journal article·2016-04

The effect of surface finish on tensile behavior of additively manufactured tensile bars

Wes Everhart, Eric Sawyer, Tod Neidt, Joe Dinardo, Ben Brown

Journal of Materials Science· Volume 51· Issue 8
Publisher page

Abstract

Additive Manufacturing (AM) has significantly increased the design freedom available for metal parts. Many novel designs rely on the existence of surfaces that are not accessible and therefore rely on the surface finish of the parts directly from the AM equipment. Work has been performed to characterize the difference between AM, then machined tensile samples and AM tensile samples with an unimproved surface finish. This work utilizes surface analysis, fractography, and finite element analysis (FEA) to expand on this by investigating the effects of the unimproved surfaces on local tensile behavior and fracture mechanics in AM materials. Results show that measurement error in cross-sectional area is the main source of variation between unfinished and machined strength measurements. Results also indicate that a ductile material may demonstrate the same tensile strength regardless of post processing. Fractography shows that stress concentration near the surface of the samples leads to changes in fracture behavior likely explaining the difference in elongation of the samples. Finally, FEA work did not successfully show a difference in fracture initiation, though this is likely due to inaccurate representation of the samples surface.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes · Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · Manufacturing Process and Optimization

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (28)

Show source-provided references
1. El-Hajje A, Kolos EC, Wang JK, Maleksaeedi S, He Z, Wiria FE, Ruys AJ (2014) Physical and mechanical characterization of 3D-printed porous titanium for biomedical applications. J Mater Sci 25(11):2471–2480. doi: 10.1007/s10856-014-5277-2
2. Hrabe N, Quinn T (2013) Effects of processing on microstructure and mechanical properties of a titanium alloy (Ti–6Al–4V) fabricated using electron beam melting (EBM), part 1: distance from build plate and part size. Mater Sci Eng, A 573:264–27010.1016/j.msea.2013.02.064 ↗
3. Zhang LC, Klemm D, Eckert J, Hao YL, Sercombe TB (2011) Manufacture by selective laser melting and mechanical behavior of a biomedical Ti–24Nb–4Zr–8Sn alloy. Scr Mater 65(1):21–2410.1016/j.scriptamat.2011.03.024 ↗
4. Kempen K, Yasa E, Thijs L, Kruth JP, Van Humbeeck J (2011) Microstructure and mechanical properties of selective laser melted 18Ni-300 steel. Phys Procedia 12:255–26310.1016/j.phpro.2011.03.033 ↗
5. Xu W, Brandt M, Sun S, Elambasseril J, Liu Q, Latham K, Qian M (2015) Additive manufacturing of strong and ductile Ti–6Al–4V by selective laser melting via in situ martensite decomposition. Acta Mater 85:74–8410.1016/j.actamat.2014.11.028 ↗
6. Mathisen MB, Eriksen L, Yingda YU, Jensrud O, Hjelen J (2014) Characterization of microstructure and strain response in Ti–6Al–4V plasma welding deposited material by combined EBSD and in situ tensile test. Trans Nonferr Met Soc China 24(12):3929–394310.1016/S1003-6326(14)63553-6 ↗
7. Wang F (2012) Mechanical property study on rapid additive layer manufacture Hastelloy® X alloy by selective laser melting technology. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 58(5–8):545–55110.1007/s00170-011-3423-2 ↗
8. Zhu Y, Li J, Tian X, Wang H, Liu D (2014) Microstructure and mechanical properties of hybrid fabricated Ti–6.5 Al–3.5 Mo–1.5 Zr–0.3 Si titanium alloy by laser additive manufacturing. Mater Sci Eng, A 607:427–43410.1016/j.msea.2014.04.019 ↗
9. Suo H, Chen Z, Liu J, Gong S, Xiao J (2014) Microstructure and mechanical properties of Ti-6Al-4V by electron beam rapid manufacturing. Rare Metal Mater Eng 43(4):780–78510.1016/S1875-5372(14)60083-7 ↗
10. Ram GJ, Esplin CK, Stucker BE (2008) Microstructure and wear properties of LENS® deposited medical grade CoCrMo. J Mater Sci 19(5):2105–2111. doi: 10.1007/s10856-007-3078-6
11. Chen J, Xue L, Wang SH (2011) Experimental studies on process-induced morphological characteristics of macro-and microstructures in laser consolidated alloys. J Mater Sci 46(17):5859–5875. doi: 10.1007/s10853-011-5543-310.1007/s10853-011-5543-3 ↗
12. Hrabe N, Quinn T (2013) Effects of processing on microstructure and mechanical properties of a titanium alloy (Ti–6Al–4V) fabricated using electron beam melting (EBM), Part 2: energy input, orientation, and location. Mater Sci Eng, A 573:271–27710.1016/j.msea.2013.02.065 ↗
13. Bass BS (2008) Validating the Arcam EBM process as an alternative fabrication method for titanium-6Al-4V alloys. http://www.lib.ncsu.edu/resolver/1840.16/2757 . Accessed 17 Dec 2015
14. Ackelid U, Svensson M (2009) Novel sintering approaches: additive manufacturing of dense metal parts by electron beam melting, European Congress and exhibition on powder metallurgy. In: European PM conference proceedings, pp 1–6
15. Antonysamy AA (2012) Microstructure, texture and mechanical property evolution during additive manufacturing of Ti6Al4V alloy for aerospace applications. PhD Dissertation, University of Manchester
16. Spierings AB, Herres N, Levy G (2011) Influence of the particle size distribution on surface quality and mechanical properties in AM steel parts. Rapid Prototyping J 17(3):195–20210.1108/13552541111124770 ↗
17. Kruth JP, Mercelis P, Van Vaerenbergh J, Froyen L, Rombouts M (2005) Binding mechanisms in selective laser sintering and selective laser melting. Rapid prototyping journal 11(1):26–3610.1108/13552540510573365 ↗
18. Vilaro T, Colin C, Bartout JD, Nazé L, Sennour M (2012) Microstructural and mechanical approaches of the selective laser melting process applied to a nickel-base superalloy. Mater Sci Eng, A 534:446–45110.1016/j.msea.2011.11.092 ↗
19. Rafi HK, Karthik NV, Gong H, Starr TL, Stucker BE (2013) Microstructures and mechanical properties of ti6al4v parts fabricated by selective laser melting and electron beam melting. J Mater Eng Perform 22(12):3872–388310.1007/s11665-013-0658-0 ↗
20. Niendorf T, Brenne F (2013) Steel showing twinning-induced plasticity processed by selective laser melting—An additively manufactured high performance material. Mater Charact 85:57–6310.1016/j.matchar.2013.08.010 ↗
21. Suh CH, Jung YC, Kim YS (2010) Effects of thickness and surface roughness on mechanical properties of aluminum sheets. J Mech Sci Technol 24(10):2091–209810.1007/s12206-010-0707-7 ↗
22. Chen L, Ahadi A, Zhou J, Ståhl JE (2013) Modeling effect of surface roughness on nanoindentation tests. Procedia CIRP 8:334–33910.1016/j.procir.2013.06.112 ↗
23. Xie HB, Manabe K, Jiang ZY (2013) A novel approach to investigate surface roughness evolution in asymmetric rolling based on three dimensional real surface. Finite Elem Anal Des 74:1–810.1016/j.finel.2013.05.010 ↗
24. ASTM Standard E8 (2015) standard test methods for tension testing of metallic materials, ASTM International, West Conshohocken. doi: 10.1520/E0008-15A , www.astm.org
25. ASTM Standard E4 (2014) Standard practices for force verificiation of testing machines, ASTM International, West Conshohocken. doi: 10.1520/E0004-14 , www.astm.org10.1520/E0004-14 ↗
26. ASTM Standard E83 (2010) Standard practice for verification and classification of extensometer systems, ASTM International, West Conshohocken. doi: 10.1520/E0083-10A , www.astm.org10.1520/E0083-10A ↗
27. Metallic materials properties development and standardization (MMPDS-01). U.S. Department of Transportation
28. Oh CS, Kim NH, Kim YJ, Baek JH, Kim YP, Kim WS (2011) A finite element ductile failure simulation method using stress-modified fracture strain model. Eng Fract Mech 78(1):124–13710.1016/j.engfracmech.2010.10.004 ↗