journal article·2019-09

Antimicrobial activity of biocomposite films containing cellulose nanofibrils and ethyl lauroyl arginate

Filomena Silva, Nicolás Gracia, Birgitte H. McDonagh, Fernanda C. Domingues, Cristina Nerín, Gary Chinga-Carrasco

Journal of Materials Science· Volume 54· Issue 18
Publisher page

Abstract

Food packaging is tailored to keep food fresh by increasing shelf life and preventing microbial deterioration. However, traditional food packaging is commonly made from non-degradable polymers without antimicrobial properties and that pose an environmental threat if not disposed properly. To address this issue, here we describe the preparation of cellulose nanofibril (CNF) films and hydrogels with antimicrobial activity against common foodborne pathogens such as verotoxigenic E. coli, L. monocytogenes and S. Typhimurium. Furthermore, two grades of negatively charged CNFs with different fibrillation degrees were modified with ethyl lauroyl arginate (LAE), which is an antimicrobial agent. CNF films were able to bind LAE molecules up to a maximum concentration of 145–160 ppm. LAE–CNF biocomposite films exerted a bactericidal activity against a major foodborne pathogen present in ready-to-eat food (L. monocytogenes) even at 1% LAE. Our work describes a novel biopolymer-based strategy that overcomes the current hurdles with LAE incorporation into packaging materials, offering a green and antimicrobial alternative for packaging of ready-to-eat (RTE) meat products.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advanced Cellulose Research Studies · Nanocomposite Films for Food Packaging · Microplastics and Plastic Pollution

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (44)

Show source-provided references
1. Khan A, Huq T, Khan RA et al (2014) Nanocellulose-based composites and bioactive agents for food packaging. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr 54:163–17410.1080/10408398.2011.578765 ↗
2. Liimatainen H, Visanko M, Sirviö JA et al (2012) Enhancement of the nanofibrillation of wood cellulose through sequential periodate–chlorite oxidation. Biomacromol 13:1592–159710.1021/bm300319m ↗
3. Wagberg L, Decher G, Norgren M et al (2008) The build-up of polyelectrolyte multilayers of microfibrillated cellulose and cationic polyelectrolytes. Langmuir 24:784–79510.1021/la702481v ↗
4. Saito T, Nishiyama Y, Putaux JL et al (2006) Homogeneous suspensions of individualized microfibrils from TEMPO-catalyzed oxidation of native cellulose. Biomacromol 7:1687–169110.1021/bm060154s ↗
5. De France KJ, Hoare T, Cranston ED (2017) Review of hydrogels and aerogels containing nanocellulose. Chem Mater 29:4609–463110.1021/acs.chemmater.7b00531 ↗
6. Chinga-Carrasco G, Syverud K (2012) On the structure and oxygen transmission rate of biodegradable cellulose nanobarriers. Nanoscale Res Lett 7:192–19810.1186/1556-276X-7-192 ↗
7. Fukuzumi H, Saito T, Wata T et al (2009) Transparent and high gas barrier films of cellulose nanofibers prepared by TEMPO-mediated oxidation. Biomacromol 10:162–16510.1021/bm801065u ↗
8. Powell LC, Khan S, Chinga-Carrasco G et al (2016) An investigation of Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm growth on novel nanocellulose fibre dressings. Carbohydr Polym 137:191–19710.1016/j.carbpol.2015.10.024 ↗
9. Jack AA, Nordli HR, Powell LC et al (2017) The interaction of wood nanocellulose dressings and the wound pathogen P. aeruginosa. Carbohydr Polym 157:1955–196210.1016/j.carbpol.2016.11.080 ↗
10. de Castro DO, Tabary N, Martel B et al (2018) Controlled release of carvacrol and curcumin: bio-based food packaging by synergism action of TEMPO-oxidized cellulose nanocrystals and cyclodextrin. Cellulose 25:1249–126310.1007/s10570-017-1646-6 ↗
11. Weishaupt R, Heuberger L, Siqueira G et al (2018) Enhanced antimicrobial activity and structural transitions of a nanofibrillated cellulose-nisin biocomposite suspension. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 10:20170–2018110.1021/acsami.8b04470 ↗
12. Nerin C, Becerril R, Manso S, Silva F (2016) Ethyl Lauroyl arginate (LAE): antimicrobial activity and applications in food systems. A2-Barros-Velázquez, Jorge. In: Antimicrobial food packaging. Academic Press, San Diego, pp 305–312
13. Otero V, Becerril R, Santos JA et al (2014) Evaluation of two antimicrobial packaging films against Escherichia coli O157:H7 strains in vitro and during storage of a Spanish ripened sheep cheese (Zamorano). Food Control 42:296–30210.1016/j.foodcont.2014.02.022 ↗
14. Theinsathid P, Visessanguan W, Kruenate J et al (2012) Antimicrobial activity of lauric arginate-coated polylactic acid films against Listeria monocytogenes and Salmonella Typhimurium on cooked sliced ham. J Food Sci 77:M142–M14910.1111/j.1750-3841.2011.02526.x ↗
15. Moreno O, Atarés L, Chiralt A et al (2018) Starch-gelatin antimicrobial packaging materials to extend the shelf life of chicken breast fillets. LWT-Food Sci Technol 97:483–49010.1016/j.lwt.2018.07.005 ↗
16. Kashiri M, Cerisuelo JP, Domínguez I et al (2016) Novel antimicrobial zein film for controlled release of lauroyl arginate (LAE). Food Hydrocoll 61:547–55410.1016/j.foodhyd.2016.06.012 ↗
17. Haghighi H, De Leo R, Bedin E et al (2019) Comparative analysis of blend and bilayer films based on chitosan and gelatin enriched with LAE (lauroyl arginate ethyl) with antimicrobial activity for food packaging applications. Food Packag Shelf Life 19:31–3910.1016/j.fpsl.2018.11.015 ↗
18. Muriel-Galet V, Carballo GL, Hernández-Muñoz P, Gavara R (2016) Chapter 24-Ethyl lauroyl arginate (LAE): usage and potential in antimicrobial packaging A2-barros-Velázquez, Jorge. Antimicrobial food packaging. Academic Press, San Diego, pp 313–31810.1016/B978-0-12-800723-5.00024-3 ↗
19. Chinga-Carrasco G, Kuznetsova N, Garaeva M et al (2012) Bleached and unbleached MFC nanobarriers: properties and hydrophobisation with hexamethyldisilazane. J Nanoparticle Res 14:1280–128410.1007/s11051-012-1280-z ↗
20. Saito T, Isogai A (2004) TEMPO-mediated oxidation of native cellulose. The effect of oxidation conditions on chemical and crystal structures of the water-insoluble fractions. Biomacromol 5:1983–198910.1021/bm0497769 ↗
21. Inoue T, Shingaki R, Hirose S et al (2007) Genome-wide screening of genes required for swarming motility in Escherichia coli K-12. J Bacteriol 189:950–95710.1128/JB.01294-06 ↗
22. Di Bonaventura G, Piccolomini R, Paludi D et al (2008) Influence of temperature on biofilm formation by Listeria monocytogenes on various food-contact surfaces: relationship with motility and cell surface hydrophobicity. J Appl Microbiol 104:1552–156110.1111/j.1365-2672.2007.03688.x ↗
23. Reeser RJ, Medler RT, Billington SJ et al (2007) Characterization of Campylobacter jejuni biofilms under defined growth conditions. Appl Environ Microbiol 73:1908–191310.1128/AEM.00740-06 ↗
24. Chen CY, Nace GW, Irwin PL (2003) A 6 × 6 drop plate method for simultaneous colony counting and MPN enumeration of Campylobacter jejuni, Listeria monocytogenes, and Escherichia coli. J Microbiol Methods 55:475–47910.1016/S0167-7012(03)00194-5 ↗
25. Pezo D, Navascues B, Salafranca J, Nerin C (2012) Analytical procedure for the determination of Ethyl Lauroyl Arginate (LAE) to assess the kinetics and specific migration from a new antimicrobial active food packaging. Anal Chim Acta 745:92–9810.1016/j.aca.2012.07.038 ↗
26. Chinga-Carrasco G, Averianova N, Kondalenko O et al (2014) The effect of residual fibres on the micro-topography of cellulose nanopaper. Micron 56:80–8410.1016/j.micron.2013.09.002 ↗
27. Tehrani Z, Nordli HR, Pukstad B et al (2016) Translucent and ductile nanocellulose-PEG bionanocomposites—a novel substrate with potential to be functionalized by printing for wound dressing applications. Ind Crops Prod 93:193–20210.1016/j.indcrop.2016.02.024 ↗
28. Mikczinski MR, Josefsson G, Chinga-Carrasco G et al (2014) Nanorobotic testing to assess the stiffness properties of nanopaper. IEEE Trans Robot 30:115–11910.1109/TRO.2013.2283409 ↗
29. Josefsson G, Chinga-Carrasco G, Gamstedt EK (2015) Elastic models coupling the cellulose nanofibril to the macroscopic film level. RSC Adv 5:58091–5809910.1039/C5RA04016G ↗
30. Sun FZ, Nordli HR, Pukstad B et al (2017) Mechanical characteristics of nanocellulose-PEG bionanocomposite wound dressings in wet conditions. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 69:377–38410.1016/j.jmbbm.2017.01.049 ↗
31. Weller-Stuart T, Toth I, De Maayer P, Coutinho T (2017) Swimming and twitching motility are essential for attachment and virulence of Pantoea ananatis in onion seedlings. Mol Plant Pathol 18:734–74510.1111/mpp.12432 ↗
32. Josenhans C, Suerbaum S (2002) The role of motility as a virulence factor in bacteria. Int J Med Microbiol 291:605–61410.1078/1438-4221-00173 ↗
33. Morales-Soto N, Anyan ME, Mattingly AE et al (2015) Preparation, imaging, and quantification of bacterial surface motility assays. J Vis Exp 98:52338–52348
34. Lippolis JD, Brunelle BW, Reinhardt TA et al (2014) Proteomic analysis reveals protein expression differences in Escherichia coli strains associated with persistent versus transient mastitis. J Proteomics 108:373–38110.1016/j.jprot.2014.06.008 ↗
35. Allison SE, Silphaduang U, Mascarenhas M et al (2012) Novel repressor of Escherichia coli O157:H7 motility encoded in the putative fimbrial cluster OI-1. J Bacteriol 194:5343–535210.1128/JB.01025-12 ↗
36. O’Neil HS, Marquis H (2006) Listeria monocytogenes flagella are used for motility, not as adhesins, to increase host cell invasion. Infect Immun 74:6675–668110.1128/IAI.00886-06 ↗
37. Barbosa FD, Neto OCD, Batista DFA et al (2017) Contribution of flagella and motility to gut colonisation and pathogenicity of Salmonella Enteritidis in the chicken. Braz J Microbiol 48:754–75910.1016/j.bjm.2017.01.012 ↗
38. Kearns DB (2010) A field guide to bacterial swarming motility. Nat Rev Microbiol 8:634–64410.1038/nrmicro2405 ↗
39. de la Fuente-Nunez C, Korolik V, Bains M et al (2012) Inhibition of bacterial biofilm formation and swarming motility by a small synthetic cationic peptide. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 56:2696–270410.1128/AAC.00064-12 ↗
40. Guttenplan SB, Kearns DB (2013) Regulation of flagellar motility during biofilm formation. FEMS Microbiol Rev 37:849–87110.1111/1574-6976.12018 ↗
41. Belas R (2013) When the swimming gets tough, the tough form a biofilm. Mol Microbiol 90:1–510.1111/mmi.12354 ↗
42. Rees A, Powell LC, Chinga-Carrasco G et al (2015) 3D Bioprinting of carboxymethylated-periodate oxidized nanocellulose constructs for wound dressing applications. Biomed Res Int 2015:925757–92576410.1155/2015/925757 ↗
43. Ma Q, Davidson PM, Zhong Q (2013) Antimicrobial properties of lauric arginate alone or in combination with essential oils in tryptic soy broth and 2% reduced fat milk. Int J Food Microbiol 166:77–8410.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2013.06.017 ↗
44. Becerril R, Manso S, Nerin C et al (2013) Antimicrobial activity of lauroyl arginate ethyl (LAE), against selected food-borne bacteria. Food Control 32:404–40810.1016/j.foodcont.2013.01.003 ↗