Sulfonated PVDF nanocomposite membranes tailored with graphene oxide nanoparticles: Improved proton conductivity and membrane selectivity thereof
Source abstract
Abstract
The nanocomposite membranes consisting of polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) and graphene oxide (GO) are prepared via solution casting method and the membranes are subsequently sulfonated by chlorosulfonic acid. A series of physicochemical properties such as, thermogravimetric analysis (TGA), X-ray diffraction (XRD) and Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) are carried out to investigate the thermal and structural properties of the prepared sulfonated PVDF GO (SPG) nanocomposite membranes. The preliminary studies including ion exchange capacity (IEC), water and methanol absorption are conducted for evaluating the feasibility of the SPG membranes to perform as a proton exchange membrane (PEM). The results are quite encouraging and acceptable for further investigations on membrane performance evaluation. The proton conductivity of the membrane has been remarkably improved after the sulfonation and found to be 0.075 S cm−1 at 25 °C which can be ascribed to the hydrophilic nature of incorporated graphene oxide nanoparticles as well as sulfonic groups attached to the PVDF chains which forms a suitable proton conduction channel and favors easy proton migration. Further, the blocking effect of GO provides an advantage for the methanol permeation rate thereby creating a torturous path and giving the methanol permeability value as 1.62 × 10–6 cm2s−1 which is 76.62% less than Nafion 117 membrane. Finally, the higher selectivity of the SPG membranes makes them more competitive than Nafion 117 membranes to employ as a PEM for DMFC.
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Fuel Cells and Related Materials · Membrane-based Ion Separation Techniques · Advanced battery technologies research
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (67)
Show source-provided references
1. Sharaf OZ, Orhan MF (2014) An overview of fuel cell technology: Fundamentals and applications. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 32:810–853. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2014.01.01210.1016/j.rser.2014.01.012 ↗
2. Kumar P, Dutta K, Das S, Kundu PP (2014) An overview of unsolved deficiencies of direct methanol fuel cell technology: factors and parameters affecting its widespread use. Int J Energy Res 38:1367–1390. https://doi.org/10.1002/er.316310.1002/er.3163 ↗
3. Rath R, Kumar P, Mohanty S, Nayak SK (2019) Recent advances, unsolved deficiencies, and future perspectives of hydrogen fuel cells in transportation and portable sectors. Int J Energy Res 43:8931–8955. https://doi.org/10.1002/er.479510.1002/er.4795 ↗
4. Kumar P, Dutta K, Kundu PP (2014) Enhanced performance of direct methanol fuel cells: a study on the combined effect of various supporting electrolytes, flow channel designs and operating temperatures. Int J Energy Res 38:41–50. https://doi.org/10.1002/er.303410.1002/er.3034 ↗
5. Mekhilef S, Saidur R, Safari A (2012) Comparative study of different fuel cell technologies. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 16:981–989. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2011.09.02010.1016/j.rser.2011.09.020 ↗
6. Kumar P (2021) Current and Future Perspectives on Hydrogen and Fuelcells for Its Potential Application in Portable; Stationary and Transportation Sectors10.1016/B978-0-12-819727-1.00048-0 ↗
7. Ren X, Zelenay P, Thomas S et al (2000) Recent advances in direct methanol fuel cells at los alamos national laboratory. J Power Sources 86:111–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-7753(99)00407-310.1016/S0378-7753(99)00407-3 ↗
8. Joghee P, Malik JN, Pylypenko S, O’Hayre R (2015) A review on direct methanol fuel cells–In the perspective of energy and sustainability. MRS Energy Sustain 2:1–31. https://doi.org/10.1557/mre.2015.410.1557/mre.2015.4 ↗
9. Mauritz KA, Moore RB (2004) State of understanding of Nafion. Chem Rev 104:4535–4585. https://doi.org/10.1021/cr020712310.1021/cr0207123 ↗
10. Karimi MB, Mohammadi F, Hooshyari K (2019) Recent approaches to improve Nafion performance for fuel cell applications: a review. Int J Hydrog Energy 44:28919–28938. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.09.09610.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.09.096 ↗
11. Hickner MA, Ghassemi H, Kim YS et al (2004) Alternative polymer systems for proton exchange membranes (PEMs). Chem Rev 104:4587–4611. https://doi.org/10.1021/cr020711a10.1021/cr020711a ↗
12. Rath R, Kumar P, Unnikrishnan L et al (2019) Current scenario of poly (2,5-Benzimidazole) (ABPBI) as prospective PEM for application in HT-PEMFC. Polym Rev. https://doi.org/10.1080/15583724.2019.166321110.1080/15583724.2019.1663211 ↗
13. Ogungbemi E, Ijaodola O, Khatib FN et al (2019) Fuel cell membranes – Pros and cons. Energy 172:155–172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2019.01.03410.1016/j.energy.2019.01.034 ↗
14. Kim DJ, Jo MJ, Nam SY (2015) A review of polymer-nanocomposite electrolyte membranes for fuel cell application. J Ind Eng Chem 21:36–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jiec.2014.04.03010.1016/j.jiec.2014.04.030 ↗
15. Das S, Kumar P, Dutta K, Kundu PP (2014) Partial sulfonation of PVdF-co-HFP: A preliminary study and characterization for application in direct methanol fuel cell. Appl Energy 113:169–177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2013.07.03010.1016/j.apenergy.2013.07.030 ↗
16. Kumar P, Dutta K, Das S, Kundu PP (2014) Membrane prepared by incorporation of crosslinked sulfonated polystyrene in the blend of PVdF-co-HFP/Nafion: a preliminary evaluation for application in DMFC. Appl Energy 123:66–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2014.02.06010.1016/j.apenergy.2014.02.060 ↗
17. Dutta K, Das S, Kumar P, Kundu PP (2014) Polymer electrolyte membrane with high selectivity ratio for direct methanol fuel cells: a preliminary study based on blends of partially sulfonated polymers polyaniline and PVdF-co-HFP. Appl Energy 118:183–191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2013.12.02910.1016/j.apenergy.2013.12.029 ↗
18. Kumar P, Kundu PP (2015) Coating and lamination of nafion117 with partially sulfonated PVdF for low methanol crossover in DMFC applications. Electrochim Acta 173:124–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2015.05.04410.1016/j.electacta.2015.05.044 ↗
19. Rajabalizadeh Mojarrad N, Iskandarani B, Taşdemir A et al (2021) Nanofiber based hybrid sulfonated silica/P(VDF-TrFE) membranes for PEM fuel cells. Int J Hydrogen Energy 46:13583–13593. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.08.00510.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.08.005 ↗
20. kumar GG, Kim AR, Nahm KS et al (2010) High ion and lower molecular transportation of the poly vinylidene fluoride-hexa fluoro propylene hybrid membranes for the high temperature and lower humidity direct methanol fuel cell applications. J Power Sources 195:5922–5928. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2009.11.02110.1016/j.jpowsour.2009.11.021 ↗
21. Shaari N, Kamarudin SK (2018) Performance of crosslinked sodium alginate/sulfonated graphene oxide as polymer electrolyte membrane in DMFC application: RSM optimization approach. Int J Hydrog Energy 43:22986–23003. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2018.10.09810.1016/j.ijhydene.2018.10.098 ↗
22. Jiang ZJ, Jiang Z, Tian X et al (2017) Sulfonated holey graphene oxide (SHGO) filled sulfonated poly(ether ether ketone) membrane: the role of holes in the SHGO in improving its performance as proton exchange membrane for direct methanol fuel cells. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 9:20046–20056. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.7b0019810.1021/acsami.7b00198 ↗
23. Kim K, Bae J, Lim MY et al (2017) Enhanced physical stability and chemical durability of sulfonated poly(arylene ether sulfone) composite membranes having antioxidant grafted graphene oxide for polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cell applications. J Memb Sci 525:125–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2016.10.03810.1016/j.memsci.2016.10.038 ↗
24. Vinothkannan M, Kim AR, Yoo DJ (2021) Potential carbon nanomaterials as additives for state-of-the-art Nafion electrolyte in proton-exchange membrane fuel cells: a concise review. RSC Adv 11:18351–18370. https://doi.org/10.1039/d1ra00685a10.1039/d1ra00685a ↗
25. Vinothkannan M, Kim AR, Nahm KS, Yoo DJ (2016) Ternary hybrid (SPEEK/SPVdF-HFP/GO) based membrane electrolyte for the applications of fuel cells: profile of improved mechanical strength, thermal stability and proton conductivity. RSC Adv 6:108851–108863. https://doi.org/10.1039/c6ra22295a10.1039/c6ra22295a ↗
26. Kim AR, Vinothkannan M, Yoo DJ (2018) Sulfonated fluorinated multi-block copolymer hybrid containing sulfonated(poly ether ether ketone) and graphene oxide: a ternary hybrid membrane architecture for electrolyte applications in proton exchange membrane fuel cells. J Energy Chem 27:1247–1260. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jechem.2018.02.02010.1016/j.jechem.2018.02.020 ↗
27. Ko T, Kim K, Lim MY et al (2015) Sulfonated poly(arylene ether sulfone) composite membranes having poly(2,5-benzimidazole)-grafted graphene oxide for fuel cell applications. J Mater Chem A 3:20595–20606. https://doi.org/10.1039/c5ta04849d10.1039/c5ta04849d ↗
28. Shukla A, Dhanasekaran P, Sasikala S et al (2020) Covalent grafting of polystyrene sulfonic acid on graphene oxide nanoplatelets to form a composite membrane electrolyte with sulfonated poly(ether ether ketone) for direct methanol fuel cells. J Memb Sci 595:117484. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2019.11748410.1016/j.memsci.2019.117484 ↗
29. Lavanya G, Paradesi D, Hemalatha P (2020) Development of proton conducting polymer nanocomposite membranes based on SPVdF-HFP and graphene oxide for H2–O2 fuel cells. J Macromol Sci Part A Pure Appl Chem 57:283–290. https://doi.org/10.1080/10601325.2019.169145510.1080/10601325.2019.1691455 ↗
30. Hariprasad R, Vinothkannan M, Kim AR, Yoo DJ (2020) SPVdF-HFP/SGO nanohybrid proton exchange membrane for the applications of direct methanol fuel cells. J Dispers Sci Technol 42:33–45. https://doi.org/10.1080/01932691.2019.166067210.1080/01932691.2019.1660672 ↗
31. Devi AU, Divya K, Kaleekkal NJ et al (2018) Tailored SPVdF-co-HFP/SGO nanocomposite proton exchange membranes for direct methanol fuel cells. Polymer (Guildf) 140:22–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymer.2018.02.02410.1016/j.polymer.2018.02.024 ↗
32. Rath R, Kumar P, Unnikrishnan L et al (2021) Functionalized poly(vinylidene fluoride) for selective proton-conducting membranes. Mater Chem Phys 260:124148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchemphys.2020.12414810.1016/j.matchemphys.2020.124148 ↗
33. Ayyaru S, Ahn YH (2017) Application of sulfonic acid group functionalized graphene oxide to improve hydrophilicity, permeability, and antifouling of PVDF nanocomposite ultrafiltration membranes. J Memb Sci 525:210–219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2016.10.04810.1016/j.memsci.2016.10.048 ↗
34. Jayakumar OD, Abdelhamid EH, Kotari V et al (2015) Fabrication of flexible and self-standing inorganic-organic three phase magneto-dielectric PVDF based multiferroic nanocomposite films through a small loading of graphene oxide (GO) and Fe3O4 nanoparticles. Dalt Trans 44:15872–15881. https://doi.org/10.1039/c5dt01509j10.1039/c5dt01509j ↗
35. Ahmad AL, Farooqui UR, Hamid NA (2018) Porous (PVDF-HFP/PANI/GO) ternary hybrid polymer electrolyte membranes for lithium-ion batteries. RSC Adv 8:25725–25733. https://doi.org/10.1039/c8ra03918f10.1039/c8ra03918f ↗
36. Ahmad AL, Farooqui UR, Hamid NA (2018) Effect of graphene oxide (GO) on Poly(vinylidene fluoride-hexafluoropropylene) (PVDF- HFP) polymer electrolyte membrane. Polymer (Guildf) 142:330–336. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymer.2018.03.05210.1016/j.polymer.2018.03.052 ↗
37. Jana KK, Charan C, Shahi VK et al (2015) Functionalized poly(vinylidene fluoride) nanohybrid for superior fuel cell membrane. J Memb Sci 481:124–136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2015.01.05310.1016/j.memsci.2015.01.053 ↗
38. Prakash O, Jana KK, Jain R et al (2018) Functionalized poly(vinylidene fluoride-co-hexafluoro propylene) membrane for fuel cell. Polymer (Guildf) 151:261–268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymer.2018.07.08610.1016/j.polymer.2018.07.086 ↗
39. Kim AR, Gabunada JC, Yoo DJ (2018) Sulfonated fluorinated block copolymer containing naphthalene unit/sulfonated polyvinylidene-co-hexafluoropropylene/functionalized silicon dioxide ternary composite membrane for low-humidity fuel cell applications. Colloid Polym Sci 296:1891–1903. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00396-018-4403-y10.1007/s00396-018-4403-y ↗
40. Ranjani M, Yoo DJ, Gnana kumar J (2018) Sulfonated Fe3O4@SiO2 nanorods incorporated sPVdF nanocomposite membranes for DMFC applications. J Memb Sci 555:497–506. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2018.03.04910.1016/j.memsci.2018.03.049 ↗
41. Rath R, Mohanty S, Nayak SK, Unnikrishnan L (2021) Surface architecture and proton conduction in SPVDF-co-HFP based nanocomposite membrane for fuel cell applications: influence of aprotic solvent mixture. Polymer (Guildf) 234:124248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymer.2021.12424810.1016/j.polymer.2021.124248 ↗
42. Ismail AM, Mohammed MI, Fouad SS (2018) Optical and structural properties of polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF)/reduced graphene oxide (RGO) nanocomposites. J Mol Struct 1170:51–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molstruc.2018.05.08310.1016/j.molstruc.2018.05.083 ↗
43. Shuai C, Zeng Z, Yang Y et al (2020) Graphene oxide assists polyvinylidene fluoride scaffold to reconstruct electrical microenvironment of bone tissue. Mater Des 190:108564. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2020.10856410.1016/j.matdes.2020.108564 ↗
44. Ataur Rahman M, Lee BC, Phan DT, Chung GS (2013) Fabrication and characterization of highly efficient flexible energy harvesters using PVDF-graphene nanocomposites. Smart Mater Struct. https://doi.org/10.1088/0964-1726/22/8/08501710.1088/0964-1726/22/8/085017 ↗
45. Kumar P, Singh AD, Kumar V, Kundu PP (2015) Incorporation of nano-Al2O3 within the blend of sulfonated-PVdF-co-HFP and Nafion for high temperature application in DMFCs. RSC Adv 5:63465–63472. https://doi.org/10.1039/c5ra07992f10.1039/c5ra07992f ↗
46. Li W, Li H, Zhang YM (2009) Preparation and investigation of PVDF/PMMA/TiO2 composite film. J Mater Sci 44:2977–2984. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-009-3395-x10.1007/s10853-009-3395-x ↗
47. Wieser C (2004) Novel polymer electrolyte membranes for automotive applications - requirements and benefits. Fuel Cells 4:245–250. https://doi.org/10.1002/fuce.20040003810.1002/fuce.200400038 ↗
48. Gao S, Xu H, Fang Z et al (2018) Highly sulfonated poly(ether ether ketone) grafted on graphene oxide as nanohybrid proton exchange membrane applied in fuel cells. Electrochim Acta 283:428–437. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2018.06.18010.1016/j.electacta.2018.06.180 ↗
49. Li Y, Liang L, Liu C et al (2018) Self-healing proton-exchange membranes composed of nafion–poly(vinyl alcohol) complexes for durable direct methanol fuel cells. Adv Mater 30:1–7. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.20170714610.1002/adma.201707146 ↗
50. Li J, Cai W, Ma L et al (2015) Towards neat methanol operation of direct methanol fuel cells: a novel self-assembled proton exchange membrane. Chem Commun 51:6556–6559. https://doi.org/10.1039/c4cc09420d10.1039/c4cc09420d ↗
51. Tseng CY, Ye YS, Cheng MY et al (2011) Sulfonated polyimide proton exchange membranes with graphene oxide show improved proton conductivity, methanol crossover impedance, and mechanical properties. Adv Energy Mater 1:1220–1224. https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.20110036610.1002/aenm.201100366 ↗
52. Ben Liew K, Leong JX, Wan Daud WR et al (2020) Incorporation of silver graphene oxide and graphene oxide nanoparticles in sulfonated polyether ether ketone membrane for power generation in microbial fuel cell. J Power Sources 449:227490. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2019.22749010.1016/j.jpowsour.2019.227490 ↗
53. Jia W, Wu P (2019) Stable functionalized graphene oxide-cellulose nanofiber solid electrolytes with long-range 1D/2D ionic nanochannels. J Mater Chem A 7:20871–20877. https://doi.org/10.1039/c9ta07883e10.1039/c9ta07883e ↗
54. Velayutham P, Sahu AK (2018) Graphitic carbon nitride nanosheets - nafion as a methanol barrier hybrid membrane for direct methanol fuel cells. J Phys Chem C 122:21735–21744. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.8b0604210.1021/acs.jpcc.8b06042 ↗
55. Chen RM, Xu FZ, Fu K et al (2018) Enhanced proton conductivity and dimensional stability of proton exchange membrane based on sulfonated poly(arylene ether sulfone) and graphene oxide. Mater Res Bull 103:142–149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.materresbull.2018.02.03610.1016/j.materresbull.2018.02.036 ↗
56. Karim MR, Hatakeyama K, Matsui T et al (2013) Graphene oxide nanosheet with high proton conductivity. J Am Chem Soc 135:8097–8100. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja401060q10.1021/ja401060q ↗
57. Mao X, Xu M, Wu H et al (2019) Supramolecular calix[n]arenes-intercalated graphene oxide membranes for efficient proton conduction. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 11:42250–42260. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.9b1533110.1021/acsami.9b15331 ↗
58. Jia T, Shen S, Xiao L et al (2020) Constructing multilayered membranes with layer-by-layer self-assembly technique based on graphene oxide for anhydrous proton exchange membranes. Eur Polym J 122:109362. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2019.10936210.1016/j.eurpolymj.2019.109362 ↗
59. Cui F, Wang W, Shan B et al (2020) Enhanced performance of the chitosan proton exchange membrane via anatase titania anchored go and sodium ligninsulfonate constructing proton transport channels. Energy Fuels. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.0c0036710.1021/acs.energyfuels.0c00367 ↗
60. Liu G, Tsen WC, Wen S (2020) Sulfonated silica coated polyvinylidene fluoride electrospun nanofiber-based composite membranes for direct methanol fuel cells. Mater Des 193:108806. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2020.10880610.1016/j.matdes.2020.108806 ↗
61. Ahmed S, Cai Y, Ali M et al (2019) One-step phosphorylation of graphene oxide for the fabrication of nanocomposite membranes with enhanced proton conductivity for fuel cell applications. J Mater Sci Mater Electron 30:13056–13066. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10854-019-01667-510.1007/s10854-019-01667-5 ↗
62. Cali A, Yağızatlı Y, Sahin A, Ar İ (2020) Highly durable phosphonated graphene oxide doped polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) composite membranes. Int J Hydrog Energy 45:35171–35179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.01.09210.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.01.092 ↗
63. Bunlengsuwan P, Paradee N, Sirivat A (2017) Influence of sulfonated graphene oxide on sulfonated polysulfone membrane for direct methanol fuel cell. Polym - Plast Technol Eng 56:1695–1703. https://doi.org/10.1080/03602559.2017.128939810.1080/03602559.2017.1289398 ↗
64. Chien HC, Tsai LD, Huang CP et al (2013) Sulfonated graphene oxide/Nafion composite membranes for high-performance direct methanol fuel cells. Int J Hydrog Energy 38:13792–13801. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2013.08.03610.1016/j.ijhydene.2013.08.036 ↗
65. Kumar P, Singh AD, Kumar V, Kundu PP (2015) Incorporation of nano-Al2O3 within the blend of sulfonated-PVdF-co-HFP and Nafion for high temperature application in DMFCs. RSC Adv 5:63465–63472. https://doi.org/10.1039/c5ra07992f10.1039/c5ra07992f ↗
66. Sodagar S, Jaleh B, Fakhri P et al (2020) Flexible piezoelectric PVDF/NDs nanocomposite films: improved electroactive properties at low concentration of nanofiller and numerical simulation using finite element method. J Polym Res 27:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10965-020-02184-410.1007/s10965-020-02184-4 ↗
67. Martina P, Gayathri R, Pugalenthi MR et al (2020) Nanosulfonated silica incorporated SPEEK/SPVdF-HFP polymer blend membrane for PEM fuel cell application. Ionics (Kiel) 26:3447–3458. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11581-020-03478-910.1007/s11581-020-03478-9 ↗