journal article·2019-05

Reactive molecular dynamics simulation of thermal decomposition for nano-AlH3/TNT and nano-AlH3/CL-20 composites

Zheng Mei, Cui-Fang Li, Feng-Qi Zhao, Si-Yu Xu, Xue-Hai Ju

Journal of Materials Science· Volume 54· Issue 9
Publisher page

Abstract

Using reactive molecular dynamics method with the reactive force field framework, the thermal decomposition of nano-AlH3/TNT and nano-AlH3/CL-20 composites was investigated to develop new high explosives. The binding energies and relaxed densities of the composites show that the compatibility of TNT/AlH3 is better than CL-20/AlH3, which is confirmed by the DFT calculations. The pyrolysis simulations showed that the potential barrier of TNT/AlH3 (1.14 kJ g−1) and CL-20/AlH3 (0.72 kJ g−1) are smaller than pure TNT (1.99 kJ g−1) and pure CL-20 (1.01 kJ g−1), respectively. This indicates the catalytic effect of AlH3 nanoparticle on the decomposition of TNT and CL-20. The catalytic effect was confirmed by the DFT calculations of the R–NO2 rupture of TNT and CL-20 molecules on AlH3 surfaces. The slower heating rate (rh) of 16 K ps−1 led to similar evolution results as rh = 32 K ps−1, which implies that the dependence of the simulation results on the heating rate is small. Moreover, TNT/AlH3 and CL-20/AlH3 release 1.07 and 1.97 kJ g−1 more energies and generate 33.8% and 14.0% more total gas products than pure TNT and CL-20, respectively. Therefore, AlH3 nanoparticles can improve the detonation performance and specific impulse for TNT and CL-20. These are in accord with the effect of AlH3 on nitromethane and ammonium perchlorate/hydroxyl-terminated polybutadiene propellants in the experiments. As a result, the nano-AlH3/TNT and nano-AlH3/CL-20 composites can be promising candidates of new high explosives.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Energetic Materials and Combustion · Combustion and Detonation Processes · Rocket and propulsion systems research

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (33)

Show source-provided references
1. Bernstein J (2018) Ab initio study of energy transfer rates and impact sensitivities of crystalline explosives. J Chem Phys 148:1–7. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.501298910.1063/1.5012989 ↗
2. Dilmac AM, Spuling E, de Meijere A, Brase S (2017) Propellanes-from a chemical curiosity to “explosive” materials and natural products. Angew Chem Int Ed 56:5684–5718. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.20160395110.1002/anie.201603951 ↗
3. Watkins EB, Velizhanin KA, Dattelbaum DM et al (2017) Evolution of carbon clusters in the detonation products of the triaminotrinitrobenzene (TATB)-based explosive PBX 9502. J Phys Chem C 121:23129–23140. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.7b0563710.1021/acs.jpcc.7b05637 ↗
4. Bolton O, Matzger AJ (2011) Improved stability and smart-material functionality realized in an energetic cocrystal. Angew Chem Int Ed 50:8960–8963. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.20110416410.1002/anie.201104164 ↗
5. Kalman J, Essel J (2017) Influence of particle size on the combustion of CL-20/HTPB propellants. Propellants Explos Pyrotech 42:1261–1267. https://doi.org/10.1002/prep.20170013710.1002/prep.201700137 ↗
6. Zhou SP, Pang AM, Tang G (2017) Crystal transition behaviors of CL-20 in polyether solid propellants plasticized by nitrate esters containing both HMX and CL-20. New J Chem 41:15064–15071. https://doi.org/10.1039/c7nj03309e10.1039/C7NJ03309E ↗
7. Bergthorson JM (2018) Recyclable metal fuels for clean and compact zero-carbon power. Prog Energy Combust Sci 68:169–196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pecs.2018.05.00110.1016/j.pecs.2018.05.001 ↗
8. Ilyin A, Tikhonov D, Mostovshchikov A (2018) Parameters of aluminum nanopowders activity after long-term storage in an airtight container. Propellants Explos Pyrotech 43:749–753. https://doi.org/10.1002/prep.20180017810.1002/prep.201800178 ↗
9. Chang Y, Zhang Q (2012) Explosion energy prediction of aluminized explosive. Energ Mater 20:770–774
10. DeLuca LT, Galfetti L, Severini F et al (2007) Physical and ballistic characterization of AlH3-based space propellants. Aerosp Sci Technol 11:18–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2006.08.01010.1016/j.ast.2006.08.010 ↗
11. Maggi F, Gariani G, Galfetti L, DeLuca LT (2012) Theoretical analysis of hydrides in solid and hybrid rocket propulsion. Int J Hydrog Energy 37:1760–1769. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2011.10.01810.1016/j.ijhydene.2011.10.018 ↗
12. Graetz J, Reilly JJ, Yartys VA et al (2011) Aluminum hydride as a hydrogen and energy storage material: past, present and future. J Alloys Compd 509:S517–S528. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2010.11.11510.1016/j.jallcom.2010.11.115 ↗
13. Sun YL, Sun R, Zhu BZ, Mao KK, Wu YX (2016) Thermal reaction mechanisms of nano-and micro-scale aluminum powders in carbon dioxide at low heating rate. J Therm Anal Calorim 124:1727–1734. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-016-5284-210.1007/s10973-016-5284-2 ↗
14. Li QZ, Lin BQ, Li WX, Zhai C, Zhu CJ (2011) Explosion characteristics of nano-aluminum powder-air mixtures in 20 L spherical vessels. Powder Technol 212:303–309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.powtec.2011.04.03810.1016/j.powtec.2011.04.038 ↗
15. Chenoweth K, van Duin ACT, Persson P, Cheng MJ, Oxgaard J, Goddard WA (2008) Development and application of a ReaxFF reactive force field for oxidative dehydrogenation on vanadium oxide catalysts. J Phys Chem C 112:14645–14654. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp802134x10.1021/jp802134x ↗
16. van Duin ACT, Dasgupta S, Lorant F, Goddard WA (2001) ReaxFF: a reactive force field for hydrocarbons. J Phys Chem A 105:9396–9409. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp004368u10.1021/jp004368u ↗
17. Aral G, Islam MM, van Duin ACT (2018) Role of surface oxidation on the size dependent mechanical properties of nickel nanowires: a ReaxFF molecular dynamics study. Phys Chem Chem Phys 20:284–298. https://doi.org/10.1039/c7cp06906e10.1039/C7CP06906E ↗
18. Compton OC, Cranford SW, Putz KW et al (2012) Tuning the mechanical properties of graphene oxide paper and its associated polymer nanocomposites by controlling cooperative intersheet hydrogen bonding. ACS Nano 6:2008–2019. https://doi.org/10.1021/nn202928w10.1021/nn202928w ↗
19. Kim SY, Ostadhossein A, van Duin ACT, Xiao XC, Gao HJ, Qi Y (2016) Self-generated concentration and modulus gradient coating design to protect Si nano-wire electrodes during lithiation. Phys Chem Chem Phys 18:3706–3715. https://doi.org/10.1039/c5cp07219k10.1039/C5CP07219K ↗
20. Chowdhury SC, Gillespie JW (2017) Silica–silane coupling agent interphase properties using molecular dynamics simulations. J Mater Sci 52:12981–12998. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-017-1412-z10.1007/s10853-017-1412-z ↗
21. Cote AS, Cormack AN, Tilocca A (2017) Reactive molecular dynamics: an effective tool for modelling the sol–gel synthesis of bioglasses. J Mater Sci 52:9006–9013. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-017-1009-610.1007/s10853-017-1009-6 ↗
22. Chowdhury SC, Haque BZ, Gillespie JW (2016) Molecular dynamics simulations of the structure and mechanical properties of silica glass using ReaxFF. J Mater Sci 51:10139–10159. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-016-0242-810.1007/s10853-016-0242-8 ↗
23. Seve A, Pichot V, Schnell F, Spitzer D (2017) Trinitrotoluene nanostructuring by spray flash evaporation process. Propellants Explos Pyrotech 42:1051–1056. https://doi.org/10.1002/prep.20170002410.1002/prep.201700024 ↗
24. Vuppuluri VS, Samuels PJ, Caflin KC, Gunduz IE, Son SF (2018) Detonation performance characterization of a novel CL-20 cocrystal using microwave interferometry. Propellants Explos Pyrotech 43:38–47. https://doi.org/10.1002/prep.20170015010.1002/prep.201700150 ↗
25. Carper WR, Davis LP, Extine MW (1982) Molecular structure of 2,4,6-trinitrotoluene. J Phys Chem 86:459–462. https://doi.org/10.1021/j100393a00910.1021/j100393a009 ↗
26. Xu XJ, Zhu WH, Xiao HM (2007) DFT studies on the four polymorphs of crystalline CL-20 and the influences of hydrostatic pressure on epsilon-CL-20 crystal. J Phys Chem B 111:2090–2097. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp066833e10.1021/jp066833e ↗
27. Li XH, Zhang RZ, Zhang XZ (2010) Computational study of imidazole derivative as high energetic materials. J Hazard Mater 183:622–631. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2010.07.07010.1016/j.jhazmat.2010.07.070 ↗
28. Liu YR, Duan ZP, Zhang ZY, Ou ZC, Huang FL (2016) A mesoscopic reaction rate model for shock initiation of multi-component PBX explosives. J Hazard Mater 317:44–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2016.05.05210.1016/j.jhazmat.2016.05.052 ↗
29. Hoover WG, Holian BL (1996) Kinetic moments method for the canonical ensemble distribution. Phys Lett A 211:253–257. https://doi.org/10.1016/0375-9601(95)00973-610.1016/0375-9601(95)00973-6 ↗
30. Patra PK, Bhattacharya B (2014) A deterministic thermostat for controlling temperature using all degrees of freedom. J Chem Phys 140:064106. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.486420410.1063/1.4864204 ↗
31. Plimpton S (1995) Fast parallel algorithms for short-range molecular dynamics. J Comput Phys 117:1–19. https://doi.org/10.1006/jcph.1995.103910.1006/jcph.1995.1039 ↗
32. Li CF, Mei Z, Zhao FQ, Xu SY, Ju XH (2018) Molecular dynamic simulation for thermal decomposition of RDX with nano-AlH3 particles. Phys Chem Chem Phys 20:14192–14199. https://doi.org/10.1039/c8cp01621f10.1039/C8CP01621F ↗
33. Clark SJ, Segall MD, Pickard CJ et al (2005) First principles methods using CASTEP. Z Kristall 220:567–570. https://doi.org/10.1524/zkri.220.5.567.6507510.1524/zkri.220.5.567.65075 ↗