Carbon microspheres decorated with iron sulfide nanoparticles for mercury(II) removal from water
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract A new and simple method is developed to synthesize carbon microspheres decorated with iron sulfide nanoparticles for mercury ion removal from water. The synthesis is based on carbonizing polystyrene–divinylbenzene-based and iron(III) sulfate-loaded cation exchange resins between 500 and 1000 °C. The phase composition, surface area, and morphology of these materials are characterized by various spectroscopic and diffraction techniques, including Mössbauer spectroscopy, powder X-ray diffraction, Raman and scanning electron microscopy, and BET analysis. Pyrrhotite is found to be the dominant iron-containing phase. The adsorption performance of microspheres for mercury ion removal from water is studied as a function of adsorbent load and contact time at pH 6.5 using a solution of 40 mg dm−3mercury ion. Pyrrhotite nanoparticles played a key role in mercury ion removal amounting to 70–90% of the extracted amount. A high adsorption capacity of 104 mg of mercury/g of adsorbent at an adsorbent load of 0.33 g dm−3is achieved, and the removal kinetics could be well fitted with a pseudo-second-order kinetic model, indicating chemical sorption. The synthetic method is easy to scale up for large-scale production and materials are easy to handle, which is significant for large-scale environmental applications.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Adsorption and biosorption for pollutant removal · Mercury impact and mitigation studies · Environmental remediation with nanomaterials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (34)
Show source-provided references
1. Raehsler SL, Choung RS, Marietta EV, Murray JA (2018) Accumulation of heavy metals in people on a gluten-free diet. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 16:244–25110.1016/j.cgh.2017.01.034 ↗
2. Jaishankar M, Tseten T, Anbalagan N, Mathew BB, Beeregowda KN (2014) Toxicity, mechanism and health effects of some heavy metals. Interdiscip Toxicol 7:60–7210.2478/intox-2014-0009 ↗
3. Tunsu C, Wickman B (2018) Effective removal of mercury from aqueous streams via electrochemical alloy formation on platinum. Nat Comm 9:487610.1038/s41467-018-07300-z ↗
4. Habila MA, AlOthman ZA, Ghfar AA, Al-Zaben MIM, Alothman AAS, Abdeltawab AA, El-Marghany A, Sheikh M (2019) Phosphonium-based ionic liquid modified activated carbon from mixed recyclable waste for mercury(II) uptake. Molecules 24:57010.3390/molecules24030570 ↗
5. Huang S, Ma C, Liao Y, Min C, Du P, Jiang Y (2016) Removal of mercury(II) from aqueous solutions by adsorption on poly(1-amino-5-chloroanthraquinone) nanofibrils: equilibrium, kinetics, and mechanism studies. J Nanomater 2016, Article ID 7245829
6. Hadi P, To M-H, Hui C-W, Lin CSK, McKay G (2015) Aqueous mercury adsorption by activated carbons. Water Res 73:37–5510.1016/j.watres.2015.01.018 ↗
7. Mahmud HNME, Huqa AKO, Yahya Rb (2016) Removal of heavy metal ions from wastewater/aqueous solution by polypyrrole-based adsorbents: a review. RSC Adv 6:14778–1479110.1039/C5RA24358K ↗
8. Streets DG, Horowitz HM, Jacob DJ, Lu Z, Levin L, ter Schure AFH, Sunderland EM (2017) Total mercury released to the environment by human activities. Environ Sci Technol 51:5969–597710.1021/acs.est.7b00451 ↗
9. US EPA (2001) National primary drinking water standards. Report EPA 816-F-01-007, Washington DC. https://www.epa.gov/ground-water-and-drinking-water/national-primary-drinking-water-regulations . Accessed 10 July 2019
10. Zhang F-S, Nriagu JO, Itoh H (2005) Mercury removal from water using activated carbons derived from organic sewage sludge. Water Res 39:389–39510.1016/j.watres.2004.09.027 ↗
11. Kabiri S, Tran DNH, Azari S, Losic D (2015) Graphene-diatom silica aerogels for efficient removal of mercury ions from water. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 7:11815–1182310.1021/acsami.5b01159 ↗
12. Yap PL, Kabiri S, Tran DNH, Losic D (2019) Multifunctional binding chemistry on modified graphene composite for selective and highly efficient adsorption of mercury. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 11:6350–636210.1021/acsami.8b17131 ↗
13. Yu J-G, Yue B-Y, Wu X-W, Liu Q, Jiao F-P, Yiang X-Y, Chen X-Q (2016) Removal of mercury by adsorption: a review. Environ Sci Pollut Res 23:5056–507610.1007/s11356-015-5880-x ↗
14. Pasinszki T, Krebsz M, Kótai L, Sajó IE, Homonnay Z, Kuzmann E, Kiss LF, Váczi T, Kovács I (2015) Nanofurry magnetic carbon microspheres for separation processes and catalysis: synthesis, phase composition, and properties. J Mater Sci 50:7353–7363. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-015-9292-610.1007/s10853-015-9292-6 ↗
15. Pasinszki T, Krebsz M, Lajgut GG, Kocsis T, Kótai L, Kauthale S, Tekale S, Pawar R (2018) Copper nanoparticles grafted on carbon microspheres as novel heterogeneous catalysts and their application for the reduction of nitrophenol and one-pot multicomponent synthesis of hexahydroquinolines. New J Chem 42:1092–109810.1039/C7NJ03562D ↗
16. Córdoba MH, Garcia IL, Sánchez-Pedrenno C (1984) Spectrophotometric determination of mercury with thiocyanate and rhodamine B. Mikrochim Acta 3:467–47510.1007/BF01197161 ↗
17. Liu L, Luo X-B, Ding L, Luo S-L (2019) Application of nanotechnology in the removal of heavy metal from water. In: Luo X, Deng F (eds) Nanomaterials for the removal of pollutants and resource reutilization. Elsevier, Amsterdam
18. Zhang X, Scott T, Socha T, Nielsen D, Manno M, Johnson M, Yan Y, Losovyj Y, Dowben P, Aydil ES, Leighton C (2015) Phase stability and stoichiometry in thin film iron pyrite: impact on electronic transport properties. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 7:14130–1413910.1021/acsami.5b03422 ↗
19. Krishnan R, Jerin J, Manoj B (2013) Raman spectroscopy investigation of camphor soot: spectral analysis and structural information. Int J Electrochem Sci 8:9421–942810.1016/S1452-3981(23)12981-6 ↗
20. Walton EL, Sharp TG, Hu J, Filiberto J (2014) Heterogeneous mineral assemblages in Martian meteorite Tissint as a result of a recent small impact event on Mars. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 140:334–34810.1016/j.gca.2014.05.023 ↗
21. Wopenka B (2012) Raman spectroscopic investigation of two grains from comet 81P/Wild 2: information that can be obtained beyond the presence of sp2-bonded carbon. Meteor Planet Sci 47:565–58410.1111/j.1945-5100.2011.01317.x ↗
22. Thommes M, Kaneko K, Neimark AV, Olivier JP, Rodriguez-Reinoso F, Rouquerol J, Sing SW (2015) Physisorption of gases, with special reference to the evaluation of surface area and pore size distribution (IUPAC Technical Report). Pure Appl Chem 87:1051–106910.1515/pac-2014-1117 ↗
23. Scheuermann W, Ritter GJ (1969) Raman Spectra of Cinnabar (HgS), Realgar (As4S4) and Orpiment (As2S3). Z Naturforsch 24:408–41110.1515/zna-1969-0317 ↗
24. Sun Y, Lv D, Zhou J, Zhou X, Lou Z, Baig SA, Xu X (2017) Adsorption of mercury(II) from aqueous solutions using FeS and pyrite: a comparative study. Chemosphere 185:452–46110.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.07.047 ↗
25. Sun M, Cheng G, Ge X, Chen M, Wang C, Lou L, Xu X (2018) Aqueous Hg(II) immobilization by chitosan stabilized magnetic iron sulfide nanoparticles. Sci Tot Environ 621:1074–108310.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.10.119 ↗
26. Chen Y, Liang W, Li Y, Wu Y, Chen Y, Xiao W, Zhao L, Zhang J, Li H (2019) Modification, application and reaction mechanisms of nano-sized iron sulfide particles for pollutant removal from soil and water: a review. Chem Eng J 362:144–15910.1016/j.cej.2018.12.175 ↗
27. Ting Y, His HC (2019) Iron sulfide minerals as potential active capping materials for mercury-contaminated sediment remediation: a minireview. Sustainability 11:174710.3390/su11061747 ↗
28. Pillay K, Cukrowska EM, Coville NJ (2013) Improved uptake of mercury by sulphur-containing carbon nanotubes. Microchem J 108:124–13010.1016/j.microc.2012.10.014 ↗
29. Abdelouahab-Reddam Z, Wahby A, Rel Mail, Silvestre-Albero J, Rodriguez-Reinoso F, Sepulveda-Escribano A (2014) Activated carbons impregnated with Na2S and H2SO4: texture, surface chemistry and application to mercury removal from aqueous solutions. Ads Sci Technol 32:101–11510.1260/0263-6174.32.2-3.101 ↗
30. Zhang C, Sui J, Li J, Tang Y, Cai W (2012) Efficient removal of heavy metal ions by thiol-functionalized superparamagnetic carbon nanotubes. Chem Eng J 210:45–5210.1016/j.cej.2012.08.062 ↗
31. Cai JH, Jia CQ (2010) Mercury removal from aqueous solution using coke-derived sulfur-impregnated activated carbons. Ind Eng Chem Res 49:2716–272110.1021/ie901194r ↗
32. Hadavifar M, Bahramifar N, Younesi H, Li Q (2014) Adsorption of mercury ions from synthetic and real wastewater aqueous solution by functionalized multi-walled carbon nanotube with both amino and thiolated groups. Chem Eng J 237:217–22810.1016/j.cej.2013.10.014 ↗
33. Bandaru NM, Reta N, Dalal H, Ellis AV, Shapter J, Voelcker NH (2013) Enhanced adsorption of mercury ions on thiol derivatized single wall carbon nanotubes. J Hazardous Mat 261:534–54110.1016/j.jhazmat.2013.07.076 ↗
34. Mohan D, Gupta VK, Srivastava SK, Chander S (2001) Kinetics of mercury adsorption from wastewater using activated carbon derived from fertilizer waste. Coll Surf A 177:169–18110.1016/S0927-7757(00)00669-5 ↗