MQSPR modeling in materials informatics: a way to shorten design cycles?
Source abstract
Abstract
We demonstrate applications of quantitative structure–property relationship (QSPR) modeling to supplement first-principles computations in materials design. We have here focused on the design of polymers with specific electronic properties. We first show that common materials properties such as the glass transition temperature (T g) can be effectively modeled by QSPR to generate highly predictive models that relate polymer repeat unit structure to T g. Next, QSPR modeling is shown to supplement and guide first-principles density functional theory (DFT) computations in the design of polymers with specific dielectric properties, thereby leveraging the power of first-principles computations by providing high-throughput capability. Our approach consists of multiple rounds of validated MQSPR modeling and DFT computations to optimize the polymer skeleton as well as functional group substitutions thereof. Rigorous model validation protocols insure that the statistical models are able to make valid predictions on molecules outside the training set. Future work with inverse QSPRs has the potential to further reduce the time to optimize materials properties.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Machine Learning in Materials Science · Computational Drug Discovery Methods · Polymer crystallization and properties
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (45)
Show source-provided references
1. Hammett LP (1937) J Am Chem Soc 59(1):9610.1021/ja01280a022 ↗
2. Hansch C, Muir RM, Fujita T, Maloney PP, Geiger F, Streich M (1963) J Am Chem Soc 85:281710.1021/ja00901a033 ↗
3. Hansch C, Fujita T (eds) (1995) Classical and three-dimensional QSAR in agrochemistry. American Chemical Society symposium series. American Chemical Society, Washington
4. Taft RW (1952) J Am Chem Soc 74:312010.1021/ja01132a049 ↗
5. Tropsha A (2010) Mol Inf 29(6–7):476. doi: 10.1002/minf.20100006110.1002/minf.201000061 ↗
6. Breneman CM (2008) In: American Chemical Society national meeting, New Orleans
7. Nikolova N, Jaworska J (2003) QSAR Comb Sci 22:100610.1002/qsar.200330831 ↗
8. Jaworska J, Nikolova-Jeliazkova N, Aldenberg T (2005) Altern Lab Anim 33(5):44510.1177/026119290503300508 ↗
9. Vrentas JS, Duda JL (1976) Macromolecules 9(5):78510.1021/ma60053a019 ↗
10. Vrentas JS, Duda JL (1977) J Polym Sci 15:403
11. Bicerano J (1992) Computational modeling of polymers. Plastics engineering series, vol 25. Marcel Dekker, New York
12. Bicerano J (1996) Prediction of polymer properties. Marcel Dekker, New York
13. Breneman CM, Thompson T (1993) In: Smith D (ed) Modeling the hydrogen bond. ACS symposium series. American Chemical Society, Washington, pp 152–174
14. Breneman CM, Thompson TR, Rhem M, Dung M (1995) Comput Chem 19(3):16110.1016/0097-8485(94)00052-G ↗
15. Whitehead CE, Breneman CM, Sukumar N, Ryan MD (2003) J Comput Chem 24:51210.1002/jcc.10240 ↗
16. Bader RFW (1990) Atoms in molecules: a quantum theory. Oxford Press, Oxford10.1093/oso/9780198551683.001.0001 ↗
17. Nantasenamat C, Naenna T, Ayudhya CIN, Prachasittikul V (2005) J Comput-Aided Mol Des 19:50910.1007/s10822-005-9004-4 ↗
18. Sukumar N, Breneman CM (2007) In: Matta CF, Boyd RJ (eds) The quantum theory of atoms in molecules: from solid state to DNA and drug design. Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, pp 471–49810.1002/9783527610709.ch18 ↗
19. Murray JS, Politzer P, Famini GR (1998) J Mol Struct 454(2–3):29910.1016/S0166-1280(98)00299-1 ↗
20. Sjoberg P, Murray JS, Brinck T, Politzer P (1990) Can J Chem 68(8):144010.1139/v90-220 ↗
21. Politzer P, Murray JS, Grice ME, Brinck T, Ranganathan S (1991) J Chem Phys 95(9):669910.1063/1.461539 ↗
22. Murray JS, Abu-Awwad F, Politzer P (2000) J Mol Struct 501–502:24110.1016/S0166-1280(99)00435-2 ↗
23. Politzer P, Daiker K (1981) In: Deb BM (ed) The force concept in chemistry. Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York
24. Politzer P, Truhlar DG (1981) Chemical applications of atomic and molecular electrostatic potential. Plenum Press, New York10.1007/978-1-4757-9634-6 ↗
25. Topliss JG, Edwards RP (1979) J Med Chem 22:123810.1021/jm00196a017 ↗
26. Rücker C, Rücker G, Meringer M (2007) J Chem Inf Model 47(6):2345. doi: 10.1021/ci700157b10.1021/ci700157b ↗
27. Clark R, Fox P (2004) J Comput-Aided Mol Des 18(7):563. doi: 10.1007/s10822-004-4077-z10.1007/s10822-004-4077-z ↗
28. Breneman CM, Sukumar N, Embrechts MJ, Bennett KP, Sundling CM, Krein M, Hepburn T (2007) In: 234th national meeting American Chemical Society, Boston
29. Labute P (2008) Molecular Operating Environment. Chemical Computing Group, Inc., Montreal
30. Frisch MJ, Trucks GW, Schlegel HB, Gill PMW, Johnson BG, Robb MA, Cheeseman JR, Keith T, Petersson GA, Montgomery JA, Raghavachari K, Al-Laham MA, Zakrzewski VG, Ortiz JV, Foresman JB, Cioslowski J, Stefanov BB, Nanayakkara A, Challacombe M, Peng CY, Ayala PY, Chen W, Wong MW, Andres JL, Replogle ES, Gomperts R, Martin RL, Fox DJ, Binkley JS, Defrees DJ, Baker J, Stewart JP, Head-Gordon M, Gonzalez C, Pople JA (2003) Gaussian 03. Gaussian, Inc., Wallingford
31. Tropsha A, Gramatica P, Gombar VK (2003) QSAR Comb Sci 22(1):69. doi: 10.1002/qsar.20039000710.1002/qsar.200390007 ↗
32. Gramatica P (2007) QSAR Comb Sci 26(5):694. doi: 10.1002/qsar.20061015110.1002/qsar.200610151 ↗
33. Golbraikh A, Tropsha A (2002) J Mol Graph Model 20(4):26910.1016/S1093-3263(01)00123-1 ↗
34. Embrechts M, Bress R, Kewley R (2006) In: Guyon I, Nikravesh M, Gunn S, Zadeh L (eds) Studies in fuzziness and soft computing, vol 207. Springer, Berlin, pp 447–462. doi: 10.1007/978-3-540-35488-8_2210.1007/978-3-540-35488-8_22 ↗
35. Lide DR (1994) CRC handbook of chemistry and physics, 75th edn. CRC Press, Boca Raton
36. Zupan A, Burke K, Ernzerhof M, Perdew JP (1997) J Chem Phys 106(24):1018410.1063/1.474101 ↗
37. Perdew JP, Ernzerhof M, Zupan A, Burke K (1998) J Chem Phys 108(4):152210.1063/1.475524 ↗
38. De Julian-Ortiz JV (2001) Comb Chem High Throughput Screen 4(3):29510.2174/1386207013331129 ↗
39. Visco DP, Pophale RS, Rintoul MD, Faulon J-L (2002) J Mol Graph Model 20(6):42910.1016/S1093-3263(01)00144-9 ↗
40. Adams N (2009) In: Meier MAR, Webster DC (eds) Advances in polymer science, vol 225. Springer, Berlin, pp 107–149. doi: 10.1007/12_2009_18
41. Greenwald BC, Stiglitz JE (1986) Q J Econ 101(2):229. doi: 10.2307/189111410.2307/1891114 ↗
42. Golbraikh A, Tropsha A (2002) J Comput-Aided Mol Des 16(5):357. doi: 10.1023/a:102086911868910.1023/A:1020869118689 ↗
43. Baroni M, Clementi S, Cruciani G, Kettaneh-Wold N, Wold S (1993) Quant Struct-Act Relat 12(3):225. doi: 10.1002/qsar.1993012030210.1002/qsar.19930120302 ↗
44. Brandmaier S, Sahlin U, Tetko IV, Öberg T (2012) J Chem Inf Model 52(4):975. doi: 10.1021/ci300019810.1021/ci3000198 ↗
45. Weaver S, Gleeson MP (2008) J Mol Graph Model 26(8):131510.1016/j.jmgm.2008.01.002 ↗