Improved methods for nanoindentation Berkovich probe calibrations using fused silica
Source abstract
Abstract
Improved methods are needed to improve the reliability and reporting of Berkovich probe calibrations. Current methods for calibrating machine compliance rely substantially on the subjectivity of the user to choose and exclude from the analysis nanoindentations below a threshold size that are affected by probe tip imperfections or the fused silica surface properties. Furthermore, it can be difficult to identify erroneous experimental data, such as those resulting from dirty or damaged probes. To help overcome these issues in Berkovich probe calibrations, a pre-nanoindentation liftoff analysis and systematic analysis of the Stone–Yoder–Sproul plot were developed. The utility of the analyses was demonstrated through analysis of experimental data. After correcting the fused silica data for machine compliance, the probe area function calibration was performed following established protocols. Finally, a concise protocol for reporting Berkovich probe calibration results was established to improve comparisons between experiments performed with different Berkovich probes.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Metal and Thin Film Mechanics · Force Microscopy Techniques and Applications · Advanced Surface Polishing Techniques
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (24)
Show source-provided references
1. Oliver WC, Pharr GM (2004) Measurement of hardness and elastic modulus by instrumented indentation: advances in understanding and refinements to methodology. J Mater Res 19:3–2010.1557/jmr.2004.19.1.3 ↗
2. Fischer-Cripps AC (2006) Critical review of analysis and interpretation of nanoindentation test data. Surf Coat Technol 200:4153–416510.1016/j.surfcoat.2005.03.018 ↗
3. Pethica JB, Hutchings R, Oliver WC (1983) Hardness measurement at penetration depths as small as 20 nm. Philos Mag A 48:593–60610.1080/01418618308234914 ↗
4. Doerner MF, Nix WD (1986) A method for interpreting the data from depth-sensing indentation instruments. J Mater Res 1:601–60910.1557/JMR.1986.0601 ↗
5. Oliver WC, Pharr GM (1992) Improved technique for determining hardness and elastic modulus using load and displacement sensing indentation experiments. J Mater Res 7:1564–158010.1557/JMR.1992.1564 ↗
6. Fischer-Cripps AC (2004) Nanoindentation, 2nd edn. Springer, New York10.1007/978-1-4757-5943-3 ↗
7. Stone DS, Yoder KB, Sproul WD (1991) Hardness and elastic modulus of TiN based on continuous indentation technique and new correlation. J Vac Sci Technol A 9:2543–254710.1116/1.577270 ↗
8. Berkovich E (1951) Three-faceted diamond pyramid for micro-hardness testing. Ind Diam Rev 11:129–133
9. Chen W, Li M, Zhang T, Cheng Y-T, Cheng C-M (2007) Influence of indenter tip roundness on hardness behavior in nanoindentation. Mater Sci Eng A 445–446:323–32710.1016/j.msea.2006.09.050 ↗
10. Chen J, Bull SJ (2009) On the factors affecting the critical indenter penetration for measurement of coating hardness. Vacuum 83:911–92010.1016/j.vacuum.2008.11.007 ↗
11. Fischer-Cripps AC (2010) The sharpness of a Berkovich indenter. J Mater Res 25:927–93410.1557/JMR.2010.0111 ↗
12. Li M, Chen W, Cheng Y-T, Cheng C-M (2009) Influence of contact geometry on hardness behavior in nano-indentation. Vacuum 84:315–32010.1016/j.vacuum.2009.07.001 ↗
13. Nix WD, Gao H (1998) Indentation size effects in crystalline materials: a law for strain gradient plasticity. J Mech Phys Solids 46:411–42510.1016/S0022-5096(97)00086-0 ↗
14. Jakes JE, Frihart CR, Beecher JF, Moon RJ, Stone DS (2008) Experimental method to account for structural compliance in nanoindentation measurements. J Mater Res 23:1113–112710.1557/jmr.2008.0131 ↗
15. Jakes JE, Frihart CR, Beecher JF, Moon RJ, Resto PJ, Melgarejo ZH, Surez OM, Baumgart H, Elmustafa AA, Stone DS (2009) Nanoindentation near the edge. J Mater Res 24:1016–103110.1557/jmr.2009.0076 ↗
16. Jakes JE, Hunt CG, Yelle DJ, Lorenz LF, Hirth K, Gleber S-C, Vogt S, Grigsby W, Frihart CR (2015) Synchrotron-based x-ray fluorescence microscopy in conjunction with nanoindentation to study molecular-scale interactions of phenol-formaldehyde in wood cell walls. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 7:6584–658910.1021/am5087598 ↗
17. Bolshakov A, Pharr GM (1997) Inaccuracies in Sneddon’s solution for elastic indentation by a rigid cone and their implications for nanoindentation data analysis. In: Gerberich WW, Gao H, Sundgren J-E, Baker SP (eds) Thin films: stresses and mechanical properties VI. Mater Res Soc Symp Proc 436, San Francisco, CA, USA, p 189
18. Chudoba T, Jennett NM (2008) Higher accuracy analysis of instrumented indentation data obtained with pointed indenters. J Phys D Appl Phys 41:21540710.1088/0022-3727/41/21/215407 ↗
19. Strader JH, Shim S, Bei H, Oliver WC, Pharr GM (2006) An experimental evaluation of the constant β relating the contact stiffness to the contact area in nanoindentation. Philos Mag 86:5285–529810.1080/14786430600567747 ↗
20. Joslin DL, Oliver WC (1990) New method for analyzing data from continuous depth-sensing microindentation tests. J Mater Res 5:123–12610.1557/JMR.1990.0123 ↗
21. Sneddon IN (1965) Relation between load and penetration in axisymmetric Boussinesq problem for punch of arbitrary profile. Int J Eng Sci 3:47–5710.1016/0020-7225(65)90019-4 ↗
22. Pharr GM, Bolshakov A (2002) Understanding nanoindentation unloading curves. J Mater Res 17:2660–267110.1557/JMR.2002.0386 ↗
23. Harding DS, Oliver WC, Pharr GM (1994) Cracking during nanoindentation and its use in the measurement of fracture toughness. In: Demczyk BG, Williams ED, Garfunkel E, et al (eds) Evolution of thin-film and surface structure and morphology. Mater Res Soc Symp Proc 356, Pittsburgh, PA, p 66310.1557/PROC-356-663 ↗
24. King RB (1987) Elastic analysis of some punch problems for a layered medium. Int J Solids Struct 23:1657–166410.1016/0020-7683(87)90116-8 ↗