journal article·2010-08

Structure and properties of cocoons and silk fibers produced by Hyalophora cecropia

Narendra Reddy, Yiqi Yang

Journal of Materials Science· Volume 45· Issue 16
Publisher page

Abstract

This paper shows that silk fibers produced by cecropia (Hyalophora cecropia) have similar tensile properties but different amino acid composition than that of mulberry (Bombyx mori) silk. The cecropia fibers are also much finer and have bet ter strength and modulus than tasar silk, the most common non-mulberry silk. Cecropia is one of the largest silk producing moths and has similar lifecycle to that of mulberry silk but is easier to grow and produces larger cocoons than mulberry silk. In this study, we have characterized the composition, morphology, physical and tensile properties, and thermal behavior of the cecropia silk. Cecropia cocoons have a three tier structure and are larger (750 mg) than the cocoons produced by B. mori (650 mg). Fibers in the three layers in cecropia cocoons have tensile properties similar to that of B. mori silk but are finer (1.7–2 denier) and have higher strength (3.8–4.3 g/denier) and modulus (68–92 g/denier) than tasar silk.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Silk-based biomaterials and applications · Silkworms and Sericulture Research · Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (30)

Show source-provided references
1. Robson RM (1998) In: Lewin M, Pearce EM (eds) Handbook of fiber chemistry. Marcel Dekker Inc, New York
2. Sen K, Babu M (2004) J Appl Polym Sci 92:108010.1002/app.13609 ↗
3. Sen K, Babu MK (2004) J Appl Polym Sci 92:109810.1002/app.13610 ↗
4. Reddy N, Yang Y (2007) Biomacromolecules 8(2):63810.1021/bm0608840 ↗
5. Reddy N, Yang Y (2008) J Mater Sci Mater Med 19:205510.1007/s10856-007-3294-0 ↗
6. Reddy N, Yang Y (2009) Biotechnol Prog 25(6):179610.1002/btpr.244 ↗
7. Reddy N, Li Y, Yang Y (2009) J Agric Food Chem 57(1):9010.1021/jf802341u ↗
8. Reddy N, Li Y, Yang Y (2009) Biotechnol Prog 25(1):13910.1002/btpr.86 ↗
9. Brauer S, Meister F, Gottlober R, Nechwatal A (2007) Macromol Mater Eng 292:17610.1002/mame.200600364 ↗
10. Reddy N, Yang Y (2010) Int J Biol Macromol 46(4):41910.1016/j.ijbiomac.2010.02.013 ↗
11. Wagner DL (2005) Caterpillars of eastern North America. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey
12. Waldbauer GP, Scarbrough AG, Sternburg JG (1982) Entomol Exp Appl 31:19110.1111/j.1570-7458.1982.tb03134.x ↗
13. Moore AJ, Beazley WD, Bibby MC, Devine DA (1996) Antimicrob Chemother 37(6):107710.1093/jac/37.6.1077 ↗
14. Engstroem P, Carlsoon A, Engstroem A, Tao ZJ, Bennich H (1984) EMBO J 3(13):334710.1002/j.1460-2075.1984.tb02302.x ↗
15. Steiner H (1982) FEBS Lett 137(2):28310.1016/0014-5793(82)80368-2 ↗
16. Hummerich D, Slotta U, Scheibel T (2006) Appl Phys A 82:21910.1007/s00339-005-3428-5 ↗
17. Siedel A, Liivak O, Calve S, Adaska J, Ji G, Yang Z, Grubb D, Zax DB, Jelinski LW (2000) Macromolecules 33:75
18. Fedic R, Zurovec M, Sehnal F (2003) J Biol Chem 278(37):3525510.1074/jbc.M305304200 ↗
19. Van der Kloot WG, Williams GM (1953) Behavior 5(1):14110.1163/156853953X00087 ↗
20. Van der Kloot WG, Williams GM (1953) Behavior 5(1):15710.1163/156853953X00096 ↗
21. Rau P (1911) Psyche 18:16810.1155/1911/872589 ↗
22. Lounibos LP (1976) Physiol Entomol 1(3):19510.1111/j.1365-3032.1976.tb00961.x ↗
23. Saha M, Mahendran B, Kundu SC (2008) J Econ Entomol 101(4):117610.1093/jee/101.4.1176 ↗
24. Zhao H, Feng X, Yu S, Cui W, Zou F (2005) Polymer 46:919210.1016/j.polymer.2005.07.004 ↗
25. Jiang P, Liu H, Wang C, Wu L, Huang J, Guo C (2006) Mater Lett 60:91910.1016/j.matlet.2005.10.056 ↗
26. Sirichaisit J, Brookes VL, Young RJ, Vollrath F (2003) Biomarocmolecules 4:38710.1021/bm0256956 ↗
27. Silberman AK, Lewis HB (1932) J Biol Chem 95:49110.1016/S0021-9258(18)76329-1 ↗
28. Das S, Chattopadhyay R, Gulrajani ML, Sen K (2004) In: 3rd Indo-Czech textile research conferences, Liberec, Czech Republic, 14–16 June
29. Kameda T, Tsukada M (2006) Macromol Mater Eng 291:87710.1002/mame.200600081 ↗
30. Zhang H, Magoshi J, Becker M, Chen J, Matsunaga R (2002) J Appl Polym Sci 86:181710.1002/app.11089 ↗