Controllable synthesis and morphology-dependent microwave absorption properties of iron nanocrystals
Source abstract
Abstract
Iron nanospheres, nanoflakes and nanofibers were synthesized via a simple pyrolysis method. When the pyrolysis temperature increased from 523 to 623 K and the flow rate of Ar carrier gas maintained at 100 sccm, the as-prepared iron nanocrystals showed a morphology evolution from isotropic nanospheres to isotropic nanofibers. The phase structures and morphologies of the composite were characterized by X-ray diffraction and scanning electron microscopy. The complex permittivity (e′ − je″) and permeability (μ′ − jμ″) of these composites were measured using the transmission/refection coaxial line method in the frequency range of 1–18 GHz by a vector network analyzer. The iron nanofibers exhibited superior microwave absorbing properties compared to iron nanoparticles and nanoflakes. The optimal reflection loss (RL) reached −17.8 dB at 9.9 GHz with a layer thickness of 2.0 mm. The RL below −10 dB can be obtained in the frequency range of 7.3–11.7 GHz. Considering the low cost and high efficiency; the iron nanofibers are favorable for application as microwave absorber.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Electromagnetic wave absorption materials · Advanced Antenna and Metasurface Technologies · Metamaterials and Metasurfaces Applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (22)
Show source-provided references
1. Sugimoto S, Maeda T, Book D, Kagotani T, Inomata K, Homma M, Ota H, Houjou Y, Sato R (2002) J Alloys Compd 330:331
2. Che RC, Peng LM, Duan XF, Chen Q, Liang XL (2004) Adv Mater 16:401–40510.1002/adma.200306460 ↗
3. Yuan CL, Hong YS (2010) J Mater Sci 45:3470. doi: 10.1007/s10853-010-4375-x10.1007/s10853-010-4375-x ↗
4. Cheng YL, Dai JM, Zhu XB, Wu DJ, Yang ZR, Sun YP (2009) Nanoscale Res Lett 4:115310.1007/s11671-009-9374-y ↗
5. Yan LG, Wang JB, Han XH, Ren Y, Liu QF, Li FS (2010) Nanotechnology 21:09570810.1088/0957-4484/21/9/095708 ↗
6. Liu QC, Dai JM, Zi ZF, Wu DJ, Sun YP (2011) Adv Mater Res 239–242:172510.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.239-242.1725 ↗
7. Darwish MSA, Peuker U, Kunz U, Turek T (2011) J Mater Sci 46:2123. doi: 10.1007/s10853-010-5048-510.1007/s10853-010-5048-5 ↗
8. Wang J, Xu HF, Song JW, Zhang HJ, Gao BL, Huang YD (2011) J Mater Sci 46:2955. doi: 10.1007/s10853-010-5171-310.1007/s10853-010-5171-3 ↗
9. Zhao HT, Zhang B, Zhang JS, Zhang LF, Han XJ, Xu P, Zhou Y (2010) J Phys Chem C 114:2121410.1021/jp107903r ↗
10. Liu XG, Ou ZQ, Geng DY, Han Z, Jiang JJ, Liu W, Zhang ZD (2010) Carbon 48:89110.1016/j.carbon.2009.11.011 ↗
11. Zhou JH, He JP, Li GX, Wang T, Sun D, Ding XC, Zhao JQ, Wu SC (2010) J Phys Chem C 114:761110.1021/jp911030n ↗
12. Huo J, Wang L, Yu H (2009) J Mater Sci 44:3917. doi: 10.1007/s10853-009-3561-110.1007/s10853-009-3561-1 ↗
13. Wang C, Han XJ, Zhang XL, Hu SR, Zhang T, Wang JY, Du YC, Wang XH, Xu P (2010) J Phys Chem C 114:1482610.1021/jp1050386 ↗
14. Liu QL, Zhang D, Fan TX (2008) Appl Phys Lett 93:01311010.1063/1.2957035 ↗
15. Yang RB, Liang WF, Lin WS, Lin HM, Tsay CY, Lin CK (2011) J Appl Phys 109:07B52710.1063/1.3561449 ↗
16. Snoek JL (1948) Physica 14:20710.1016/0031-8914(48)90038-X ↗
17. Liu JR, Itoh M, Terada M, Horikawa T, Machida K (2007) Appl Phys Lett 91:09310110.1063/1.2775804 ↗
18. Suslick KS, Fang M, Hyeon T (1996) J Am Chem Soc 118:1196010.1021/ja961807n ↗
19. Fan X, Guan JG, Wang W, Tong GX (2009) J Phys D Appl Phys 42:07500610.1088/0022-3727/42/7/075006 ↗
20. Park SJ, Kim S, Lee S, Khim ZG, Char K, Hyeon T (2000) J Am Chem Soc 122:858110.1021/ja001628c ↗
21. Ma J, Li JG, Ni X, Zhang XD, Huang JJ (2009) Appl Phys Lett 95:10250510.1063/1.3224883 ↗
22. Naito Y, Suetake K (1971) IEEE Trans Microwave Theory Tech 19:6510.1109/TMTT.1971.1127446 ↗