Enhanced dielectric properties of polyethylene/hexagonal boron nitride nanocomposites
Source abstract
Abstract
A range of nanocomposites based on a polyethylene polymer and hexagonal boron nitride (hBN) filler have been explored in this study. The dielectric properties of the nanocomposites, which consisted of 2, 5, 10, 20 and 30 wt% of hBN, have been compared to the dielectric properties of the unfilled polyethylene blend. Scanning electron microscopy revealed that the hBN was uniformly distributed in the polyethylene matrix, although large amounts of agglomerates were present in the nanocomposites containing more than 10 wt% of hBN. The incorporation of hBN into polyethylene resulted in a highly disordered morphology in comparison with the unfilled polyethylene, in which this effect was more pronounced with increasing hBN content. This is consistent with the increasing crystallisation temperature as the hBN content increases, as shown by differential scanning calorimetry, where the hBN acted as a highly effective nucleating due to the strong interactions between the polyethylene and the hBN. This strong interaction is again reflected in the thermal decomposition temperature which similarly increases with increasing hBN content. The study demonstrates the remarkable electrical properties of the prepared nanocomposites, where the breakdown strength monotonically increased as a function of hBN content, even with a very high 30 wt% of hBN. The improvement in electrical properties, even at high hBN concentrations, is contradictory to the reported results in the literature and is mainly attributed to the hydrophobic surface of the hBN particles.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Dielectric materials and actuators · High voltage insulation and dielectric phenomena · Polymer Nanocomposite Synthesis and Irradiation
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (70)
Show source-provided references
1. Gielen D, Boshell F, Saygin D (2016) Climate and energy challenges for materials science. Nat Mater 15:117–120. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat454510.1038/nmat4545 ↗
2. Lakshmanan P, Liang J, Jenkins N (2015) Assessment of collection systems for HVDC connected offshore wind farms. Electr Power Syst Res 129:75–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsr.2015.07.01510.1016/j.epsr.2015.07.015 ↗
3. Nelson JK (2007) Overview of nanodielectrics: insulating materials of the future. In: Electrical insulation conference and electrical manufacturing expo, Nashville, TN, pp 229–23510.1109/EEIC.2007.4562626 ↗
4. Lewis TJ (1994) Nanometric dielectrics. IEEE Trans Dielectr Electr Insul 1:812–82510.1109/94.326653 ↗
5. Pourrahimi AM, Pallon LKH, Liu D et al (2016) Polyethylene nanocomposites for the next generation of ultralow-transmission-loss HVDC cables: insulation containing moisture-resistant MgO nanoparticles. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 8:14824–14835. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.6b0418810.1021/acsami.6b04188 ↗
6. Wang W, Li S (2014) Correlation between trap parameters and breakdown strength of polyethylene/alumina nanocomposites. In: International symposium on electrical insulating materials, pp 73–7610.1109/ISEIM.2014.6870723 ↗
7. Li W, Hillborg H, Gedde UW (2015) Influence of process conditions and particle dispersion on the ac breakdown strength of polyethylene–aluminium oxide nanocomposites. IEEE Trans Dielectr Electr Insul 22:3536–3542. https://doi.org/10.1109/TDEI.2015.00536610.1109/TDEI.2015.005366 ↗
8. Calebrese C, Hui L, Schadler LS, Nelson JK (2011) A review on the importance of nanocomposite processing to enhance electrical insulation. IEEE Trans Dielectr Electr Insul 18:938–945. https://doi.org/10.1109/TDEI.2011.597607910.1109/TDEI.2011.5976079 ↗
9. Rytoluoto I, Lahti K, Karttunen M et al (2015) Large-area dielectric breakdown performance of polymer films—part II: interdependence of filler content, processing and breakdown performance in polypropylene-silica nanocomposites. IEEE Trans Dielectr Electr Insul 22:2196–2206. https://doi.org/10.1109/TDEI.2015.00476410.1109/TDEI.2015.004764 ↗
10. Tian F, Lei Q, Wang X, Wang Y (2012) Investigation of electrical properties of LDPE/ZnO nanocomposite dielectrics. IEEE Trans Dielectr Electr Insul 19:763–76910.1109/TDEI.2012.6215078 ↗
11. Therlakkadan AS, Coletti G, Guastavino F, Fina A (2012) Thermomechanical and electrical characterization of epoxy-organoclay nanocomposites. Polym Eng Sci 52:1037–1046. https://doi.org/10.1002/pen10.1002/pen ↗
12. Grabowski CA, Fillery SP, Westing NM et al (2013) Dielectric breakdown in silica-amorphous polymer nanocomposite films: the role of the polymer matrix. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 5:5486–5492. https://doi.org/10.1021/am400562310.1021/am4005623 ↗
13. Siddabattuni S, Schuman TP, Dogan F (2013) Dielectric properties of polymer–particle nanocomposites influenced by electronic nature of filler surfaces. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 5:1917–192710.1021/am3030239 ↗
14. Kim P, Doss NM, Tillotson JP et al (2009) High energy density nanocomposites based on surface-modified BaTiO3 and a ferroelectric polymer. ACS Nano 3:2581–259210.1021/nn9006412 ↗
15. Tsekmes IA, Kochetov R, Morshuis PHF, Smit JJ (2013) Thermal conductivity of polymeric composites: a review. IEEE Int Conf Solid Dielectr 2013:678–681. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSD.2013.661969810.1109/ICSD.2013.6619698 ↗
16. Zhi C, Bando Y, Terao T et al (2009) Towards thermoconductive, electrically insulating polymeric composites with boron nitride nanotubes as fillers. Adv Funct Mater 19:1857–1862. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.20080143510.1002/adfm.200801435 ↗
17. Kolesov SN (1980) The influence of morphology on the electric strength of polymer insulation”. IEEE Trans Electr Insul 15(5):382–38810.1109/TEI.1980.298330 ↗
18. Vaughan AS (1992) On morphology and polymer blends—polystyrene and polyethylene. Polymer 33(12):2513–2521. https://doi.org/10.1016/0032-3861(92)91132-L10.1016/0032-3861(92)91132-L ↗
19. Brana MTC, Sainz JII, Terselius B, Gedde UW (1989) Morphology of binary blends of linear and branched polyethylene—transmission electron-microscopy. Polymer 30(3):410–41510.1016/0032-3861(89)90005-0 ↗
20. Norton DR, Keller A (1984) On the morphology of blends of linear and branched polyethylene. J Mater Sci 19(2):447–456. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF0055356810.1007/BF00553568 ↗
21. Hosier IL, Vaughan AS, Swingler SG (2002) The effects of measuring technique and sample preparation on the breakdown strength of polyethylene. IEEE Trans Dielectr Electr Insul. 9(3):353–361. https://doi.org/10.1109/TDEI.2002.100769710.1109/TDEI.2002.1007697 ↗
22. Hosier IL, Vaughan AS, Swingler SG (1997) Structure–property relationships in polyethylene blends: the effect of morphology on electrical breakdown strength. J Mater Sci 2:4523–4531. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:101861720028510.1023/A:1018617200285 ↗
23. Hosier IL, Vaughan AS, Swingler SG (2000) On the effects of morphology and molecular momposition on the electrical strength of polyethylene blends. J Polym Sci Part B Polym Phys 38:2309–232210.1002/1099-0488(20000901)38:17<2309::AID-POLB110>3.0.CO;2-7 ↗
24. Green CD, Vaughan AS (2007) Morphology and crystallisation kinetics of polyethylene/montmorillonite nanocomposites. In: IEEE international conference solid dielectrics. IEEE, pp 368–371
25. Green CD, Vaughan AS (2007) Morphology and crystallisation kinetics of polyethylene/montmorillonite nanocomposites. In: Annual report—conference on electrical insulation and dielectric phenomena, CEIDP, pp 635–638. https://doi.org/10.1109/CEIDP.2007.445150710.1109/CEIDP.2007.4451507 ↗
26. Chan C-M, Wu J, Li J-X, Cheung Y-K (2002) Polypropylene/calcium carbonate nanocomposites. Polymer (Guildf) 43:2981–2992. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0032-3861(02)00120-910.1016/S0032-3861(02)00120-9 ↗
27. Yu B, Xing W, Guo W, Qiu S, Xin W, Lo S, Hu Y (2016) Thermal exfoliation of hexagonal boron nitride for effective enhancements on thermal stability, flame retardancy and smoke suppression of epoxy resin nanocomposites via sol–gel process. J Mater Chem A 4:7330–734010.1039/C6TA01565D ↗
28. Hod O (2012) Graphite and hexagonal boron-nitride have the same interlayer distance. why? J Chem Theory Comput 8(4):1360–1369. https://doi.org/10.1021/ct200880m10.1021/ct200880m ↗
29. Huang MT, Ishida H (2005) Surface study of hexagonal boron nitride powder by diffuse reflectance Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy. Surf Interfaces Anal 37(7):621–62710.1002/sia.2055 ↗
30. Li J, Xiao X, Xu X, Lin J, Huang Y, Xue Y, Jin P, Zou J, Tang C (2013) Activated boron nitride as an effective adsorbent for metal ions and organic pollutants. Sci Rep 3:3208. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep0320810.1038/srep03208 ↗
31. Gautam C, Tiwary CS, Jose S, Brunetto G, Ozden S, Vinod S, Raghavan P, Biradar S, Galvao DS, Ajayan PM (2015) Synthesis of low-density, carbon-doped, porous hexagonal boron nitride solids. ACS Nano 9(12):12088–1209510.1021/acsnano.5b05847 ↗
32. Zou C, Fothergill JC, Rowe SW (2008) The effect of water absorption on the dielectric properties of epoxy nanocomposites. IEEE Trans Dielectr Electr Insul. 15(1):106–117. https://doi.org/10.1109/T-DEI.2008.444674110.1109/T-DEI.2008.4446741 ↗
33. Hui L, Schadler LS, Nelson JK (2013) The influence of moisture on the electrical properties of crosslinked polyethylene/silica nanocomposites. IEEE Trans Dielectr Electr Insul. 20(2):641–653. https://doi.org/10.1109/TDEI.2013.650876810.1109/TDEI.2013.6508768 ↗
34. Hosier IL, Praeger M, Vaughan AS, Swingler SG (2017) The effects of water on the dielectric properties of silicon-based nanocomposites. IEEE Trans Nano 16(2):169–179. https://doi.org/10.1109/TNANO.2016.264281910.1109/TNANO.2016.2642819 ↗
35. Ayoob R, Andritsch T, Vaughan AS (2016) Water absorption behaviour in polyethylene boron nitride nanocomposites. IEEE Int Conf Dielectr 1–2:784–787
36. Bassett DC, Hodge AM (1981) On the morphology of melt-crystallized polyethylene 1 Lamellar profiles. Proc R Soc Lond A 377(1768):25–37. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.1981.011310.1098/rspa.1981.0113 ↗
37. Weng Q, Wang X, Wang X et al (2016) Functionalized hexagonal boron nitride nanomaterials: emerging properties and applications. Chem Soc Rev 45:3989–4012. https://doi.org/10.1039/C5CS00869G10.1039/C5CS00869G ↗
38. Malucelli G, Ronchetti S, Lak N et al (2007) Intercalation effects in LDPE/o-montmorillonites nanocomposites. Eur Polym J 43:328–33510.1016/j.eurpolymj.2006.11.024 ↗
39. Nicolosi V, Chhowalla M, Kanatzidis MG et al (2013) Liquid exfoliation of layered materials. Science 340:1226419. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.122641910.1126/science.1226419 ↗
40. Lin Z, Mcnamara A, Liu Y et al (2014) Exfoliated hexagonal boron nitride-based polymer nanocomposite with enhanced thermal conductivity for electronic encapsulation. Compos Sci Technol 90:123–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compscitech.2013.10.01810.1016/j.compscitech.2013.10.018 ↗
41. Vaughan AS, Hosier IL (2008) The effect of dibenzylidene sorbitol on the crystallization behaviour of polyethylene. J Mater Sci 43:2922–2928. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-007-1801-910.1007/s10853-007-1801-9 ↗
42. Zaman HU, Khan MA, Khan RA, Beg MDH (2014) Effect of nano-CaCO3 on the mechanical and crystallization behavior of HDPE/LDPE/nano-CaCO3 ternary blend. J Thermoplast Compos Mater 27:1701–1710. https://doi.org/10.1177/089270571247501010.1177/0892705712475010 ↗
43. Cui L, Cho HY, Shin JW et al (2007) Polyethylene-montmorillonite nanocomposites: preparation, characterization and properties. Macromol Symp 260:49–57. https://doi.org/10.1002/masy.20075140810.1002/masy.200751408 ↗
44. Kuila T, Bose S, Mishra AK et al (2012) Effect of functionalized graphene on the physical properties of linear low density polyethylene nanocomposites. Polym Test 31:31–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymertesting.2011.09.00710.1016/j.polymertesting.2011.09.007 ↗
45. Jiang X, Drzal LT (2012) Multifunctional high-density polyethylene nanocomposites produced by incorporation of exfoliated graphene nanoplatelets 2: crystallization, thermal and electrical properties. Polym Compos 33:636–642. https://doi.org/10.1002/pc.2218710.1002/pc.22187 ↗
46. Puente JAS, Esposito A, Chivrac F, Dargent E (2013) Effect of boron nitride as a nucleating agent on the crystallization of bacterial poly(3-hydroxybutyrate). J Appl Polym Sci 128:2586–2594. https://doi.org/10.1002/app.3818210.1002/app.38182 ↗
47. Liu WJ, Yang HL, Wang Z et al (2002) Effect of nucleating agents on the crystallization of poly(3-hydroxybutyrate-co-3-hydroxyvalerate). J Appl Polym Sci 86:2145–2152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymer.2015.03.06110.1016/j.polymer.2015.03.061 ↗
48. Wang L, Wang X, Zhu W et al (2010) Effect of nucleation agents on the crystallization of poly(3-hydroxybutyrate-co-4-hydroxybutyrate) (P3/4HB). J Appl Polym Sci 116:1116–1123. https://doi.org/10.1002/app10.1002/app ↗
49. Hoffman JD (1985) Growth-rate of extended-chain crystals—the lateral surface free-energy of pure N-C94H190 and a fraction C207H416. Macromolecules 18(4):772–786. https://doi.org/10.1021/ma00146a03210.1021/ma00146a032 ↗
50. Muchova M, Lednicky F (1996) Investigation of heterogeneous nucleation using the induction time of crystallization: 1. Theory of induction time. Polymer 37(14):3031–3036. https://doi.org/10.1016/0032-3861(96)89401-810.1016/0032-3861(96)89401-8 ↗
51. Zhang X, Wu H, Guo S, Wang Y-Z (2015) Understanding in crystallization of polyethylene: the role of boron nitride (BN) particles. RSC Adv 5:99812–99819. https://doi.org/10.1039/C5RA19982D10.1039/C5RA19982D ↗
52. Corrales T, Catalina F, Peinado C et al (2002) Photooxidative and thermal degradation of polyethylenes: interrelationship by chemiluminescence, thermal gravimetric analysis and FTIR data. J Photochem Photobiol A Chem 147:213–224. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1010-6030(01)00629-310.1016/S1010-6030(01)00629-3 ↗
53. Peterson JD, Vyazovkin S, Wight CA (2001) Kinetics of the thermal and thermo-oxidative degradation of polystyrene, polyethylene and poly(propylene). Macromol Chem Phys 202:775–784. https://doi.org/10.1002/1521-3935(20010301)202:6<775:AID-MACP775>3.0.CO;2-G10.1002/1521-3935(20010301)202:6<775::AID-MACP775>3.0.CO;2-G ↗
54. Li T-L, Hsu SL-C (2011) Preparation and properties of thermally conductive photosensitive polyimide/boron nitride nanocomposites. J Appl Polym Sci 121:916–922. https://doi.org/10.1002/app10.1002/app ↗
55. Fim FC, Basso NRS, Graebin AP, Azambuja DS (2013) Thermal, electrical, and mechanical properties of polyethylene–graphene nanocomposites obtained by in situ polymerization. J Appl Polym Sci 128:2630–263710.1002/app.38317 ↗
56. Panupakorn P, Chaichana E, Praserthdam P, Jongsomjit B (2013) Polyethylene/clay nanocomposites produced by in situ polymerization with zirconocene/MAO catalyst. J Nanomater 2013:1–910.1155/2013/154874 ↗
57. Dash S, Swain SK (2013) Effect of nanoboron nitride on the physical and chemical properties of soy protein. Compos Sci Technol 84:39–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compscitech.2013.05.00410.1016/j.compscitech.2013.05.004 ↗
58. Leszczyńska A, Njuguna J, Pielichowski K, Banerjee JR (2007) Polymer/montmorillonite nanocomposites with improved thermal properties. Part II. Thermal stability of montmorillonite nanocomposites based on different polymeric matrixes. Thermochim Acta 454:1–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tca.2006.11.00310.1016/j.tca.2006.11.003 ↗
59. Tsekmes IA, Kochetov R, Morshuis PHF, Smit JJ (2015) AC breakdown strength of epoxy-boron nitride nanocomposites: trend and reproducibility. In: Electrical insulation conference, pp 446–44910.1109/ICACACT.2014.7223609 ↗
60. Tsekmes IA, Kochetov R, Morshuis PHF, Smit JJ (2015) DC breakdown strength of epoxy-boron nitride nanocomposites: trend and reproducibility. In: Conference electrical insulation dielectric phenomena, pp 479–48210.1109/CEIDP.2015.7352014 ↗
61. Gao M, Zhang P, Wang F (2013) Effect of percolation and interfacial characteristics on breakdown behavior of nano-silica/epoxy composites. In: 8th international forum strategic technology, vol 1, pp 120–123. https://doi.org/10.1109/IFOST.2013.661695710.1109/IFOST.2013.6616957 ↗
62. Singha S, Thomas M (2008) Dielectric properties of epoxy nanocomposites. IEEE Trans Dielectr Electr Insul 15:12–23. https://doi.org/10.1109/T-DEI.2008.444673210.1109/T-DEI.2008.4446732 ↗
63. Smith RC, Liang C, Landry M et al (2008) The mechanisms leading to the useful electrical properties of polymer nanodielectrics. IEEE Trans Dielectr Electr Insul 15:187–196. https://doi.org/10.1109/T-DEI.2008.444675010.1109/T-DEI.2008.4446750 ↗
64. Green CD, Vaughan AS, Mitchell GR, Liu T (2008) Structure property relationships in polyethylene/montmorillonite nanodielectrics. IEEE Trans Dielectr Electr Insul 15:134–143. https://doi.org/10.1109/T-DEI.2008.444674410.1109/T-DEI.2008.4446744 ↗
65. Vaughan AS, Swingler SG, Zhang Y (2006) Polyethylene nanodielectrics: the influence of nanoclays on structure formation and dielectric breakdown. IEEJ Trans Fundam Mater 126:1057–106310.1541/ieejfms.126.1057 ↗
66. Lau KY (2013) Structure and electrical properties of silica-based polyethylene nanocomposites. PhD Thesis, University of Southampton10.1109/ICSD.2013.6619800 ↗
67. Li S, Yin G, Chen G et al (2010) Short-term breakdown and long-term failure in nanodielectrics: a review. IEEE Trans Dielectr Electr Insul 17:1523–1535. https://doi.org/10.1109/TDEI.2010.559555410.1109/TDEI.2010.5595554 ↗
68. Li S, Min D, Wang W, Chen G (2016) Linking traps to dielectric breakdown through charge dynamics for polymer nanocomposites. IEEE Trans Dielectr Electr Insul 23:2777–2785. https://doi.org/10.1109/TDEI.2016.773683710.1109/TDEI.2016.7736837 ↗
69. Wang W, Min D, Li S (2016) Understanding the conduction and breakdown properties of polyethylene nanodielectrics: effect of deep traps. IEEE Trans Dielectr Electr Insul 23:564–572. https://doi.org/10.1109/TDEI.2015.00482310.1109/TDEI.2015.004823 ↗
70. Roy M, Nelson JK, MacCrone RK, Schadler LS (2007) Candidate mechanisms controlling the electrical characteristics of silica/XLPE nanodielectrics. J Mater Sci 42:3789–3799. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-006-0413-010.1007/s10853-006-0413-0 ↗