The influence of multiscale heterogeneity on recrystallization in nickel processed by accumulative roll bonding
Source abstract
Abstract
Microscopic and sample-scale heterogeneities have been characterized in nickel processed by accumulative roll bonding (ARB) to a von Mises strain of 4.8, and their influence on recrystallization have been analyzed. The microscopic deformation heterogeneities in this material are mostly associated with regions near the bonding interface, which are more refined and thus possess a higher stored energy than other regions. These regions also contain characteristic particle deformation zones around fragments of the steel wire brush used to prepare the surface for bonding. The sample-scale heterogeneities are seen as variations in the distribution of different texture components and in the fractions of high misorientation regions between the subsurface, intermediate, and central layers. Each of these heterogeneities affects the progress of recrystallization. Regions near bonding interfaces and particle deformation zones are found to act as preferential nucleation sites. Preferential nucleation is also observed at shear bands and within cube-oriented lamellae. On the sample scale, recrystallization proceeds faster in the intermediate layer than in the central and subsurface layers.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Microstructure and mechanical properties · Metallurgy and Material Forming · Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Steels
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (48)
Show source-provided references
1. Saito Y, Tsuji N, Utsunomiya H, Sakai T, Hong RG (1998) Ultra-fine grained bulk aluminum produced by accumulative roll-bonding (ARB) process. Scr Mater 39:1221–122710.1016/S1359-6462(98)00302-9 ↗
2. Saito Y, Utsunomiya H, Tsuji N, Sakai T (1999) Novel ultra-high straining process for bulk materials—development of the accumulative roll-bonding (ARB) process. Acta Mater 47:579–58310.1016/S1359-6454(98)00365-6 ↗
3. Zhang YB, Mishin OV, Kamikawa N, Godfrey A, Liu W, Liu Q (2013) Microstructure and mechanical properties of nickel processed by accumulative roll bonding. Mater Sci Eng A 576:160–16610.1016/j.msea.2013.04.002 ↗
4. Heason CP, Prangnell PB (2002) Grain refinement and texture evolution during the deformation of Al to ultra-high strains by accumulative roll bonding (ARB). Mater Sci Forum 396–402:429–43410.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.396-402.429 ↗
5. Kim HW, Kang SB, Tsuji N, Minamino Y (2005) Deformation textures of AA8011 aluminum alloy sheets severely deformed by accumulative roll bonding. Metall Mater Trans A 36:3151–316310.1007/s11661-005-0086-3 ↗
6. Kamikawa N, Tsuji N, Huang X, Hansen N (2007) Through-thickness characterization of microstructure and texture in high purity aluminum processed to high strain by accumulative roll-bonding. Mater Trans 48:1978–198510.2320/matertrans.MA200702 ↗
7. Li S, Sun F, Li H (2010) Observation and modeling of the through-thickness texture gradient in commercial-purity aluminum sheets processed by accumulative roll-bonding. Acta Mater 58:1317–133110.1016/j.actamat.2009.10.036 ↗
8. Su L, Lu C, Gazder AA, Saleh AA, Deng G, Tieu K, Li H (2014) Shear texture gradient in AA6061 aluminum alloy processed by accumulative roll bonding with high roll roughness. J Alloys Compd 594:12–2210.1016/j.jallcom.2014.01.125 ↗
9. Zhang YB, Mishin OV, Godfrey A (2014) Analysis of through-thickness heterogeneities of microstructure and texture in nickel after accumulative roll bonding. J Mater Sci 49:287–293. doi: 10.1007/s10853-013-7703-010.1007/s10853-013-7703-0 ↗
10. Najafzadeh N, Quadir MZ, Munroe P (2015) Through thickness microstructural and texture inhomogeneity within Al layers in ARB-produced Al–Al(Sc) layered composite sheets. Metall Mater Trans A 46:4772–478210.1007/s11661-015-3056-4 ↗
11. Lee SH, Saito Y, Tsuji N, Utsunomiya H, Sakai T (2002) Role of shear strain in ultragrain refinement by accumulative roll-bonding (ARB) process. Scr Mater 46:281–28510.1016/S1359-6462(01)01239-8 ↗
12. Lee SH, Saito Y, Tsuji N, Utsunomiya H, Sakai T (2002) Microstructures and mechanical properties of 6061 aluminum alloy processed by accumulative roll-bonding. Mater Sci Eng A 325:228–23510.1016/S0921-5093(01)01416-2 ↗
13. Duan JQ, Quadir MZ, Ferry M (2016) An analytical framework for predicting the limit in structural refinement in accumulative roll bonded nickel. Metall Mater Trans A 47:471–47810.1007/s11661-015-3240-6 ↗
14. Su L, Lu C, Li H, Deng G, Tieu K (2014) Investigation of ultrafine grained AA1050 fabricated by accumulative roll bonding. Mater Sci Eng A 614:148–15510.1016/j.msea.2014.07.032 ↗
15. Xing ZP, Kang SB, Kim HW (2001) Softening behavior of 8011 alloy produced by accumulative roll bonding. Scr Mater 45:597–60410.1016/S1359-6462(01)01069-7 ↗
16. Pirgazi H, Akbarzadeh A, Petrov R, Kestens L (2008) Microstructure evolution and mechanical properties of AA1100 aluminum sheet processed by accumulative roll bonding. Mater Sci Eng A 497:132–13810.1016/j.msea.2008.06.025 ↗
17. Kamikawa N, Tsuji N, Mi Y (2004) Microstructure and texture through thickness of ultralow carbon IF steel sheet severely deformed by accumulative roll-bonding. Sci Technol Adv Mater 5:163–17210.1016/j.stam.2003.10.018 ↗
18. Kim J-K, Jee Y-K, Huh M-Y (2004) Formation of textures and microstructures in asymmetrically cold rolled and subsequently annealed aluminum alloy 1100 sheets. J Mater Sci 39:5365–5369. doi: 10.1023/B:JMSC.0000039246.72708.0a10.1023/B:JMSC.0000039246.72708.0a ↗
19. Mishin OV, Bowen JR (2009) Through-thickness variations of deformed and annealed microstructures in ECAE-processed copper. Metall Mater Trans A 40:1684–169210.1007/s11661-009-9852-y ↗
20. Mishin OV, Godfrey A, Juul Jensen D, Hansen N (2013) Recovery and recrystallization in commercial purity aluminum cold rolled to an ultrahigh strain. Acta Mater 61:5354–536410.1016/j.actamat.2013.05.024 ↗
21. Lin FX, Zhang YB, Tao N, Pantleon W, Juul Jensen D (2014) Effects of heterogeneity on recrystallization kinetics of nanocrystalline copper prepared by dynamic plastic deformation. Acta Mater 72:252–26110.1016/j.actamat.2014.03.036 ↗
22. Suresh KS, Rollett AD, Suwas S (2013) Evolution of microstructure and texture during deformation and recrystallization of heavily rolled Cu–Cu multilayer. Metall Mater Trans A 44:3866–388110.1007/s11661-013-1749-0 ↗
23. Kwan C, Wang Z, Kang S-B (2008) Mechanical behavior and microstructural evolution upon annealing of the accumulative roll-bonding (ARB) processed Al alloy 1100. Mater Sci Eng A 480:148–15910.1016/j.msea.2007.07.022 ↗
24. Godfrey A, Mishin OV, Yu T (2015) Characterization and influence of deformation microstructure heterogeneity on recrystallization. IOP Conf Ser 89:01200310.1088/1757-899X/89/1/012003 ↗
25. Wu GL, Juul Jensen D (2008) Automatic determination of recrystallization parameters based on EBSD mapping. Mater Charact 59:794–80010.1016/j.matchar.2007.06.015 ↗
26. Godfrey A, Cao WQ, Hansen N, Liu Q (2005) Stored energy, microstructure, and flow stress of deformed metals. Metall Mater Trans A 36:2371–237810.1007/s11661-005-0109-0 ↗
27. Read WT, Shockley W (1950) Dislocation models of crystal grain boundaries. Phys Rev 78:275–28910.1103/PhysRev.78.275 ↗
28. Read WT (1953) Dislocation in solids. McGraw-Hill, New York, pp 155–172
29. Humphreys FJ, Hatherly M (2004) Recrystallization and related annealing phenomena, 2nd edn. Elsevier Ltd, Oxford
30. Hughes DA, Hansen N (1993) Microstructural evolution in nickel during rolling from intermediate to large strains. Metall Trans A 24:2021–203710.1007/BF02666337 ↗
31. Hughes DA, Hansen N (2000) Microstructure and strength of nickel at large strains. Acta Mater 48:2985–300410.1016/S1359-6454(00)00082-3 ↗
32. Zhang HW, Luo ZP, Hansen N, Lu K (2015) Influence of structural heterogeneity on the structural coarsening during annealing of polycrystalline Ni subjected to dynamic plastic deformation. IOP Conf Ser 89:01205610.1088/1757-899X/89/1/012056 ↗
33. Xing Q, Huang X, Hansen N (2006) Recovery of heavily cold-rolled aluminum: effect of local texture. Metall Mater Trans A 37:1311–132210.1007/s11661-006-1083-x ↗
34. Zhang ZB, Tao NR, Mishin OV, Pantleon W (2016) Oxide dispersion-strengthened steel PM2000 after dynamic plastic deformation: nanostructure and annealing behavior. J Mater Sci 51:5545–5555. doi: 10.1007/s10853-016-9859-x10.1007/s10853-016-9859-x ↗
35. Zhang ZB, Zhang YB, Mishin OV, Tao NR, Pantleon W, Juul Jensen D (2016) Analysis of orientation-dependent recovery and recrystallization in a modified 9Cr–1Mo steel deformed by compression at a high strain rate. Metall Mater Trans A 47:4682–469310.1007/s11661-016-3626-0 ↗
36. Li XL, Liu W, Godfrey A, Juul Jensen D, Liu Q (2007) Development of the cube texture at low annealing temperatures in highly rolled pure nickel. Acta Mater 55:3531–354010.1016/j.actamat.2007.02.005 ↗
37. Ridha AA, Hutchinson WB (1982) Recrystallisation mechanisms and the origin of cube texture in copper. Acta Metall 30:1929–193910.1016/0001-6160(82)90033-5 ↗
38. Samajdar I, Verlinden B, Rabet L, Van Houtte P (1999) Recrystallization texture in a cold rolled commercial purity aluminum: on the plausible macro- and micro-mechanisms. Mater Sci Eng A 266:146–15410.1016/S0921-5093(99)00022-2 ↗
39. Zaefferer S, Baudin T, Penelle R (2001) A study on the formation mechanisms of the cube recrystallization texture in cold rolled Fe–36% Ni alloys. Acta Mater 49:1105–112210.1016/S1359-6454(00)00387-6 ↗
40. Duggan BJ, Sindel M, Köhlhoff GD, Lücke K (1990) Oriented nucleation, oriented growth and twinning in cube texture. Acta Metall Mater 38:103–11110.1016/0956-7151(90)90138-7 ↗
41. Zhang YB, Godfrey A, Juul Jensen D (2009) Effects of strain on recrystallization of nickel metals and nanometals produced by heavy cold rolling, In: 30th Risø international symposium on material science, DTU, Roskilde, pp 423–430
42. Zhang YB, Godfrey A, Liu Q, Liu W, Juul Jensen D (2009) Analysis of the growth of individual grains during recrystallization in pure nickel. Acta Mater 57:2631–263910.1016/j.actamat.2009.01.039 ↗
43. Vandermeer RA, Juul Jensen D (1995) Quantifying recrystallization nucleation and growth kinetics of cold-rolled copper by microstructural analysis. Metall Mater Trans A 26:2227–223510.1007/BF02671238 ↗
44. Lin FX, Zhang YB, Pantleon W, Juul Jensen D (2015) Supercube grains leading to a strong cube texture and a broad grain size distribution after recrystallization. Philos Mag 22:2427–244910.1080/14786435.2015.1063787 ↗
45. Johnson WA, Mehl RF (1939) Reaction kinetics in processes of nucleation and growth. Trans AIME 135:416–430
46. Tong WS, Rickman JM, Barmak K (1999) Quantitative analysis of spatial distribution of nucleation sites: microstructural implications. Acta Mater 47:435–44510.1016/S1359-6454(98)00382-6 ↗
47. Godiksen RB, Schmidt S, Juul Jensen D (2007) Effects of distributions of growth rates on recrystallization kinetics and microstructure. Scr Mater 57:345–34810.1016/j.scriptamat.2007.04.036 ↗
48. Juul Jensen D (1992) Growth of nuclei with different crystallographic orientations during recrystallization. Scr Metall Mater 27:533–53810.1016/0956-716X(92)90335-C ↗