journal article·2018-08

Porous poly(l-lactic acid) nanocomposite scaffolds with functionalized TiO2 nanoparticles: properties, cytocompatibility and drug release capability

Aleksandra Buzarovska, Sorina Dinescu, Leona Chitoiu, Marieta Costache

Journal of Materials Science· Volume 53· Issue 16
Publisher page

Abstract

Cytocompatibility is one of the most important aspects in evaluating biomaterials for tissue engineering applications. In this study, biodegradable polymer scaffolds based on nanocomposites of poly(l-lactic acid) and TiO2 nanoparticles functionalized with oleic acid (5 and 10 wt%) were prepared by thermally induced phase separation method. The aim of this research was to evaluate the properties of nanocomposite scaffolds and to investigate the influence of functionalized nanofiller on their bioactivity, biodegradability and cytocompatibility. The nanocomposite scaffolds showed bioactivity in supersaturated fluids and reduced biodegradation in simulated body fluid when compared to pure PLA scaffold. Cell viability and proliferation potential in contact with nanocomposite scaffolds were tested via MTT assay, while the scaffolds cytotoxic potential was evaluated using lactate dehydrogenase method. It was found that incorporation of functionalized TiO2 nanofiller with content of 5 wt% in the corresponding PLA matrix has a significant positive effect on the cell viability and proliferation, while at higher nanofiller content (10 wt%), insignificant cell proliferation and increased cytotoxicity were confirmed. Furthermore, PLA/TiO2–OA nanocomposite scaffolds were proved as promising materials for drug delivery.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: biodegradable polymer synthesis and properties · Bone Tissue Engineering Materials · Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (49)

Show source-provided references
1. Armentano I, Dottori M, Fortunati E, Mattioli S, Kenny JM (2010) Biodegradable polymer matrix nanocomposite for tissue engineering: a review. Polym Degrad Stabil 95:2126–214610.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2010.06.007 ↗
2. Armentano I, Bitinis N, Fortunati E, Mattioli S, Rescignano N, Verdejo R, Lopez-Manchado MA, Kenny JM (2013) Multifunctional nanostructured PLA materials for packaging and tissue engineering. Prog Polym Sci 38:1720–174710.1016/j.progpolymsci.2013.05.010 ↗
3. Pellis A, Silvestrini L, Scaini D, Coburn JM, Gardossi L, Kaplan DL, Acero EH, Guebitz GM (2017) Enzyme-catalyzed functionalization of poly(l-lactic acid) for drug delivery applications. Process Biochem Part A 59:77–8310.1016/j.procbio.2016.10.014 ↗
4. Dorati R, De Trizio A, Modena T, Conti B, Benazzo F, Gastaldi G, Genta I (2017) Biodegradable scaffolds for bone regeneration combined with drug-delivery systems in osteomyelitis therapy. Pharmaceuticals 96:10–21
5. Davachi SM, Kaffashi B (2015) Polylactic acid in medicine. Polym Plast Technol Eng 54:944–96710.1080/03602559.2014.979507 ↗
6. Ruiz-Hitzky E, Fernandes FM (2013) Progress in bionanocomposites: from green plastics to biomedical applications. Prog Polym Sci 38:1389–177210.1016/j.progpolymsci.2013.09.004 ↗
7. Allo BA, Costa DO, Dixon SJ, Mequanint K, Rizkalla A (2012) Bioactive and biodegradable nanocomposites and hybrid biomaterials for bone regeneration. J Funct Biomater 3:432–46310.3390/jfb3020432 ↗
8. Goreham RV, Mierczyska A, Smith LE, Sedev R, Vasilev K (2013) Small surface nanotopography encourages fibroblast and osteoblast cell adhesion. RCS Adv 3:10309–10317
9. Lin ASP, Barrows TH, Cartmell SH, Guldberg RE (2003) Microarchitectural and mechanical characterization of oriented porous polymer scaffolds. Biomaterials 24:481–48910.1016/S0142-9612(02)00361-7 ↗
10. Wilberforce SIJ, Finlayson CE, Best SM, Cameron R (2011) A comparative study of the thermal and dynamic mechanical behaviour of quenched and annealed poly-l-lactide/α-tricalciumphosphate nanocomposites. Acta Biomater 7:2176–218410.1016/j.actbio.2011.02.006 ↗
11. Kim SS, Park MS, Jeon O, Choi CY, Kim BS (2006) Poly(lactide-co-glucolide)/hydroxyapatite composite scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Biomaterials 27:1399–140910.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.08.016 ↗
12. Mantsos T, Chatzistavrou X, Roether JA, Hupa L, Arstila H, Boccaccini AR (2009) Non-crystalline composite tissue engineering scaffolds using boron containing bioactive glass and poly(d, l-lactic acid) coatings. Biomed Mater 4:055002. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-6041/4/5/05500210.1088/1748-6041/4/5/055002 ↗
13. Armentano I, Marinucci L, Dottori M, Balloni S, Fortunati E, Penacchi M, Becchetti E, Locci P, Kenny JM (2011) Novel poly(l-lactide) (PLLA)/SWCNTs nanocomposites for biomedical application: material characterization and biocompatibility evaluation. J Biomat Sci Polym E 22:541–55610.1163/092050610X487873 ↗
14. Bocccaccini A, Blaker J, Maquet V, Chung W, Jerome R, Nazhat S (2006) Poly(d, l-lactide) (PDLLA) foams with TiO2 nanoparticles and (PDLLA)/TiO2-Bioglass foam composites for tissue engineering scaffolds. J Mater Sci 41:3999–4008. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-006-7575-710.1007/s10853-006-7575-7 ↗
15. Wei J, Chen QZ, Stevens MM, Roether JA, Boccaccini AR (2008) Biocompatibility and bioactivity of PDLLA/TiO2 and PDLLA/TiO2/Bioglass nanocomposites. Mater Sci Eng, C 28:1–1010.1016/j.msec.2007.01.004 ↗
16. Uchida M, Kim HM, Kokubo T, Fujibayashi S, Nakamura T (2003) Structural dependence of apatite formation on titania gels in a simulated body fluid. J Biomed Mater Res A 64:164–17010.1002/jbm.a.10414 ↗
17. Oberdörter G (2000) Pulmonary effects of inhaled ultrafine particles. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 74:1–810.1007/s004200000185 ↗
18. Bhattacharya K, Davoren M, Boertz J, Schins RPF, Hoffmann E, Dopp E (2009) Titanium dioxide nanoparticles induce oxidative stress and DNA-adduct formation but not DNA-breakage in human lung cells. Part Fibre Toxicol 6:17. https://doi.org/10.1186/1743-8977-6-1710.1186/1743-8977-6-17 ↗
19. Petkovic J (2011) DNA damage and alterations in expression of DNA damage responsive genes induced by TiO2 nanoparticles in human hepatoma HepG2cells. Nanotechnology 5:341–353
20. Treccani L, Klein TY, Meder F, Pardun K, Rezwan K (2013) Functionalized ceramics for biomedical and environmental applications. Acta Biomater 9:7115–715010.1016/j.actbio.2013.03.036 ↗
21. Xie J, Pan X, Wang M, Ma J, Fei Y, Wang PN, Mi L (2016) The role of surface modification for TiO2 nanoparticles in cancer cells. Colloids Surf B 143:148–15510.1016/j.colsurfb.2016.03.029 ↗
22. Fisher EW, Sterzel HJ, Wegner G (1973) Investigation of the structure of solution grown crystals of lactide copolymers by means of chemical. Coll Polym Sci 251:980–990
23. Ma PX, Zhang RJ (1999) Synthetic nano-scale fibrous extracellular matrix. J Biomed Res 46:60–7210.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(199907)46:1<60::AID-JBM7>3.0.CO;2-H ↗
24. Kokubo T, Kushitani H, Sakka S, Kitsugi T, Yamamuro T (1990) Solutions able to produce in vivo surface-structure changes in bioactive glass-ceramic A-W. J Biomed Mater Res A 24:721–73410.1002/jbm.820240607 ↗
25. Bracci B, Panzavolta S, Bigi A (2013) A new simplified calcifying solution to synthesize calcium phosphate coatings. Surf Coat Technol 232:13–2110.1016/j.surfcoat.2013.04.046 ↗
26. Silvetrein PM, Webster FX (1997) Spectrometric identification of organic compounds, 6th edn. Wiley, New York
27. Dobson KD, McQuillian AJ (2000) Insitu infrared spectroscopic analysis of the adsorption of aromatic carboxylic acids to TiO2, Zr, O2, Al2O3 and Ta2O5 from aqueous solutions. Spectrochim Acta A 56:557–56510.1016/S1386-1425(99)00154-7 ↗
28. Shete PB, Patil RM, Tiwale BM, Pawar SH (2015) Water dispersible oleic acid-coated Fe3O4 nanoparticles for biomedical application. J Magn Magn Mater 377:406–41010.1016/j.jmmm.2014.10.137 ↗
29. Auras R, Lim LT, Susan E, Selke M, Tsuji H (2010) Poly (lactic acid): synthesis, structures, properties, processing, and application. Wiley, New Jersey10.1002/9780470649848 ↗
30. Blomergen S, Holden D, Hamer G, Bluhm T, Marchessault R (1986) Studies of composition and crystallinity of bacterial poly(β-hydroxybutyrate-co-β-hydroxyvalerate). Macromolecules 19:2865–287110.1021/ma00165a034 ↗
31. Buzarovska A, Gozdanov A (2012) Bidegradable Poly(l-lactic acid)/TiO2 nanocomposites: thermal properties and degradation. J Appl Polym Sci 123:2187–219310.1002/app.34729 ↗
32. Buzarovska A, Qualandi C, Parrilli A, Scandola M (2015) Effect of TiO2 nanoparticle loading on Poly(l-lactic acid) porous scaffolds fabricated by TIPS. Compos Part B Eng 81:189–19510.1016/j.compositesb.2015.07.016 ↗
33. Mandelkern L (2004) Crystallization of polymers: kinetics and mechanisms, vol 2, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge10.1017/CBO9780511535413 ↗
34. Haugh MG, Murphy CM, O’Brien FJ (2010) Novel freeze-drying methods to produce a range of collagen–glucosaminoglucan scaffolds with tailored mean pore size. Tissue Eng Part C 16:887–89410.1089/ten.tec.2009.0422 ↗
35. Leung LH, Chan C, Baek S, Naguib H (2008) Comparison of morphology and mechanical properties of PLGA bioscaffolds. Biomed Mater 3(2):025006. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-6041/3/2/02500610.1088/1748-6041/3/2/025006 ↗
36. Leung LH, Perron J, Naguib HE (2007) A study of the mechanics of porous PLGA 85/15 scaffold in compression. Polym Polym Compos 15(6):437–443
37. Kong L, Gao Y, Lu G, Gong Y, Zhao N, Zhang X (2006) A study of bioactivity of chitosan/nano-hydroxyapatite composite scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Eur Polym J 42:3171–317910.1016/j.eurpolymj.2006.08.009 ↗
38. Zhang J, Yin HM, Hsiao BS, Zhong GJ, Li ZM (2014) Biodegradable poly(lactic acid)/hydroxyl apatite 3D porous scaffolds using high-pressure molding and salt leaching. J Mater Sci 49:1648–1658. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-013-7848-x10.1007/s10853-013-7848-x ↗
39. Prabaharan M, Rodriguez-Perez MA, deSaja JA, Mano JE (2007) Preparation and Characterization of Poly(l-lactic acid)-chitosan hybrid scaffolds with drug release capability. J Biomed Mater Res B 81:427–43410.1002/jbm.b.30680 ↗
40. Guo Z, Yang C, Zhou Z, Chen S, Li F (2017) Characterization of biodegradable poly(lactic acid) porous scaffolds prepared using selective enzymatic degradation for tissue engineering. RSC Adv 7:34063–3407010.1039/C7RA03574H ↗
41. Ha CS, Cho W (2002) Miscibility, properties, and biodegradability of microbial polyester containing blends. J Prog Polym Sci 27:759–80910.1016/S0079-6700(01)00050-8 ↗
42. He Y, Inoue Y (2000) Novel FTIR method for determining the crystallinity of poly(ε-caprolactone). Polym Int 49:623–62610.1002/1097-0126(200006)49:6<623::AID-PI435>3.0.CO;2-8 ↗
43. Fonseca C, Ochoa A, Ulloa MT, Alvarez E, Canales D, Zapata PA (2015) Poly(lactic acid)/TiO2 nanocomposites as alternative biocidal and antifungal materials. Mater Sci Eng, C 57:314–32010.1016/j.msec.2015.07.069 ↗
44. Costa P (2015) Bone tissue engineering drug delivery. Curr Mol Bio Rep 1:87–9310.1007/s40610-015-0016-0 ↗
45. Dash TK, Konkimalla B (2012) Poly-caprolactone based formulations for drug delivery and tissue engineering. J Control Release 158:15–3310.1016/j.jconrel.2011.09.064 ↗
46. Kayal S, Ramanujan RV (2010) Doxorubicin loaded PVA coated iron oxide nanoparticles for targeted drug delivery. Mater Sci Eng, C 30:484–49010.1016/j.msec.2010.01.006 ↗
47. Illie A, Ghitulica C, Andronescu E, Cucuruz A, Fiscai A (2016) New composite materials on alginate and hydroxyapatite as potential carriers for ascorbic acid. Int J Pharm 510:501–50710.1016/j.ijpharm.2016.01.025 ↗
48. Hue J, Prabhakaran MP, Tian L, Ding X, Ramakrishna S (2015) Drug-loaded emulsion electrospun nanofibers: characterization, drug release and invitro biocompatibility. RSC Adv 5:100256–10026710.1039/C5RA18535A ↗
49. Pereira R, Bartolo PJ (2013) Degradation behavior of biopolymer-based membranes for skin tissue engineering. Procedia Eng 59:285–29110.1016/j.proeng.2013.05.123 ↗