Synthesis of porous polymer-based metal–organic frameworks monolithic hybrid composite for hydrogen storage application
Source abstract
Abstract
Herein, we report a simple method for the preparation of cross-linked polymer of intrinsic microporosity (PIM-1)/Materials Institute Lavoisier chromium (III) terephthalate [MIL-101(Cr)] monoliths which involves direct impregnation of PIM-1 with MIL-101(Cr) powder by physical mixing in tetrachloroethane solvent. This procedure yields monoliths with high metal–organic framework (MOF) loading weight percentages of up to 80 wt% of MIL-101 powder with little loss of composite mechanical strength. From the nitrogen adsorption isotherms, it was observed that the PIM-1/80 wt% MIL-101(Cr) had good retention of MOF filler surface area and accessibility of its micropores with nearly no pore blocking effects. The hydrogen adsorption was also not far from the estimated hydrogen uptake capacity based on the MIL-101 weight percentage estimation. As a consequence of the highly porous nature of the hybrid material, PIM-1/MIL-101(Cr) composite has been considered as a promising material for inclusion in hybrid hydrogen storage cylinders. Moreover, these composites provided better handling compared to the crystalline powder MOFs without compromising the properties of MOF.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Metal-Organic Frameworks: Synthesis and Applications · Membrane Separation and Gas Transport · Covalent Organic Framework Applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (28)
Show source-provided references
1. Schlapbach L, Züttel A (2011) Hydrogen-storage materials for mobile applications. Materials for sustainable energy: a collection of peer-reviewed research and review articles from Nature Publishing Group 265–270
2. Lim KL, Kazemian H, Yaakob Z, Daud WW (2010) Solid-state materials and methods for hydrogen storage: a critical review. Chem Eng Technol 33:213–22610.1002/ceat.200900376 ↗
3. Ren J, Langmi HW, North BC, Mathe M (2015) Review on processing of metal–organic framework (MOF) materials towards system integration for hydrogen storage. Int J Energy Res 39:607–62010.1002/er.3255 ↗
4. U.S. Department of Energy (2018) DOE Technical targets for onboard hydrogen storage for light-duty vehicles. https://www.energy.gov/eere/fuelcells/doe-technical-targets-onboard-hydrogen-storage-light-duty-vehicles . Accessed 19 July 2018
5. Ren J, Musyoka NM, Langmi HW, Swartbooi A, North BC, Mathe M (2015) A more efficient way to shape metal–organic framework (MOF) powder materials for hydrogen storage applications. Int J Hydrogen Energy 40:4617–462210.1016/j.ijhydene.2015.02.011 ↗
6. Ren J, Dyosiba X, Musyoka NM, Langmi HW, Mathe M, Liao S (2017) Review on the current practices and efforts towards pilot-scale production of metal-organic frameworks (MOFs). Coord Chem Rev 352:187–21910.1016/j.ccr.2017.09.005 ↗
7. Huo J, Marcello M, Garai A, Bradshaw D (2013) MOF-polymer composite microcapsules derived from pickering emulsions. Adv Mater 25:2717–272210.1002/adma.201204913 ↗
8. Zornoza B, Tellez C, Coronas J, Gascon J, Kapteijn F (2013) Metal organic framework based mixed matrix membranes: an increasingly important field of research with a large application potential. Microporous Mesoporous Mater 166:67–7810.1016/j.micromeso.2012.03.012 ↗
9. Zhu QL, Xu Q (2014) Metal-organic framework composites. Chem Soc Rev 43:5468–551210.1039/C3CS60472A ↗
10. Denny MS, Cohen SM (2015) In situ modification of metal-organic frameworks in mixed-matrix membranes. Angew Chem Int Ed 54:9029–903210.1002/anie.201504077 ↗
11. Seoane B, Coronas J, Gascon I, Benavides ME, Karvan O, Caro J, Kapteijn F, Gascon J (2015) Metal–organic framework based mixed matrix membranes: a solution for highly efficient CO2 capture? Chem Soc Rev 44:2421–245410.1039/C4CS00437J ↗
12. Zhang ZJ, Nguyen HTH, Miller SA, Cohen SM (2015) PolyMOFs: a class of interconvertible polymer-metal–organic-framework hybrid materials. Angew Chem Int Ed 54:6152–615710.1002/anie.201502733 ↗
13. Kubica P, Wolinska-Grabczyk A, Grabiec E, Libera M, Wojtyniak M, Czajkowska S, Domański M (2016) Gas transport through mixed matrix membranes composed of polysulfone and copper terephthalate particles. Microporous Mesoporous Mater 235:120–13410.1016/j.micromeso.2016.07.037 ↗
14. DeCoste JB, Denny MS, Peterson GW, Mahle JJ, Cohen SM (2016) Enhanced aging properties of HKUST-1 in hydrophobic mixed-matrix membranes for ammonia adsorption. Chem Sci 7:2711–271610.1039/C5SC04368A ↗
15. Ling RJ, Ge L, Diao H, Rudolph V, Zhu ZH (2016) Ionic liquids as the MOFs/polymer interfacial binder for efficient membrane separation. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 8:32041–3204910.1021/acsami.6b11074 ↗
16. Zhang ZJ, Nguyen HTH, Miller SA, Ploskonka AM, DeCoste JB, Cohen SM (2016) Polymer-metal–organic frameworks (polyMOFs) as water tolerant materials for selective carbon dioxide separations. J Am Chem Soc 138:920–92510.1021/jacs.5b11034 ↗
17. Wickenheisser M, Herbst A, Tannert R, Milow B, Janiak C (2015) Hierarchical MOF-xerogel monolith composites from embedding MIL-100 (Fe, Cr) and MIL-101 (Cr) in resorcinol-formaldehyde xerogels for water adsorption applications. Microporous Mesoporous Mater 215:143–15310.1016/j.micromeso.2015.05.017 ↗
18. Wickenheisser M, Janiak C (2015) Hierarchical embedding of micro-mesoporous MIL-101 (Cr) in macroporous poly (2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate) high internal phase emulsions with monolithic shape for vapor adsorption applications. Microporous Mesoporous Mater 204:242–25010.1016/j.micromeso.2014.11.025 ↗
19. Channell MN, Sefa M, Fedchak JA, Scherschligt J, Miller AE, Ahmed Z, Hartings MR (2017) Toward 3D printed hydrogen storage materials made with ABS-MOF composites. Polym Adv Technol 1–710.31224/osf.io/4utb2 ↗
20. Rochat S, Polak-Kraśna K, Tian M, Holyfield LT, Mays TJ, Bowen CR, Burrows AD (2017) Hydrogen storage in polymer-based processable microporous composites. J Mater Chem A 5:18752–1876110.1039/C7TA05232D ↗
21. Polak-Kraśna K, Dawson R, Holyfield LT, Bowen CR, Burrows AD, Mays TJ (2017) Mechanical characterisation of polymer of intrinsic microporosity PIM-1 for hydrogen storage applications. J Mater Sci 52:3862–3875. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-016-0647-410.1007/s10853-016-0647-4 ↗
22. Ren J, Musyoka NM, Langmi HW, Segakweng T, North BC, Mathe M, Kang X (2014) Modulated synthesis of chromium-based metal-organic framework (MIL-101) with enhanced hydrogen uptake. Int J Hydrogen Energy 39:12018–1202310.1016/j.ijhydene.2014.06.019 ↗
23. Budd PM, Elabas ES, Ghanem BS, Makhseed S, McKeown NB, Msayib KJ, Tattershall CE, Wang D (2004) Solution-processed, organophilic membrane derived from a polymer of intrinsic microporosity. Adv Mater 16:456–45910.1002/adma.200306053 ↗
24. Wu X, Liu W, Wu H, Zong X, Yang L, Wu Y, Ren Y, Shi C, Wang S, Jiang Z (2018) Nanoporous ZIF-67 embedded polymers of intrinsic microporosity membranes with enhanced gas separation performance. J Membr Sci 548:309–31810.1016/j.memsci.2017.11.038 ↗
25. Yang JF, Zhao Q, Li JP, Dong JX (2010) Synthesis of metal–organic framework MIL-101 in TMAOH-Cr(NO3)3-H2BDC-H2O and its hydrogen-storage behaviour. Microporous Mesoporous Mater 130:174–17910.1016/j.micromeso.2009.11.001 ↗
26. Du N, Robertson GP, Song J, Pinnau I, Thomas S, Guiver MD (2008) Polymers of intrinsic microporosity containing trifluoromethyl and phenylsulfone groups as materials for membrane gas separation. Macromolecules 41:9656–966210.1021/ma801858d ↗
27. Broom DP, Webb CJ, Hurst KE, Parilla PA, Gennett T, Brown CM, Zacharia R, Tylianakis E, Klontzas E, Froudakis GE, Steriotis TA (2016) Outlook and challenges for hydrogen storage in nanoporous materials. Appl Phys A 122:151–17110.1007/s00339-016-9651-4 ↗
28. Ren J, Musyoka NM, Langmi HW, North BC, Mathe M, Kang X (2014) Fabrication of core-shell MIL-101(Cr)@UiO-66(Zr) nanocrystals for hydrogen storage. Int J Hydrogen Energy 39:14912–1491710.1016/j.ijhydene.2014.07.056 ↗