journal article·2023-04-25Open access

Temperature Distribution in TaOx Resistive Switching Devices Assessed In Operando by Scanning Thermal Microscopy

Jingjia Meng, Jonathan M. Goodwill, Evgheni Strelcov, Kefei Bao, Jabez J. McClelland, Marek Skowronski

Abstract

High Resolution Image Download MS PowerPoint Slide Understanding the physical changes during electroformation and switching processes in transition-metal-oxide-based non-volatile memory devices is important for advancing this technology. Relatively few characteristics of these devices have been assessed in operando. In this work, we present scanning thermal microscopy measurements in vacuum on TaO x -based memory devices electroformed in both positive and negative polarities and high- and low-resistance states. The observed surface temperature footprints of the filament showed higher peak temperatures and narrower temperature distributions when the top electrode served as the anode in the electroformation process. This is consistent with a model in which a hot spot is created by a gap in the conducting filament that forms closest to the anode. A similar behavior was seen on comparing the high-resistance state to the low-resistance state, with the low-resistance footprint showing a lower peak and a larger width, consistent with the gap disappearing when the device is switched from high resistance to low resistance.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advanced Memory and Neural Computing · Ferroelectric and Negative Capacitance Devices · Semiconductor materials and devices

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213, United States

Physical Measurement Laboratory, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, Maryland 20899, United States

Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland 20742, United States

Funding

National Institute of Standards and Technology · Division of Materials Research

References (31)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1038/nmat307010.1038/nmat3070 ↗
2. 10.1038/s41586-020-1942-410.1038/s41586-020-1942-4 ↗
3. 10.1109/ted.2016.263092510.1109/ted.2016.2630925 ↗
4. Chi, P.; Li, S.; Xu, C.; Zhang, T.; Zhao, J.; Liu, Y.; Wang, Y.; Xie, Y. PRIME: A Novel Processing-in-Memory Architecture for Neural Network Computation in ReRAM-Based Main Memory. In 2016 ACM/IEEE 43rd Annual International Symposium on Computer Architecture (ISCA), 2016; pp 27–39.10.1109/ISCA.2016.13 ↗
5. Schor, D. Intel Expands 22FFL With Production-Ready RRAM and MRAM on FinFET–WikiChip Fuse. https://fuse.wikichip.org/news/2801/intel-expands-22ffl-with-production-ready-rram-and-mram-on-finfet/ (accessed Mar 1, 2022).
6. 10.3390/app11231125410.3390/app112311254 ↗
7. TSMC offers 22nm RRAM, taking MRAM on to 16nm. https://www.eenewsanalog.com/news/tsmc-offers-22nm-rram-taking-mram-16nm (accessed Dec 21, 2021).
8. Nakayama, M. ReRAM Technologies: Applications and Outlook. In 2017 IEEE 9th International Memory Workshop (IMW 2017), 2017; pp 1–4.10.1109/IMW.2017.7939099 ↗
9. Fukuyama, S.; Hayakawa, A.; Yasuhara, R.; Matsuda, S.; Kinoshita, H.; Takeuchi, K. Comprehensive Analysis of Data-Retention and Endurance Trade-Off of 40nm TaOx-Based ReRAM. In 2019 IEEE International Reliability Physics Symposium (IRPS); IEEE, 2019; Vol. 2019-March, pp 1–6.10.1109/IRPS.2019.8720436 ↗
10. 10.1002/aelm.20180095410.1002/aelm.201800954 ↗
11. 10.1021/acsami.0c0696010.1021/acsami.0c06960 ↗
12. 10.1063/5.003249410.1063/5.0032494 ↗
13. 10.1002/adma.20110337910.1002/adma.201103379 ↗
14. 10.1021/nn204457710.1021/nn2044577 ↗
15. 10.1002/aelm.20210093610.1002/aelm.202100936 ↗
16. 10.1109/TED.2012.220232010.1109/TED.2012.2202320 ↗
17. 10.1002/aelm.20150023310.1002/aelm.201500233 ↗
18. 10.1038/s41524-020-00455-810.1038/s41524-020-00455-8 ↗
19. 10.1103/physrevapplied.17.05404010.1103/physrevapplied.17.054040 ↗
20. 10.1063/1.10933510.1063/1.109335 ↗
21. 10.1126/sciadv.abk151410.1126/sciadv.abk1514 ↗
22. 10.1021/nl500049g10.1021/nl500049g ↗
23. 10.1021/acsami.2c0687010.1021/acsami.2c06870 ↗
24. Ma, Y.; Goodwill, J.; Skowronski, M. Quantification of Compositional Runaway during Electroformation in TaOx Resistive Switching Devices. In 2019 IEEE 11th International Memory Workshop (IMW 2019), 2019; pp 1–4.10.1109/IMW.2019.8739727 ↗
25. 10.1021/acsnano.7b0850410.1021/acsnano.7b08504 ↗
26. 10.1021/acsami.6b1655910.1021/acsami.6b16559 ↗
27. 10.1021/acsami.8b0372610.1021/acsami.8b03726 ↗
28. 10.1002/adma.20150543510.1002/adma.201505435 ↗
29. 10.1002/andp.20180052410.1002/andp.201800524 ↗
30. 10.1103/physrevb.17.11110.1103/physrevb.17.111 ↗
31. 10.1103/physrevb.73.14430110.1103/physrevb.73.144301 ↗