journal article·2008-02

Effect of mixture ratios and nitrogen carrier gas flow rates on the morphology of carbon nanotube structures grown by CVD

Gerald Franky Malgas, Christopher J. Arendse, Nonhlanhla P. Cele, Franscious R. Cummings

Journal of Materials Science· Volume 43· Issue 3
Publisher page

Abstract

We report on the growth of carbon nanotubes (CNTs) by thermal Chemical Vapor Deposition (CVD) and investigate the effects of nitrogen carrier gas flow rates and mixture ratios on the morphology of CNTs on a silicon substrate by vaporizing the camphor/ferrocene mixture at 750 °C in a nitrogen atmosphere. Carbon layers obtained after each CVD growth run of 15 min are characterized by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and Raman spectroscopy. Growth of CNTs is found to occur on silicon substrates. The SEM micrographs helped better understand the nanotube growth morphology while Raman Spectroscopy was used to detect the presence of nanotubes and also identify their nature vizely semiconducting or metallic, single-walled or multi-walled. Raman Spectra was also useful to estimate the quality of the samples as a ratio of nanotube to non-nanotube content. The length and diameters of the aligned CNTs were found to depend on the pyrolysis temperatures, mixture ratio, and the nitrogen carrier gas flow rates.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Carbon Nanotubes in Composites · Graphene research and applications · Diamond and Carbon-based Materials Research

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (21)

Show source-provided references
1. Iijima S (1991) Nature 354:5610.1038/354056a0 ↗
2. Andrews R, Jacques D, Rao AM, Derbyshire F, Qian D, Fan X, Dickey EC, Chen J (1999) Chem Phys Lett 303:46710.1016/S0009-2614(99)00282-1 ↗
3. Journet C, Maser WK, Bernier P, Loiseau A, de la-Chapelle MR, Lefrant S (1997) Nature 388:75610.1038/41972 ↗
4. Thess A (1996) Science 273:48310.1126/science.273.5274.483 ↗
5. Ren ZF, Huang ZP, Wang JH, Siegal MP, Provencio PN (1998) Science 282:110510.1126/science.282.5391.1105 ↗
6. Satishkumar B, Govindaraj A, Rao CNR (1999) Chem Phys Lett 307:15810.1016/S0009-2614(99)00521-7 ↗
7. Andrews R, Jacques D, Rao AM, Derbyshire F, Qian D, Fan X, Dickey EC, Chen J (1999) Chem Phys Lett 303:46710.1016/S0009-2614(99)00282-1 ↗
8. Kumar M, Ando Y (2003) Chem Phys Lett 374:52110.1016/S0009-2614(03)00742-5 ↗
9. Huczko A (2002) Appl Phys A 74:61710.1007/s003390100929 ↗
10. Musso S, Fanchini G, Tagliaferro A (2005) Diam Relat Mater 14:78410.1016/j.diamond.2004.12.030 ↗
11. Zhu C, Xie Z, Guo K (2004) Diam Relat Mater 13:18010.1016/j.diamond.2003.10.034 ↗
12. Tucknott R, Yaliraki SN (2002) Chem Phys 281:45510.1016/S0301-0104(02)00615-8 ↗
13. Rao AM, Richter E, Bandow S, Chase B, Eklund PC, Williams KA, Fang S, Subbaswamy KR, Menon M, Thess A, Smalley RE (1997) Science 275:18710.1126/science.275.5297.187 ↗
14. Li Y, Zhang B, Tao XY, Xu JM, Huang WZ, Luo JH, Li T, Bao Y, Geise HJ (2005) Carbon 43:29510.1016/j.carbon.2004.09.014 ↗
15. Tan P, An L, Liu L, Guo Z, Czerw R, Carroll DL, Ajayan PM, Zhang N, Guo H (2002) Phys Rev B 66:24541010.1103/PhysRevB.66.245410 ↗
16. Singh C, Shaffer MSP, Windle AH (2003) Carbon 41:35910.1016/S0008-6223(02)00314-7 ↗
17. Liu L, Qin Y, Guo ZX, Zhu D (2003) Carbon 41:33110.1016/S0008-6223(02)00286-5 ↗
18. Tuinstra F, Koenig JL (1970) J Chem Phys 53:112610.1063/1.1674108 ↗
19. McCulloch DG, Prawer S, Hoffman A (1994) Phys Rev B 50:590510.1103/PhysRevB.50.5905 ↗
20. Li W, Zhang H, Wang C, Zhang Y, Xu L, Zhu K, Xie S (1997) Appl Phys Lett 70:268410.1063/1.118993 ↗
21. Lee CJ, Kim DW, Lee TJ, Choi YC, Park YS, Kim WS, Lee YH, Choi WB, Lee NS, Kim JM, Choi YG, Yu SC (1999) Appl Phys Lett 75:17210.1063/1.124309 ↗