A hierarchical study of the mechanical properties of gypsum
Source abstract
Abstract
The flexural strength of gypsum is reported for freestanding single crystals in three-point bending carried with a nanoindenter. The elastic modulus, splitting tensile strength, and fracture toughness of monolithic gypsum consisting of interlocking needle-like microcrystals are also reported as functions of porosity and accelerator addition. This study shows that geometric configurations, in addition to porosity, affect the mechanical properties of gypsum. The properties are improved by 50–100% when the crystal network changes from needle aggregates to one made up of homogeneous randomly oriented single crystals. An Ashby geometric model for open-cell foams is adopted to link the properties of the individual crystals and the bulk properties. The lower and upper bounds of the measured elastic modulus are in accordance with bending-dominated behavior and stretch-dominated behavior predicted by the model, respectively. However, the strength of gypsum is much lower than values predicted by the model, which is based failure on fracture of individual crystals, suggesting that the strength of monolithic gypsum may be instead controlled by the failure of weak intercrystalline contacts.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Force Microscopy Techniques and Applications · Microstructure and mechanical properties · Calcium Carbonate Crystallization and Inhibition
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (34)
Show source-provided references
1. Gibson LJ, Ashby MF (1997) Cellular solids, structure and properties, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK10.1017/CBO9781139878326 ↗
2. Soroka I, Sereda PJ (1968) J Am Ceram Soc 51(6):33710.1111/j.1151-2916.1968.tb15949.x ↗
3. Vekinis G, Ashby MF, Beaumont PWR (1993) J Mater Sci 28:3221. doi: 10.1007/BF0035423910.1007/BF00354239 ↗
4. Sattler H (1997) ZKG Int 50(1):54
5. Meille S, Garboczi EJ (2001) Modell Simul Mater Sci Eng 9:37110.1088/0965-0393/9/5/303 ↗
6. Jeulin D, Monnaie P, Peronnet F (2001) Cem Concr Compos 23:29910.1016/S0958-9465(00)00066-4 ↗
7. Singh NB, Middendorf B (2007) Prog Cryst Growth Char Mater 53(1):5710.1016/j.pcrysgrow.2007.01.002 ↗
8. Amathieu L, Boistelle R (1986) J Cryst Growth 79(1–3):16910.1016/0022-0248(86)90432-X ↗
9. Osterwalder N, Loher S, Grass RN, Brunner TJ, Limbach LK, Halim SC, Stark WJ (2007) J Nanopart Res 9:27510.1007/s11051-006-9149-7 ↗
10. Constantinides G, Ulm F-J (2004) Cem Concr Res 34:6710.1016/S0008-8846(03)00230-8 ↗
11. Kaul VS, Faber KT (2008) Scr Mater 58:88610.1016/j.scriptamat.2008.01.018 ↗
12. Uchic MD, Dimiduk DM, Florando JN, Nix WD (2004) Science 305(5686):98610.1126/science.1098993 ↗
13. Schuster BE, Wei Q, Zhang H, Ramesh KT (2006) Appl Phys Lett 88(10):10311210.1063/1.2183814 ↗
14. Lee D, Wei XD, Zhao M, Chen X, Jun SC, Hone J, Kysar JW (2007) Modell Simul Mater Sci Eng 15:S18110.1088/0965-0393/15/1/S15 ↗
15. Chen X, Xu Z, Li X, Shaibat MA, Ishii Y, Ruoff RS (2007) Carbon 45(2):41610.1016/j.carbon.2006.08.025 ↗
16. Satava V (1996) Ceramics-Silikaty 40(2):72
17. Oliver WC GM, Pharr GM (2004) J Mater Res 19:310.1557/jmr.2004.19.1.3 ↗
18. ASTM Standard C769-98 (2005) Standard test method for sonic velocity in manufactured carbon and graphite materials for use in obtaining an approximate Young’s modulus
19. ASTM Standard C1419-99a (2007) Standard test method for sonic velocity in refractory materials at room temperature and its use in obtaining an approximate Young’s modulus
20. ASTM Standard E494-05 (2005) Standard practice for measuring ultrasonic velocity in materials
21. Miller DP, Moslemi AA (1991) Wood Fiber Sci 23(4):472
22. Jonsén P, Häggblad H-Å, Sommer K (2006) Tensile strength and fracture energy of pressed metal powder by diametral compression test. Doctoral thesis, D1-D18
23. ASTM C 1421-01b (2001) Standard test methods for determination of fracture toughness of advanced ceramics at ambient temperature
24. Petrovic JJ, Milewski JV, Rohr DL, Gac FD (1985) J Mater Sci 20:1167. doi: 10.1007/BF0102631010.1007/BF01026310 ↗
25. Underwood EE (1970) Quantitative stereology. Addison-Wesley, Publishing Co., Inc., Reading, MA
26. Ashby MF (2006) Phil Trans R Soc A 364:1510.1098/rsta.2005.1678 ↗
27. Tuncer E, Wegener M (2004) Mater Lett 58:281510.1016/j.matlet.2004.05.002 ↗
28. Broz ME, Cook RF, Whitney DL (2006) Am Mineral 91:13510.2138/am.2006.1844 ↗
29. Maalej M, Li VC (1994) J Mater Civ Eng 6(4):51310.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(1994)6:4(513) ↗
30. Ohnishi S, Stewart AM (2002) Langmuir 18:614010.1021/la025509h ↗
31. Follner S, Wolter A, Helming K, Silber C, Bartels H, Follner H (2003) Cryst Res Technol 37(2–3):207
32. Coquard P, Boistelle R (1994) Int J Rock Mech Min Sci Geomech Ahslr 31(5):51710.1016/0148-9062(94)90153-8 ↗
33. Chappuis J (1999) Colloids Surf A Physicochem Eng Asp 156:22310.1016/S0927-7757(99)00075-8 ↗
34. Israelachvili JN, Pashley RM (1983) Nature 17:24910.1038/306249a0 ↗