Evaluation of silica aerogel-reinforced polyurethane foams for footwear applications
Source abstract
Abstract
In this work, a simple way to create a nanocellular structure within polyurethane (PU) foam was developed by the incorporation of silica aerogels, and the resultant foams were evaluated for footwear applications. To protect the brittle aerogels from breakage, the softness of PU foams was first tailored by changing the ratio of glycerol and polypropylene glycol. Different amounts of silica aerogels (0–15 wt%) were then loaded into a selected PU foam and analyzed in terms of compressive mechanical properties, shock attenuation performance, and thermal insulation. After incorporation of the aerogels, the compressive modulus, the compressive stress, and the deformation recovery of the foams improved, while the excellent flexibility was preserved. For simulated gait experiments, the shock attenuation capability of the foams was shown to increase with an increase in the aerogel content. These findings can probably be attributed to the improved elasticity of the solid phase and the changed morphology of the gaseous phase as observed from the SEM images. Moreover, the thermal insulation of the developed foams was also investigated, showing an increased trend with the aerogel content.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Aerogels and thermal insulation · Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials · Surface Modification and Superhydrophobicity
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (33)
Show source-provided references
1. Kuklane K (1999) Footwear for cold environments thermal properties, performance and testing. National Institute for Working Life, Stockholm, pp 7–9
2. Mills N (2007) Polymer foams handbook: engineering and biomechanics applications and design guide. Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford, pp 308–327
3. Shariatmadari MR, English R, Rothwell G (2012) Effects of temperature on the material characteristics of midsole and insole footwear foams subject to quasi-static compressive and shear force loading. Mater Des 37:543–55910.1016/j.matdes.2011.10.045 ↗
4. Brodsky JW, Kourosh S, Stills M, Mooney V (1988) Objective evaluation of insert material for diabetic and athletic footwear. Foot Ankle Int 9:111–11610.1177/107110078800900303 ↗
5. Pratt D (1990) Long term comparison of some shock attentuating insoles. Prosthet Orthot Int 14:59–6210.3109/03093649009080322 ↗
6. Edwards J, Rome K (1992) A study of the shock attenuating properties of materials used in chiropody. Foot 2:99–10510.1016/0958-2592(92)90026-L ↗
7. Saraswathy G, Gopalakrishna G, Das B, Mohan R, Radhakrishnan G, Pal S (2009) Development of polyurethane-based sheets by coagulation method and study of mechanical and cushion properties for therapeutic footwear applications. Polym Plast Technol Eng 48:239–25010.1080/03602550802674556 ↗
8. Papadopoulos AM (2005) State of the art in thermal insulation materials and aims for future developments. Energy Buildings 37:77–8610.1016/j.enbuild.2004.05.006 ↗
9. Danowska M, Piszczyk Ł, Strankowski M, Gazda M, Haponiuk JT (2013) Rigid polyurethane foams modified with selected layered silicate nanofillers. J Appl Polym Sci 130:2272–228110.1002/app.39432 ↗
10. Jelle BP (2011) Traditional, state-of-the-art and future thermal building insulation materials and solutions—properties, requirements and possibilities. Energy Buildings 43:2549–256310.1016/j.enbuild.2011.05.015 ↗
11. Forest C, Chaumont P, Cassagnau P, Swoboda B, Sonntag P (2015) Polymer nano-foams for insulating applications prepared from CO2 foaming. Prog Polym Sci 41:122–14510.1016/j.progpolymsci.2014.07.001 ↗
12. Connor EF, Lee VY, Magbitang T et al (2004) First example of a nanoporous high-temperature polymer thermoset: eluding transition–time–temperature constraints associated with organic thermosets. Adv Mater 16:1525–152910.1002/adma.200306321 ↗
13. Kato T, Hillmyer MA (2012) Functionalized nanoporous polyethylene derived from miscible block polymer blends. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 5:291–30010.1021/am3020907 ↗
14. Smarsly B, Antonietti M (2006) Block copolymer assemblies as templates for the generation of mesoporous inorganic materials and crystalline films. Eur J Inorg Chem 2006:1111–111910.1002/ejic.200501003 ↗
15. He X, Cheng X, Zhang Y, Shao Z (2018) Multiscale structural characterization of methyltriethoxysilane-based silica aerogels. J Mater Sci 53:994–1004. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-017-1597-110.1007/s10853-017-1597-1 ↗
16. Kim G, Hyun S (2003) Effect of mixing on thermal and mechanical properties of aerogel-PVB composites. J Mater Sci 38:1961–1966. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:102356060191110.1023/A:1023560601911 ↗
17. Nazeran N, Moghaddas J (2017) Synthesis and characterization of silica aerogel reinforced rigid polyurethane foam for thermal insulation application. J Non Cryst Solids 461:1–1110.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2017.01.037 ↗
18. Kraner Zrim P, Mekjavic I, Rijavec T (2016) Properties of laminated silica aerogel fibrous matting composites for footwear applications. Text Res J 86:1063–107310.1177/0040517515591781 ↗
19. Lin H-R (1997) The structure and property relationships of commercial foamed plastics. Polym Test 16:429–44310.1016/S0142-9418(97)00003-2 ↗
20. Lu X, Caps R, Fricke J, Alviso C, Pekala R (1995) Correlation between structure and thermal conductivity of organic aerogels. J Non Cryst Solids 188:226–23410.1016/0022-3093(95)00191-3 ↗
21. Klempner D, Frisch KC (1991) Handbook of polymeric foams and foam technology. Hanser, Munich, pp 17–46
22. Scarfato P, Di Maio L, Incarnato L (2017) Structure and physical–mechanical properties related to comfort of flexible polyurethane foams for mattress and effects of artificial weathering. Compos Part B Eng 109:45–5210.1016/j.compositesb.2016.10.041 ↗
23. Chen Y, Das R, Battley M (2015) Effects of cell size and cell wall thickness variations on the stiffness of closed-cell foams. Int J Solids Struct 52:150–16410.1016/j.ijsolstr.2014.09.022 ↗
24. Smits G (1994) Effect of cellsize reduction on polyurethane foam physical properties. J Therm Insul Build Envel 17:309–32910.1177/109719639401700403 ↗
25. Parmenter KE, Milstein F (1998) Mechanical properties of silica aerogels. J Non Cryst Solids 223:179–18910.1016/S0022-3093(97)00430-4 ↗
26. Srivastava V, Srivastava R (2014) On the polymeric foams: modeling and properties. J Mater Sci 49:2681–2692. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-013-7974-510.1007/s10853-013-7974-5 ↗
27. Ramirez B, Gupta V (2018) Evaluation of novel temperature-stable viscoelastic polyurea foams as helmet liner materials. Mater Des 137:298–30410.1016/j.matdes.2017.10.037 ↗
28. Deqing W, Weiwei X, Xiangjun M, Ziyuan S (2005) Cell structure and compressive behavior of an aluminum foam. J Mater Sci 40:3475–3480. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-005-2852-410.1007/s10853-005-2852-4 ↗
29. Reglero Ruiz JA, Saiz-Arroyo C, Dumon M, Rodríguez-Perez MA, Gonzalez L (2011) Production, cellular structure and thermal conductivity of microcellular (methyl methacrylate)–(butyl acrylate)–(methyl methacrylate) triblock copolymers. Polym Int 60:146–15210.1002/pi.2931 ↗
30. Fricke J, Emmerling A (1992) Aerogels. J Am Ceram Soc 75:2027–203510.1111/j.1151-2916.1992.tb04461.x ↗
31. Madyan OA, Fan M, Feo L, Hui D (2016) Physical properties of clay aerogel composites: an overview. Compos Part B Eng 102:29–3710.1016/j.compositesb.2016.06.057 ↗
32. Koo MS, Chung K, Youn JR (2001) Reaction injection molding of polyurethane foam for improved thermal insulation. Polym Eng Sci 41:1177–118610.1002/pen.10819 ↗
33. Kim S, Park H, Jeong H, Kim B (2010) Glass fiber reinforced rigid polyurethane foams. J Mater Sci 45:2675–2680. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-010-4248-310.1007/s10853-010-4248-3 ↗