Vibration and damping performance of carbon fiber-reinforced polymer 3D double-arrow-head auxetic metamaterials
Source abstract
Abstract
The vibration and damping performances of carbon fiber-reinforced polymer (CFRP) three-dimensional double-arrow-head (3D DAH) auxetic metamaterials are investigated in this paper. The negative Poisson’s ratio effects of the CFRP 3D DAH auxetic metamaterials are analytically studied by the energy method. 3D finite element models based on Modal Strain Energy approach are developed to analyze their vibration and damping characteristics. To validate the numerical models in the present study, the CFRP 3D DAH auxetic metamaterials are designed and manufactured. The sine-sweep response tests are conducted to investigate their vibration performances. The influence of different inclined corrugated angles, and fiber orientations on the natural frequencies, loss factors and the nominal Young’s modulus are plotted and discussed using validated numerical models. Meanwhile, the effect of Poisson’s ratio on the nominal Young’s modulus, natural frequencies and loss factors is also revealed explicitly. Furthermore, the comprehensive evaluation parameter that simultaneously characterizes the structural bearing capacity and vibration damping performance is further improved through parameter optimization.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Cellular and Composite Structures · Advanced Materials and Mechanics · Polymer composites and self-healing
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (48)
Show source-provided references
1. Evans KE, Nkansah M (1991) Molecular network design. Nature 353:124–12510.1038/353124a0 ↗
2. Grima JN, Caruana-Gauci R (2012) Materials that push back. Nat Mater 11:565–56610.1038/nmat3364 ↗
3. Evans KE, Alderson A (2000) Auxetic materials: functional materials and structures from lateral thinking. Adv Mater 12(9):617–62810.1002/(SICI)1521-4095(200005)12:9<617::AID-ADMA617>3.0.CO;2-3 ↗
4. Lakes RS (1987) Foam structures with a negative Poisson's ratio. Science 235(4792):1038–104010.1126/science.235.4792.1038 ↗
5. Lakes R, Elms K (1993) Indentability of conventional and negative Poisson's ratio foams. J Compos Mater 27(12):1193–120210.1177/002199839302701203 ↗
6. Alderson K, Fitzgerald A, Evans K (2000) The strain dependent indentation resilience of auxetic microporous polyethylene. J Mater Sci 35(16):4039–4047. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:100483010341110.1023/A:1004830103411 ↗
7. Allen T, Shepherd J et al (2015) Low-kinetic energy impact response of auxetic and conventional open-cell polyurethane foams. Phys Status Solidi 252(7):1631–163910.1002/pssb.201451715 ↗
8. Scarpa F, Ciffo L, Yates J (2004) Dynamic properties of high structural integrity auxetic open cell foam. Smart Mater Struct 13(1):49–5610.1088/0964-1726/13/1/006 ↗
9. Scarpa F, Remillat C (2000) Damping modelization of auxetic foams. Proc SPIE Int Soc Optical Eng 3989:336–343
10. Evans KE (1991) Axetic polymers: a new range of materials. Endeavour 15:170–17410.1016/0160-9327(91)90123-S ↗
11. Saxena K, Das R, Calius E (2016) Three decades of auxetics research-materials with negative Poisson's ratio: a review. Adv Eng Mater 18(11):1847–187010.1002/adem.201600053 ↗
12. Milton GW (1992) Composite materials with Poisson's ratios close to -1. J Mech Phys Solid 40(5):1105–113710.1016/0022-5096(92)90063-8 ↗
13. Choi J, Lakes R (1992) Non-linear properties of polymer cellular materials with a negative Poisson's ratio. J Mater Sci 27(17):4678–4684. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF0116600510.1007/BF01166005 ↗
14. Yang L, Harrysson O, West H et al (2015) Mechanical properties of 3D re-entrant honeycomb auxetic structures realized via additive manufacturing. Int J Solids Struct 69:475–49010.1016/j.ijsolstr.2015.05.005 ↗
15. Wang XT, Wang B, Wen ZH, Ma L (2018) Fabrication and mechanical properties of CFRP composite three-dimensional double-arrow-head auxetic structures. Compos Sci Technol 164:92–10210.1016/j.compscitech.2018.05.014 ↗
16. Scarpa F, Panayiotou P, Tomlinson G (2000) Numerical and experimental uniaxial loading on in-plane auxetic honeycombs. J Strain Anal Eng Des 35(5):383–38810.1243/0309324001514152 ↗
17. Wan H, Ohtaki H, Kotosaka S et al (2004) A study of negative Poisson’s ratios in auxetic honeycombs based on a large deflection model. Eur J Mech A Solids 23(1):95–10610.1016/j.euromechsol.2003.10.006 ↗
18. Grima JN, Caruana-Gauci R, Attard D et al (2012) Three-dimensional cellular structures with negative Poisson’s ratio and negative compressibility properties. Proc R Soc A Royal Soc 468(2146):3121–313810.1098/rspa.2011.0667 ↗
19. Larsen UD, Signund O, Bouwsta S (1997) Design and fabrication of compliant micro mechanisms and structures with negative Poisson’s ratio. J Microelectromechan Syst 6(2):99–10610.1109/84.585787 ↗
20. Qiao JX, Chen CQ (2015) Impact resistance of uniform and functionally graded auxetic double arrowhead honeycombs. Int J Impact Eng 83:47–5810.1016/j.ijimpeng.2015.04.005 ↗
21. Agnese F, Scarpa F (2014) Macro-composites with star-shaped inclusions for vibration damping in wind turbine blades. Compos Struct 108(1):978–98610.1016/j.compstruct.2013.10.030 ↗
22. Agnese F, Remillat C, Scarpa F et al (2015) Composite chiral shear vibration damper. Compos Struct 132:215–22510.1016/j.compstruct.2015.05.048 ↗
23. Azoti WL, Bonfoh N, Koutsawa Y et al (2013) Influence of auxeticity of reinforcements on the overall properties of viscoelastic composite materials. Mech Mater 61:28–3810.1016/j.mechmat.2013.02.002 ↗
24. Chandra R, Singh SP, Gupta K (1999) Damping studies in fiber-reinforced composites–a review. Compos Struct 46(1):41–5110.1016/S0263-8223(99)00041-0 ↗
25. Berthelot JM, Assarar M, Sefrani Y (2008) Damping analysis of composite materials and structures. Compos Struct 85:189–20410.1016/j.compstruct.2007.10.024 ↗
26. Maheri MR, Adams RD, Hugon J (2008) Vibration damping in sandwich panels. J Mater Sci 43(20):6604–6618. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-008-2694-y10.1007/s10853-008-2694-y ↗
27. Evans AG, Hutchinson JW, Fleck NA et al (2001) The topological design of multifunctional cellular metals. Pro Mater Sci 46:309–32710.1016/S0079-6425(00)00016-5 ↗
28. Dong L, Deshpande V, Wadley H (2015) Mechanical response of Ti–6Al–4V octet-truss lattice structures. Int J Solids Struct 60:107–12410.1016/j.ijsolstr.2015.02.020 ↗
29. Liu T, Deng ZC, Lu TJ (2007) Minimum weights of pressurized hollow sandwich cylinders with ultralight cellular cores. Int J Solid Struct 44:3231–326610.1016/j.ijsolstr.2006.09.018 ↗
30. Wang B, Wu L, Ma L et al (2010) Mechanical behavior of the sandwich structures with carbon fiber-reinforced pyramidal lattice truss core. Mater Des 31(5):2659–266310.1016/j.matdes.2009.11.061 ↗
31. Zhang G, Wang B, Ma L et al (2014) Energy absorption and low velocity impact response of polyurethane foam filled pyramidal lattice core sandwich panels. Compos Struct 108:304–31010.1016/j.compstruct.2013.09.040 ↗
32. Jiang L, Hu H (2016) Low-velocity impact response of multilayer orthogonal structural composite with auxetic effect. Compos Struct 169:62–6810.1016/j.compstruct.2016.10.018 ↗
33. Qin HX, Yang DQ (2019) Vibration reduction design method of metamaterials with negative Poisson’s ratio. J Mater Sci 54:14038–14054. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-019-03903-z10.1007/s10853-019-03903-z ↗
34. Strek T, Michalski J, Jopek H (2018) Computational analysis of the mechanical impedance of the sandwich beam with auxetic metal foam core. Phys. Status Solidi B 256:180042310.1002/pssb.201800423 ↗
35. Ma YH, Scarpa F, Zhang D et al (2013) A nonlinear auxetic structural vibration damper with metal rubber particles. Smart Mater Struct 22(8):08401210.1088/0964-1726/22/8/084012 ↗
36. Duc ND, Seung-Eock K, Cong PH et al (2017) Dynamic response and vibration of composite double curved shallow shells with negative Poisson’s ratio in auxetic honeycombs core layer on elastic foundations subjected to blast and damping loads. Int J Mech Sci 133:504–51210.1016/j.ijmecsci.2017.09.009 ↗
37. Duc ND, Seung-Eock K, Tuan ND et al (2017) New approach to study nonlinear dynamic response and vibration of sandwich composite cylindrical panels with auxetic honeycomb core layer. Aerosp Sci Technol 70:396–40410.1016/j.ast.2017.08.023 ↗
38. Duc DN, Cong PH (2016) Nonlinear dynamic response and vibration of sandwich composite plates with negative Poisson’s ratio in auxetic honeycombs. J Sandw Struct Mater 70:692–717
39. Cong PH, Khanh ND, Khoa ND et al (2018) New approach to investigate nonlinear dynamic response of sandwich auxetic double curves shallow shells using TSDT. Compos Struct 185:455–46510.1016/j.compstruct.2017.11.047 ↗
40. Ma L, Chen YL et al (2018) Modal characteristics and damping enhancement of carbon fiber composite auxetic double-arrow corrugated sandwich panels. Compos Struct 203:539–55010.1016/j.compstruct.2018.07.006 ↗
41. Chen YL, Wang XT, Ma L (2020) Damping mechanisms of CFRP three-dimensional double-arrow-head auxetic metamaterials. Polym Test 81:10618910.1016/j.polymertesting.2019.106189 ↗
42. Ma ZD (2011) Three-dimensional Auxetic Structures and Applications Thereof, United States Patent US007910193B2
43. Jones RM (1999) Mechanics of composite materials, 2nd edn. Taylor & Francis, London
44. Berthelot JM, Assarar M, Sefrani Y (2008) Damping analysis of composite materials and structures. Compos Struct 85:189–20410.1016/j.compstruct.2007.10.024 ↗
45. Lin DX, Ni R, Adams RD (1984) Prediction and measurement of the vibrational parameters of carbon and glass–fiber reinforced plastic plates. J Compos Mater 18:132–15210.1177/002199838401800204 ↗
46. Maheri MR, Adams RD (1995) Finite-element prediction of modal response of damped layered composite panels. Compos Sci Technol 55:13–2310.1016/0266-3538(95)00074-7 ↗
47. Allan GP, Thomas LP (2009) Harris’ shock and vibration handbook, 6th edn. McGraw-Hill Education, New York
48. Lakes RS (2002) High damping composite materials: effect of structural hierarchy. J Compos Mater 36(3):287–29710.1177/0021998302036003538 ↗