journal article·2014-01

Oxidation-induced microstructural changes of a polymer-derived Nextel™ 610 ceramic composite and impact on the mechanical performance

E. Volkmann, L. Lima Evangelista, K. Tushtev, D. Koch, C. Wilhelmi, K. Rezwan

Journal of Materials Science· Volume 49· Issue 2
Publisher page

Abstract

This study analyses the effects of heat treatments in oxidative atmosphere on the mechanical and microstructural properties of a fiber-reinforced weak interface composite (UMOX™) which is composed of a mullite-SiOC matrix and Nextel™ 610 fibers with fugitive coatings. Composites of different porosity grades, depending on the polymer infiltration and pyrolysis cycle, are exposed to 1000 and 1200 °C for 50 h. The exposure provokes the formation of silica, which leads to matrix densification and the formation of silica bridges at the fiber–matrix interface, resulting in an increased interfacial bonding strength. Consequently, the fracture toughness and the flexural strength are significantly reduced. The study confirms that SiOC-based materials are suitable for an application at high temperatures in oxygen-rich atmospheres up to 1000 °C. It is, however, important to consider the microstructural changes and thereby induced decrease of the overall mechanical performance during a high-temperature use.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advanced ceramic materials synthesis · Advanced materials and composites · Concrete and Cement Materials Research

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (26)

Show source-provided references
1. Zok FW (2006) J Am Ceram Soc 89(11):3309–332410.1111/j.1551-2916.2006.01342.x ↗
2. Knoche R, Werth E, Weth M, García JG, Wilhelmi C, Gerendás M (2011) In: Mechanical properties and performance of engineering ceramics and composites VI. Wiley, pp 77–87. doi: 10.1002/9781118095355.ch710.1002/9781118095355.ch7 ↗
3. Motz G, Schmidt S, Beyer S (2008) The PIP-process: precursor properties and applications. Ceramic matrix composites. Wiley, New York
4. Jones R, Szweda A, Petrak D (1999) Compos A Appl Sci Manuf 30(4):569–575. doi: 10.1016/s1359-835x(98)00151-110.1016/S1359-835X(98)00151-1 ↗
5. Modena S, Sorarù GD, Blum Y, Raj R (2005) J Am Ceram Soc 88(2):339–345. doi: 10.1111/j.1551-2916.2005.00043.x10.1111/j.1551-2916.2005.00043.x ↗
6. Brewer CM, Bujalski DR, Parent VE, Su K, Zank GA (1999) J Sol Gel Sci Technol 14(1):49–68. doi: 10.1023/a:100872381399110.1023/A:1008723813991 ↗
7. Chollon G (2000) J Eur Ceram Soc 20(12):1959–1974. doi: 10.1016/s0955-2219(00)00101-110.1016/S0955-2219(00)00101-1 ↗
8. Hurwitz FI, Meador MAB (1999) J Sol Gel Sci Technol 14(1):75–86. doi: 10.1023/a:100872791490010.1023/A:1008727914900 ↗
9. Soraru GD, Suttor D (1999) J Sol Gel Sci Technol 14(1):69–7410.1023/A:1008775830830 ↗
10. Takahashi T, Münstedt H, Modesti M, Colombo P (2001) J Eur Ceram Soc 21(16):2821–2828. doi: 10.1016/s0955-2219(01)00220-510.1016/S0955-2219(01)00220-5 ↗
11. Xu TH, Ma QS, Chen ZH (2011) Ceram Int 37(7):2555–2559. doi: 10.1016/j.ceramint.2011.03.05310.1016/j.ceramint.2011.03.053 ↗
12. Harris M, Chaudhary T, Drzal L, Laine RM (1995) Mater Sci Eng A 195:223–236. doi: 10.1016/0921-5093(94)06522-510.1016/0921-5093(94)06522-5 ↗
13. Wang Y, Li H, Zhang L, Cheng L (2009) Ceram Int 35(3):1129–1132. doi: 10.1016/j.ceramint.2008.05.00610.1016/j.ceramint.2008.05.006 ↗
14. Rangarajan S, Belardinelli R, Aswath PB (1999) J Mater Sci 34(3):515–533. doi: 10.1023/a:100459052795410.1023/A:1004590527954 ↗
15. Gonczy ST, Sikonia JG (2005) In: Bansal NP (ed) Handbook of ceramic composites. Springer, pp 347–373. doi: 10.1007/0-387-23986-3_1510.1007/0-387-23986-3_15 ↗
16. Weaver JH, Yang J, Zok FW (2008) J Am Ceram Soc 91(12):4003–4008. doi: 10.1111/j.1551-2916.2008.02746.x10.1111/j.1551-2916.2008.02746.x ↗
17. Gerendás M, Cadoret Y, Wilhelmi C, Machry T, Knoche R, Behrendt T, Aumeier T, Denis S, Göring J, Koch D, Tushtev K (2011) In: ASME Turbo Expo 2011, Vancouver, 06-10-Juni 2011. ASME, p 45460
18. Fischer WP, Ritter H (2012) In: 42nd International Conference on Environmental Systems. International Conference on Environmental Systems (ICES). American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics. doi: 10.2514/6.2012-351810.2514/6.2012-3518 ↗
19. Casas L, Martinez-Esnaola JM (2004) Mater Sci Eng Struct Mater Prop Microstruct Process 368(1–2):139–144. doi: 10.1016/j.msea.2003.11.01410.1016/j.msea.2003.11.014 ↗
20. Weaver JH, Yang J, Evans AG, Zok FW (2008) Compos Sci Technol 68(1):10–1610.1016/j.compscitech.2007.06.002 ↗
21. Kuntz M, Grathwohl G (2001) Adv Eng Mater 3(6):371–379. doi: 10.1002/1527-2648(200106)3:6<371:aid-adem371>3.0.co;2-y10.1002/1527-2648(200106)3:6<371::AID-ADEM371>3.0.CO;2-Y ↗
22. Kuntz M (1996) Rißwiderstand keramischer Faserverbundwerkstoffe. Berichte aus der Werkstofftechnik. Shaker, Aachen
23. Zok F, Sbaizero O, Hom CL, Evans AG (1991) Mode I fracture resistance of a laminated fiber-reinforced ceramic. J Am Ceram Soc 74(1):187–193. doi: 10.1111/j.1151-2916.1991.tb07316.x10.1111/j.1151-2916.1991.tb07316.x ↗
24. Munz D, Fett T (1999) Ceramics—mechanical properties, failure behaviour, materials selection, vol B 125. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York Tokyo10.1007/978-3-642-58407-7 ↗
25. Presser V, Nickel KG (2008) Crit Rev Solid State Mater Sci 33(1):1–99. doi: 10.1080/1040843070171891410.1080/10408430701718914 ↗
26. Schmücker M, Flucht F, Schneider H (2001) In: Krenkel W, Naslain R, Schneider H (eds) High temperature ceramic matrix composites. Wiley, Weinheim, pp 73–78