journal article·2005-06

The role of vicinal Σ3 boundaries and Σ9 boundaries in grain boundary engineering

V. Randle, Yan Hu

Journal of Materials Science· Volume 40· Issue 12
Publisher page

Abstract

Σ 3 grain boundary planes and triple junctions containing Σ 3 boundaries have been investigated in grain boundary engineered brass using an adaptation of electron backscatter diffraction (EBSD) data combined with a single surface trace analysis methodology. The data have been analysed from the standpoint of whether or not the interface planes in the Σ 3 boundaries are close to {111} (i.e. coherent annealing twins), vicinal to {111} (i.e. a small deviation from the {111} reference structure) or not on {111}. At triple junctions composed of Σ 3/Σ 3/Σ 9 it was shown that a combination of one {111} and one vicinal-to-{111} Σ 3 was more likely to occur than two {111} Σ 3s or two not-{111} Σ 3s. The explanation for the preferred {111}/vicinal-to-{111} combination is that mobile Σ 9 boundaries with high deviations encounter {111} Σ 3s, and in consequence regenerate a Σ 3 at the triple junction which must be vicinal-to-{111} according to the crystallographic constraints at the junction. Analysis of the not-{111} Σ 3s indicated that more than half the boundaries in this category could not have {211}{211}, {774}{855}, {111}{511}, {001}{221} or {110}{411} planes. The possible distribution of these planes types, based on information from the single-surface trace analysis, had a high rank correlation coefficient, 0.925, with previous data from nickel which was based on a two-surface, full boundary planes analysis.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Microstructure and mechanical properties · Aluminum Alloy Microstructure Properties · Aluminum Alloys Composites Properties

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (13)

Show source-provided references
1. D. WOLF, in “Materials Interfaces: Atomic Level Structure and Properties”, edited by D Wolf and S. Yip (Chapman & Hall, London, 1992) p. 1.
2. V. RANDLE and P. DAVIES, Interf. Sci 7 (1999) 5.10.1023/A:1008734331685 ↗
3. V. RANDLE, in “Microtexture Determination and its Applications”, 2nd edn (Institute of Materials, London, 2003).
4. S. I. WRIGHT and R. J. LARSEN, J. Microsc 205 (2002) 245.10.1046/j.1365-2818.2002.00992.x ↗
5. V. RANDLE and H. DAVIES, Ultramicrosc 90 (2002) 153.10.1016/S0304-3991(01)00137-1 ↗
6. H. DAVIES and V. RANDLE, J. Microsc 205 (2002) 253.10.1046/j.1365-2818.2002.00989.x ↗
7. V. RANDLE, Acta. Mater 47 (1999) 4187.10.1016/S1359-6454(99)00277-3 ↗
8. V. RANDLE, in “The Role of the Coincidence Site Lattice in Grain Boundary Engineering” (Institute of Materials, London, 1996).
9. V. RANDLE, P. DAVIES and B. HULM, Philos. Mag. A 79 (1999) 305.10.1080/01418619908210299 ↗
10. U. WOLF, F. ERNST, T. MUSCHIK, M. W. FINNIS and H. F. FISCHMEISTER, Philos. Mag. A 66 (1992) 991.10.1080/01418619208248003 ↗
11. R. W. BALLUFFI and R. MAURER, Scripta Metall 22 (1988) 709.10.1016/S0036-9748(88)80187-X ↗
12. D. WOLF and J. F. LUTSKO, Zeit. Kristall 189 (1989) 239.
13. V. RANDLE, Acta. Mater 46 (1997) 1459.10.1016/S1359-6454(97)00338-8 ↗