X-ray CT imaging and finite element computations of the elastic properties of a rigid organic foam compared to experimental measurements: insights into foam variability
Source abstract
Abstract
A combined computational/experimental technique was developed to analyze the compressive elastic properties of a rigid organic foam. This technique combines X-ray computed tomography, image analysis, and large-scale finite element computations utilizing a new numerical technique. Predictions of Young’s modulus were validated with uniaxial compression testing. Good agreement was obtained between imaging/finite element computations and experimental mechanical measurements within experimental error, and the limited knowledge existing on the solid material comprising the backbone of the foam. Using the new combined experimental/theoretical procedures, it was found that the predicted Young’s modulus of the solid backbone differed by more than a factor of 100 % between two different grades of the foam, in accordance with the findings of other researchers. A significant variability of the backbone modulus was also found within the same grade. Density measurements identified the variability between different grades of foam and different as-received sample thicknesses within the same grade of foam.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Cellular and Composite Structures · Elasticity and Material Modeling · Asphalt Pavement Performance Evaluation
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (58)
Show source-provided references
1. Gibson LJ, Ashby MF (1997) Cellular Solids: Structure and Properties, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge10.1017/CBO9781139878326 ↗
2. Rice RW (1998) Porosity of ceramics. Marcel Dekker Inc, New York
3. Gibson LJ (2000) Mechanical behavior of metallic foams. Annu Rev Mater Sci 30:191–227. doi: 10.1146/annurev.matsci.30.1.19110.1146/annurev.matsci.30.1.191 ↗
4. Roberts AP, Garboczi EJ (2000) Elastic properties of model porous ceramics. J Amer Ceram Soc 83:3041–304810.1111/j.1151-2916.2000.tb01680.x ↗
5. Roberts AP, Garboczi EJ (2002) Elastic properties of model random three-dimensional open-cell solids. J Mech Phys Solids 50:33–5510.1016/S0022-5096(01)00056-4 ↗
6. Roberts AP, Garboczi EJ (2001) Elastic moduli of model random three-dimensional closed-cell cellular solids. Acta Mater 49:189–19710.1016/S1359-6454(00)00314-1 ↗
7. Guessasma S, Babin P, Della Valle G, Dendievel R (2008) Relating cellular structure of open solid food foams to their Young’s modulus: finite element calculation. Int J Solids Struct 45:2881–289610.1016/j.ijsolstr.2008.01.007 ↗
8. Jang WY, Kraynik AM, Kyriakides S (2008) On the microstructure of open-cell foams and its effect on elastic properties. Int J Solids Struct 45:1845–187510.1016/j.ijsolstr.2007.10.008 ↗
9. Kak AC, Slaney M (2001) Principles of computerized tomographic imaging. SIAM, New York10.1137/1.9780898719277 ↗
10. Maire E, Withers PJ (2014) Quantitative X-ray tomography. Inter Mater Rev 59:1–4310.1179/1743280413Y.0000000023 ↗
11. Maire E, Fazekas A, Salvo L, Dendievel R, Youssef S, Cloetens P, Letang JM (2003) X-ray tomography applied to the characterization of cellular materials: related finite element modeling problems. Compos Sci Technol 63:2431–244310.1016/S0266-3538(03)00276-8 ↗
12. Ulrich D, van Rietbergen B, Weinans H, Ruegsegger P (1998) Finite element analysis of trabecular bone structure: a comparison of image-based meshing techniques. J Biomech 31:1187–1192. doi: 10.1016/S0021-9290(89)00118-310.1016/S0021-9290(98)00118-3 ↗
13. Arns CH, Knackstedt MA, Pinczewski WV, Garboczi EJ (2002) Computation of linear elastic properties from microtomographic images: methodology and agreement between theory and experiment. Geophysics 67(5):1396–1405. doi: 10.1190/1.151278510.1190/1.1512785 ↗
14. Elliott JA, Windle AH, Hobdell JR, Eeckhaut G, Oldman RJ, Ludwig W, Boller E, Cloetens P, Baruchel J (2002) In-situ deformation of an open-cell flexible polyurethane foam characterised by 3D computed microtomography. J Mater Sci 37:1547–1555. doi: 10.1023/A:101492090271210.1023/A:1014920902712 ↗
15. Patterson BM, Henderson K, Smith Z, Zhang D, and Giguere P (2012) Application of Micro-CT to In-situ Foam Compression and Numerical Modeling. Microscopy and Analysis Tomography and Image Analysis Supplement, March 2012
16. Hangai Y, Yamaguchi R, Takahashi S, Utsunomiya T, Kuwazuru O, Yoshikawa N (2013) Deformation behaviour estimation of aluminum foam by X-ray CT image-based finite element analysis. Metall Mater Trans A 44(4):1880–188610.1007/s11661-012-1532-7 ↗
17. Zhang L, Ferreira JMF, Olhere S, Courtois L, Zhang T, Maire E, Rauhe JC (2012) Modeling the mechanical properties of optimally processed cordierite-mullite-alumina ceramic foams by X-ray computed tomography and finite element analysis. Acta Mater 60:4235–424610.1016/j.actamat.2012.04.025 ↗
18. Knackstedt MA, Arns CH, Saadatfar M, Sended TJ, Limaye A, Sakellariou A, Sheppard AP, Sok RM, Schrof W, Steininger H (2006) Elastic and transport properties of cellular solids derived from three-dimensional tomographic images. Proc R Soc A 462:2833–2862. doi: 10.1098/rspa.2006.165710.1098/rspa.2006.1657 ↗
19. Caty O, Maire E, Youssef S, Bouchet R (2008) Modeling the properties of closed-cell cellular materials from tomography images using finite shell elements. Acta Mater 56:5524–5534. doi: 10.1016/j.actamat.2008.07.02310.1016/j.actamat.2008.07.023 ↗
20. Babin P, Della Valle G, Dendievel R, Lassoued N, Salvo L (2005) Mechanical properties of bread crumbs from tomography based finite element simulations. J Mater Sci 40:5867–5873. doi: 10.1007/s10853-005-5021-x10.1007/s10853-005-5021-x ↗
21. Tsafnat N, Tsafnat G, Jones AS (2008) Micro-finite element modelling of coke blends using X-ray microtomography. Fuel 87:2983–2987. doi: 10.1016/j.fuel.2008.03.02710.1016/j.fuel.2008.03.027 ↗
22. Amsellem O, Madi K, Borit F, Jeulin D, Guipont V, Jeandin M, Boller E, Pauchet F (2008) Two-dimensional (2D) and three-dimensional (3D) analyses of plasma-sprayed alumina microstructures for finite-element simulation of Young’s modulus. J Mater Sci 43:4091–4098. doi: 10.1007/s10853-007-2239-910.1007/s10853-007-2239-9 ↗
23. Veyhl C, Belova IV, Murch GE, Fiedler T (2011) Finite element analysis of the mechanical properties of cellular aluminum based on micro-computed tomography. Mater Sci Eng A 528:4550–4555. doi: 10.1016/j.msea.2011.02.03110.1016/j.msea.2011.02.031 ↗
24. Youssef S, Maire E, Gaertner R (2005) Finite element modelling of the actual structure of cellular materials determined by X-ray tomography. Acta Materiala 53:719–730. doi: 10.1016/j.actamat.2004.10.02410.1016/j.actamat.2004.10.024 ↗
25. Maire E, Colombo P, Adrien J, Babout L, Biasetto L (2007) Characterization of the morphology of cellular ceramics by 3D image processing of X-ray tomography. J Eur Ceram Soc 27:1973–198110.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2006.05.097 ↗
26. Garboczi EJ, Kushch VI (2015) Computing elastic moduli on 3-D X-ray computed tomography image stacks. J Mech Phys Solids 76:84–9710.1016/j.jmps.2014.12.003 ↗
27. http://www.rohacell.com . Accessed 14 Oct 2014
28. Flores-Johnson EA, Li QM, Mines RAW (2008) Degradation of elastic modulus of progressively-crushable foams in uniaxial compression. J Cell Plast 44:415–43410.1177/0021955X08095113 ↗
29. Li QM, Mines RAW (2002) Strain measures for rigid crushable foam in uniaxial compression. Strain 38:132–14010.1046/j.1475-1305.2002.00029.x ↗
30. Li QM, Magkiriadis I, Harrigan JJ (2006) Compressive strain at the onset of densification of cellular solids. J Cell Plast 42:371–39210.1177/0021955X06063519 ↗
31. Li QM, Mines RAW, Birch RS (2000) The crush behavior of Rohacell-51 WF structural foam. Inter J Solids Struct 37:6321–634110.1016/S0020-7683(99)00277-2 ↗
32. Gibson LJ, Ashby MF (1982) The mechanics of three-dimensional cellular materials. Proc R Soc Lond A 382:43–5910.1098/rspa.1982.0088 ↗
33. Maiti SK, Gibson LJ, Ashby MF (1984) Deformation and energy absorption diagrams for cellular solids. Acta Metal 32:1963–197510.1016/0001-6160(84)90177-9 ↗
34. Maiti SK, Ashby MF, Gibson LF (1984) Fracture toughness of brittle cellular solids. Scr Metall 18:213–21710.1016/0036-9748(84)90510-6 ↗
35. Wang J, Wang H, Chen X, Yu Y (2010) Experimental and numerical study of the elastic properties of PMI foams. J Mater Sci 45:2688–2695. doi: 10.1007/s10853-010-4250-910.1007/s10853-010-4250-9 ↗
36. Daphalapurkar NP, Hanan JC, Phelps NB, Bale H, Lu H (2008) Tomography and simulation of microstructure evolution of a closed-cell polymer foam in compression. Mech Adv Mater Struct 15:594–61110.1080/15376490802470523 ↗
37. Bhat BT, Wang TG (1990) A comparison of mechanical properties of some foams and honeycombs. J Mater Sci 25:5157–5162. doi: 10.1007/BF0058014410.1007/BF00580144 ↗
38. Arezoo S, Tagarielli VL, Petrinic N, Reed JM (2011) The mechanical response of Rohacell foams at different length scales. J Mater Sci 46:6864–6870. doi: 10.1007/s10853-011-5649-710.1007/s10853-011-5649-7 ↗
39. Kak AC, Slandy M (1988) Principles of computerized tomographic imaging. IEEE Press, New York
40. Miller JD, Lin CL (2004) Three-dimensional analysis of particulates in mineral processing systems by cone-beam x-ray microtomography. Miner Metall. Process 21(3):113–124
41. Yu H, Cao G, Burk L, Lee Y, Lu J, Santago P, Zhou O, Wang G (2009) Compressive sampling based interior reconstruction for dynamic carbon nanotube micro-CT. J X-Ray Sci Technol 17:295–303. doi: 10.3233/XST-2009-023010.3233/XST-2009-0230 ↗
42. Cho S, Bian J, Pelizzari CA, Chen CT, He TC, Pan X (2007) Region-of-interest image reconstruction in circular cone-beam microCT. Med Phys 34:4923–4933. doi: 10.1118/1.280492410.1118/1.2804924 ↗
43. Videla AR, Lin CL, Miller JD (2006) Watershed functions applied to a 3Dd image segmentation problem for the analysis of packed particle beds. Part Sys Charact 23:237–24510.1002/ppsc.200601055 ↗
44. Patterson BM, Escobedo-Diaz JP, Cerreta E, Dennis-Koller D (2012) Dimensional quantification of embedded voids or objects in three dimensions using X-ray tomography. Microsc Microanal 18(2):390–39810.1017/S1431927611012554 ↗
45. Schlimper R, Rinker M, Schäuble R (2009) Prediction of material behaviour of closed cell rigid foams via mesoscopic modelling, In: Proceedings of the International Committee on Composite Materials Meeting: ICCM 17, 27–31 July 2009, Edinburgh, Scotland, UK
46. The Fiji software, found at http://fiji.sc/Fiji , which is a version of the NIH software ImageJ, located at http://imagej.nih.gov/ij/
47. Elias H-G (1984) Macromolecules: structure and properties, 2nd edn. Plenum Press, New York10.1007/978-1-4899-2809-2 ↗
48. Chen CP, Anderson WB, Lakes RS (1994) Relating the properties of the foam to the properties of the solid from which it is made. Cell Polym 13:16–3210.1177/026248939401300102 ↗
49. Garboczi EJ, Day AR (1995) An algorithm for computing the effective linear elastic properties of heterogeneous materials: 3-D results for composites with equal phase Poisson ratios. J Mech Phys Solids 43:1349–136210.1016/0022-5096(95)00050-S ↗
50. Garboczi EJ (1998) Finite element and finite difference programs for computing the linear electric and elastic properties of digital images of random materials. NIST Internal Report 6269, U.S. Department of Commerce, Gaithersburg, Maryland10.6028/NIST.IR.6269 ↗
51. Bohn RB, Garboczi EJ (2003) User manual for finite element and finite difference programs: A parallel version of NIST IR 6269. NIST Internal Report 6997, U.S. Department of Commerce, Gaithersburg, Maryland10.6028/NIST.IR.6997 ↗
52. Garboczi EJ, Douglas JF, Bohn RB (2006) A hybrid finite element-analytical method for determining the intrinsic elastic moduli of particles having moderately extended shapes and a wide range of elastic properties. Mech Mater 38:786–80010.1016/j.mechmat.2005.06.012 ↗
53. Kushch VI (2013) Micromechanics of composites: multipole expansion approach. Elsevier, Amsterdam
54. ASTM D1621 - 10 Standard Test Method for Compressive Properties of Rigid Cellular Plastics, ASTM Subcommittee D20.22, Book of Standards Volume: 08.01 (ASTM, West Conshohocken, PA)
55. Roberts AP, Garboczi EJ (2002) Computation of the linear elastic properties of random porous materials with a wide variety of microstructure. Proc Royal Soc 458:1033–105410.1098/rspa.2001.0900 ↗
56. Tranchida D, Piccarolo S, Loos J, Alexeev A (2006) Accurately evaluating Young’s modulus of polymers through nanoindentations: a phenomenological correction factor to the Oliver and Pharr procedure. Appl Phys Lett 89:171905-1–171905-310.1063/1.2364863 ↗
57. Kaufman JD, Klapperich CM (2009) Surface detection errors cause overestimation of the modulus in nanoindentation on soft materials. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 2:312–317. doi: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2008.08.00410.1016/j.jmbbm.2008.08.004 ↗
58. Thorpe MF, Jasiuk I (1992) New results in the theory of elasticity for two-dimensional composites. Proc Roy Soc Lond A 438:531–54410.1098/rspa.1992.0124 ↗