journal article·2012-12

The effect of surface modification with carbon nanotubes upon the tensile strength and Weibull modulus of carbon fibers

Kimiyoshi Naito, Jenn-Ming Yang, Yuta Inoue, Hiroshi Fukuda

Journal of Materials Science· Volume 47· Issue 23
Publisher page

Abstract

Carbon fibers are widely used as reinforcements in composite materials because of their high specific strength and modulus. Today, a number of ultrahigh strength polyacrylonitrile (PAN)-based (more than 6 GPa), and ultrahigh modulus pitch-based (more than 900 GPa) carbon fibers have been commercially available. In contrast, carbon nanotube (CNT) with the extremely high tensile strength have attracted attention as reinforcements. An interesting technique to modify the carbon fiber is CNT grafting on the carbon fiber surface. CNT-grafted carbon fibers offer the opportunity to add the potential benefits of nanoscale reinforcement to well-established fibrous composites to create micro-nano multiscale hybrid composites. In the present study, the tensile properties of CNT grown on T1000GB PAN- and K13D pitch-based carbon fibers have been investigated. Single filament tensile test at gauge lengths of 1, 5, and 25 mm were conducted. The effect of gauge length on tensile strength and Weibull modulus of CNT-grafted PAN- and pitch-based carbon fibers were evaluated. It was found that grafting of CNT improves the tensile strength and Weibull modulus of PAN- and pitch-based carbon fibers with longer gauge length (≥5 mm). The results also clearly show that for CNT-grafted and as-received PAN- and pitch-based carbon fibers, there is a linear relation between the Weibull modulus and the average tensile strength on log–log scale.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Fiber-reinforced polymer composites · Natural Fiber Reinforced Composites · Carbon Nanotubes in Composites

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (22)

Show source-provided references
1. Chand S (2000) J Mater Sci 35(6):1303. doi: 10.1023/A:100478030148910.1023/A:1004780301489 ↗
2. Naito K, Tanaka Y, Yang JM, Kagawa Y (2008) Carbon 46(2):189. doi: 10.1016/j.carbon.2007.11.00110.1016/j.carbon.2007.11.001 ↗
3. Naito K, Tanaka Y, Yang JM, Kagawa Y (2009) J Am Ceram Soc 92(1):186. doi: 10.1111/j.1551-2916.2008.02868.x10.1111/j.1551-2916.2008.02868.x ↗
4. Demczyk BG, Wang YM, Cunnings J, Hetman M, Han W, Zettl A, Ritchie RO (2002) Mat Sci Eng A Struct 334(1–2):173. doi: 10.1016/S0921-5093(01)01807-X10.1016/S0921-5093(01)01807-X ↗
5. Tran CD, Humphries W, Smith SM, Huynh C, Lucas S (2009) Carbon 47(11):2662. doi: 10.1016/j.carbon.2009.05.02010.1016/j.carbon.2009.05.020 ↗
6. Zhang X, Li Q, Tu Y, Li Y, Coulter JY, Zheng LX, Zhao YH, Jia QX, Peterson DE, Zhu YT (2007) Small 3(2):244. doi: 10.1002/smll.20060036810.1002/smll.200600368 ↗
7. Tzeng SS, Hung KH, Ko TH (2006) Carbon 44(5):859. doi: 10.1016/j.carbon.2005.10.03310.1016/j.carbon.2005.10.033 ↗
8. Zhao JO, Liu L, Guo QG, Shi JL, Zhai GT, Song JR, Liu ZJ (2008) Carbon 46(2):380. doi: 10.1016/j.carbon.2007.11.02110.1016/j.carbon.2007.11.021 ↗
9. Bekyarova E, Thostenson ET, Yu A, Kim H, Gao J, Tang J, Hahn HT, Chou TW, Itkis ME, Haddon RC (2007) Langmuir 23(7):3970. doi: 10.1021/la062743p10.1021/la062743p ↗
10. Thostenson ET, Li WZ, Wang DZ, Ren ZF, Chou TW (2002) J Appl Phys 91(9):6034. doi: 10.1063/1.146688010.1063/1.1466880 ↗
11. Qian H, Bismarck A, Greenhalgh ES, Kalinka, Shaffer MSP (2008) Chem Mater 20(5):1862. doi: 10.1021/cm702782j10.1021/cm702782j ↗
12. Naito K, Yang JM, Tanaka Y, Kagawa Y (2008) Appl Phys Lett 92(23):231912-1. doi: 10.1063/1.294425810.1063/1.2944258 ↗
13. Padgett WJ, Durham SD, Mason AM (1995) J Compos Mater 29(14):1873. doi: 10.1177/00219983950290140510.1177/002199839502901405 ↗
14. Pickering KL, Murray TL (1999) Compos Part A 30(8):1017. doi: 10.1016/S1359-835X(99)00003-210.1016/S1359-835X(99)00003-2 ↗
15. Paiva MC, Bernardo CA, Nardin M (2000) Carbon 38(9):1323. doi: 10.1016/S0008-6223(99)00266-310.1016/S0008-6223(99)00266-3 ↗
16. Naito K, Yang JM, Tanaka Y, Kagawa Y (2012) J Mater Sci 47(2):632. doi: 10.1007/s10853-011-5832-x10.1007/s10853-011-5832-x ↗
17. ASTM C1557-03 (2008) Standard test method for tensile strength and young’s modulus of fibers. ASTM annual book of standards, vol 15.01. American Society for Testing and Materials, West Conshohocken. doi: 10.1520/C1557-03R0810.1520/C1557-03R08 ↗
18. Sung MG, Sassa K, Tagawa T, Miyata T, Ogawa H, Doyama M, Yamada S, Asai S (2002) Carbon 40(11):2013. doi: 10.1016/S0008-6223(02)00059-310.1016/S0008-6223(02)00059-3 ↗
19. Morimoto T, Nakagawa S, Ogihara S (2005) JSME Int J Series A 48(4):194. doi: 10.1299/jsmea.48.19410.1299/jsmea.48.194 ↗
20. Weibull W (1951) J Appl Mech 18:29310.1115/1.4010337 ↗
21. Lu CS, Danzer R, Fischer FD (2002) J Am Ceram Soc 85(6):1640. doi: 10.1111/j.1151-2916.2002.tb00330.x10.1111/j.1151-2916.2002.tb00330.x ↗
22. Danzer R (2006) J Eur Ceram Soc 26(15):3043. doi: 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2005.08.02110.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2005.08.021 ↗