journal article·2019-01Open access

Size and shape effect on the photocatalytic efficiency of TiO2 brookite

Stephanie Pigeot-Rémy, Damia Gregori, Roumayssaa Hazime, Alexandre Hérissan, Chantal Guillard, Corinne Ferronato, Sophie Cassaignon, Christophe Colbeau-Justin, Olivier Durupthy

Journal of Materials Science· Volume 54· Issue 2

Abstract

Thanks to aqueous sol–gel chemistry, it is now possible to prepare several phase pure TiO2 brookite colloidal systems that significantly differ on nanoparticles size and shape. This TiO2 polymorph is more difficult to be obtained as phase pure material than anatase or rutile. Here we have prepared a set of four different sol–gel brookite syntheses with particles size ranging from 10 to 500 nm and significantly different morphologies as demonstrated by X-ray diffraction, Raman spectroscopy, and transmission electron microscopy. We have studied their photocatalytic activities in aqueous solution on phenol and formic acid. The brookite sample with higher specific surface displays better activity for both pollutants abatement than anatase and rutile reference samples and very close to the TiO2 P25 commercial reference. Additional experimental characterization of photogenerated charge carriers and their lifetime is performed using time-resolved microwave conductivity. We could then explain why another efficient brookite material is able to compensate a significantly lower specific surface with a higher photon conversion rate. This study involving a broad set of pure phase brookite samples brings back that phase into the TiO2 polymorphs race for light-enhanced applications. It confirms that size/shape–activity correlation already observed for the anatase polymorph is also valid for the brookite phase.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advanced Photocatalysis Techniques · TiO2 Photocatalysis and Solar Cells · Polyoxometalates: Synthesis and Applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (53)

Show source-provided references
1. Weir A, Westerhoff P, Fabricius L, Hristovski K, von Goetz N (2012) Titanium dioxide nanoparticles in food and personal care products. Environ Sci Technol 46:2242–225010.1021/es204168d ↗
2. Fujishima A, Rao TN, Tryk DA (2000) Titanium dioxide photocatalysis. J Photochem Photobiol C 1:1–21
3. Bonhôte P, Moser J-E, Humphry-Baker R et al (1999) Long-lived photoinduced charge separation and redox-type photochromism on mesoporous oxide films sensitized by molecular dyads. J Am Chem Soc 121:1324–133610.1021/ja981742j ↗
4. Lin H-M, Keng C-H, Tung C-Y (1997) Gas-sensing properties of nanocrystalline TiO2. Nanostruct Mater 9:747–75010.1016/S0965-9773(97)00161-X ↗
5. Croce F, Appetecchi GB, Persi L, Scrosati B (1998) Nanocomposite polymer electrolytes for lithium batteries. Nature 394:456–45810.1038/28818 ↗
6. Baudrin E, Cassaignon S, Koesch M, Jolivet JP, Dupont L, Tarascon JM (2007) Structural evolution during the reaction of Li with nano-sized rutile type TiO2 at room temperature. Electrochem Commun 9:337–34210.1016/j.elecom.2006.09.022 ↗
7. Magne C, Cassaignon S, Lancel G, Pauporte T (2011) Brookite TiO(2) nanoparticle films for dye-sensitized solar cells. ChemPhysChem 12:2461–246710.1002/cphc.201100194 ↗
8. Reisch M (2001) Paints and coatings. Chem Eng News 79:23–2810.1021/cen-v079n048.p023 ↗
9. Henderson MA (2011) A surface science perspective on TiO(2) photocatalysis. Surf Sci Rep 66:185–29710.1016/j.surfrep.2011.01.001 ↗
10. Di Paola A, Bellardita M, Palmisano L (2013) Brookite, the Least Known TiO2 photocatalyst. Catalysts 3:36–7310.3390/catal3010036 ↗
11. Di Paola A, Bellardita M, Palmisano L, Barbierikova Z, Brezova V (2014) Influence of crystallinity and OH surface density on the photocatalytic activity of TiO2 powders, J. Photochem Photobiol A 273:59–6710.1016/j.jphotochem.2013.09.008 ↗
12. Le Bahers T, Rérat M, Sautet P (2014) Semiconductors used in photovoltaic and photocatalytic devices: assessing fundamental properties from DFT. J Phys Chem C 118:5997–600810.1021/jp409724c ↗
13. Dou M, Persson C (2013) Comparative study of rutile and anatase SnO2 and TiO2: band-edge structures, dielectric functions, and polaron effects. J Appl Phys 113:08370310.1063/1.4793273 ↗
14. Ozawa K, Emori M, Yamamoto S et al (2014) Electron-hole recombination time at TiO2 single-crystal surfaces: influence of surface band bending. J Phys Chem Lett 5:1953–195710.1021/jz500770c ↗
15. Mino L, Spoto G, Bordiga S, Zecchina A (2012) Particles morphology and surface properties as investigated by HRTEM, FTIR, and periodic DFT calculations: from pyrogenic TiO2 (P25) to nanoanatase. J Phys Chem C 116:17008–1701810.1021/jp303942h ↗
16. Odling G, Robertson N (2015) Why is anatase a better photocatalyst than rutile? The importance of free hydroxyl radicals. ChemSusChem 8:1838–184010.1002/cssc.201500298 ↗
17. Lin H, Huang CP, Li W, Ni C, Shah SI, Tseng Y-H (2006) Size dependency of nanocrystalline TiO2 on its optical property and photocatalytic reactivity exemplified by 2-chlorophenol. Appl Catal B 68:1–1110.1016/j.apcatb.2006.07.018 ↗
18. Tachikawa T, Yamashita S, Majima T (2011) Evidence for crystal-face-dependent TIO2 photocatalysis from single-molecule imaging and kinetic analysis. J Am Chem Soc 133:7197–720410.1021/ja201415j ↗
19. Liu S, Yu J, Jaroniec M (2011) Anatase TiO2 with dominant high-energy 001 Facets: synthesis, properties, and applications. Chem Mater 23:4085–409310.1021/cm200597m ↗
20. Ohno Y, Tomita K, Komatsubara Y et al (2011) Pseudo-cube shaped brookite (TiO2) nanocrystals synthesized by an oleate-modified hydrothermal growth method. Cryst Growth Des 11:4831–483610.1021/cg2006265 ↗
21. Lin H, Li L, Zhao M et al (2012) Synthesis of high-quality brookite TiO2 Single-crystalline nanosheets with specific facets exposed: tuning catalysts from inert to highly reactive. J Am Chem Soc 134:8328–833110.1021/ja3014049 ↗
22. Zhao M, Xu H, Chen H et al (2015) Photocatalytic reactivity of 121 and 211 facets of brookite TiO2 crystals. J Mater Chem A 3:2331–233710.1039/C4TA06087C ↗
23. Cargnello M, Montini T, Smolin SY et al (2016) Engineering titania nanostructure to tune and improve its photocatalytic activity. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 113:3966–397110.1073/pnas.1524806113 ↗
24. Pourjafari D, Reyes-Coronado D, Vega-Poot A et al (2018) Brookite-based dye-sensitized solar cells: influence of morphology and surface chemistry on cell performance. J Phys Chem C 122:14277–1428810.1021/acs.jpcc.8b02384 ↗
25. Choi M, Lim J, Baek M, Choi W, Kim W, Yong K (2017) Investigating the unrevealed photocatalytic activity and stability of nanostructured brookite TiO2 film as an environmental photocatalyst. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 9:16252–1626010.1021/acsami.7b03481 ↗
26. Kandiel TA, Feldhoff A, Robben L, Dillert R, Bahnemann DW (2010) Tailored titanium dioxide nanomaterials: anatase nanoparticles and brookite nanorods as highly active photocatalysts. Chem Mater 22:2050–206010.1021/cm903472p ↗
27. Ismail AA, Kandiel TA, Bahnemann DW (2010) Novel (and better?) titania-based photocatalysts: brookite nanorods and mesoporous structures. J Photochem. Photobiol A 216:183–19310.1016/j.jphotochem.2010.05.016 ↗
28. Kobayashi M, Tomita K, Petrykin V et al (2007) Hydrothermal synthesis of nanosized titania photocatalysts using novel water-soluble titanium complexes. Solid State Phenom 124–126:723–72610.4028/www.scientific.net/SSP.124-126.723 ↗
29. Stengl V, Bakardjieva S, Murafa N, Subrt J, Mest’ankova H, Jirkovsky J (2007) Preparation, characterization and photocatalytic activity of optically transparent titanium dioxide particles. Mater Chem Phys 105:38–4610.1016/j.matchemphys.2007.04.037 ↗
30. Zhao B, Chen F, Huang Q, Zhang J (2009) Brookite TiO2 nanoflowers. Chem Commun 34:5115–511710.1039/b909883f ↗
31. Vequizo JJM, Matsunaga H, Ishiku T, Kamimura S, Ohno T, Yamakata A (2017) Trapping-induced enhancement of photocatalytic activity on brookite TiO2 powders: comparison with anatase and rutile TIO2 powders. ACS Catal 7:2644–265110.1021/acscatal.7b00131 ↗
32. Monai M, Montini T, Fornasiero P (2017) Brookite: nothing new under the sun? Catalysts 7:30410.3390/catal7100304 ↗
33. Yang Z, Wang B, Cui H, An H, Pan Y, Zhai J (2015) Synthesis of crystal-controlled TiO2 nanorods by a hydrothermal method: rutile and brookite as highly active photocatalysts. J Phys Chem C 119:16905–1691210.1021/acs.jpcc.5b02485 ↗
34. Montoya JF, Velasquez JA, Salvador P (2009) The direct-indirect kinetic model in photocatalysis: a reanalysis of phenol and formic acid degradation rate dependence on photon flow and concentration in TiO2 aqueous dispersions. Appl Catal B 88:50–5810.1016/j.apcatb.2008.09.035 ↗
35. Turki A, Guillard C, Dappozze F, Ksibi Z, Berhault G, Kochkar H (2015) Phenol photocatalytic degradation over anisotropic TiO2 nanomaterials: kinetic study, adsorption isotherms and formal mechanisms. Appl Catal B 163:404–41410.1016/j.apcatb.2014.08.010 ↗
36. Turki A, Guillard C, Dappozze F, Berhault G, Ksibi Z, Kochkar H (2014) Design of TiO2 nanomaterials for the photodegradation of formic acid—adsorption isotherms and kinetics study. J Photochem Photobiol 279:8–1610.1016/j.jphotochem.2014.01.008 ↗
37. Quang Duc T, Thi Hang L, Huu Thu H (2017) Amino acid-assisted controlling the shapes of rutile, brookite for enhanced photocatalytic CO2 reduction. CrystEngComm 19:4519–452710.1039/C7CE00566K ↗
38. Pottier A, Chanéac C, Tronc E, Mazerolles L, Jolivet J-P (2001) Synthesis of brookite TiO2 nanoparticles by thermolysis of TiCl4 in strongly acidic aqueous media. J Mater Chem 11:1116–112110.1039/b100435m ↗
39. Kakihana M, Kobayashi M, Tomita K, Petrykin V (2010) Application of water-soluble titanium complexes as precursors for synthesis of titanium-containing oxides via aqueous solution processes. Bull Chem Soc Jpn 83:1285–130810.1246/bcsj.20100103 ↗
40. Nagase T, Ebina T, Iwasaki T, Hayashi K, Onodera Y, Chatterjee M (1999) Hydrothermal synthesis of brookite. Chem Lett 28:911–91210.1246/cl.1999.911 ↗
41. Pottier A, Chanéac C, Tronc E, Mazerolles L, Jolivet J-P (2001) Synthesis of brookite TiO2 nanoparticles by thermolysis of TiCl4 in strongly acidic aqueous media. J Mater Chem 11:1116–112110.1039/b100435m ↗
42. Perego C, Clemençon I, Rebours B, et al (2009) Thermal stability of brookite—TiO2 nanoparticles with controlled size and shape: in situ studies by XRD. In: Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 1146: NN04-02
43. Durupthy O, Bill J, Aldinger F (2007) Bioinspired synthesis of crystalline TiO2: effect of amino acids on nanoparticles structure and shape. Cryst Growth Des 7:2696–270410.1021/cg060405g ↗
44. Pigeot-Rémy S, Dufour F, Herissan A et al (2017) Bipyramidal anatase TiO2 nanoparticles, a highly efficient photocatalyst? Towards a better understanding of the reactivity. Appl Catal B 203:324–33410.1016/j.apcatb.2016.10.031 ↗
45. Emilio CA, Litter MI, Kunst M, Bouchard M, Colbeau-justin C (2006) Phenol photodegradation on platinized-TiO 2 photocatalysts related to charge-carrier dynamics. Langmuir 22:4943–495010.1021/la051962s ↗
46. Tompsett GA, Bowmaker GA, Cooney RP, Metson JB, Rodgers KA, Seakins JM (1995) The Raman spectrum of brookite, TiO2 (Pbca, Z = 8). J Raman Spectrosc 26:57–6210.1002/jrs.1250260110 ↗
47. Tran HTT, Kosslick H, Ibad MF et al (2016) Photocatalytic performance of highly active brookite in the degradation of hazardous organic compounds compared to anatase and rutile. Appl Catal B 200:647–658
48. Lopez-Munoz MJ, Revilla A, Alcalde G (2015) Brookite TiO2-based materials: synthesis and photocatalytic performance in oxidation of methyl orange and As(III) in aqueous suspensions. Catal Today 240:138–14510.1016/j.cattod.2014.05.008 ↗
49. Deiana C, Fois E, Coluccia S, Martra G (2010) Surface structure of TiO2 P25 nanoparticles: infrared study of hydroxy groups on coordinative defect sites. J Phys Chem C 114:21531–2153810.1021/jp107671k ↗
50. Hurum DC, Agrios AG, Gray KA, Rajh T, Thurnauer MC (2003) Explaining the enhanced photocatalytic activity of degussa P25 mixed-phase TiO2 using EPR. J Phys Chem B 107:4545–454910.1021/jp0273934 ↗
51. Kroeze JE, Savenije TJ, Warman JM (2004) Electrodeless determination of the trap density, decay kinetics, and charge separation efficiency of dye-sensitized nanocrystalline TiO2. J Am Chem Soc 126:7608–761810.1021/ja039303u ↗
52. Nakajima S, Katoh R (2015) Time-resolved microwave conductivity study of charge carrier dynamics in commercially available TiO2 photocatalysts. J Mater Chem A 3:15466–1547210.1039/C5TA02110C ↗
53. Kolen’ko YV, Churagulov BR, Kunst M, Mazerolles L, Colbeau-Justin C (2004) Photocatalytic properties of titania powders prepared by hydrothermal method. Appl Catal B 54:51–5810.1016/j.apcatb.2004.06.006 ↗