journal article·2011-07

Dielectric relaxation behavior of CdS nanoparticles and nanowires

Anoop Chandran, M. Soosen Samuel, Jiji Koshy, K. C. George

Journal of Materials Science· Volume 46· Issue 13
Publisher page

Abstract

The dielectric relaxation and scaling behavior of CdS nanoparticles and nanowires were investigated in the frequency range 102–106 Hz and in the temperature range 373–573 K by complex impedance spectroscopy and electric modulus spectroscopy. Studies on the complex permittivity revealed that the dielectric relaxation in CdS nanostructures deviates from Debye like behavior. A detailed study on the grain and grain boundary charge transport was carried out. The charge carrier transport in CdS nanostructures was identified to be hopping of polarons. From the combined analysis of the variation of imaginary part of electric modulus and complex impedance with frequency, it was found that at high temperatures localized conduction is dominant in CdS nanoparticles where as the long range hopping process is dominant with nanowires. It was also found that the scaling behavior of CdS nanoparticles varied considerably from that reported earlier.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Dielectric properties of ceramics · Ferroelectric and Piezoelectric Materials · Quantum Dots Synthesis And Properties

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (21)

Show source-provided references
1. Joshy J, AbdulKhadar M (2001) Mater Sci Eng A 304–306:810
2. Cassina V, Gerosa L, Podestà A, Ferrari G, Sampietro M, Fiorentini F, Mazza T, Lenardi C, Milani P (2009) Phys Rev B 79:11542210.1103/PhysRevB.79.115422 ↗
3. Biju V, Khadar MA (2003) J Mater Sci 38:4055. doi:https://doi.org/10.1023/A:102613110389810.1023/A:1026131103898 ↗
4. Wang C, Ao Y, Wang P, Hou J, Qian J, Zhang S (2010) Mater Lett 64:43910.1016/j.matlet.2009.11.041 ↗
5. Chrysochoos J (1992) J Phys Chem 96:286810.1021/j100186a017 ↗
6. Hodes G, Albu-Yaron A (1988) Proc Electrochem Soc 88–14:298
7. Jun Z, Xiao-wei D, Zhi-Iiang L, Xu G, Xing-pi Z (2007) Trans Nonferrous Met Soc China 17:136710.1016/S1003-6326(07)60279-9 ↗
8. Abulkhadar M, Thomas B (1995) Phys Stat Sol A 150:75510.1002/pssa.2211500219 ↗
9. Tripathi R, Kumar A, Sinha TP (2009) Pramana J Phys 72:96910.1007/s12043-009-0089-5 ↗
10. Mukherjee S, Sudarsan V, Vatsa RK, Godbole SV, Kadam RM, Bhatta UM, Tyagi AK (2008) Nanotechnology 19:32570410.1088/0957-4484/19/32/325704 ↗
11. Cole KS, Cole RH (1941) J Chem Phys 9:34110.1063/1.1750906 ↗
12. Macedo PB, Moynihan T, Bose R (1972) Phys Chem Glasses 13:171
13. Savitha T, Selvasekarapandian S, Ramya CS, Bhuvaneswari MS, Angelo PC (2007) J Mater Sci 42:5470. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-006-0983-x10.1007/s10853-006-0983-x ↗
14. Sural M, Ghosh A (1998) J Phys Condens Matter 10:1057710.1088/0953-8984/10/47/009 ↗
15. Dutta A, Sinha TP (2007) Phys Rev B 76:15511310.1103/PhysRevB.76.155113 ↗
16. Veena Gopalan E, Malini KA, Sakthi Kumar D, Yoshida Y, Al-Omari IA, Saravanan S, Anantharaman MR (2009) J Phy Condens Matter 21:14600610.1088/0953-8984/21/14/146006 ↗
17. Chiang YM, Lavik EB, Kosacki I, Tuller HL, Ying JY (1996) Appl Phys Lett 69:18510.1063/1.117366 ↗
18. Terwilliger CD, Chiang YM (1995) Acta Mater 43:31910.1016/0956-7151(95)90288-0 ↗
19. Raymond O, Font R, Suárez-Almodover N, Portelles J, Siqueiros JM (2005) J App Phys 97:8410810.1063/1.1870100 ↗
20. Pradhan DK, Choudhary RNP, Rinaldi C, Katiyar RS (2009) J Appl Phys 106:2410210.1063/1.3158121 ↗
21. Baskaran N (2002) J Appl Phys 92:82510.1063/1.1487456 ↗