journal article·2020-12

Effect of Pd and Cu co-catalyst on the charge carrier trapping, recombination and transfer during photocatalytic hydrogen evolution over WO3–TiO2 heterojunction

David Ramírez-Ortega, Diana Guerrero-Araque, Próspero Acevedo-Peña, Luis Lartundo-Rojas, Rodolfo Zanella

Journal of Materials Science· Volume 55· Issue 35
Publisher page

Abstract

Co-catalysts are well known for improving the charge carrier’s separation and transfer to species in solution, and hence, the photocatalytic hydrogen production. Thus, in this work, the effect of loading Cu and Pd species over the WO3–TiO2 structure was evaluated. The structure of WO3–TiO2 was obtained by direct hydrolysis of titanium isopropoxide (sol–gel method) in previously synthesized WO3 nanoparticles (6 mol% of WO3), forming a composite that provided direct contact between WO3 and TiO2 nanoparticles. Subsequently, 0.5 wt% of copper or 0.5 wt% of palladium loadings was deposited onto WO3–TiO2. The photocatalytic hydrogen production results show that the activity increased with the presence of Cu and Pd species, reaching hydrogen production rates of 1496 μmol g−1 h−1 and 5427.07 μmol g−1 h−1 for Cu/WT and Pd/WT, respectively, as compared to WT structure (770.10 μmol g−1 h−1). To understand this behavior, semiconducting properties of the synthesized materials were characterized by (photo)electrochemical techniques. The presence of Cu and Pd in the structure moved the flatband position, increased the photocurrent and modified the open circuit potential under illumination toward less negative values, indicating the formation of energy states in the interface between WO3–TiO2 and the co-catalysts. These energy states at the heterojunction allow the transfer of photogenerated electrons toward co-catalysts, preventing the recombination of photogenerated charge carriers.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advanced Photocatalysis Techniques · Copper-based nanomaterials and applications · Gas Sensing Nanomaterials and Sensors

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (67)

Show source-provided references
1. Liu G, Kolodziej C, Jin R, Qi S, Lou Y, Chen J, Jiang D, Zhao Y, Burda C (2020) MoS2-Stratified CdS-Cu2–xS core–shell nanorods for highly efficient photocatalytic hydrogen production. ACS Nano 14:5468–5479. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.9b0947010.1021/acsnano.9b09470 ↗
2. Lu M, Shao C, Wang K, Lu N, Zhang X, Zhang P, Zhang M, Li X, Liu Y (2014) p-MoO3 nanostructures/n-TiO2 nanofiber heterojunctions: controlled fabrication and enhanced photocatalytic properties. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 6(12):9004–9012. https://doi.org/10.1021/am502115510.1021/am5021155 ↗
3. McCullagh C, Skillen N, Adams M, Robertson PKJ (2011) Photocatalytic reactors for environmental remediation: a review. J Chem Technol Biotechnol 86:1002–1017. https://doi.org/10.1002/jctb.265010.1002/jctb.2650 ↗
4. Chan SHS, Wu TY, Juan JC, The CY (2011) Recent developments of metal oxide semiconductors as photocatalysts in advanced oxidation processes (AOPs) for treatment of dye waste-water. J Chem Technol Biotechnol 86:1130–1158. https://doi.org/10.1002/jctb.263610.1002/jctb.2636 ↗
5. Pan Hong J, Lee in W, (2006) Preparation of highly ordered cubic mesoporous WO3/TiO2 films and their photocatalytic properties. Chem Mater 18:847–853. https://doi.org/10.1021/cm052278210.1021/cm0522782 ↗
6. Rey A, García-Muñoz P, Hernández-Alonso MD, Mena E, García-Rodríguez S, Beltrán FJ (2014) WO3–TiO2 based catalysts for the simulated solar radiation assisted photocatalytic ozonation of emerging contaminants in a municipal wastewater treatment plant effluent. Appl Catal B Environ 154–155:274–284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2014.02.03510.1016/j.apcatb.2014.02.035 ↗
7. Toledo Camacho SY, Rey A, Hernández-Alonso MD, Llorca J, Medina F, Contreras S (2018) Pd/TiO2–WO3 photocatalysts for hydrogen generation from water-methanol mixtures. Appl Surf Sci 455:570–580. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2018.05.12210.1016/j.apsusc.2018.05.122 ↗
8. DohĿeviĿ-MitroviĿ Z, StojadinoviĿ S, Lozzi L, AškrabiĿ S, RosiĿ M, TomiĿ N, PaunoviĿ N, LazoviĿ S, NikoliĿSantucci MGS (2016) WO3/TiO2 composite coatings: structural, optical and photocatalytic properties. Mater Res Bull 83:217–224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.materresbull.2016.06.01110.1016/j.materresbull.2016.06.011 ↗
9. Ramírez-Ortega D, Meléndez AM, Acevedo-Peña P, González I, Arroyo R (2014) Semiconducting properties of ZnO/TiO2 composites by electrochemical measurements and their relationship with photocatalytic activity. Electrochim Acta 140:541–549. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2014.06.06010.1016/j.electacta.2014.06.060 ↗
10. Ramírez-Ortega D, Acevedo-Peña P, Tzompantzi F, Arroyo R, González F, González I (2017) Energetic states in SnO2–TiO2 structures and their impact on interfacial charge transfer process. J Mater Sci 52:260–275. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-016-0328-310.1007/s10853-016-0328-3 ↗
11. Guerrero-Araque D, Acevedo-Peña P, Ramírez-Ortega D, Lartundo-Rojas L, Gómez R (2017) SnO2–TiO2 structures and the effect of CuO, CoO metal oxide on photocatalytic hydrogen production. J Chem Technol Biotechnol 92:1531–1539. https://doi.org/10.1002/jctb.527310.1002/jctb.5273 ↗
12. Lalitha K, Sadanandam G, Kumari VD, Subrahmanyam M, Sreedhar B, Hebalkar NY (2010) Highly stabilized and finely dispersed Cu2O/TiO2: a promising visible sensitive photocatalyst for continuous production of hydrogen from glycerol: water mixtures. J Phys Chem C 114:22181–22189. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp107405u10.1021/jp107405u ↗
13. Li L, Xu L, Shi W, Guan J (2013) Facile preparation and size-dependent photocatalytic activity of Cu2O nanocrystals modified titania for hydrogen evolution. Int J Hydrog Energy 38:816–822. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2012.10.06410.1016/j.ijhydene.2012.10.064 ↗
14. Lo SS, Mirkovic T, Chuang C-H, Burda C, Scholes GD (2011) Emergent properties resulting from type-II band alignment in semiconductor nanoheterostructures. Adv Mater 23:180–197. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.20100229010.1002/adma.201002290 ↗
15. Wang Y, Zhang Y, Zhao G, Tian H, Shi H, Zhou T (2012) Design of a novel Cu2O/TiO2/carbon aerogel electrode and its efficient electrosorption-assisted visible light photocatalytic degradation of 2,4,6-trichlorophenol. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 4:3965–3972. https://doi.org/10.1021/am300795w10.1021/am300795w ↗
16. Ni D, Shen H, Li H, Ma Y, Zhai T (2017) Synthesis of high efficient Cu/TiO2 photocatalysts by grinding and their size-dependent photocatalytic hydrogen production. Appl Surf Sci 409:241–249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2017.03.04610.1016/j.apsusc.2017.03.046 ↗
17. Chen W-T, Jovic V, Sun-Waterhouse D, Idriss H, Waterhouse GIN (2013) The role of CuO in promoting photocatalytic hydrogen production over TiO2. Int J Hydrog Energy 38:15036–15048. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2013.09.10110.1016/j.ijhydene.2013.09.101 ↗
18. Wu J, Lu S, Ge D, Zhang L, Chen W, Gu H (2016) Photocatalytic properties of Pd/TiO2 nanosheets for hydrogen evolution from water splitting. RSC Adv 6:67502–67508. https://doi.org/10.1039/C6RA10408H10.1039/C6RA10408H ↗
19. Vuong NM, Kim D, Kim H (2013) Electrochromic properties of porous WO3–TiO2 core–shell nanowires. J Mater Chem C 1:3399–3407. https://doi.org/10.1039/C3TC30157E10.1039/C3TC30157E ↗
20. Patil SM, Deshmukh SP, More KB, Shevale VB, Mullani SB, Dhodamani AG, Delekar SD (2019) Sulfated TiO2/WO3 nanocomposite: an efficient photocatalyst for degradation of Congo red and methyl red dyes under visible light irradiation. Mater Chem Phys 225:247–255. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchemphys.2018.12.04110.1016/j.matchemphys.2018.12.041 ↗
21. Wei Y, Huang Y, Fang Y, Zhao Y, Luo D, Guo Q, Fan L, Wu J (2019) Hollow mesoporous TiO2/WO3 sphere heterojunction with high visible-light-driven photocatalytic activity. Mater Res Bull 119:110571–110578. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.materresbull.2019.11057110.1016/j.materresbull.2019.110571 ↗
22. Mathankumar G, Bharathi P, Mohan MK, Harish S, Navaneethan M, Archana J, Suresh P, Mani GK, Dhivya P, Ponnusamy S, Muthamizhchelvan C (2020) Synthesis and functional properties of nanostructured Gd-doped WO3/TiO2 composites for sensing applications. Mater Sci Semicond Process 105:104732–104740. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mssp.2019.10473210.1016/j.mssp.2019.104732 ↗
23. Prabhu S, Cindrella L, Kwon OJ, Mohanraju K (2019) Photoelectrochemical, photocatalytic and photochromic performance of rGO–TiO2–WO3 composites. Mater Chem Phys 224:217–228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchemphys.2018.12.03010.1016/j.matchemphys.2018.12.030 ↗
24. Ke D, Li H, Peng T, Liu X, Ke D (2008) Preparation and photocatalytic activity of WO3/TiO2 nanocomposite particles. Mater Lett 62:447–450. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matlet.2007.05.06010.1016/j.matlet.2007.05.060 ↗
25. Ramana CV, Utsunomiya S, Ewing RC, Julien CM, Becker U (2006) Structural stability and phase transitions in WO3 thin films. J Phys Chem B 110:10430–10435. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp056664i10.1021/jp056664i ↗
26. Mondal I, Pal U (2016) Synthesis of MOF templated Cu/CuO@TiO2 nanocomposites for synergistic hydrogen production. Phys Chem Chem Phys 18:4780–4788. https://doi.org/10.1039/C5CP06292F10.1039/C5CP06292F ↗
27. Zhen W, Jiao W, Wu Y, Jing H, Lu G (2017) The role of a metallic copper interlayer during visible photocatalytic hydrogen generation over a Cu/Cu2O/Cu/TiO2 catalyst. Catal Sci Technol 7:5028–5037. https://doi.org/10.1039/C7CY01432E10.1039/C7CY01432E ↗
28. Yuan J, Zhang J-J, Yang M-P, Meng W-J, Wang H, Lu J-X (2018) CuO Nanoparticles supported on TiO2 with high efficiency for CO2 electrochemical reduction to ethanol. Catalysts 8:171–181. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal804017110.3390/catal8040171 ↗
29. Zhao Q, Li H, Zhang L, Cao Y (2019) Study of PdO species on surface of TiO2 for photoreduction of CO2 into CH4. J Photochem Photobiol A 384:112032–112039. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jphotochem.2019.11203210.1016/j.jphotochem.2019.112032 ↗
30. Dong X, Ma X, Xu H, Ge Q (2016) Comparative study of silicasupported copper catalysts prepared by different methods: formation and transition of copper phyllosilicate. Catal Sci Technol 6:4151–4158. https://doi.org/10.1039/C5CY01965F10.1039/C5CY01965F ↗
31. Rungjaroentawon N, Onsuratoom S, Chavadej S (2012) Hydrogen production from water splitting under visible light irradiation using sensitized mesoporous-assembled TiO2–SiO2 mixed oxide photocatalysts. Int J Hydrog Energy 37:11061–1107110.1016/j.ijhydene.2012.04.120 ↗
32. Rusinque B, Escobedo S, de Lasa H (2020) Photoreduction of a Pd-doped mesoporous TiO2 photocatalyst for hydrogen production under visible light. Catalysts 10:74–97. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal1001007410.3390/catal10010074 ↗
33. López R, Gómez R, Llanos ME (2010) Photophysical and photocatalytic properties of nanosized copper-doped titania sol–gel catalysts. Catal Today 148:103–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cattod.2009.04.00110.1016/j.cattod.2009.04.001 ↗
34. Chen J, Lin L-B, Jing F-Q (2001) Theoretical study of F-type color center in rutile TiO2. J Phys Chem Solids 62:1257–1262. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3697(01)00018-X10.1016/S0022-3697(01)00018-X ↗
35. Yu H, Irie H, Hashimoto K (2010) Conduction band energy level control of titanium dioxide: toward an efficient visible-light-sensitive photocatalyst. J Am Chem Soc 132:6898–6899. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja101714s10.1021/ja101714s ↗
36. Wu Y, Lu G, Li S (2009) The role of Cu(I) species for photocatalytic hydrogen generation over CuOx/TiO2. Catal Lett 133:97–105. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10562-009-0165-y10.1007/s10562-009-0165-y ↗
37. Mekasuwandumrong O, Chaitaworn S, Panpranot J, Praserthdam P (2019) Photocatalytic liquid-phase selective hydrogenation of 3-nitrostyrene to 3-vinylaniline of various treated-TiO2 without use of reducing gas. Catalysts 9:329–343. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal904032910.3390/catal9040329 ↗
38. Kumar Paul K, Jana S, Giri PK (2018) Tunable and high photoluminescence quantum yield from self-decorated TiO2 quantum dots on fluorine doped mesoporous TiO2 flowers by rapid thermal annealing. Part Part Syst Char 35:1800198–1800213. https://doi.org/10.1002/ppsc.20180019810.1002/ppsc.201800198 ↗
39. Zakrzewska K (2012) Nonstoichiometry in TiO2−y studied by ion beam methods and photoelectron spectroscopy. Adv Mater Sci Eng 826873:1–13. https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/82687310.1155/2012/826873 ↗
40. Kato K, Xin Y, Shirai T (2019) Structural-controlled synthesis of highly efficient visible light TiO2 photocatalyst via one-step single-mode microwave assisted reaction. Sci Rep 9:4900–49008. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-41465-x10.1038/s41598-019-41465-x ↗
41. Grandcolas M, Cottineau T, Louvet A, Keller N, Keller V (2013) Solar light-activated photocatalytic degradation of gas phase diethylsulfide on WO3-modified TiO2 nanotubes. Appl Catal B Environ 138–139:128–140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2013.02.04110.1016/j.apcatb.2013.02.041 ↗
42. Gao L, Gan W, Qiu Z, Zhan X, Qiang T, Li J (2017) Preparation of heterostructured WO3/TiO2 catalysts from wood fibers and its versatile photodegradation abilities. Sci Rep 7:1102–1114. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-01244-y10.1038/s41598-017-01244-y ↗
43. Chang F, Wang J, Luo J, Sun J, Deng B, Hu X (2016) Enhanced visible-light-driven photocatalytic performance of mesoporous W-Ti-SBA-15 prepared through a facile hydrothermal route. Colloid Surf A 499:69–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfa.2016.04.01310.1016/j.colsurfa.2016.04.013 ↗
44. Patrocinio AOT, Paula LF, Paniago RM, Freita J, Bahnemann DW (2014) Layer-by-layer TiO2/WO3 thin films as efficient photocatalytic self-cleaning surfaces. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 6:16859–16866. https://doi.org/10.1021/am504269a10.1021/am504269a ↗
45. Terohid SAA, Heidari S, Jafari A (2018) Effect of growth time on structural, morphological and electrical properties of tungsten oxide nanowire. Appl Phys A 124:567–575. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00339-018-1955-010.1007/s00339-018-1955-0 ↗
46. Alonso-Tellez A, Robert D, Keller V, Keller N (2014) H2S photocatalytic oxidation over WO3/TiO2 Hombikat UV100. Environ Sci Pollut Res 21:3503–3514. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-013-2329-y10.1007/s11356-013-2329-y ↗
47. Gui Y, Blackwood DJ (2014) Electrochromic enhancement of WO3–TiO2 composite films produced by electrochemical anodization. J Electrochem Soc 161:E191–E201. https://doi.org/10.1149/2.0631414jes10.1149/2.0631414jes ↗
48. Reale F, Palczynski P, Amit I, Jones GF, Mehew JD, Bacon A, Ni N, Sherrell PC, Agnoli S, Craciun MF, Russo S, Mattev C (2017) High-mobility and high-optical quality atomically thin WS2. Sci Rep 7:14911–14920. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-14928-210.1038/s41598-017-14928-2 ↗
49. Drouet C, Laberty C, Fierro JLG, Alphonse P, Rousset A (2000) X-ray photoelectron spectroscopic study of non-stoichiometric nickel and nickel–copper spinel manganites. J Inorg Mater 2:419–426. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1466-6049(00)00047-710.1016/S1466-6049(00)00047-7 ↗
50. Monte M, Munuera G, Costa D, Conesa JC, Martínez-Arias A (2015) Near-ambient XPS characterization of interfacial copper species in ceria-supported copper catalysts. Phys Chem Chem Phys 17:29995–30004. https://doi.org/10.1039/C5CP04354A10.1039/C5CP04354A ↗
51. Mohammad A, Chandra P, Ghosh T, Carraro M, Mobin SM (2017) Facile access to amides from oxygenated or unsaturated organic compounds by metal oxide nanocatalysts derived from single-source molecular precursors. Inorg Chem 56:10596–10608. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.inorgchem.7b0157610.1021/acs.inorgchem.7b01576 ↗
52. Richharia P, Chopra KL, Bhatnagar MC (1991) Surface analysis of a black copper selective coating. Sol Energy Mater 23:93–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-1633(91)90156-F10.1016/0165-1633(91)90156-F ↗
53. Biesinger MC (2017) Advanced analysis of copper X-ray photoelectron spectra. Surf Interface Anal 49:1325–1334. https://doi.org/10.1002/sia.623910.1002/sia.6239 ↗
54. Tressaud A, Khairoun S, Touhara H, Watanabe N (1986) X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy of palladium fluorides. Chemie 540–541:291–299. https://doi.org/10.1002/zaac.1986540093210.1002/zaac.19865400932 ↗
55. Priolkar KR, Bera P, Sarode PR, Hegde MS, Emura S, Kumashiro R, Lalla NP (2002) Formation of Ce1−xPdxO2−δ solid solution in combustion-synthesized Pd/CeO2 catalyst: XRD, XPS, and EXAFS investigation. Chem Mater 14:2120–2128. https://doi.org/10.1021/cm010389510.1021/cm0103895 ↗
56. Cai G, Luo W, Xiao Y, Zheng Y, Zhong F, Zhan Y, Jiang L (2018) Synthesis of a highly stable Pd@CeO2 catalyst for methane combustion with the synergistic effect of urea and citric acid. ACS Omega 3:16769–16776. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.8b0255610.1021/acsomega.8b02556 ↗
57. Kibis LS, Titkov AI, Stadnichenko AI, Koscheev SV, Boronin AI (2009) X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy study of Pd oxidation by RF discharge in oxygen. Appl Surf Sci 255:9248–9254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2009.07.01110.1016/j.apsusc.2009.07.011 ↗
58. Moroseac M, Skála T, Veltruská K, Matolίn V, Matolίnová I (2004) XPS and SSIMS studies of Pd/SnOx system: reduction and oxidation in hydrogen containing air. Surf Sci 566–568:1118–1123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.susc.2004.06.06810.1016/j.susc.2004.06.068 ↗
59. Tan H-Z, Wang Z-Q, Xu Z-N, Sun J, Chen Z-N, Chen Q-S, Chen Y, Guo G-C (2017) Active Pd(ii) complexes: enhancing catalytic activity by ligand effect for carbonylation of methyl nitrite to dimethyl carbonate. Catal Sci Technol 7:3785–3790. https://doi.org/10.1039/C7CY01305A10.1039/C7CY01305A ↗
60. Veziroglu S, Hwang J, Drewes J, Barg I, Shondo J, Strunskus T, Polonskyi O, Faupel F, Aktas OC (2020) PdO nanoparticles decorated TiO2 film with enhanced photocatalytic and self-cleaning properties. Mater Today 16:100251. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtchem.2020.10025110.1016/j.mtchem.2020.100251 ↗
61. Guerrero-Araque D, Acevedo-Peña P, Ramírez-Ortega D, Calderon HA, Gómez R (2017) Charge transfer processes involved in photocatalytic hydrogen production over CuO/ZrO2–TiO2 materials. Int J Hydrog Energy 42:9744–9753. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2017.03.05010.1016/j.ijhydene.2017.03.050 ↗
62. Sreethawong T, Yoshikawa S (2005) Comparative investigation on photocatalytic hydrogen evolution over Cu-, Pd-, and Au-loaded mesoporous TiO2 photocatalysts. Catal Commun 6:661–668. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catcom.2005.06.00410.1016/j.catcom.2005.06.004 ↗
63. Xu C, Wang X, Zhu J (2008) Graphene−metal particle nanocomposites. J Phys Chem C 112:9841–19845. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp807989b10.1021/jp807989b ↗
64. Agrell J, Hasselbo K, Jansson K, Järåsa G, S, Boutonnet M, (2001) Production of hydrogen by partial oxidation of methanol over Cu/ZnO catalysts prepared by microemulsion technique. Appl Catal A Gen 211:239–250. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0926-860X(00)00876-010.1016/S0926-860X(00)00876-0 ↗
65. Agrell J, Germani G, Järås SG, Boutonnet M (2003) Production of hydrogen by partial oxidation of methanol over ZnO-supported palladium catalysts prepared by microemulsion technique. Appl Catal A Gen 242:233–245. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0926-860X(02)00517-310.1016/S0926-860X(02)00517-3 ↗
66. Barrios CE, Albiter E, Gracia y Jimenez J.M., Tiznado H, Romo-Herrera J, Zanella R, (2016) Photocatalytic hydrogen production over titania modified by gold–metal (palladium, nickel and cobalt) catalysts. Int J Hydrog Energy 41:23287–23300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2016.09.20610.1016/j.ijhydene.2016.09.206 ↗
67. Bahruji H, Bowker M, Davies PR, Morgan DJ, Morton CA, Egerton TA, Kennedy J, Jones W (2015) Rutile TiO2–Pd photocatalysts for hydrogen gas production from methanol reforming. Top Catal 58:70–76. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11244-014-0346-910.1007/s11244-014-0346-9 ↗