Paper reinforcing by in situ growth of bacterial cellulose
Source abstract
Abstract
The ability of the bacteria Gluconacetobacter sucrofermentans to produce high-quality cellulose is well known. This bacterial cellulose has unique properties, as the result of an ultrathin crosslinked structure. It is almost chemically pure (until 98% cellulose), has a high crystallinity, mechanical strength, elasticity and durability. It is compatible with plant cellulose and could be grown on a vegetal fibrous network what makes bacterial cellulose an excellent candidate to reinforce damaged papers. The objective of this work is to promote the production of bacterial cellulose on the surface of a variety of papers by the direct application of a culture of G. sucrofermentans and to test if this procedure could be an economic and feasible possibility in reinforcing papers or cellulosic surfaces. After 7 days of cultivation, G. sucrofermentans deposits a thin layer (ca. 10 µm) of bacterial cellulose on the papers surfaces. Microscopic observations have shown a heterogeneous covering of the surfaces, while the modified papers maintain their thickness and their basic weight. The treatment has not increased the papers mechanical properties, but maintains them after artificial aging. The changes in optical properties of the reinforced papers, such as opacity and colorimetric coordinates, are minor even after further aging. Air permeance is the paper characteristic that experiences more variations because the layers of bacterial cellulose inhibit the airflow through the papers. The changes in the static and dynamic contact angles suggest that the bacterial cellulose structure is more compact and make the surface more hydrophobic than the original paper surface. © 2017, Springer Science+Business Media New York.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced Cellulose Research Studies · Polysaccharides and Plant Cell Walls
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (19)
Show source-provided references
1. Ahn K, Rosenau T, Potthast A (2013) The influence of alkaline reserve on the aging behavior of book papers. Cellulose 20:1989–200110.1007/s10570-013-9978-3 ↗
2. Bansa H, Ishii R (1997) The effect of different strengthening methods on different kinds of paper. Restaurator 18:51–72
3. Iguchi M, Yamanaka S, Budhiono A (2000) Bacterial cellulose: a masterpiece of nature’s arts. J Mater Sci 35:261–270. doi: 10.1023/A:100477522914910.1023/A:1004775229149 ↗
4. Chawla PR, Bajaj IB, Survase SA, Singhal RS (2009) Microbial cellulose: fermentative production and applications. Food Technol Biotechnol 47:107–124
5. Santos SM, Carbajo JM, Villar JC (2013) The effect of carbon and nitrogen sources on bacterial cellulose production and properties from Gluconacetobacter sucrofermentans CECT 7291 focused on its use in degraded paper restoration. BioResources 8(3):3630–3645
6. Santos SM, Carbajo JM, Quintana E, Ibarra D, Gómez N, Ladero M, Eugenio ME, Villar JC (2015) Characterization of purified bacterial cellulose focused on its use on paper restoration. Carbohydr Polym 116:173–18110.1016/j.carbpol.2014.03.064 ↗
7. Meftahi A, Khajavi R, Rashidi A, Sattari M, Yazdanshenas ME, Torabi M (2010) The effects of cotton gauze coating with microbial cellulose. Cellulose 17:199–20410.1007/s10570-009-9377-y ↗
8. Wu S, Li M, Fang B, Tong H (2012) Reinforcement of vulnerable historic silk fabrics with bacterial cellulose film and its light aging behavior. Carbohydr Polym 88:496–50110.1016/j.carbpol.2011.12.033 ↗
9. Saibuatong O, Phisalaphong M (2010) Novo aloe vera-bacterial cellulose composite film from biosynthesis. Carbohydr Polym 79(2):455–46010.1016/j.carbpol.2009.08.039 ↗
10. Serafica G, Mormino R, Bungay H (2002) Inclusion of solid particles in bacterial cellulose. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 58:756–76010.1007/s00253-002-0978-8 ↗
11. Hestrin S, Schramm M (1954) Synthesis of cellulose by Acetobacter xylinum. 2. Preparation of freeze-dried cells capable of polymerizing glucose to cellulose. Biochem J 58:345–35210.1042/bj0580345 ↗
12. Pommet M, Juntaro J, Heng JYY, Mantalaris A, Lee AF, Wilson K, Kalinka G, Shaffer MSP, Bismarck A (2008) Surface modification of natural fibers using bacteria: depositing bacterial cellulose onto natural fibers to create hierarchical fiber reinforced nanocomposites. Biomacromolecules 9:1643–165110.1021/bm800169g ↗
13. Santos SM, Carbajo JM, Gómez N, Quintana E, Ladero M, Sánchez A, Chinga-Carrasco G, Villar JC (2016) Use of bacterial cellulose in degraded paper restoration. Part II: application on real samples. J Mater Sci 51(3):1553–1561. doi: 10.1007/s10853-015-9477-z10.1007/s10853-015-9477-z ↗
14. Santos SM, Carbajo JM, Gómez N, Quintana E, Ladero M, Sánchez A, Chinga-Carrasco G, Villar JC (2016) Use of bacterial cellulose in degraded paper restoration. Part I: application on model papers. J Mater Sci 51(3):1541–1552. doi: 10.1007/s10853-015-9476-010.1007/s10853-015-9476-0 ↗
15. Yousefi H, Faezipour M, Hedjazi S, Mousavi MM, Azusa Y, Heidari AH (2013) Comparative study of paper and nanopaper properties prepared from bacterial cellulose nanofibres and fibres/ground cellulose nanofibres of canola straw. Ind Crop Prod 43:732–73710.1016/j.indcrop.2012.08.030 ↗
16. Fendler A, Villanueva MP, Giminez E, Lagarón JM (2007) Characterization of the barrier properties of composites of HDPE and purified cellulose fibers. Cellulose 14:427–43810.1007/s10570-007-9136-x ↗
17. Gao WH, Chen KF, Yang RD, Yang F, Han WJ (2011) Properties of bacterial cellulose and its influence on the physical properties of paper. BioResources 6:144–15310.15376/biores.6.1.144-153 ↗
18. Kato KL, Cameron RE (1999) A review of the relationship between thermally accelerated ageing of paper and hornification. Cellulose 6:23–4010.1023/A:1009292120151 ↗
19. Fernandes-Diniz JMB, Gil MH, Castro JAAM (2004) Hornification-its origin and interpretation in wood pulps. Wood Sci Technol 37:489–49410.1007/s00226-003-0216-2 ↗