Rate dependence of the tensile and flexural strengths of glass–ceramic Macor
Source abstract
Abstract
Understanding of the tensile and flexural strengths of the glass–ceramic Macor bears important applications in materials science, aerospace, defense, and other engineering disciplines. In this article, we systematically investigate the rate dependence of the tensile strength and the flexural strength of Macor utilizing two methods: the Brazilian disk (BD) test and semi-circular bend (SCB) test. Both static tests and dynamic tests are conducted to explore the rate dependence of tensile and flexural strengths of Macor. The static measurement is conducted with a servo-controlled material testing machine, and the dynamic experiment is carried out with a 6.35-mm diameter split Hopkinson pressure bar (SHPB) system. The pulse-shaping technique is used to achieve dynamic force balance, and thus eliminates the loading inertial effect and enables quasi-static stress analysis. The experimental results show that both the tensile strength and the flexural strength of Macor are loading rate dependent. The flexural strength is observed to be consistently higher than the tensile strength.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: High-Velocity Impact and Material Behavior · Advanced Surface Polishing Techniques · Advanced ceramic materials synthesis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (20)
Show source-provided references
1. Chen WN, Ravichandran G (1997) J Mech Phys Solids 45:130310.1016/S0022-5096(97)00006-9 ↗
2. Chen WW, Rajendran AM, Song B, Nie X (2007) J Am Ceram Soc 90:100510.1111/j.1551-2916.2007.01515.x ↗
3. Frew DJ, Forrestal MJ, Chen W (2002) Exp Mech 42:9310.1007/BF02411056 ↗
4. Bagdassarov NS (1999) Phys Chem Miner 26:51310.1007/s002690050214 ↗
5. So JH, Green DH, Yun SS (2003) J Mater Sci 38:2007. doi: 10.1023/A:102359350645410.1023/A:1023593506454 ↗
6. Mellor M, Hawkes I (1971) Eng Geol 5:17310.1016/0013-7952(71)90001-9 ↗
7. ASTM C1144-89 (2004) Annual book of ASTM standards. ASTM International
8. Chen CS, Pan E, Amadei B (1998) Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 35:4310.1016/S0148-9062(97)00329-X ↗
9. Zhao J, Li HB (2000) Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 37:86110.1016/S1365-1609(00)00015-0 ↗
10. Johnston C, Ruiz C (1995) Int J Solids Struct 32:264710.1016/0020-7683(94)00287-7 ↗
11. Gomez JT, Shukla A, Sharma A (2001) Theor App Fract Mech 36:3710.1016/S0167-8442(01)00054-4 ↗
12. Dai F, Xia K, Luo SN (2008) Rev Sci Instrum 79:12390310.1063/1.3043420 ↗
13. Dai F, Xia KW, Tang LZ (2010) Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 47:46910.1016/j.ijrmms.2009.05.001 ↗
14. Bohme W, Kalthoff JF (1982) Int J Fract 20:R13910.1007/BF01130620 ↗
15. Dong SM, Wang Y, Xia YM (2006) Polym Test 25:94310.1016/j.polymertesting.2006.06.003 ↗
16. Song B, Chen W (2004) Exp Mech 44:62210.1007/BF02428252 ↗
17. Kendall K, Alford NM, Clegg WJ, Birchall JD (1989) Nature 339:13010.1038/339130a0 ↗
18. Corning Incorporated (1992) Technical Bulletin, New York
19. Bieniawski ZT, Hawkes I (1978) Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 15:9910.1016/0148-9062(78)90956-7 ↗
20. Nie X, Chen WNW, Wereszczak AA, Templeton DW (2009) J Am Ceram Soc 92:128710.1111/j.1551-2916.2009.03019.x ↗