Microstructural effects on central crack formation in hot cross-wedge-rolled high-strength steel parts
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Central cracking in cross-wedge-rolled workpieces results in high wastage and economic loss. Recent cross-wedge rolling tests on two batches of steel showed that one batch formed central cracks, while the other was crack-free. The batches were both nominally of the same chemical composition and thermomechanical treatment history. In addition, both batches had passed all the standard quality assessments set for conventional forging processes. It was suspected that the different cracking behaviours were due to differences in microstructure between the two as-received steel billets, and the material in cross-wedge rolling (CWR) was more sensitive to the initial microstructure compared with other forging processes due to its specific loading condition including ostensibly compression and large plastic strain. Nevertheless, no previous study of this important problem could be identified. The aim of this study is, therefore, to identify the key microstructural features determining the central crack formation behaviour in CWR. The hot workability of the as-received billets was studied under uniaxial tensile conditions using a Gleeble 3800 test machine. Scanning electron microscope with energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy and electron backscatter diffraction was applied to characterise, quantitatively analyse, and compare the chemical composition, phase, grain, and inclusions in these two billets, both at room temperature and also at the CWR temperature (1080 °C). Non-metallic inclusions (oxides, sulphides, and silicates) in the billets were determined to be the main cause of the reported central cracking problem. The ductility of the steels at both room and elevated temperatures deteriorated markedly in the presence of the large volumes of inclusions. Grain boundary embrittlement occurred at the CWR temperature due to the aggregation of inclusions along the grain boundaries. It is suggested that a standard on specifying the inclusion quantity and size in CWR billets be established to produce crack-free products.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Metallurgy and Material Forming · Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Steels · Metal Alloys Wear and Properties
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (46)
Show source-provided references
1. Fu XP, Dean TA (1993) Past developments, current applications and trends in the cross wedge rolling process. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 33:367–400. https://doi.org/10.1016/0890-6955(93)90047-X10.1016/0890-6955(93)90047-X ↗
2. Pater Z (1998) A study of cross wedge rolling process. J Mater Process Technol 80–81:370–375. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0924-0136(03)00212-710.1016/S0924-0136(03)00212-7 ↗
3. Pater Z, Tomczak J, Bulzak T et al (2019) Prediction of crack formation for cross wedge rolling of harrow tooth preform. Materials (Basel) 12:2287. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma1214228710.3390/ma12142287 ↗
4. Yang C, Dong H, Hu Z (2018) Micro-mechanism of central damage formation during cross wedge rolling. J Mater Process Technol 252:322–332. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2017.09.04110.1016/j.jmatprotec.2017.09.041 ↗
5. Zhou X, Shao Z, Pruncu CI et al (2020) A study on central crack formation in cross wedge rolling. J Mater Process Technol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2019.11654910.1016/j.jmatprotec.2019.116549 ↗
6. Dong Y, Tagavi KA, Lovell MR, Deng Z (2000) Analysis of stress in cross wedge rolling with application to failure. Int J Mech Sci 42:1233–1253. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0020-7403(99)00035-110.1016/S0020-7403(99)00035-1 ↗
7. Li Q, Lovell MR, Slaughter W, Tagavi K (2002) Investigation of the morphology of internal defects in cross wedge rolling. J Mater Process Technol 125–126:248–257. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0924-0136(02)00303-510.1016/S0924-0136(02)00303-5 ↗
8. Pater Z (2014) Cross-wedge rolling. Elsevier, Amsterdam10.1016/B978-0-08-096532-1.00315-0 ↗
9. Zhu C, Zhang H, Zhou X et al (2018) Personal communication, Laiwu
10. Wang M, Li X, Du F, Zheng Y (2005) A coupled thermal-mechanical and microstructural simulation of the cross wedge rolling process and experimental verification. Mater Sci Eng A 391:305–312. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2004.08.08010.1016/j.msea.2004.08.080 ↗
11. Huo Y, Lin J, Bai Q et al (2017) Prediction of microstructure and ductile damage of a high-speed railway axle steel during cross wedge rolling. J Mater Process Technol 239:359–369. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2016.09.00110.1016/j.jmatprotec.2016.09.001 ↗
12. Bhadeshia H, Honeycombe R (2017) Steels: microstructure and properties, 4th edn. Elsevier, Amsterdam
13. Pineau A, Amine Benzerga A, Pardoen T (2016) Failure of metals III: fracture and fatigue of nanostructured metallic materials. Acta Mater 107:508–544. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2015.07.04910.1016/j.actamat.2015.07.049 ↗
14. Thornton PA (1971) The influence of nonmetallic inclusions on the mechanical properties of steel: a review. J Mater Sci 6:347–356. https://doi.org/10.1007/PL0002037810.1007/PL00020378 ↗
15. Bartosiaki BG, Pereira JAM, Bielefeldt WV, Vilela ACF (2015) Assessment of inclusion analysis via manual and automated SEM and total oxygen content of steel. J Mater Res Technol 4:235–240. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmrt.2015.01.00810.1016/j.jmrt.2015.01.008 ↗
16. Park JH, Kang Y (2017) Inclusions in stainless steels—a review. Steel Res Int 88:1700130. https://doi.org/10.1002/srin.20170013010.1002/srin.201700130 ↗
17. Luiz A (2018) Non-metallic inclusions in steels—origin and control. J Mater Res Technol 7:283–29910.1016/j.jmrt.2018.04.003 ↗
18. Bielefeldt WV, Vilela ACF (2015) Study of inclusions in high sulfur, al-killed ca-treated steel via experiments and thermodynamic calculations. Steel Res Int. https://doi.org/10.1002/srin.20140011210.1002/srin.201400112 ↗
19. Tervo H, Kaijalainen A, Pikkarainen T et al (2017) Effect of impurity level and inclusions on the ductility and toughness of an ultra-high-strength steel. Mater Sci Eng A 697:184–193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2017.05.01310.1016/j.msea.2017.05.013 ↗
20. Holappa LEK, Helle AS (1995) Inclusion control in high-performance steels. J Mater Process Technol. https://doi.org/10.1016/0924-0136(95)01974-J10.1016/0924-0136(95)01974-J ↗
21. Mu W, Dogan N, Coley KS (2018) In situ observation of deformation behavior of chain aggregate inclusions: a case study for Al2O3 at a liquid steel/argon interface. J Mater Sci 53:13203–13215. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-018-2557-010.1007/s10853-018-2557-0 ↗
22. Ma W, Bao Y, Wang M, Zhao L (2014) Effect of Mg and Ca treatment on behavior and particle size of inclusions in bearing steels. ISIJ Int 54:536–542. https://doi.org/10.2355/isijinternational.54.53610.2355/isijinternational.54.536 ↗
23. Pickering FB (1978) Physical metallurgy and the design of steels: austenitic stainless steels. Applied Science Publishers, Michigan
24. Tomita Y (1993) Improved fracture toughness of ultrahigh strength steel through control of non-metallic inclusions. J Mater Sci 28:853–859. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF0040086410.1007/BF00400864 ↗
25. Crowther DN, Mintz B (1986) Influence of grain size and precipitation on hot ductility of microalloyed steels. Mater Sci Technol 2:1099–1105. https://doi.org/10.1179/mst.1986.2.11.109910.1179/mst.1986.2.11.1099 ↗
26. Mintz B, Yue S, Jonas JJ (1991) Hot ductility of steels and its relationship to the problem of transverse cracking during continuous casting. Int Mater Rev 36:187–220. https://doi.org/10.1179/imr.1991.36.1.18710.1179/imr.1991.36.1.187 ↗
27. Kim TK, Jang J, Ryu WS et al (2001) Influence of precipitation and grain size on the hot ductility of alloy C-276 ESR ingots. High Temp Mater Process 20:143–154. https://doi.org/10.1515/HTMP.2001.20.2.14310.1515/HTMP.2001.20.2.143 ↗
28. Faccoli M, Roberti R (2013) Study of hot deformation behaviour of 2205 duplex stainless steel through hot tension tests. J Mater Sci 48:5196–5203. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-013-7307-810.1007/s10853-013-7307-8 ↗
29. Marder AR, Bramfitt BL (1976) The effect of morphology on the strength of pearlite. Metall Trans A. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF0264283210.1007/BF02642832 ↗
30. Elwazri AM, Wanjara P, Yue S (2005) The effect of microstructural characteristics of pearlite on the mechanical properties of hypereutectoid steel. Mater Sci Eng A. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2005.05.05110.1016/j.msea.2005.05.051 ↗
31. Kammerhofer C, Hohenwarter A, Scheriau S et al (2013) Influence of morphology and structural size on the fracture behavior of a nanostructured pearlitic steel. Mater Sci Eng A. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2013.07.03210.1016/j.msea.2013.07.032 ↗
32. Kulakov M, Poole WJ, Militzer M (2013) The effect of the initial microstructure on recrystallization and austenite formation in a DP600 steel. Metall Mater Trans A Phys Metall Mater Sci 1:1. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11661-013-1721-z10.1007/s11661-013-1721-z ↗
33. Zheng C, Raabe D (2013) Interaction between recrystallization and phase transformation during intercritical annealing in a cold-rolled dual-phase steel: a cellular automaton model. Acta Mater. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2013.05.04010.1016/j.actamat.2013.05.040 ↗
34. Standardization Administration of China (2014) Structural steels with specific hardenability bands (in Chinese). GB/T 5216-2014
35. Rasband WS (2011) ImageJ, U.S. National Institutes of Health, Bethesda. https://imagej.nih.gov/ij/
36. Beausir B, Fundenberger JJ (2017) Analysis tools for electron and X-ray diffraction. ATEX software, Metz. http://www.atex-software.eu
37. Hu J, Zhang JM, Sun GS et al (2019) High strength and ductility combination in nano-/ultrafine-grained medium-Mn steel by tuning the stability of reverted austenite involving intercritical annealing. J Mater Sci 54:6565–6578. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-018-03291-w10.1007/s10853-018-03291-w ↗
38. Li J, Cao Y, Gao B et al (2018) Superior strength and ductility of 316L stainless steel with heterogeneous lamella structure. J Mater Sci 53:10442–10456. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-018-2322-410.1007/s10853-018-2322-4 ↗
39. Zhang L, Thomas BG (2003) Inclusions in continuous casting of steel. In: XXIV national steelmaking symposium, pp 138–183
40. Raghupathy VP, Srinivasan V, Krishnan H, Chandrasekharaiah MN (1982) The effect of sulphide inclusions on fracture toughness and fatigue crack growth in 12 wt% Cr steels. J Mater Sci 17:2112–2126. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF0054043010.1007/BF00540430 ↗
41. Salas-Reyes AE, Mejía I, Bedolla-Jacuinde A et al (2014) Hot ductility behavior of high-Mn austenitic Fe-22Mn-1.5Al-1.5Si-0.45C TWIP steels microalloyed with Ti and V. Mater Sci Eng A 611:77–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2014.05.07210.1016/j.msea.2014.05.072 ↗
42. Mejía I, Bedolla-Jacuinde A, Maldonado C, Cabrera JM (2011) Hot ductility behavior of a low carbon advanced high strength steel (AHSS) microalloyed with boron. Mater Sci Eng A 528:4468–4474. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2011.02.04010.1016/j.msea.2011.02.040 ↗
43. Suzuki HG, Nishimura S, Yamaguchi S (1982) Characteristics of hot ductility in steels subjected to the melting and solidification. Trans Iron Steel Inst Jpn 22:48–56. https://doi.org/10.2355/isijinternational1966.22.4810.2355/isijinternational1966.22.48 ↗
44. Zhang X, Yang S, Li J, Wu J (2019) Transformation of oxide inclusions in stainless steel containing yttrium during isothermal heating at 1473 K. Metals (Basel). https://doi.org/10.3390/met909096110.3390/met9090961 ↗
45. Shibata H, Tanaka T, Kimura K, Kitamura SY (2010) Composition change in oxide inclusions of stainless steel by heat treatment. Ironmak Steelmak 37:522–528. https://doi.org/10.1179/030192310X1270032892590310.1179/030192310X12700328925903 ↗
46. Chu Y, Li W, Ren Y, Zhang L (2019) Transformation of inclusions in linepipe steels during heat treatment. Metall Mater Trans B Process Metall Mater Process Sci 50:2047–2062. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11663-019-01593-110.1007/s11663-019-01593-1 ↗