–9810.1016/j.addma.2014.08.002 ↗
3. Mower TM, Long MJ (2016) Mechanical behavior of additive manufactured, powder-bed laser-fused materials. Mater Sci Eng A 651:198–21310.1016/j.msea.2015.10.068 ↗
4. Wauthle R, Vrancken B, Beynaerts B, Jorissen K, Schrooten J, Kruth J, Humbeeck JV (2015) Effects of build orientation and heat treatment on the microstructure and mechanical properties of selective laser melted Ti6Al4V lattice structures. Addit Manuf 5:77–8410.1016/j.addma.2014.12.008 ↗
5. National Research Council (2011) Opportunities in protection materials science and technology for future army applications. The National Academies Press, Washington, DC
6. Meyers MA, Subhash G, Kada BK, Prasad L (1994) Evolution of microstructure and shear-band formation in α-hcp titanium. Mech Mater 17:175–19310.1016/0167-6636(94)90058-2 ↗
7. Montgomery JS, Wells MGH, Roopchand B, Ogilvy JW (1997) Low-cost titanium armors for combat vehicles. JOM 49:45–4710.1007/BF02914684 ↗
8. Nemat-Nasser S, Guo WG, Cheng JY (1999) Mechanical properties and deformation mechanisms of a commercially pure titanium. Acta Mater 47:3705–372010.1016/S1359-6454(99)00203-7 ↗
9. Chichili DR, Ramesh KT, Hemker KT (1998) The high-strain-rate response of alpha-titanium: experiments, deformation mechanisms and modeling. Acta Mater 46:1025–104310.1016/S1359-6454(97)00287-5 ↗
10. Khan AS, Yu S (2012) Deformation induced anisotropic responses of Ti–6Al–4V alloy. Part I: experiments. Int J Plast 38:1–1310.1016/j.ijplas.2012.03.015 ↗
11. Ghaderi A, Barnett MR (2011) Sensitivity of deformation twinning to grain size in titanium and magnesium. Acta Mater 59:7824–783910.1016/j.actamat.2011.09.018 ↗
12. Huang W, Zan X, Nie X, Gong M, Wang Y, Xia Y (2007) Experimental study on the dynamic tensile behavior of a poly-crystal pure titanium at elevated temperatures. Mat Sci Eng A 443:33–4110.1016/j.msea.2006.06.041 ↗
13. Curran DR, Seaman L, Shockey DA (1987) Dynamic failure of solids. Phys Rep 147:253–38810.1016/0370-1573(87)90049-4 ↗
14. Meyers MA (1994) Dynamic behavior of materials. Wiley-Interscience, New York10.1002/9780470172278 ↗
15. Dandekar DP, Spletzer SV (2000) Shock response of Ti-6Al-4V. AIP Conf Proc 505:427–43010.1063/1.1303508 ↗
16. Boidin X, Chevrier P, Klepaczko JR, Sabar H (2006) Identification of damage mechanism and validation of a fracture model based on mesoscale approach in spalling of titanium alloy. Int J Solids Struct 43:4595–461510.1016/j.ijsolstr.2005.06.039 ↗
17. Xue Q, Meyers MA, Nesterenko VF (2002) Self-organization of shear bands in titanium and Ti–6Al–4V alloy. Acta Mater 50:575–59610.1016/S1359-6454(01)00356-1 ↗
18. Meyers MA, Subhash G, Kad BK, Prasad L (1994) Evolution of microstructure and shear-band formation in α-hcp titanium. Mech Mater 17:175–19310.1016/0167-6636(94)90058-2 ↗
19. Meyers MA, Pak HR (1986) Observation of an adiabatic shear band in titanium by high-voltage transmission electron microscopy. Acta Metall Mater 34:2493–249910.1016/0001-6160(86)90152-5 ↗
20. Remington BA, Bazan G, Belak J, Bringa E, Caturla M, Colvin JD, Edwards MJ, Glendinning SG, Ivanov DS, Kad B, Kalantar DH, Kumar M, Lasinski BF, Lorenz KT, McNaney JM, Meyerhofer DD, Meyers MA, Pollaine SM, Rowley D, Schneider M, Stölken JS, Wark JS, Weber SV, Wolfer WG, Yaakobi B, Zhigilei LV (2004) Materials science under extreme conditions of pressure and strain rate. Metall Mater Trans A 35:2587–260710.1007/s11661-004-0205-6 ↗
21. Whelchel RL, Mehoke DS, Iyer KA, Sanders TH Jr, Thadani NN (2016) Dynamic yielding and fracture of grade 4 titanium in plate impact experiments. J Appl Phys 119:11590110.1063/1.4943777 ↗
22. Kanel GI, Razorenov SV, Fortov VE (1987) Spall resistance of metals over a wide range of shock load amplitudes. Acad Sci USSR-Dokl 294:350
23. Ivanov DS, Zhigilei LV (2003) Combined atomistic-continuum modeling of short-pulse laser melting and disintegration of metal films. Phys Rev B 68:06411410.1103/PhysRevB.68.064114 ↗
24. Lin Z, Leveugle E, Bringa EM, Zhigilei LV (2010) Molecular dynamics simulation of laser melting of nanocrystalline Au. J Phys Chem C 114:5686–569910.1021/jp909328q ↗
25. Sedao X, Shugaev MV, Wu C, Douillard T, Esnouf C, Maurice C, Reynaud S, Pigeon F, Garrelie F, Zhigilei LV, Colombier J-P (2016) Growth twinning and generation of high-frequency surface nanostructures in ultrafast laser-induced transient melting and resolidification. ACS Nano 10:6995–700710.1021/acsnano.6b02970 ↗
26. Mackenchery K, Valisetty R, Stukowski A, Namburu R, Rajendran AM, Dongare AM (2016) Dislocation evolution and peak spall strengths in single crystal and nanocrystalline Cu. J Appl Phys 119:04430110.1063/1.4939867 ↗
27. Srinivasan SG, Baskes MI, Wagner GJ (2007) Atomistic simulations of shock induced microstructural evolution and spallation in single crystal nickel. J Appl Phys 101:04350410.1063/1.2423084 ↗
28. Ravelo R, Germann TC, Guerrero O, An Q, Holian BL (2013) Shock-induced plasticity in tantalum single crystals: interatomic potentials and large-scale molecular dynamics simulations. Phys Rev B 88:13410110.1103/PhysRevB.88.134101 ↗
29. Dongare AM, Rajendran AM, LaMattina B, Zikry MA, Brenner DW (2009) Atomic scale simulations of ductile failure micromechanisms in nanocrystalline Cu at high strain rates. Phys Rev B 80:10410810.1103/PhysRevB.80.104108 ↗
30. Dongare AM, Rajendran AM, Lamattina B, Zikry MA, Brenner DW (2010) Atomic scale studies of spall behavior in nanocrystalline Cu. J Appl Phys 108:11351810.1063/1.3517827 ↗
31. Dongare AM, Lamattina B, Rajendran AM (2011) Atomic scale studies of spall behavior in single crystal Cu. Procedia Eng 10:3636–364110.1016/j.proeng.2011.04.598 ↗
32. Bringa EM, Caro A, Wang Y, Victoria M, McNaney JM, Remington BA, Smith RF, Torralva BR, Van Swygenhoven H (2005) Ultrahigh strength in nanocrystalline materials under shock loading. Science 309:1838–184110.1126/science.1116723 ↗
33. Agarwal G, Dongare AM (2016) Shock wave propagation and spall failure in single crystal Mg at atomic scales. J Appl Phys 119:14590110.1063/1.4944942 ↗
34. Dongare AM (2014) Quasi-coarse-grained dynamics: modeling of metallic materials at mesoscales. Phil Mag 94:3877–389710.1080/14786435.2014.961992 ↗
35. Zhou XW, Johnson RA, Wadley HNG (2004) Misfit-energy-increasing dislocations in vapor-deposited CoFe/NiFe multilayers. Phys Rev B 69:14411310.1103/PhysRevB.69.144113 ↗
36. Mishin Y, Mehl MJ, Papaconstantopoulos DA, Voter AF, Kress JD (2001) Structural stability and lattice defects in copper: Ab initio, tight-binding and embedded-atom calculations. Phys Rev B 63:22410610.1103/PhysRevB.63.224106 ↗
37. Mackenchery K, Dongare AM (2015) Shock Hugoniot Behavior of single crystal titanium using atomistic simulations. In: Proceedings of 2015 shock compression of condensed matter (accepted, in press)
38. Honeycutt DJ, Andersen HC (1987) Molecular dynamics study of melting and freezing of small Lennard-Jones clusters. J Phys Chem 91:4950–496310.1021/j100303a014 ↗
39. Kelchner CL, Plimpton SJ, Hamilton JC (1998) Dislocation nucleation and defect structure during surface indentation. Phys Rev B 58:1108510.1103/PhysRevB.58.11085 ↗
40. Chase MW (1998) NIST-JANAF thermochemical tables. American Institute of Physics, Washington, DC
41. Marsh SP (1980) LASL Shock Hugoniot data. University of California Press, Berkeley, p 143