journal article·2021-01Open access

Facile synthesis of cubic cuprous oxide for electrochemical reduction of carbon dioxide

Juqin Zeng, Micaela Castellino, Katarzyna Bejtka, Adriano Sacco, Gaia Di Martino, M. Amin Farkhondehfal, Angelica Chiodoni, Simelys Hernández, Candido F. Pirri

Journal of Materials Science· Volume 56· Issue 2

Abstract

Abstract High level of atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO2) concentration is considered one of the main causes of global warming. Electrochemical conversion of CO2 into valuable chemicals and fuels has promising potential to be implemented into practical and sustainable devices. In order to efficiently realize this strategy, one of the biggest efforts has been focused on the design of catalysts which are inexpensive, active and selective and can be produced through green and up-scalable routes. In this work, copper-based materials are simply synthesized via microwave-assisted process and carefully characterized by physical/chemical/electrochemical techniques. Nanoparticle with a cupric oxide (CuO) surface as well as various cuprous oxide (Cu2O) cubes with different sizes is obtained and used for the CO2 reduction reaction. It is observed that the Cu2O-derived electrodes show enhanced activity and carbon monoxide (CO) selectivity compared to the CuO-derived one. Among various Cu2O catalysts, the one with the smallest cubes leads to the best CO selectivity of the electrode, attributed to a higher electrochemically active surface area. Under applied potentials, all Cu2O cubes undergo structural and morphological modification, even though the cubic shape is retained. The nanoclusters formed during the material evolution offer abundant and active reaction sites, leading to the high performance of the Cu2O-derived electrodes. Graphic abstract
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: CO2 Reduction Techniques and Catalysts · Advanced battery technologies research · Advanced Photocatalysis Techniques

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (50)

Show source-provided references
1. Wang Z-L, Li C, Yamauchi Y (2016) Nanostructured nonprecious metal catalysts for electrochemical reduction of carbon dioxide. Nano Today 11:373–391. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nantod.2016.05.00710.1016/j.nantod.2016.05.007 ↗
2. Vickers JW, Alfonso D, Kauffman DR (2017) Electrochemical carbon dioxide reduction at nanostructured gold, copper, and alloy materials. Energy Technol 5:1–22. https://doi.org/10.1002/ente.20160058010.1002/ente.201600580 ↗
3. Centi G, Quadrelli EA, Perathoner S (2013) Catalysis for CO2 conversion: a key technology for rapid introduction of renewable energy in the value chain of chemical industries. Energy Environ Sci 6:1711–1731. https://doi.org/10.1039/C3EE00056G10.1039/C3EE00056G ↗
4. Kondratenko EV, Mul G, Baltrusaitis J, Larrazabal GO, Perez-Ramırez J (2013) Status and perspectives of CO2 conversion into fuels and chemicals by catalytic, photocatalytic and electrocatalytic processes. Energy Environ Sci 6:3112–3135. https://doi.org/10.1039/C3EE41272E10.1039/C3EE41272E ↗
5. Lim RJ, Xie MS, Sk MA, Lee JM, Fisher A, Wang X, Lim KH (2014) A review on the electrochemical reduction of CO2 in fuel cells, metal electrodes and molecular catalysts. Catal Today 233:169–180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cattod.2013.11.03710.1016/j.cattod.2013.11.037 ↗
6. Kuhl KP, Hatsukade T, Cave ER, Abram DN, Kibsgaard J, Jaramillo TF (2014) Electrocatalytic conversion of carbon dioxide to methane and methanol on transition metal surfaces. J Am Chem Soc 136:14107–14113. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja505791r10.1021/ja505791r ↗
7. Zheng Y, Wang J, Yu B, Zhang W, Chen J, Qiao J, Zhang J (2017) A review of high temperature co-electrolysis of H2O and CO2 to produce sustainable fuels using solid oxide electrolysis cells (SOECs): advanced materials and technology. Chem Soc Rev 46:1427–1463. https://doi.org/10.1039/C6CS00403B10.1039/C6CS00403B ↗
8. Ganesh I (2016) Electrochemical conversion of carbon dioxide into renewable fuel chemicals: the role of nanomaterials and the commercialization. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 59:1269–1297. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.01.02610.1016/j.rser.2016.01.026 ↗
9. Guzmán H, Farkhondehfal MA, Tolod KR, Hernández S, Russo N (2019) Photo/electrocatalytic hydrogen exploitation for CO2 reduction toward solar fuels production. In: Calise F, D’Accadia MD, Santarelli M, Lanzini A, Ferrero D (eds) Solar hydrogen production. Academic Press, Cambridge, pp 365–418. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-814853-2.00011-410.1016/B978-0-12-814853-2.00011-4 ↗
10. Zhao G, Huang X, Wang X, Wang X (2017) Progress in catalyst exploration for heterogeneous CO2 reduction and utilization: a critical review. J Mater Chem A 5:21625–21649. https://doi.org/10.1039/C7TA07290B10.1039/C7TA07290B ↗
11. Xie H, Wang T, Liang J, Li Q, Sun S (2019) Cu-based nanocatalysts for electrochemical reduction of CO2. Nano Today 21:41–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nantod.2018.05.00110.1016/j.nantod.2018.05.001 ↗
12. Hori Y, Kikuchi K, Suzuki S (1985) Production of CO and CH4 in electrochemical reduction of CO2 at metal electrodes in aqueous hydrogencarbonate solution. Chem Lett 14:1695–1698. https://doi.org/10.1246/cl.1985.169510.1246/cl.1985.1695 ↗
13. Yin Z, Palmore GTR, Sun S (2019) Electrochemical reduction of CO2 catalyzed by metal nanocatalysts. Trends Chem 8:739–750. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trechm.2019.05.00410.1016/j.trechm.2019.05.004 ↗
14. Hernández S, Farkhondehfal MA, Sastre F, Makkee M, Saracco G, Russo N (2017) Syngas production from electrochemical reduction of CO2: current status and prospective implementation. Green Chem 19:2326–2346. https://doi.org/10.1039/C7GC00398F10.1039/C7GC00398F ↗
15. Pardal T, Messias T, Sousa M, Machado ASR, Rangel CM, Nunes D, Pinto JV, Martins R, da Ponte MN (2017) Syngas production by electrochemical CO2 reduction in an ionic liquid based-electrolyte. J CO2 Util 18:62–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcou.2017.01.00710.1016/j.jcou.2017.01.007 ↗
16. Zhu W, Zhang Y-J, Zhang H, Lv H, Li Q, Michalsky R, Peterson AA, Sun S (2014) Active and selective conversion of CO2 to CO on ultrathin Au nanowires. J Am Chem Soc 136:16132–16135. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja509509910.1021/ja5095099 ↗
17. Zhang B, Zhang J (2017) Rational design of Cu-based electrocatalysts for electrochemical reduction of carbon dioxide. J Energy Chem 6:1050–1066. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jechem.2017.10.01110.1016/j.jechem.2017.10.011 ↗
18. Ajmal S, Yang Y, Li K, Tahir MA, Liu Y, Wang T, Bacha A, Feng Y, Deng Y, Zhang L (2019) Zinc-modified copper catalyst for efficient (photo-)electrochemical CO2 reduction with high selectivity of HCOOH production. J Phys Chem C 123:11555–11563. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.9b0011910.1021/acs.jpcc.9b00119 ↗
19. Bejtka K, Zeng J, Sacco A, Castellino M, Hernández S, Farkhondehfal MA, Savino U, Ansaloni S, Pirri CF, Chiodoni A (2019) Chainlike mesoporous SnO2 as a well-performing catalyst for electrochemical CO2 reduction. ACS Appl Energy Mater 2:3081–3091. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsaem.8b0204810.1021/acsaem.8b02048 ↗
20. Zhang T, Qiu Y, Yao P, Li X, Zhang H (2019) Bi-modified Zn catalyst for efficient CO2 electrochemical reduction to formate. ACS Sustain Chem Eng 18:15190–15196. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.9b0198510.1021/acssuschemeng.9b01985 ↗
21. Reske R, Mistry H, Behafarid F, Roldan Cuenya B, Strasser P (2014) Particle size effects in the catalytic electroreduction of CO2 on Cu nanoparticles. J Am Chem Soc 136:6978–6986. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja500328k10.1021/ja500328k ↗
22. Sacco A, Zeng J, Bejtka K, Chiodoni A (2019) Modeling of gas bubble-induced mass transport in the electrochemical reduction of carbon dioxide on nanostructured electrodes. J Catal 372:39–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcat.2019.02.01610.1016/j.jcat.2019.02.016 ↗
23. Li Y, Cui F, Ross MB, Kim D, Sun Y, Yang P (2017) Structure-sensitive CO2 electroreduction to hydrocarbons on ultrathin 5-fold twinned Copper nanowires. Nano Lett 17:1312–1317. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.nanolett.6b0528710.1021/acs.nanolett.6b05287 ↗
24. Varela AS, Ju W, Bagger A, Franco P, Rossmeisl J, Strasser P (2019) Electrochemical reduction of CO2 on metal-nitrogen-doped carbon catalysts. ACS Catal 9:7270–7284. https://doi.org/10.1021/acscatal.9b0140510.1021/acscatal.9b01405 ↗
25. Hirunsit P, Soodsawang W, Limtrakul J (2015) CO2 electrochemical reduction to methane and methanol on copper-based alloys: theoretical insight. J Phys Chem C 119:8238–8249. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.5b0157410.1021/acs.jpcc.5b01574 ↗
26. Zeng J, Bejtka K, Ju W, Castellino M, Chiodoni A, Sacco A, Farkhondehfal MA, Hernández S, Rentsch D, Battaglia C, Pirri CF (2018) Advanced Cu–Sn foam for selectively converting CO2 to CO in aqueous solution. Appl Catal B 236:475–482. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2018.05.05610.1016/j.apcatb.2018.05.056 ↗
27. Ju W, Zeng J, Bejtka K, Ma H, Rentsch D, Castellino M, Sacco A, Pirri CF, Battaglia C (2019) Sn-decorated Cu for selective electrochemical CO2 to CO conversion: precision architecture beyond composition design. ACS Appl Energy Mater 2:867–872. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsaem.8b0194410.1021/acsaem.8b01944 ↗
28. Zeng J, Bejtka K, Di Martino G, Sacco A, Castellino M, Re Fiorentin M, Risplendi F, Farkhondehfal MA, Hernández S, Cicero G, Pirri CF, Chiodoni A (2020) Microwave-assisted synthesis of copper-based electrocatalysts for converting carbon dioxide to tunable syngas. ChemElectroChem 7:229–238. https://doi.org/10.1002/celc.20190173010.1002/celc.201901730 ↗
29. Zeng J, Francia C, Amici J, Bodoardo S, Penazzi N (2014) Mesoporous Co3O4 nanocrystals as an effective electro-catalyst for highly reversible Li–O2 batteries. J Power Sour 272:1003–1009. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.09.05510.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.09.055 ↗
30. Kim MH, Lim B, Lee EP, Xia Y (2018) Polyol synthesis of Cu2O nanoparticles: use of chloride to promote the formation of a cubic morphology. J Mater Chem 18:4069–4073. https://doi.org/10.1039/B805913F10.1039/B805913F ↗
31. Holder CF, Schaak RE (2019) Tutorial on powder X-ray diffraction for characterizing nanoscale materials. ACS Nano 13:7359–7365. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.9b0515710.1021/acsnano.9b05157 ↗
32. Kuo C-H, Huang MH (2008) Facile synthesis of Cu2O nanocrystals with systematic shape evolution from cubic to octahedral structures. J Phys Chem C 112:18355–18360. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp806002710.1021/jp8060027 ↗
33. Soon A, Todorova M, Delley B, Stampfl C (2007) Thermodynamic stability and structure of copper oxide surfaces: a first-principles investigation. Phys Rev B 75:125420. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.75.12542010.1103/PhysRevB.75.125420 ↗
34. Biesinger MC, Lau LWM, Gerson AR, St R, Smart C (2010) Resolving surface chemical states in XPS analysis of first row transition metals, oxides and hydroxides: Sc, Ti, V, Cu and Zn. Appl Surf Sci 257:887–898. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2010.07.08610.1016/j.apsusc.2010.07.086 ↗
35. Biesinger MC (2017) Advanced analysis of copper X-ray photoelectron spectra. Surf Interface Anal 49:1325–1334. https://doi.org/10.1002/sia.623910.1002/sia.6239 ↗
36. Yang T, Zhu P, Liu W, Chen L, Zhang D (2017) Recovery of tin from metal powders of waste printed circuit boards. Waste Manag 68:449–457. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2017.06.01910.1016/j.wasman.2017.06.019 ↗
37. Larrazábal GO, Martín AJ, Krumeich F, Hauert R, Pérez-Ramírez J (2017) Solvothermally-prepared Cu2O electrocatalysts for CO2 reduction with tunable selectivity by the introduction of p-block elements. Chemsuschem 10:1255–1265. https://doi.org/10.1002/cssc.20160157810.1002/cssc.201601578 ↗
38. Huang J, Hörmann N, Oveisi E, Loiudice A, De Gregorio GL, Andreussi O, Marzari N, Buonsanti R (2018) Potential-induced nanoclustering of metallic catalysts during electrochemical CO2 reduction. Nat Commun 9:3117. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-05544-310.1038/s41467-018-05544-3 ↗
39. Scott SB, Hogg TV, Landers AT, Maagaard T, Bertheussen E, Lin JC, Davis RC, Beeman JW, Higgins D, Drisdell WS, Hahn C, Mehta A, Seger B, Jaramillo TF, Chorkendorff I (2019) Absence of oxidized phases in Cu under CO reduction conditions. ACS Energy Lett 4:803–804. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsenergylett.9b0017210.1021/acsenergylett.9b00172 ↗
40. Lum Y, Ager JW (2018) Stability of residual oxides in oxide-derived copper catalysts for electrochemical CO2 reduction investigated with 18O labeling. Angew Chem Int Ed 57:551–554. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.20171059010.1002/anie.201710590 ↗
41. Sacco A (2018) Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy as a tool to investigate the electroreduction of carbon dioxide: a short review. J CO2 Util 27:22–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcou.2018.06.02010.1016/j.jcou.2018.06.020 ↗
42. Reid O, Saleh F, Easton E (2013) Determining electrochemically active surface area in PEM fuel cell electrodes with electrochemical impedance spectroscopy and its application to catalyst durability. Electrochim Acta 114:278–284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2013.10.05010.1016/j.electacta.2013.10.050 ↗
43. Waszczuk P, Zelenay P, Sobkowski J (1995) Surface interaction of benzoic acid with a copper electrode. Electrochim Acta 40:1717–1721. https://doi.org/10.1016/0013-4686(95)00088-V10.1016/0013-4686(95)00088-V ↗
44. Qin B, Li Y, Fu H, Wang H, Chen S, Liu Z, Peng F (2018) Electrochemical reduction of CO2 into tunable syngas production by regulating the crystal facets of earth-abundant Zn catalyst. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 10:20530–20539. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.8b0480910.1021/acsami.8b04809 ↗
45. Farkhondehfal MA, Hernández S, Rattalino M, Makkee M, Lamberti A, Chiodoni A, Bejtka K, Sacco A, Pirri FC, Russo N (2019) Syngas production by electrocatalytic reduction of CO2 using Ag-decorated TiO2 nanotubes. Int J Hydrog Energy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.04.18010.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.04.180 ↗
46. Lan Y, Gai C, Kenis PJA, Lu J (2014) Electrochemical reduction of carbon dioxide on Cu/CuO core/shell catalysts. ChemElectroChem 1:1577–1582. https://doi.org/10.1002/celc.20140218210.1002/celc.201402182 ↗
47. Chen K, Zhang X, Williams T, Bourgeois L, MacFarlane DR (2017) Electrochemical reduction of CO2 on core-shell Cu/Au nanostructure arrays for syngas production. Electrochim Acta 239:84–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2017.04.01910.1016/j.electacta.2017.04.019 ↗
48. Wuttig A, Yaguchi M, Motobayashi K, Osawa M, Surendranath Y (2016) Inhibited proton transfer enhances Au-catalyzed CO2-to-fuels selectivity. PNAS 113:E4585–E4593. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.160298411310.1073/pnas.1602984113 ↗
49. Luo W, Zhang J, Li M, Züttel A (2019) Boosting CO production in electrocatalytic CO2 reduction on highly porous Zn catalysts. ACS Catal 9:3783–3791. https://doi.org/10.1021/acscatal.8b0510910.1021/acscatal.8b05109 ↗
50. Singh MR, Goodpaster JD, Weber AZ, Head-Gordon M, Bell AT (2017) Mechanistic insights into electrochemical reduction of CO2 over Ag using density functional theory and transport models. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 114:E8812–E8821. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.171316411410.1073/pnas.1713164114 ↗