journal article·2019-05Open access

Evaluation of cellulose nanocrystal addition on morphology, compression modulus and cytotoxicity of poly(3-hydroxybutyrate-co-3-hydroxyvalerate) scaffolds

Thaís Larissa do Amaral Montanheiro, Larissa Stieven Montagna, Viorica Patrulea, Olivier Jordan, Gerrit Borchard, Gabriela Matheus Monteiro Lobato, Luiz Henrique Catalani, Ana Paula Lemes

Journal of Materials Science· Volume 54· Issue 9

Abstract

Nanocomposite scaffolds of poly(3-hydroxybutyrate-co-3-hydroxyvalerate) (PHBV) with 1, 2 and 3% (wt) of cellulose nanocrystals (CNC) were produced by thermally induced phase separation. CNC presented an average length of 91 ± 26 nm and average diameter of 7 ± 1 nm, determined by atomic force microscopy (AFM). Field emission gun scanning electron microscopy (FEG-SEM) and X-ray microtomography showed porous morphology with interconnected pores, porosity between 41 and 77% and micron-sized CNC dispersion along the samples. Pore distribution after introducing CNC was less regular with an average reduction of 37% in the porosity. The compression modulus was improved about 28% for PHBV/1% CNC, 25% for PHBV/2% CNC and 63% for PHBV/3% CNC. Mouse fibroblasts attached and proliferated better on PHBV/CNC scaffolds surface than on neat PHBV or tissue culture plate controls. After 10 days of cell culture, PHBV/2% CNC sample enhanced cell proliferation with 42%, compared to neat PHBV. Therefore, the addition of CNC can improve both compressive modulus and cell proliferation, making the composite scaffold a potential candidate for tissue engineering.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advanced Cellulose Research Studies · biodegradable polymer synthesis and properties · Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (47)

Show source-provided references
1. O’Brien FJ (2011) Biomaterials & scaffolds for tissue engineering. Mater Today 14:88–9510.1016/S1369-7021(11)70058-X ↗
2. Sankar D, Chennazhi KP, Nair SV, Jayakumar R (2012) Fabrication of chitin/poly(3-hydroxybutyrate-co-3-hydroxyvalerate) hydrogel scaffold. Carbohydr Polym 90:725–72910.1016/j.carbpol.2012.05.041 ↗
3. Fernández E, Gil FJ, Ginebra MP, Driessens C, Planell A, Best SM (1999) Calcium phosphate bone cements for clinical applications. Part I: solution chemistry. J Mater Sci Mater Med 10:169–176. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:100893750771410.1023/A:1008937507714 ↗
4. Chanprateep S (2010) Current trends in biodegradable polyhydroxyalkanoates. J Biosci Bioeng 110:621–63210.1016/j.jbiosc.2010.07.014 ↗
5. Cao Z, Dou C, Dong S (2014) Scaffolding biomaterials for cartilage regeneration. J Nanomater 2014:1–810.1155/2014/489128 ↗
6. Chen GQ, Wu Q (2005) The application of polyhydroxyalkanoates as tissue engineering materials. Biomaterials 26:6565–657810.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.04.036 ↗
7. Moon RJ, Martini A, Nairn J, Simonsen J, Youngblood J (2011) Cellulose nanomaterials review: structure, properties and nanocomposites. Chem Soc Rev 40:3941–399410.1039/c0cs00108b ↗
8. Ten E, Turtle J, Bahr D, Jiang L, Wolcott M (2010) Thermal and mechanical properties of poly(3-hydroxybutyrate-co-3-hydroxyvalerate)/cellulose nanowhiskers composites. Polymer (Guildf) 51:2652–266010.1016/j.polymer.2010.04.007 ↗
9. Song T, Tanpichai S, Oksman K (2016) Cross-linked polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) foams reinforced with cellulose nanocrystals (CNCs). Cellulose 23:1925–193810.1007/s10570-016-0925-y ↗
10. Yu H-Y, Qin Z-Y (2014) Surface grafting of cellulose nanocrystals with poly(3-hydroxybutirate-co-3-hydroxyvalerate). Carbohydr Polym 101:471–47810.1016/j.carbpol.2013.09.048 ↗
11. Miao C, Hamad WY (2016) In-situ polymerized cellulose nanocrystals (CNC)-poly(L-lactide) (PLLA) nanomaterials and applications in nanocomposite processing. Carbohydr Polym 153:549–55810.1016/j.carbpol.2016.08.012 ↗
12. Ten E, Jiang L, Wolcott MP (2013) Preparation and properties of aligned poly (3-hydroxybutyrate- co -3-hydroxyvalerate)/cellulose nanowhiskers composites. Carbohydr Polym 92:206–21310.1016/j.carbpol.2012.09.033 ↗
13. Jiang L, Morelius E, Zhang J, Wolcott M, Holbery J (2008) Study of the poly(3-hydroxybutyrate-co-3-hydroxyvalerate)/cellulose nanowhisker composites prepared by solution casting and melt processing. J Compos Mater 42:2629–264510.1177/0021998308096327 ↗
14. Benini KCCC, Cioffi MOH, Voorwald HJC (2017) PHBV/cellulose nanocrystals composites obtained by solution casting and electrospinning process. Revista Matér 22:1–9
15. Yu H, Qin Z, Zhou Z (2011) Cellulose nanocrystals as green fillers to improve crystallization and hydrophilic property of poly(3-hydroxybutyrate-co-3-hydroxyvalerate). Prog Nat Sci Mater Int 21:478–48410.1016/S1002-0071(12)60086-0 ↗
16. Yu H-Y, Qin Z-Y, Liu Y-N, Chen L, Liu N, Zhou Z (2012) Simultaneous improvement of mechanical properties and thermal stability of bacterial polyester by cellulose nanocrystals. Carbohydr Polym 89:971–97810.1016/j.carbpol.2012.04.053 ↗
17. Srithep Y, Ellingham T, Peng J et al (2013) Melt compounding of poly (3-hydroxybutyrate- co-3- hydroxyvalerate)/nanofibrillated cellulose nanocomposites. Polym Degrad Stab 98:1439–144910.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2013.05.006 ↗
18. Hermida ÉB, Ruiz I, Baldessari A, Kreimann E (2012) Biodegradation and histological response of PHBV porous scaffolds. Biocell A9:1–4
19. Sultana N (2013) Biodegradable polymer-based scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Springer, Berlin10.1007/978-3-642-34802-0 ↗
20. Eichhorn SJ (2011) Cellulose nanowhiskers: promising materials for advanced applications. Soft Matter 20:1–12
21. Deroiné M, Le Duigou A, Corre Y-M et al (2014) Seawater accelerated ageing of poly(3-hydroxybutyrate-co-3-hydroxyvalerate). Polym Degrad Stab 105:237–24710.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2014.04.026 ↗
22. Stock SR (2008) Recent advances in X-ray microtomography applied to materials. Int Mater Rev 53:129–18110.1179/174328008X277803 ↗
23. Meyer JP, Adio SA, Sharifpur M, Nwosu PN (2016) The viscosity of nanofluids: a review of the theoretical, empirical, and numerical models. Heat Transf Eng 37:387–42110.1080/01457632.2015.1057447 ↗
24. Murshed SMS, Estellé P (2017) A state of the art review on viscosity of nanofluids. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 76:1134–115210.1016/j.rser.2017.03.113 ↗
25. Bashirnezhad K, Bazri S, Safaei MR et al (2016) Viscosity of nanofluids: a review of recent experimental studies. Int Commun Heat Mass Transf 73:114–12310.1016/j.icheatmasstransfer.2016.02.005 ↗
26. Bolloli M, Antonelli C, Molméret Y, Alloin F, Iojoiu C, Sanchez JY (2016) Nanocomposite poly(vinylidene fluoride)/nanocrystalline cellulose porous membranes as separators for lithium-ion batteries. Electrochim Acta 214:38–4810.1016/j.electacta.2016.08.020 ↗
27. Wu J, Xue K, Li H, Sun J, Liu K (2013) Improvement of PHBV scaffolds with bioglass for cartilage tissue engineering. PLoS ONE 8:1–9
28. Karageorgiou V, Kaplan D (2005) Porosity of 3D biomaterial scaffolds and osteogenesis. Biomaterials 26:5474–549110.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.02.002 ↗
29. Naseri N, Poirier JM, Girandon L, Fröhlich M, Oksman K, Mathew AP (2016) 3-Dimensional porous nanocomposite scaffolds based on cellulose nanofibers for cartilage tissue engineering: tailoring of porosity and mechanical performance. RSC Adv 6:5999–600710.1039/C5RA27246G ↗
30. Whang K, Healy KE, Elenz DR, Nam EK et al (1999) Engineering bone regeneration with bioabsorbable scaffolds with novel microarchitecture. Tissue Eng 5:35–5110.1089/ten.1999.5.35 ↗
31. Yang S, Leong K-F, Du Z, Chua C-K (2001) The design of scaffolds for use in tissue engineering. Part I Tradit Factors Tissue Eng 7:679–689
32. Bruzauskaite I, Bironaite D, Bagdonas E, Bernotiene E (2016) Scaffolds and cells for tissue regeneration: different scaffold pore sizes—different cell effects. Cytotechnology 68:355–36910.1007/s10616-015-9895-4 ↗
33. Murphy CM, O’Brien FJ (2010) Understanding the effect of mean pore size on cell activity in collagen-glycosaminoglycan scaffolds. Cell Adhes Migr 4:377–38110.4161/cam.4.3.11747 ↗
34. Ghorbani F, Zamanian A (2016) Oriented microstructure in neural tissue engineering: a review. J Tissue Sci Eng 07:1–410.4172/2157-7552.1000182 ↗
35. Liang D, Hsiao BS, Chu B (2007) Functional electrospun nanofibrous scaffolds for biomedical applications. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 59:1392–141210.1016/j.addr.2007.04.021 ↗
36. Diermann SH, Lu M, Zhao Y, Vandi L, Dargusch M, Huang H (2018) Synthesis, microstructure, and mechanical behaviour of a unique porous PHBV scaffold manufactured using selective laser sintering. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 84:151–16010.1016/j.jmbbm.2018.05.007 ↗
37. Ku D N (2005) Flexible Spinal Disc. US 2005/0055099 A1
38. Wang K, Nune KC, Misra RDK (2016) The functional response of alginate-gelatin-nanocrystalline cellulose injectable hydrogels toward delivery of cells and bioactive molecules. Acta Biomater 36:143–15110.1016/j.actbio.2016.03.016 ↗
39. Sabree I, Gough JE, Derby B (2015) Mechanical properties of porous ceramic scaffolds: influence of internal dimensions. Ceram Int 41:8425–843210.1016/j.ceramint.2015.03.044 ↗
40. Zhu H, Shen J, Feng X, Zhang H, Guo Y, Chen J (2010) Fabrication and characterization of bioactive silk fibroin/wollastonite composite scaffolds. Mater Sci Eng C 30:132–14010.1016/j.msec.2009.09.009 ↗
41. Zhou C, Wu Q (2012) Recent development in applications of cellulose nanocrystals for advanced polymer-based nanocomposites by novel fabrication strategies. In: Neralla S (ed) Nanocrystals-synthesis, characterization and applications. IntechOpen, London, pp 103–120
42. Montanheiro TLA, Montagna LS, de Farias MA, Magalhães JA, Tada DB et al (2018) Cytotoxicity and physico-chemical evaluation of acetylated and pegylated cellulose nanocrystals. J Nanopart Res 20:20610.1007/s11051-018-4306-3 ↗
43. Patil S, Sandberg A, Heckert E, Self W, Seal S (2007) Protein adsorption and cellular uptake of cerium oxide nanoparticles as a function of zeta potential. Biomaterials 28:4600–460710.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.07.029 ↗
44. Pelaz B, del Pino P, Maffre P, Hartmann R et al (2015) Surface functionalization of nanoparticles with polyethylene glycol: effects on protein adsorption and cellular uptake. ACS Nano 9:6996–700810.1021/acsnano.5b01326 ↗
45. Hu SG, Jou CH, Yang MC (2003) Protein adsorption, fibroblast activity and antibacterial properties of poly(3-hydroxybutyric acid-co-3-hydroxyvaleric acid) grafted with chitosan and chitooligosaccharide after immobilized with hyaluronic acid. Biomaterials 24:2685–269310.1016/S0142-9612(03)00079-6 ↗
46. Hu S-G, Jou C-H, Yang M-C (2004) Biocompatibility and antibacterial activity of chitosan and collagen immobilized poly(3-hydroxybutyric acid-co-3-hydroxyvaleric acid). Carbohydr Polym 58:173–17910.1016/j.carbpol.2004.06.039 ↗
47. Zhijiang C, Yi X, Haizheng Y, Jia J, Liu Y (2016) Poly(hydroxybutyrate)/cellulose acetate blend nanofiber scaffolds: preparation, characterization and cytocompatibility. Mater Sciende Eng C 58:757–76710.1016/j.msec.2015.09.048 ↗