c-In2O3/α-Fe2O3 heterojunction photoanodes for water oxidation
Source abstract
Abstract
Hematite (α-Fe2O3) is supposed to be one of the most promising photoanode candidates for solar-driven water splitting. However, the photoelectrochemical (PEC) performance of α-Fe2O3 is limited by fast recombination of carriers. In this work, we demonstrate that the recombination of α-Fe2O3 films could be suppressed by forming the heterojunction structure with cubic-In2O3. By utilizing the magnetron sputtering method, the In2O3/α-Fe2O3 films were prepared when the In concentration exceeded its solubility in α-Fe2O3 matrix, which was confirmed by the XRD and TEM analysis. The dependence of charge separation on heterojunction structure was evidenced by Mott–Schottky and EIS analyses. It was found that the enhanced separation of holes and electrons in α-Fe2O3 films contributed to higher PEC performance.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Iron oxide chemistry and applications · Copper-based nanomaterials and applications · Arsenic contamination and mitigation
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (32)
Show source-provided references
1. Kim D, Sakimoto KK, Hong D, Yang P (2015) Artificial photosynthesis for sustainable fuel and chemical production. Angew Chemie Int Ed 54:3259–3266. doi: 10.1002/anie.20140911610.1002/anie.201409116 ↗
2. Le Formal F, Pastor E, Tilley SD et al (2015) Rate law analysis of water oxidation on a hematite surface. J Am Chem Soc 137:6629–6637. doi: 10.1021/jacs.5b0257610.1021/jacs.5b02576 ↗
3. Klahr B, Gimenez S, Fabregat-Santiago F et al (2012) Electrochemical and photoelectrochemical investigation of water oxidation with hematite electrodes. Energy Environ Sci 5:7626–7636. doi: 10.1039/c2ee21414h10.1039/c2ee21414h ↗
4. Klahr B, Gimenez S, Zandi O et al (2015) Competitive photoelectrochemical methanol and water oxidation with hematite electrodes. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 7:7653–7660. doi: 10.1021/acsami.5b0044010.1021/acsami.5b00440 ↗
5. Jang J-W, Du C, Ye Y et al (2015) Enabling unassisted solar water splitting by iron oxide and silicon. Nat Commun 6:7447. doi: 10.1038/ncomms844710.1038/ncomms8447 ↗
6. Bassi PS, Gurudayal Wong LH, Barber J (2014) Iron based photoanodes for solar fuel production. Phys Chem Chem Phys 16:11834–11842. doi: 10.1039/c3cp55174a10.1039/c3cp55174a ↗
7. Miao C, Ji S, Xu G et al (2012) Micro-nano-structured Fe2O3:Ti/ZnFe2O4 heterojunction films for water oxidation. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 4:4428–4433. doi: 10.1021/am301146610.1021/am3011466 ↗
8. Warren SC, Voïtchovsky K, Dotan H et al (2013) Identifying champion nanostructures for solar water-splitting. Nat Mater 12:842–849. doi: 10.1038/nmat368410.1038/nmat3684 ↗
9. Cai J, Li S, Li Z et al (2013) Electrodeposition of Sn-doped hollow α-Fe2O3 nanostructures for photoelectrochemical water splitting. J Alloy Compd 574:421–42610.1016/j.jallcom.2013.05.152 ↗
10. Li S, Cai J, Mei Y et al (2014) Thermal oxidation preparation of doped hematite thin films for photoelectrochemical water splitting. Int J Photoenergy 2014:794370. doi: 10.1155/2014/79437010.1155/2014/794370 ↗
11. Chen Z, Huang L, Zhang Q et al (2015) Electronic structures and transport properties of n-type-doped indium ixides. J Phys Chem C 119:4789–4795. doi: 10.1021/jp510416410.1021/jp5104164 ↗
12. Meng X, Qin G, Goddard WA et al (2013) Theoretical understanding of enhanced photoelectrochemical catalytic activity of Sn-doped hematite: anisotropic catalysis and effects of morin transition and Sn doping. J Phys Chem C 117:3779–3784. doi: 10.1021/jp310740h10.1021/jp310740h ↗
13. Ling Y, Wang G, Wheeler DA et al (2011) Sn-doped hematite nanostructures for photoelectrochemical water splitting. Nano Lett 11:2119–2125. doi: 10.1021/nl200708y10.1021/nl200708y ↗
14. Zandi O, Klahr BM, Hamann TW (2013) Highly photoactive Ti-doped α-Fe2O3 thin film electrodes: resurrection of the dead layer. Energy Environ Sci 6:634–642. doi: 10.1039/C2EE23620F10.1039/C2EE23620F ↗
15. Hou Y, Zuo F, Dagg A, Feng P (2013) A three-dimensional branched cobalt-doped α-Fe2O3 nanorod/MgFe2O4 heterojunction aray as a flexible photoanode for efficient photoelectrochemical water oxidation. Angew Chemie Int Ed 52:1248–1252. doi: 10.1002/anie.20120757810.1002/anie.201207578 ↗
16. Preissler N, Bierwagen O, Ramu AT, Speck JS (2013) Electrical transport, electrothermal transport, and effective electron mass in single-crystalline In2O3 films. Phys Rev B 88:1–10. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.88.08530510.1103/PhysRevB.88.085305 ↗
17. Jiang Z, Jiang D, Yan Z et al (2015) A new visible light active multifunctional ternary composite based on TiO2–In2O3 nanocrystals heterojunction decorated porous graphitic carbon nitride for photocatalytic treatment of hazardous pollutant and H2 evolution. Appl Catal B 170–171:195–205. doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2015.01.04110.1016/j.apcatb.2015.01.041 ↗
18. Chi X, Liu C, Liu L et al (2014) Enhanced formaldehyde-sensing properties of mixed Fe2O3–In2O3 nanotubes. Mater Sci Semicond Process 18:160–164. doi: 10.1016/j.mssp.2013.11.01610.1016/j.mssp.2013.11.016 ↗
19. Kotsikau D, Ivanovskaya M (2015) Influence of structure of Fe2O3–In2O3 nanocomposites on the sensitivity of thin-film sensors on their base. Mater Chem Phys 160:337–344. doi: 10.1016/j.matchemphys.2015.04.04710.1016/j.matchemphys.2015.04.047 ↗
20. Kay A, Cesar I, Grätzel M (2006) New benchmark for water photooxidation by nanostructured α-Fe2O3 films. J Am Chem Soc 128:15714–15721. doi: 10.1021/ja064380l10.1021/ja064380l ↗
21. Cesar I, Sivula K, Kay A et al (2009) Influence of feature size, film thickness, and silicon doping on the performance of nanostructured hematite photoanodes for solar water splitting. J Phys Chem C 113:772–782. doi: 10.1021/jp809060p10.1021/jp809060p ↗
22. Sorescu M, Diamandescu L, Tarabasanu-Mihaila D (2004) α-Fe2O3–In2O3 mixed oxide nanoparticles synthesized under hydrothermal supercritical conditions. J Phys Chem Solids 65:1719–1725. doi: 10.1016/j.jpcs.2004.05.00210.1016/j.jpcs.2004.05.002 ↗
23. Chu D, Masuda Y, Ohji T, Kato K (2010) Shape-controlled growth of In(OH)3/In2O3 nanostructures by electrodeposition. Langmuir 26:14814–14820. doi: 10.1021/la102255k10.1021/la102255k ↗
24. Zhao C, Zhang G, Han W et al (2013) Electrospun In2O3/α-Fe2O3 heterostructure nanotubes for highly sensitive gas sensor applications. Cryst Eng Comm 15:6491. doi: 10.1039/c3ce40962g10.1039/c3ce40962g ↗
25. Dotan H, Mathews N, Hisatomi T et al (2014) On the solar to hydrogen conversion efficiency of photoelectrodes for water splitting. J Phys Chem Lett 5:3330–333410.1021/jz501716g ↗
26. Kleiman-Shwarsctein A, Huda MN, Walsh A et al (2010) Electrodeposited aluminum-doped α-Fe2O3 photoelectrodes: experiment and theory. Chem Mater 22:510–517. doi: 10.1021/cm903135j10.1021/cm903135j ↗
27. Gurudayal Chiam SY, Kumar MH et al (2014) Improving the efficiency of hematite nanorods for photoelectrochemical water splitting by doping with manganese. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 6:5852–5859. doi: 10.1021/am500643y10.1021/am500643y ↗
28. Pham HT, Jeong HD (2015) Newly observed temperature and surface ligand dependence of electron mobility in indium oxide nanocrystals solids. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 7:11660–11667. doi: 10.1021/acsami.5b0297110.1021/acsami.5b02971 ↗
29. Martinez-Morillas R, Ramirez R, Sanchez-Marcos J et al (2014) Huge photoresistance in transparent and conductive indium titanium oxide films prepared by electron beam-physical vapor deposition. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 6:1781–1787. doi: 10.1021/am404675n10.1021/am404675n ↗
30. Oh I, Kye J, Hwang S (2012) Enhanced photoelectrochemical hydrogen production from silicon nanowire array photocathode. Nano Lett 12:298–302. doi: 10.1021/nl203564s10.1021/nl203564s ↗
31. Kim JY, Magesh G, Youn DH et al (2013) Single-crystalline, wormlike hematite photoanodes for efficient solar water splitting. Sci Rep 3:2681. doi: 10.1038/srep0268110.1038/srep02681 ↗
32. Ahmed MG, Kandiel TA, Ahmed AY et al (2015) Enhanced photoelectrochemical water oxidation on nanostructured hematite photoanodes via p-CaFe2O4/n-Fe2O3 heterojunction formation. J Phys Chem C 119:5864–5871. doi: 10.1021/jp512804p10.1021/jp512804p ↗