Characterisation and modelling of the elastic properties of poly(lactic acid) nanofibre scaffolds
Source abstract
Abstract
The aim of this study is to predict the elastic response of poly(lactic acid) (PLA) electrospun nanofibre scaffolds through mathematical models based on homogenisation and the differential replacement method (DRM). These models principally seek to determine and analyse the effects of the internal morphology of the nanofibres on the effective Young’s modulus of polymer nanofibre scaffolds. The microstructure of the nanofibres was first characterised by SEM, XRD, DSC, AFM, and TEM techniques. From this characterisation, strong evidence of a hierarchical core–shell structure was found. With the experimental data, it was possible to design and validate better models than those currently used. In addition, the effects of the electrospinning parameters, such as take-up velocity and thermal treatment, were analysed and correlated with the morphology and the elastic properties of the nanofibres and their scaffolds. To validate the models’ results, we conducted a series of uniaxial tensile tests on the PLA nanofibre scaffolds. Using the data from the nanofibre measurements, the homogenisation approximations and the model based on the DRM predicted an effective Young’s modulus of 667 and 835 MPa, respectively. The predicted data were in excellent agreement with the experimental results (685–880 MPa). These models will be useful in understanding and evaluating the structure–property relationships of oriented nanofibre scaffolds for medical or biological applications.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications · biodegradable polymer synthesis and properties · Supercapacitor Materials and Fabrication
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (42)
Show source-provided references
1. Barnes CP, Sell SA, Boland ED, Simpson DG, Bowlin GL (2007) Adv Drug Deliv Rev 59:141310.1016/j.addr.2007.04.022 ↗
2. Jayaraman K, Kotaki M, Zhang Y, Mo X, Ramakrishna S (2004) J Nanosci Nanotechnol 4:52
3. Agarwal S, Wendorff JH, Greiner A (2008) Polymer 49:560310.1016/j.polymer.2008.09.014 ↗
4. Yi-Fan G, Imran S, Rafaqat H (2013) J Mater Sci 48:3027. doi: 10.1007/s10853-013-7145-810.1007/s10853-013-7145-8 ↗
5. Lannutti J, Reneker D, Ma T, Tomasko D, Farson D (2007) Mater Sci Eng, C 27:50410.1016/j.msec.2006.05.019 ↗
6. Liao S, Murugan R, Chan CK, Ramakrishna S (2008) J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 1:25210.1016/j.jmbbm.2008.01.007 ↗
7. Persson M, Cho S-W, Skrifvars M (2013) J Mater Sci 48:3055. doi: 10.1007/s10853-012-7022-x10.1007/s10853-012-7022-x ↗
8. Reneker DH, Yarin AL (2008) Polymer 49:238710.1016/j.polymer.2008.02.002 ↗
9. McClure M, Simpson DG, Bowlin GL (2012) J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 10:4810.1016/j.jmbbm.2012.02.026 ↗
10. Hong Z, Qiu X, Sun J, Deng M, Chen X, Jing X (2004) Polymer 45:669910.1016/j.polymer.2004.07.036 ↗
11. Vera-Graziano R, Maciel-Cerda A, Moreno-Rondon EV, Ospina A, Gomez-Pachon EY (2012) Mater Res Soc Symp Proc 1376:110.1557/opl.2012.274 ↗
12. Liao C-C, Wang C-C, Chen C-Y (2011) Polymer 52:430310.1016/j.polymer.2011.07.031 ↗
13. Tan EPS, Lim CT (2004) App Phys Lett 84:160310.1063/1.1651643 ↗
14. Lim CT, Tan EPS, Ng SY (2008) App Phys Lett 92:3
15. Tan EPS, Lim CT (2006) Nanotechnology 17:264910.1088/0957-4484/17/10/034 ↗
16. Wong S-C, Baji A, Leng S (2008) Polymer 21:471310.1016/j.polymer.2008.08.022 ↗
17. Naraghi M, Arshad SN, Chasiotis I (2011) Polymer 52:161210.1016/j.polymer.2011.02.013 ↗
18. Baji A, Mai Y, Wong S, Abtahi M, Chen P (2010) Compos Sci Technol 70:70310.1016/j.compscitech.2010.01.010 ↗
19. Yoshioka T, Dersch R, Tsuji M, Schaper AK (2010) Polymer 51:238310.1016/j.polymer.2010.03.031 ↗
20. Inai R, Kotaki M, Ramakrishna S (2005) Nanotechnol 16:20810.1088/0957-4484/16/2/005 ↗
21. Arinstein A, Burman M, Gendelman O, Zussman E (2007) Nat Nanotechnol 2:5910.1038/nnano.2006.172 ↗
22. Cicero JA, Dorgan JR (2002) J Polym Environ 9:110.1023/A:1016012818800 ↗
23. Stylianopoulos T, Barocas VH (2007) Comp Meth Appl Mech Eng 196:298110.1016/j.cma.2006.06.019 ↗
24. Stylianopoulos T, Bashur CA, Goldstein AS, Guelcher SA, Barocas VH (2008) J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 1(4):32610.1016/j.jmbbm.2008.01.003 ↗
25. Sun L, Han RPS, Wang J, Lim CT (2008) Nanotechnology 19:45570610.1088/0957-4484/19/45/455706 ↗
26. Hori M, Nemat-Nasser S (1999) Mech Mater 31:66710.1016/S0167-6636(99)00020-4 ↗
27. Hill R (1964) J Mech Phys Solids 12:19910.1016/0022-5096(64)90019-5 ↗
28. Hashin Z, Rosen BW (1964) J Appl Mech 31:22310.1115/1.3629590 ↗
29. Qiu YP, Weng GJ (1991) ASME J Appl Mech 58:38810.1115/1.2897198 ↗
30. Jasiuk I, Kouider MW (1993) Mech Mater 15:5310.1016/0167-6636(93)90078-6 ↗
31. Shen L, Li J (2003) Int J Solids Struct 40:139310.1016/S0020-7683(02)00659-5 ↗
32. Shen L, Li J (2005) Proc R Soc Lond A 461:147510.1098/rspa.2005.1447 ↗
33. Sevostianov I, Kachanov M (2007) Int J Solids Struct 44:130410.1016/j.ijsolstr.2006.06.020 ↗
34. ASTM D1708.10 (2010) Standard test method for tensile properties of plastics by use of microtensile specimens. doi: 10.1520/D1708-1010.1520/D1708-10 ↗
35. Sánchez-Arévalo FM, Pulos G (2008) Mater Charact 59:157210.1016/j.matchar.2008.02.002 ↗
36. Montes De Oca H, Ward IM (2007) J Polym Sci Part B 45:89210.1002/polb.21131 ↗
37. Ramírez M, Nava-Gómez GG, Sabina FJ, Camacho-Montes H, Guinovart-Díaz R, Rodríguez-Ramos R, Bravo-Castillero J (2012) Int J Eng Sci 58:9510.1016/j.ijengsci.2012.03.029 ↗
38. Milton GW (2002) The Mathematical Theory of Composites. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge10.1017/CBO9780511613357 ↗
39. Garlotta D (2001) J Polym Environ 9:6310.1023/A:1020200822435 ↗
40. Gunatillake PA, Adhikari R (2003) Eur Cell Mater 5:110.22203/eCM.v005a01 ↗
41. Madhavan K, Nair NR, John RP (2010) Bioresour Technol 101:849310.1016/j.biortech.2010.05.092 ↗
42. Christensen RM (1991) Mechanics of composite materials edit. Krieger, Malabar