journal article·2018-07

Morphology of cross-linked cellulose nanocrystal aerogels: cryo-templating versus pressurized gas expansion processing

Daniel A. Osorio, Bernhard Seifried, Paul Moquin, Kathryn Grandfield, Emily D. Cranston

Journal of Materials Science· Volume 53· Issue 13
Publisher page

Abstract

Cellulose nanocrystal (CNC)-based aerogels are often produced through cryo-templating, followed by either critical point drying or freeze drying. While cryo-templating gives aerogels with a bimodal pore size distribution, better morphological control may be needed for certain applications. This work compares CNC aerogels prepared using a new processing method, called pressurized gas expansion (PGX) technology, to aerogels produced via cryo-templating. In all cases, CNCs were surface-modified with orthogonal functional groups to produce covalently cross-linked aerogels which are flexible and do not disperse in water. The aerogels were imaged by scanning electron microscopy and X-ray micro-computed tomography and further characterized by nitrogen sorption isotherms, X-ray diffraction, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy, and compression testing. PGX aerogels appeared expanded and fibrillar at high magnification, with small mesopores and macropores less than 7 µm, but with large mound-like porous aggregates. Conversely, cryo-templated aerogels were comprised of denser CNC sheets surrounding macropores of 10–950 μm. Overall, PGX aerogels had a lower density, higher porosity, and a higher specific surface area than cryo-templated aerogels; they were also less stiff due to their morphology and reduced number of chemical cross-links. Scale-up of aerogel processing and understanding of the tunability of such methods may extend the use of CNCs in applications including insulation, separations, flexible supports, drug delivery, and template materials.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advanced Cellulose Research Studies · Aerogels and thermal insulation · Polysaccharides and Plant Cell Walls

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (58)

Show source-provided references
1. Du A, Zhou B, Zhang Z, Shen J (2013) A special material or a new state of matter: a review and reconsideration of the aerogel. Materials (Basel) 6:941–968. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma603094110.3390/ma6030941 ↗
2. Hrubesh LW (1998) Aerogel applications. J Non Cryst Solids 225:335–342. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3093(98)00135-510.1016/S0022-3093(98)00135-5 ↗
3. Tao Y, Endo M, Kaneko K (2008) A review of synthesis and nanopore structures of organic polymer aerogels and carbon aerogels. Recent Patents Chem Eng 1:192–200. https://doi.org/10.2174/187447881080103019210.2174/2211334710801030192 ↗
4. Zou J, Liu J, Karakoti AS et al (2010) Ultralight multiwalled carbon nanotube aerogel. ACS Nano 4:7293–730210.1021/nn102246a ↗
5. Gui X, Wei J, Wang K et al (2010) Carbon nanotube sponges. Adv Mater 22:617–621. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.20090298610.1002/adma.200902986 ↗
6. Zhu C, Han TY, Duoss EB et al (2015) Highly compressible 3D periodic graphene aerogel microlattices. Nat Commun 6:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms796210.1038/ncomms7962 ↗
7. Bandi S, Bell M, Schiraldi DA (2005) Temperature-responsive clay aerogel—polymer composites. Macromolecules 38:9216–922010.1021/ma051698+ ↗
8. Sehaqui H, Morimune S, Nishino T, Berglund LA (2012) Stretchable and strong cellulose nanopaper structures based on polymer-coated nano fiber networks: an alternative to nonwoven porous membranes from electrospinning. Biomacromol 13:3661–366710.1021/bm301105s ↗
9. Sehaqui H, Zhou Q, Berglund LA (2011) High-porosity aerogels of high specific surface area prepared from nanofibrillated cellulose (NFC). Compos Sci Technol 71:1593–1599. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compscitech.2011.07.00310.1016/j.compscitech.2011.07.003 ↗
10. Klemm D, Heublein B, Fink H, Bohn A (2005) Polymer science cellulose: fascinating biopolymer and sustainable raw material. Angew Chemie Int Ed 44:3358–3393. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.20046058710.1002/anie.200460587 ↗
11. Nechyporchuk O, Belgacem MN, Bras J (2016) Production of cellulose nanofibrils: a review of recent advances. Ind Crop Prod 93:2–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2016.02.01610.1016/j.indcrop.2016.02.016 ↗
12. De France KJ, Hoare T, Cranston ED (2017) Review of hydrogels and aerogels containing nanocellulose. Chem Mater 29:4609–4631. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemmater.7b0053110.1021/acs.chemmater.7b00531 ↗
13. Beck-Candanedo S, Roman M, Gray DG (2005) Effect of reaction conditions on the properties and behavior of wood cellulose nanocrystal suspensions. Biomacromol 6:1048–1054. https://doi.org/10.1021/bm049300p10.1021/bm049300p ↗
14. Roman M (2015) Toxicity of cellulose nanocrystals: a review. Ind Biotechnol 11:25–33. https://doi.org/10.1089/ind.2014.002410.1089/ind.2014.0024 ↗
15. Eyley S, Thielemans W (2014) Surface modification of cellulose nanocrystals. Nanoscale 6:7764–7779. https://doi.org/10.1039/C4NR01756K10.1039/C4NR01756K ↗
16. Habibi Y, Lucia LA, Rojas OJ (2010) Cellulose nanocrystals: chemistry, self-assembly, and applications. Chem Rev 110:3479–3500. https://doi.org/10.1021/cr900339w10.1021/cr900339w ↗
17. Leung ACW, Hrapovic S, Lam E et al (2011) Characteristics and properties of carboxylated cellulose nanocrystals prepared from a novel one-step procedure. Small 7:302–305. https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.20100171510.1002/smll.201001715 ↗
18. Yang X, Shi K, Zhitomirsky I, Cranston ED (2015) Cellulose nanocrystal aerogels as universal 3D lightweight substrates for supercapacitor materials. Adv Mater 27:6104–6109. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.20150228410.1002/adma.201502284 ↗
19. Zhu H, Yang X, Cranston ED, Zhu S (2016) Flexible and porous nanocellulose aerogels with high loadings of metal-organic framework particles for separations applications. Adv Mater 28:7652–776510.1002/adma.201601351 ↗
20. Kobayashi Y, Saito T, Isogai A (2014) Aerogels with 3D ordered nanofiber skeletons of liquid-crystalline nanocellulose derivatives as tough and transparent insulators. Angew Chemie 126:10562–10565. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.20140512310.1002/ange.201405123 ↗
21. Beck S, Bouchard J, Berry R (2012) Dispersibility in water of dried nanocrystalline cellulose. Biomacromolecules 13:1486–1494. https://doi.org/10.1021/bm300191k10.1021/bm300191k ↗
22. Eyley S, Thielemans W (2011) Imidazolium grafted cellulose nanocrystals for ion exchange applications. Chem Commun 14:4177–417910.1039/c0cc05359g ↗
23. Tingaut P, Zimmermann T, Sèbe G (2012) Cellulose nanocrystals and microfibrillated cellulose as building blocks for the design of hierarchical functional materials. J Mater Chem 22:20105–20111. https://doi.org/10.1039/c2jm32956e10.1039/c2jm32956e ↗
24. Rosilo H, Kontturi E, Seitsonen J et al (2013) Transition to reinforced state by percolating domains of intercalated brush-modified cellulose nanocrystals and poly(butadiene) in cross-linked composites based on thiol − ene click chemistry. Biomacromolecules 14:1547–155410.1021/bm400185z ↗
25. Yang X, Cranston ED (2014) Chemically cross-linked cellulose nanocrystal aerogels with shape recovery and superabsorbent properties. Chem Mater 26:6016–602510.1021/cm502873c ↗
26. Smeets NMB, Bakaic E, Patenaude M, Hoare T (2014) Injectable and tunable poly(ethylene glycol) analogue hydrogels based on poly(oligoethylene glycol methacrylate). Chem Commun 50:3306–3309. https://doi.org/10.1039/c3cc48514e10.1039/c3cc48514e ↗
27. Buesch C, Smith SW, Eschbach P et al (2016) The microstructure of cellulose nanocrystal aerogels as revealed by transmission electron microscope tomography. Biomacromol 17:2956–2962. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.biomac.6b0076410.1021/acs.biomac.6b00764 ↗
28. Abraham E, Weber DE, Sharon S et al (2017) Multifunctional cellulosic scaffolds from modified cellulose nanocrystals. Multif ACS Appl Mater interfaces 9:2010–2015. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.6b1352810.1021/acsami.6b13528 ↗
29. Fumagalli M, Sanchez F, Boisseau M, Heux L (2013) Gas-phase esterification of cellulose nanocrystal aerogels for colloidal dispersion in apolar solvents. Soft Matter 9:11309–11317. https://doi.org/10.1039/c3sm52062e10.1039/c3sm52062e ↗
30. Rahbar K, Heidari H, Rashidi A (2016) Preparation and evaluation of nanocrystalline cellulose aerogels from raw cotton and cotton stalk. Ind Crop Prod 93:203–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2016.01.04410.1016/j.indcrop.2016.01.044 ↗
31. Chau M, De France KJ, Kopera B et al (2016) Composite hydrogels with tunable anisotropic morphologies and mechanical properties. Chem Mater 28:3406–3415. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemmater.6b0079210.1021/acs.chemmater.6b00792 ↗
32. Seifried B (2010) Physicochemical properties and microencapsulation process development for fish oil using supercritical carbon dioxide. Ph.D. Thesis, Univ. Alberta, 2010
33. Seifried B, Temelli F (2012) Supercritical fluid drying of high molecular weight biopolymers for particle formation and delivery of bioactives. Oral Present. 10th International Meeting on Supercritical Fluids (ISSF), May 13–16, 2012, San Fr. CA, USA
34. Seifried B (2016) PGX Technology: An enabling technology for generating biopolymer fibrils, particles, aerogels and nano-composites. Oral Present. 15th European Meeting on Supercritical Fluids (EMSF), May 8–11, 2016, Essen, Germany
35. Temelli F, Seifried B (2016) Supercritical fluid treatment of high molecular weight biopolymers. US Patent 9,249,266, U.S. Patent Trademark Off. (“USPTO”), 2011, pp 1–62
36. Sun B, Hou Q, Liu Z, Ni Y (2015) Sodium periodate oxidation of cellulose nanocrystal and its application as a paper wet strength additive. Cellulose 22:1135–1146. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-015-0575-510.1007/s10570-015-0575-5 ↗
37. Isogai A, Saito T, Fukuzumi H (2011) TEMPO-oxidized cellulose nanofibers. Nanoscale 3:71–8510.1039/C0NR00583E ↗
38. Beck S, Méthot M, Bouchard J (2015) General procedure for determining cellulose nanocrystal sulfate half-ester content by conductometric titration. Cellulose 22:101–116. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-014-0513-y10.1007/s10570-014-0513-y ↗
39. Campbell SB, Patenaude M, Hoare T (2013) Injectable Superparamagnets: highly elastic and degradable poly(N-isopropylacrylamide) − superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticle (SPION) composite hydrogels. Biomacromolecules 14:644–65310.1021/bm301703x ↗
40. Fraschini C, Chauve G, Bouchard J (2017) TEMPO-mediated surface oxidation of cellulose nanocrystals (CNCs). Cellulose 24:2775–2790. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-017-1319-510.1007/s10570-017-1319-5 ↗
41. Seifried B, Temelli F (2010) Density of carbon dioxide expanded ethanol at (313.2, 328.2, and 343.2) K. J Chem Eng Data 55:2410–2415. https://doi.org/10.1021/je900830s10.1021/je900830s ↗
42. Bhattacharjee S (2016) Review article DLS and zeta potential—What they are and what they are not? J Control Release 235:337–351. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconrel.2016.06.01710.1016/j.jconrel.2016.06.017 ↗
43. Reid MS, Villalobos M, Cranston ED (2017) Benchmarking cellulose nanocrystals: from the laboratory to industrial production. Langmuir 33:1583–1598. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.langmuir.6b0376510.1021/acs.langmuir.6b03765 ↗
44. Lyons WJ (1941) Crystal density of native cellulose. J Chem Phys 9:377–378. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.175091410.1063/1.1750914 ↗
45. Ravikovitch PI, Neimark AV (2001) Characterization of micro- and mesoporosity in SBA-15 materials from adsorption data by the NLDFT method. J Phys Chem B 105:6817–6823. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp010621u10.1021/jp010621u ↗
46. Seligman AM, Wasserhrug HL, Hanker JS (1966) A new staining method (OTO) for enhancing contrast of lipid droplets in osmium-tetroxide-fixed tissue osmiophilic thiocarbohydrazide (TCH). J Cell Biol 30:424–43210.1083/jcb.30.2.424 ↗
47. Cherhal F, Cousin F, Capron I (2015) Influence of charge density and ionic strength on the aggregation process of cellulose nanocrystals in aqueous suspension, as revealed by small-angle neutron scattering. Langmuir 31:5596–5602. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.langmuir.5b0085110.1021/acs.langmuir.5b00851 ↗
48. Hirota M, Furihata K, Saito T et al (2010) Glucose/glucuronic acid alternating co-polysaccharides prepared from TEMPO-oxidized native celluloses by surface peeling. Angew Chemie Int Ed 49:7670–7672. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.20100384810.1002/anie.201003848 ↗
49. Jessop PG, Subramaniam B (2007) Gas-expanded liquids. Chem Rev 107:2666–2694. https://doi.org/10.1021/cr040199o10.1021/cr040199o ↗
50. Dittmar D, Bijosono Oei S, Eggers R (2002) Interfacial tension and density of ethanol in contact with carbon dioxide. Chem Eng Technol 25:23–27. https://doi.org/10.1002/1521-4125(200201)10.1002/1521-4125(200201)25:1<23::AID-CEAT23>3.0.CO;2-8 ↗
51. Lim JS, Lee YY, Chun HS (1994) Phase equilibria for carbon dioxide-ethanol-water system at elevated pressures. J Supercrit Fluids 7:219–230. https://doi.org/10.1016/0896-8446(94)90009-410.1016/0896-8446(94)90009-4 ↗
52. Takishima S, Saiki K, Arai K, Saito S (1986) Phase equilibria for CO2–C2H5OH–H2O system. J Chem Eng Jpn 19:48–56. https://doi.org/10.1252/jcej.19.4810.1252/jcej.19.48 ↗
53. Yao S, Guan Y, Zhu Z (1994) Investigation of phase equilibrium for ternary systems containing ethanol, water and carbon dioxide at elevated pressures. Fluid Phase Equilib 99:249–259. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-3812(94)80035-910.1016/0378-3812(94)80035-9 ↗
54. Yoon JH, Lee H, Chung BH (1994) High pressure three-phase equilibria for the carbon dioxide–ethanol–water system. Fluid Phase Equilib 102:287–292. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-3812(94)87081-010.1016/0378-3812(94)87081-0 ↗
55. Durling NE, Catchpole OJ, Tallon SJ, Grey JB (2007) Measurement and modelling of the ternary phase equilibria for high pressure carbon dioxide–ethanol–water mixtures. Fluid Phase Equilib 252:103–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fluid.2006.12.01410.1016/j.fluid.2006.12.014 ↗
56. Heath L, Thielemans W (2010) Cellulose nanowhisker aerogels. Green Chem 12:1448–1453. https://doi.org/10.1039/c0gc00035c10.1039/c0gc00035c ↗
57. Dorris GM, Gray DG (1978) The surface analysis of paper and wood fibers by ESCA (electron spectroscopy for chemical analysis). II. Surface composition of mechanical pulps. Cellul Chem Technol 12:721–734
58. Reid MS, Villalobos M, Cranston ED (2016) Cellulose nanocrystal interactions probed by thin film swelling to predict dispersibility. Nanoscale 8:12247–12257. https://doi.org/10.1039/C6NR01737A10.1039/C6NR01737A ↗