Evaluation of cellulose nanocrystal addition on morphology, compression modulus and cytotoxicity of poly(3-hydroxybutyrate-co-3-hydroxyvalerate) scaffolds
Source abstract
Abstract
Nanocomposite scaffolds of poly(3-hydroxybutyrate-co-3-hydroxyvalerate) (PHBV) with 1, 2 and 3% (wt) of cellulose nanocrystals (CNC) were produced by thermally induced phase separation. CNC presented an average length of 91 ± 26 nm and average diameter of 7 ± 1 nm, determined by atomic force microscopy (AFM). Field emission gun scanning electron microscopy (FEG-SEM) and X-ray microtomography showed porous morphology with interconnected pores, porosity between 41 and 77% and micron-sized CNC dispersion along the samples. Pore distribution after introducing CNC was less regular with an average reduction of 37% in the porosity. The compression modulus was improved about 28% for PHBV/1% CNC, 25% for PHBV/2% CNC and 63% for PHBV/3% CNC. Mouse fibroblasts attached and proliferated better on PHBV/CNC scaffolds surface than on neat PHBV or tissue culture plate controls. After 10 days of cell culture, PHBV/2% CNC sample enhanced cell proliferation with 42%, compared to neat PHBV. Therefore, the addition of CNC can improve both compressive modulus and cell proliferation, making the composite scaffold a potential candidate for tissue engineering.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced Cellulose Research Studies · biodegradable polymer synthesis and properties · Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (47)
Show source-provided references
1. O’Brien FJ (2011) Biomaterials & scaffolds for tissue engineering. Mater Today 14:88–9510.1016/S1369-7021(11)70058-X ↗
2. Sankar D, Chennazhi KP, Nair SV, Jayakumar R (2012) Fabrication of chitin/poly(3-hydroxybutyrate-co-3-hydroxyvalerate) hydrogel scaffold. Carbohydr Polym 90:725–72910.1016/j.carbpol.2012.05.041 ↗
3. Fernández E, Gil FJ, Ginebra MP, Driessens C, Planell A, Best SM (1999) Calcium phosphate bone cements for clinical applications. Part I: solution chemistry. J Mater Sci Mater Med 10:169–176. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:100893750771410.1023/A:1008937507714 ↗
4. Chanprateep S (2010) Current trends in biodegradable polyhydroxyalkanoates. J Biosci Bioeng 110:621–63210.1016/j.jbiosc.2010.07.014 ↗
5. Cao Z, Dou C, Dong S (2014) Scaffolding biomaterials for cartilage regeneration. J Nanomater 2014:1–810.1155/2014/489128 ↗
6. Chen GQ, Wu Q (2005) The application of polyhydroxyalkanoates as tissue engineering materials. Biomaterials 26:6565–657810.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.04.036 ↗
7. Moon RJ, Martini A, Nairn J, Simonsen J, Youngblood J (2011) Cellulose nanomaterials review: structure, properties and nanocomposites. Chem Soc Rev 40:3941–399410.1039/c0cs00108b ↗
8. Ten E, Turtle J, Bahr D, Jiang L, Wolcott M (2010) Thermal and mechanical properties of poly(3-hydroxybutyrate-co-3-hydroxyvalerate)/cellulose nanowhiskers composites. Polymer (Guildf) 51:2652–266010.1016/j.polymer.2010.04.007 ↗
9. Song T, Tanpichai S, Oksman K (2016) Cross-linked polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) foams reinforced with cellulose nanocrystals (CNCs). Cellulose 23:1925–193810.1007/s10570-016-0925-y ↗
10. Yu H-Y, Qin Z-Y (2014) Surface grafting of cellulose nanocrystals with poly(3-hydroxybutirate-co-3-hydroxyvalerate). Carbohydr Polym 101:471–47810.1016/j.carbpol.2013.09.048 ↗
11. Miao C, Hamad WY (2016) In-situ polymerized cellulose nanocrystals (CNC)-poly(L-lactide) (PLLA) nanomaterials and applications in nanocomposite processing. Carbohydr Polym 153:549–55810.1016/j.carbpol.2016.08.012 ↗
12. Ten E, Jiang L, Wolcott MP (2013) Preparation and properties of aligned poly (3-hydroxybutyrate- co -3-hydroxyvalerate)/cellulose nanowhiskers composites. Carbohydr Polym 92:206–21310.1016/j.carbpol.2012.09.033 ↗
13. Jiang L, Morelius E, Zhang J, Wolcott M, Holbery J (2008) Study of the poly(3-hydroxybutyrate-co-3-hydroxyvalerate)/cellulose nanowhisker composites prepared by solution casting and melt processing. J Compos Mater 42:2629–264510.1177/0021998308096327 ↗
14. Benini KCCC, Cioffi MOH, Voorwald HJC (2017) PHBV/cellulose nanocrystals composites obtained by solution casting and electrospinning process. Revista Matér 22:1–9
15. Yu H, Qin Z, Zhou Z (2011) Cellulose nanocrystals as green fillers to improve crystallization and hydrophilic property of poly(3-hydroxybutyrate-co-3-hydroxyvalerate). Prog Nat Sci Mater Int 21:478–48410.1016/S1002-0071(12)60086-0 ↗
16. Yu H-Y, Qin Z-Y, Liu Y-N, Chen L, Liu N, Zhou Z (2012) Simultaneous improvement of mechanical properties and thermal stability of bacterial polyester by cellulose nanocrystals. Carbohydr Polym 89:971–97810.1016/j.carbpol.2012.04.053 ↗
17. Srithep Y, Ellingham T, Peng J et al (2013) Melt compounding of poly (3-hydroxybutyrate- co-3- hydroxyvalerate)/nanofibrillated cellulose nanocomposites. Polym Degrad Stab 98:1439–144910.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2013.05.006 ↗
18. Hermida ÉB, Ruiz I, Baldessari A, Kreimann E (2012) Biodegradation and histological response of PHBV porous scaffolds. Biocell A9:1–4
19. Sultana N (2013) Biodegradable polymer-based scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Springer, Berlin10.1007/978-3-642-34802-0 ↗
20. Eichhorn SJ (2011) Cellulose nanowhiskers: promising materials for advanced applications. Soft Matter 20:1–12
21. Deroiné M, Le Duigou A, Corre Y-M et al (2014) Seawater accelerated ageing of poly(3-hydroxybutyrate-co-3-hydroxyvalerate). Polym Degrad Stab 105:237–24710.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2014.04.026 ↗
22. Stock SR (2008) Recent advances in X-ray microtomography applied to materials. Int Mater Rev 53:129–18110.1179/174328008X277803 ↗
23. Meyer JP, Adio SA, Sharifpur M, Nwosu PN (2016) The viscosity of nanofluids: a review of the theoretical, empirical, and numerical models. Heat Transf Eng 37:387–42110.1080/01457632.2015.1057447 ↗
24. Murshed SMS, Estellé P (2017) A state of the art review on viscosity of nanofluids. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 76:1134–115210.1016/j.rser.2017.03.113 ↗
25. Bashirnezhad K, Bazri S, Safaei MR et al (2016) Viscosity of nanofluids: a review of recent experimental studies. Int Commun Heat Mass Transf 73:114–12310.1016/j.icheatmasstransfer.2016.02.005 ↗
26. Bolloli M, Antonelli C, Molméret Y, Alloin F, Iojoiu C, Sanchez JY (2016) Nanocomposite poly(vinylidene fluoride)/nanocrystalline cellulose porous membranes as separators for lithium-ion batteries. Electrochim Acta 214:38–4810.1016/j.electacta.2016.08.020 ↗
27. Wu J, Xue K, Li H, Sun J, Liu K (2013) Improvement of PHBV scaffolds with bioglass for cartilage tissue engineering. PLoS ONE 8:1–9
28. Karageorgiou V, Kaplan D (2005) Porosity of 3D biomaterial scaffolds and osteogenesis. Biomaterials 26:5474–549110.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.02.002 ↗
29. Naseri N, Poirier JM, Girandon L, Fröhlich M, Oksman K, Mathew AP (2016) 3-Dimensional porous nanocomposite scaffolds based on cellulose nanofibers for cartilage tissue engineering: tailoring of porosity and mechanical performance. RSC Adv 6:5999–600710.1039/C5RA27246G ↗
30. Whang K, Healy KE, Elenz DR, Nam EK et al (1999) Engineering bone regeneration with bioabsorbable scaffolds with novel microarchitecture. Tissue Eng 5:35–5110.1089/ten.1999.5.35 ↗
31. Yang S, Leong K-F, Du Z, Chua C-K (2001) The design of scaffolds for use in tissue engineering. Part I Tradit Factors Tissue Eng 7:679–689
32. Bruzauskaite I, Bironaite D, Bagdonas E, Bernotiene E (2016) Scaffolds and cells for tissue regeneration: different scaffold pore sizes—different cell effects. Cytotechnology 68:355–36910.1007/s10616-015-9895-4 ↗
33. Murphy CM, O’Brien FJ (2010) Understanding the effect of mean pore size on cell activity in collagen-glycosaminoglycan scaffolds. Cell Adhes Migr 4:377–38110.4161/cam.4.3.11747 ↗
34. Ghorbani F, Zamanian A (2016) Oriented microstructure in neural tissue engineering: a review. J Tissue Sci Eng 07:1–410.4172/2157-7552.1000182 ↗
35. Liang D, Hsiao BS, Chu B (2007) Functional electrospun nanofibrous scaffolds for biomedical applications. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 59:1392–141210.1016/j.addr.2007.04.021 ↗
36. Diermann SH, Lu M, Zhao Y, Vandi L, Dargusch M, Huang H (2018) Synthesis, microstructure, and mechanical behaviour of a unique porous PHBV scaffold manufactured using selective laser sintering. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 84:151–16010.1016/j.jmbbm.2018.05.007 ↗
37. Ku D N (2005) Flexible Spinal Disc. US 2005/0055099 A1
38. Wang K, Nune KC, Misra RDK (2016) The functional response of alginate-gelatin-nanocrystalline cellulose injectable hydrogels toward delivery of cells and bioactive molecules. Acta Biomater 36:143–15110.1016/j.actbio.2016.03.016 ↗
39. Sabree I, Gough JE, Derby B (2015) Mechanical properties of porous ceramic scaffolds: influence of internal dimensions. Ceram Int 41:8425–843210.1016/j.ceramint.2015.03.044 ↗
40. Zhu H, Shen J, Feng X, Zhang H, Guo Y, Chen J (2010) Fabrication and characterization of bioactive silk fibroin/wollastonite composite scaffolds. Mater Sci Eng C 30:132–14010.1016/j.msec.2009.09.009 ↗
41. Zhou C, Wu Q (2012) Recent development in applications of cellulose nanocrystals for advanced polymer-based nanocomposites by novel fabrication strategies. In: Neralla S (ed) Nanocrystals-synthesis, characterization and applications. IntechOpen, London, pp 103–120
42. Montanheiro TLA, Montagna LS, de Farias MA, Magalhães JA, Tada DB et al (2018) Cytotoxicity and physico-chemical evaluation of acetylated and pegylated cellulose nanocrystals. J Nanopart Res 20:20610.1007/s11051-018-4306-3 ↗
43. Patil S, Sandberg A, Heckert E, Self W, Seal S (2007) Protein adsorption and cellular uptake of cerium oxide nanoparticles as a function of zeta potential. Biomaterials 28:4600–460710.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.07.029 ↗
44. Pelaz B, del Pino P, Maffre P, Hartmann R et al (2015) Surface functionalization of nanoparticles with polyethylene glycol: effects on protein adsorption and cellular uptake. ACS Nano 9:6996–700810.1021/acsnano.5b01326 ↗
45. Hu SG, Jou CH, Yang MC (2003) Protein adsorption, fibroblast activity and antibacterial properties of poly(3-hydroxybutyric acid-co-3-hydroxyvaleric acid) grafted with chitosan and chitooligosaccharide after immobilized with hyaluronic acid. Biomaterials 24:2685–269310.1016/S0142-9612(03)00079-6 ↗
46. Hu S-G, Jou C-H, Yang M-C (2004) Biocompatibility and antibacterial activity of chitosan and collagen immobilized poly(3-hydroxybutyric acid-co-3-hydroxyvaleric acid). Carbohydr Polym 58:173–17910.1016/j.carbpol.2004.06.039 ↗
47. Zhijiang C, Yi X, Haizheng Y, Jia J, Liu Y (2016) Poly(hydroxybutyrate)/cellulose acetate blend nanofiber scaffolds: preparation, characterization and cytocompatibility. Mater Sciende Eng C 58:757–76710.1016/j.msec.2015.09.048 ↗