Tough, natural-fibre composites based upon epoxy matrices
Source abstract
Abstract
Flax fibres and cellulose fibres were used to manufacture composites with particle-modified epoxy matrices in order to develop ‘green’ composites which possess relatively high values of interlaminar fracture energy, G c. The flax used had a unidirectional architecture of continuous yarns spun from short, interlocked fibres. The regenerated cellulose consisted of continuous and non-twisted pure cellulose fibres in a plain-woven architecture. The natural-fibre-reinforced-polymer (NFRP) composites employed an anhydride-cured diglycidyl ether of bisphenol-A epoxy as the matrix. The epoxy polymeric matrix was modified with (a) silica nanoparticles, (b) rubber microparticles, and (c) a combination of both of these types of particles to give a hybrid-toughened epoxy matrix. The composites were manufactured via a resin infusion under flexible-tooling (RIFT) process. Preliminary studies on the NFRP composites manufactured using the initial-RIFT process clearly showed the deleterious effect that moisture present in the natural fibres had upon the properties of the NFRP composites, since the trapped water cannot escape from the composite panel. Hence, an optimised-RIFT process was developed whereby the natural fibres were dried in a fan oven prior to being employed in the RIFT process. This reduced the water content of the fibres from around 9 to 10 wt% to about 1 wt%. Significant improvements in the physical and mechanical properties were recorded for the NFRP composites manufactured using this optimised-RIFT process. Indeed, in particular, very dramatic improvements in the G c of the NFRP composites were measured, especially when the epoxy polymeric matrix was modified using the silica nanoparticles and/or rubber microparticles. For example, a steady-state propagation value of G c of about 1935 J/m2 was measured for the flax–fibre composite with the hybrid epoxy matrix, compared to values of 1110 and 535 J/m2 for the flax–fibre and glass–fibre composites based on the unmodified (i.e., the ‘control’) epoxy matrix, respectively.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Natural Fiber Reinforced Composites · Advanced Cellulose Research Studies · Fiber-reinforced polymer composites
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (55)
Show source-provided references
1. Eichhorn SJ, Baillie CA, Zafeiropoulos N, Mwaikambo LY et al (2001) Review: Current international research into cellulosic fibres and composites. J Mater Sci 36:2107–2131. doi: 10.1023/A:101751202969610.1023/A:1017512029696 ↗
2. Eichhorn SJ, Dufresne A, Aranguren M, Marcovich NE et al (2010) Review: Current international research into cellulose nanofibres and nanocomposites. J Mater Sci 45:1–33. doi: 10.1007/s10853-009-3874-010.1007/s10853-009-3874-0 ↗
3. Yan L, Chouw N, Jayaraman K (2014) Flax fibre and its composites—a review. Compos B 56:296–31710.1016/j.compositesb.2013.08.014 ↗
4. Dicker MPM, Duckworth PF, Baker AB, Francois G, Hazzard MK, Weaver PM (2014) Green composites: A review of material attributes and complementary applications. Compos A 56:280–28910.1016/j.compositesa.2013.10.014 ↗
5. Goda K, Cao Y (2007) Research and development of fully green composites reinforced with natural fibers. J Solid Mech Mater Eng 1:1073–108410.1299/jmmp.1.1073 ↗
6. Shah DU (2014) Natural fibre composites: comprehensive Ashby-type materials selection charts. Mater Des 61:21–3110.1016/j.matdes.2014.05.002 ↗
7. Manfredi LB, Rodriguez ES, Wladyka-Przybylak M, Vazquez A (2006) Thermal degradation and fire resistance of unsaturated polyester, modified acrylic resins and their composites with natural fibres. Polym Degrad Stab 91:255–26110.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2005.05.003 ↗
8. Liang S, Gning P-B, Guillaumat L (2014) Properties evolution of flax/epoxy composites under fatigue loading. Int J Fatigue 63:36–4510.1016/j.ijfatigue.2014.01.003 ↗
9. Gassan J (2002) A study of fibre and interface parameters affecting the fatigue behaviour of natural fibre composites. Compos A 33:369–37410.1016/S1359-835X(01)00116-6 ↗
10. Shah DU, Schubel PJ, Clifford MJ, Licence P (2013) Fatigue life evaluation of aligned plant fibre composites through S-N curves and constant-life diagrams. Compos Sci Technol 74:139–14910.1016/j.compscitech.2012.10.015 ↗
11. Muralidhar BA (2013) Tensile and compressive behaviour of multilayer flax-rib knitted preform reinforced epoxy composites. Mater Des 49:400–40510.1016/j.matdes.2012.12.040 ↗
12. Duc F, Bourban PE, Plummer CJG, Månson J-AE (2014) Damping of thermoset and thermopolymer flax fibre composites. Compos A 64:115–12310.1016/j.compositesa.2014.04.016 ↗
13. Liu Q, Hughes M (2008) The fracture behaviour and toughness of woven flax fibre reinforced epoxy composites. Compos A 39:1644–165210.1016/j.compositesa.2008.07.008 ↗
14. Hughes M, Hill CAS, Hague JRB (2002) The fracture toughness of bast fibre reinforced polyester composites—Part I: Evaluation and analysis. J Mater Sci 37:4669–4676. doi: 10.1023/A:102062102086210.1023/A:1020621020862 ↗
15. Zhang Y, Li Y, Ma H, Yu T (2013) Tensile and interfacial properties of unidirectional flax/glass fiber reinforced hybrid composites. Compos Sci Technol 88:172–17710.1016/j.compscitech.2013.08.037 ↗
16. Liang S, Guillaumat L, Gning P-B (2015) Impact behaviour of flax/epoxy composite plates. Int J Impact Eng 80:56–6410.1016/j.ijimpeng.2015.01.006 ↗
17. Vasconcellos DS, Touchard F, Chocinski-Arnault L (2014) Tension-tension fatigue behaviour of woven hemp fibre reinforced epoxy composite: a multi-instrumented damage analysis. Int J Fatigue 59:159–16910.1016/j.ijfatigue.2013.08.029 ↗
18. Chai MW, Bickerton S, Bhattacharyya D, Das R (2012) Influence of natural fibre reinforcements on the flammability of bio-derived composite materials. Compos B 43:2867–287410.1016/j.compositesb.2012.04.051 ↗
19. Mishra S, Mohanty AK, Drzal LT, Misra M, Parija S, Nayak SK, Tripathy SS (2003) Studies on mechanical performance of biofibre/glass reinforced polyester hybrid composites. Compos Sci Technol 63:1377–138510.1016/S0266-3538(03)00084-8 ↗
20. Vasconcellos DS, Sarasini F, Touchard F, Chocinski-Arnault L, Pucci M, Santulli C, Tirillò J, Iannace S, Sorrentino L (2014) Influence of low velocity impact on fatigue behaviour of woven hemp fibre reinforced epoxy composites. Compos B 66:46–5710.1016/j.compositesb.2014.04.025 ↗
21. Yan L, Chouw N (2013) Crashworthiness characteristics of flax fibre reinforced epoxy tubes for energy absorption application. Mater Des 51:629–64010.1016/j.matdes.2013.04.014 ↗
22. Li Y, Chen C, Xu J, Zhang Z, Yuan B, Huang X (2015) Improved mechanical properties of carbon nanotubes-coated flax fiber reinforced composites. J Mater Sci 50:1117–1128. doi: 10.1007/s10853-014-8668-310.1007/s10853-014-8668-3 ↗
23. Kafi AA, Magniez K, Fox BL (2011) Effect of manufacturing process on the flexural, fracture toughness, and thermo-mechanical properties of bio-composites. Compos A 42:993–99910.1016/j.compositesa.2011.04.002 ↗
24. Graupner N, Fischer H, Ziegmann G, Müssig J (2014) Improvement and analysis of fibre/matrix adhesion of regenerated cellulose fibre reinforced PP-, MAPP- and PLA-composites by the use of Eucalyptus globulus lignin. Compos B 66:117–12510.1016/j.compositesb.2014.05.002 ↗
25. Graupner N, Mussig J (2011) A comparison of the mechanical characteristics of kenaf and lyocell fibre reinforced poly(lactic acid) (PLA) and poly(3-hydroxybutyrate) (PHB) composites. Compos A 42:2010–201910.1016/j.compositesa.2011.09.007 ↗
26. Johnson RK, Zink-Sharp A, Renneckar SH, Glasser WG (2008) Mechanical properties of wetlaid lyocell and hybrid fiber-reinforced composites with polypropylene. Compos A 39:470–47710.1016/j.compositesa.2007.12.007 ↗
27. Gindl-Altmutter W, Keckes J, Plackner J, Liebner F, Englund K, Laborie M-P (2012) All-cellulose composites prepared from flax and lyocell fibres compared to epoxy–matrix composites. Compos Sci Technol 72:1304–130910.1016/j.compscitech.2012.05.011 ↗
28. Yan L, Chouw N, Jayaraman K (2015) Effect of UV and water spraying on the mechanical properties of flax fabric reinforced polymer composites used for civil engineering applications. Mater Des 71:17–2510.1016/j.matdes.2015.01.003 ↗
29. Williams C, Summerscales J, Grove S (1996) Resin infusion under flexible tooling (RIFT): a review. Compos A 27:517–52410.1016/1359-835X(96)00008-5 ↗
30. Baley A, Le Duigou A, Bourmaud A, Davies P (2012) Influence of drying on the mechanical behaviour of flax fibres and their unidirectional composites. Compos A 43:1226–123310.1016/j.compositesa.2012.03.005 ↗
31. Masseteau B, Michaud F, Irle M, Roy A, Alise G (2014) An evaluation of the effects of moisture content on the modulus of elasticity of a unidirectional flax fiber composite. Compos A 60:32–3710.1016/j.compositesa.2014.01.011 ↗
32. Van de Weyenberga I, Ivensa J, De Costerb A, Kino B, Baetens E, Verpoest I (2003) Influence of processing and chemical treatment of flax fibres on their composites. Compos Sci Technol 63:1241–124610.1016/S0266-3538(03)00093-9 ↗
33. Lebrun G, Couture A, Laperriere L (2013) Tensile and impregnation behavior of unidirectional hemp/paper/epoxy and flax/paper/epoxy composites. Compos Struct 103:151–16010.1016/j.compstruct.2013.04.028 ↗
34. Phillips S, Baets J, Lessard L, Pascal H, Verpoest I (2013) Characterization of flax/epoxy prepregs before and after cure. J Reinf Polym Compos 32:777–78510.1177/0731684412473359 ↗
35. Hsieh TH, Kinloch AJ, Masania K, Taylor AC, Sprenger S (2010) The mechanisms and mechanics of the toughening of epoxy polymers modified with silica nanoparticles. Polymer 51:6284–629410.1016/j.polymer.2010.10.048 ↗
36. Manjunatha CM, Sprenger S, Taylor AC, Kinloch AJ (2010) The tensile fatigue behaviour of a glass-fiber reinforced polymer composite using a hybrid-toughened epoxy matrix. J Compos Mater 44:2095–210910.1177/0021998309360943 ↗
37. Hsieh TH, Kinloch AJ, Masania K, Sohn Lee J, Taylor AC, Sprenger S (2010) The toughness of epoxy polymers and fibre composites modified with rubber microparticles and silica nanoparticles. J Mater Sci 45:1193–1210. doi: 10.1007/s10853-009-4064-910.1007/s10853-009-4064-9 ↗
38. Manjunatha CM, Taylor AC, Kinloch AJ, Sprenger S (2009) The cyclic-fatigue behaviour of an epoxy polymer modified with micron-rubber and nano-silica particles. J Mater Sci 44:4487–4490. doi: 10.1007/s10853-009-3653-y10.1007/s10853-009-3653-y ↗
39. Liu YP, Hu H (2008) X-ray diffraction study of bamboo fibres treated with NaOH. Fibres Polym 9:735–73910.1007/s12221-008-0115-0 ↗
40. Techapaitoon M (2015) Tough natural-fibre composites. PhD Thesis, Imperial College London, London
41. Composites_Evolution (2012) Biotex flax unidirectional fabric: Technical Data Sheet. http://www.compositesevolution.com/products/ . Accessed June 2015
42. Porcher_Industries (2012) Porcher Greenlite: Technical Data Sheet. http://www.porcher-ind.com/medias/dossier-presse/pdf/porcher-dossier-presseEN_3.pdf . Accessed June 2015
43. Masania K (2010) Toughening mechanisms of silica nanoparticle-modified epoxy polymers. PhD Thesis, Imperial College London, London
44. Cristaldi G, Latteri A, Recca G, Cicala G (2010) Composites based on natural fibre fabrics. In: Dubrovski PD (ed) Woven fabric engineering. Sciyo, Rijeka, Croatia, pp 317–342
45. John MJ, Thomas S (2008) Biofibres and biocomposites. Carbohydr Polym 71:343–36410.1016/j.carbpol.2007.05.040 ↗
46. ASTM-D2320 (2012) Standard test method for density (relative density) of solid pitch (pycnometer method). ASTM, West Conshohocken
47. ASTM-E1356 (2014) Standard test method for assignment of the glass transition temperatures by differential scanning calorimetry. ASTM, West Conshohocken
48. ASTM-D790 (2010) Standard test methods for flexural properties of unreinforced and reinforced polymers and electrical insulating materials. ASTM, West Conshohocken
49. ASTM-D3039 (2014) Standard test method for tensile properties of polymer matrix composite materials. ASTM, West Conshohocken
50. BS-ISO-15024 (2001) Fibre-reinforced polymer composites—determination of Mode I interlaminar fracture toughness, G IC, for unidirectionally reinforced materials. ISO, Geneva
51. Fox TG (1956) Influence of a diluent and of copolymer composition on the glass temperature of a polymer system. Bull Am Phys Soc Ser II 1:123–123
52. Zhang JN, Deng SQ, Ye L, Zhang Z (2013) Interlaminar facture toughness and fatigue delamination growth of CF/EP composites with matrices modified by nano-silica and CTBN rubber. In: 13th International conference on fracture, Beijing, China
53. Charlet K, Baley C, Morvan C, Jernot JP, Gomina M, Bréard J (2007) Characteristics of Hermès flax fibres as a function of their location in the stem and properties of the derived unidirectional composites. Compos A 38:1912–192110.1016/j.compositesa.2007.03.006 ↗
54. Liang YL, Pearson RA (2009) Toughening mechanisms in epoxy-silica nanocomposites (ESNs). Polymer 50:4895–490510.1016/j.polymer.2009.08.014 ↗
55. Bray DJ, Dittanet P, Guild FJ, Kinloch AJ, Masania K, Pearson RA, Taylor AC (2013) The modelling of the toughening of epoxy polymers via silica nanoparticles: the effects of volume fraction and particle size. Polymer 54:7023–7032