The compressive response of a titanium foam at low and high strain rates
Source abstract
Abstract
Sintered titanium powder and titanium foams of relative density ranging from 0.3 to 0.9 were produced by powder metallurgy routes and tested in uniaxial compression at low, medium and high rates of strain. At all strain rates, the foams deform by plastic collapse of the pores, accompanied by micro-cracking at compressive strains exceeding 0.2. The foams investigated are strain rate sensitive, with both the yield stress and the strain hardening rate increasing with applied strain rate. The strain rate sensitivity is more pronounced for foams of lower relative density.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Cellular and Composite Structures · High-Velocity Impact and Material Behavior · Powder Metallurgy Techniques and Materials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (20)
Show source-provided references
1. Long M, Rack HJ (1998) Biomaterials 19:162110.1016/S0142-9612(97)00146-4 ↗
2. Nemat-Nasser S, Guo WG, Cheng JY (1999) Acta Mater 47(13):370510.1016/S1359-6454(99)00203-7 ↗
3. Ashby MF, Evans AG, Fleck NA, Hutchinson JW, Wadley HNG, Gibson LJ (2000) Metal foams: a design guide. Butterworth-Heinemann. ISBN 0-7506-7219-6
4. Lefebvre L-P, Baril E, Bureau MN (2009) J Mater Sci Mater Med 20(11):222310.1007/s10856-009-3798-x ↗
5. Jorgensen DJ, Dunand DC (2010) Mater Sci Eng A 527(3):84910.1016/j.msea.2009.08.034 ↗
6. Gudena M, Celikc E, Akara E, Cetiner S (2005) J Mater Charact 54(4–5):39910.1016/j.matchar.2005.01.006 ↗
7. Rouxel A, Chiem CY (1988) Impact Load Dyn Behav Mater 2:601
8. Kruger L, Meyer LW, Razorenov SV, Kanel GI (2003) Int J Impact Eng 28(8):87710.1016/S0734-743X(02)00151-3 ↗
9. Wen CE, Yamada Y, Shimojima K, Chino Y, Asahina T, Mabuchi M (2002) J Mater Sci Mater Med 13:39710.1023/A:1014344819558 ↗
10. Wen CE, Mabuchi M, Yamada Y, Shimojima K, Chino Y, Asahina T (2001) Scr Mater 45(10):114710.1016/S1359-6462(01)01132-0 ↗
11. Imwinkelried T (2006) J Biomed Mater Sci 81A(4):964
12. Tuncer N, Arslan G (2009) J Mater Sci 44:1477. doi: 10.1007/s10853-008-3167-z10.1007/s10853-008-3167-z ↗
13. Thelen S, Barthelat F, Brinson LC (2003) J Biomed Mater Sci 69A:60110.1002/jbm.a.20100 ↗
14. Mori T, Tanaka K (1973) Acta Metall 21:57110.1016/0001-6160(73)90064-3 ↗
15. Ashby MF, Gibson LJ (1997) Cellular solids: structure and properties. Cambridge University Press, New York
16. Deshpande VS, Fleck NA (2000) Int J Impact Eng 24:27710.1016/S0734-743X(99)00153-0 ↗
17. Radford DD, Deshpande VS, Fleck NA (2005) Int J Impact Eng 31(9):115210.1016/j.ijimpeng.2004.07.012 ↗
18. Lefebvre L-P, Thomas Y (2003) US Patent No. 6,660,224 B2, 9 Dec 2003
19. Lefebvre LP, Blouin A, Rochon SM, Bureau MN (2006) Adv Eng Mater 8(9):84110.1002/adem.200600080 ↗
20. Gray GT (2000) ASM Int 8:462